https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-01880-9 Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Advertisement Advertisement Nature * View all journals * Search * Log in * Explore content * About the journal * Publish with us * Subscribe * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed 1. nature 2. editorials 3. article * EDITORIAL * 16 June 2025 Transparent peer review to be extended to all of Nature's research papers From today, all new submissions to Nature that are published will be accompanied by referees' reports and author responses -- to illuminate the process of producing rigorous science. * Twitter * Facebook * Email You have full access to this article via your institution. Two white speech bubbles on a yellow background with two clear speech bubbles overlaid on top A published research paper is the result of an extensive conversation between authors and reviewers, guided by editors.Credit: Getty Since 2020, Nature has offered authors the opportunity to have their peer-review file published alongside their paper. Our colleagues at Nature Communications have been doing so since 2016. Until now, Nature authors could opt in to this process of transparent peer review. From 16 June, however, new submissions of manuscripts that are published as research articles in Nature will automatically include a link to the reviewers' reports and author responses. It means that, over time, more Nature papers will include a peer-review file. The identity of the reviewers will remain anonymous, unless they choose otherwise -- as happens now. But the exchanges between the referees and the authors will be accessible to all. Our aim in doing so is to open up what many see as the 'black box' of science, shedding light on how a research paper is made. This serves to increase transparency and (we hope) to build trust in the scientific process. [d41586-025] Research evaluation needs to change with the times As we have written previously, a published research paper is the result of an extensive conversation between authors and reviewers, guided by editors. These discussions, which can last for months, aim to improve a study's clarity and the robustness of its conclusions. It is a hugely important process that should receive increased recognition, including acknowledgement of the reviewers involved, if they choose to be named. For early-career researchers, there is great value in seeing inside a process that is key to their career development. Making peer-reviewer reports public also enriches science communication: it's a chance to add to the 'story' of how a result is arrived at, or a conclusion supported, even if it includes only the perspectives of authors and reviewers. The full story of a paper is, of course, more complex, involving many other contributors. Many people think of science as something fixed and unchanging. But scientific knowledge evolves as new or more-nuanced evidence comes to light. Scientists constantly discuss their results, yet these debates are not contained in research papers and often remain unreported in wider science-communication efforts. [d41586-025] Three-year trial shows support for recognizing peer reviewers The COVID-19 pandemic provided a brief interlude during which much of the world got to see how research works, almost in real time. It's easy to forget that, right from the start, we were continuously learning something new about the nature and behaviour of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. On television screens, in newspapers and on social media worldwide, scientists were discussing among themselves and with public audiences the nature of the virus, how it infects people and how it spreads. They were debating treatments and prevention methods, constantly adjusting everyone's knowledge as fresh evidence came to light. And then, it went mostly back to business as usual. We hope that publishing the peer-reviewer reports of all newly submitted Nature papers shows, in a small way, that this doesn't need to remain the case. Nature started mandating peer review for all published research articles only in 1973 (M. Baldwin Notes Rec. 69, 337-352; 2015). But the convention in most fields is still to keep the content of these peer-review exchanges confidential. That has meant that the wider research community, and the world, has had few opportunities to learn what is discussed. Peer review improves papers. The exchanges between authors and referees should be seen as a crucial part of the scientific record, just as they are a key part of doing and disseminating research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01880-9 Reprints and permissions Related Articles * [d41586-025] Nature is trialling transparent peer review -- the early results are encouraging * [d41586-025] Research evaluation needs to change with the times * [d41586-025] Three-year trial shows support for recognizing peer reviewers * Transparent peer review for all Subjects * Peer review * Authorship * Publishing Latest on: Peer review How to spot suspicious papers: a sleuthing guide for scientists How to spot suspicious papers: a sleuthing guide for scientists News 10 JUN 25 How our student journal club built on sand developed strong foundations How our student journal club built on sand developed strong foundations Career Column 09 JUN 25 Fake AI images will cause headaches for journals Fake AI images will cause headaches for journals Nature Index 27 MAY 25 Authorship Gender equality in research publishing is a responsibility for everyone Gender equality in research publishing is a responsibility for everyone Editorial 30 MAY 25 P hacking -- Five ways it could happen to you P hacking -- Five ways it could happen to you Career Column 08 MAY 25 The do's and don'ts of scientific image editing The do's and don'ts of scientific image editing Technology Feature 29 APR 25 Publishing Recording my research led to a photojournalism career Recording my research led to a photojournalism career Career Q&A 13 JUN 25 How to spot suspicious papers: a sleuthing guide for scientists How to spot suspicious papers: a sleuthing guide for scientists News 10 JUN 25 How our student journal club built on sand developed strong foundations How our student journal club built on sand developed strong foundations Career Column 09 JUN 25 Nature Careers Jobs * NORPOD Collaborative Postdoctoral Programme by Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine The Nordic EMBL Partnership is seeking postdoctoral fellows for collaborative projects in molecular medicine through the third NORPOD call. Helsinki, Finland University of Helsinki [] * High-Caliber Talents Invited to Join The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University Clinical and Research Scholars, Core Faculty Members, Full-time Instructors Xinxiang, Henan (CN) The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University [] * Faculty Positions at School of Sciences, Great Bay University, China Chair Professors / Professors / Associate Professors / Assistant Professors Dongguan, Chaozhou (CN) Great Bay University, China (GBU) [] * Open Rank Faculty Position (Tenure/Teaching/Research Stream) - School of Science and Engineering Shenzhen, China The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CUHK Shenzhen) [] * Postdoctoral fellow in neuroscience Postdoctoral fellow at Tulane University Neuroscience, Cerebrovascular, Ischemia, Dementia, Traumatic brain injury. New Orleans, Louisiana Tulane University - neuroscience and stroke research [] You have full access to this article via your institution. Related Articles * [d41586-025] Nature is trialling transparent peer review -- the early results are encouraging * [d41586-025] Research evaluation needs to change with the times * [d41586-025] Three-year trial shows support for recognizing peer reviewers * Transparent peer review for all Subjects * Peer review * Authorship * Publishing Advertisement Sign up to Nature Briefing An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday. Email address [ ] [ ] Yes! Sign me up to receive the daily Nature Briefing email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Sign up Close Nature Briefing Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter -- what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Email address [ ] Sign up [ ] I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Close Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing Explore content * Research articles * News * Opinion * Research Analysis * Careers * Books & Culture * Podcasts * Videos * Current issue * Browse issues * Collections * Subjects * Follow us on Facebook * Follow us on Twitter * Subscribe * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed About the journal * Journal Staff * About the Editors * Journal Information * Our publishing models * Editorial Values Statement * Journal Metrics * Awards * Contact * Editorial policies * History of Nature * Send a news tip Publish with us * For Authors * For Referees * Language editing services * Open access funding * Submit manuscript Search Search articles by subject, keyword or author [ ] Show results from [All journals] Search Advanced search Quick links * Explore articles by subject * Find a job * Guide to authors * Editorial policies Nature (Nature) ISSN 1476-4687 (online) ISSN 0028-0836 (print) nature.com sitemap About Nature Portfolio * About us * Press releases * Press office * Contact us Discover content * Journals A-Z * Articles by subject * protocols.io * Nature Index Publishing policies * Nature portfolio policies * Open access Author & Researcher services * Reprints & permissions * Research data * Language editing * Scientific editing * Nature Masterclasses * Research Solutions Libraries & institutions * Librarian service & tools * Librarian portal * Open research * Recommend to library Advertising & partnerships * Advertising * Partnerships & Services * Media kits * Branded content Professional development * Nature Careers * Nature Conferences Regional websites * Nature Africa * Nature China * Nature India * Nature Italy * Nature Japan * Nature Middle East * Privacy Policy * Use of cookies * Your privacy choices/Manage cookies * Legal notice * Accessibility statement * Terms & Conditions * Your US state privacy rights Springer Nature (c) 2025 Springer Nature Limited