https://phys.org/news/2025-05-jupiter-current-size-stronger-magnetic.html Phys.org Topics * Week's top * Latest news * Unread news * Subscribe [ ] Science X Account [ ] [ ] [*] Remember me Sign In Sign in with Forget Password? Not a member? Sign up Learn more * Nanotechnology * Physics * Earth * Astronomy & Space * Chemistry * Biology * Other Sciences * Medical Xpress Medicine * Tech Xplore Technology [INS::INS] * * share this! * 385 * Tweet * Share * Email 1. Home 2. Astronomy & Space 3. Astronomy 1. Home 2. Astronomy & Space 3. Planetary Sciences * * * --------------------------------------------------------------------- May 20, 2025 The GIST Jupiter was formerly twice its current size and had a much stronger magnetic field, study says by Lori Dajose, California Institute of Technology edited by Lisa Lock, reviewed by Robert Egan [llock] Lisa Lock scientific editor Meet our editorial team Behind our editorial process [Robert] Robert Egan associate editor Meet our editorial team Behind our editorial process Editors' notes This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: fact-checked peer-reviewed publication trusted source proofread Jupiter was formerly twice its current size and had a much stronger magnetic field An illustration of Jupiter with magnetic field lines emitting from its poles. Credit: Credit: K. Batygin Understanding Jupiter's early evolution helps illuminate the broader story of how our solar system developed its distinct structure. Jupiter's gravity, often called the "architect" of our solar system, played a critical role in shaping the orbital paths of other planets and sculpting the disk of gas and dust from which they formed. In a new study published in the journal Nature Astronomy, Konstantin Batygin, professor of planetary science at Caltech; and Fred C. Adams, professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Michigan; provide a detailed look into Jupiter's primordial state. Their calculations reveal that roughly 3.8 million years after the solar system's first solids formed--a key moment when the disk of material around the sun, known as the protoplanetary nebula, was dissipating--Jupiter was significantly larger and had an even more powerful magnetic field. "Our ultimate goal is to understand where we come from, and pinning down the early phases of planet formation is essential to solving the puzzle," Batygin says. "This brings us closer to understanding how not only Jupiter but the entire solar system took shape." Batygin and Adams approached this question by studying Jupiter's tiny moons Amalthea and Thebe, which orbit even closer to Jupiter than Io, the smallest and nearest of the planet's four large Galilean moons. Because Amalthea and Thebe have slightly tilted orbits, Batygin and Adams analyzed these small orbital discrepancies to calculate Jupiter's original size: approximately twice its current radius, with a predicted volume that is the equivalent of over 2,000 Earths. The researchers also determined that Jupiter's magnetic field at that time was approximately 50 times stronger than it is today. [INS::INS] Adams highlights the remarkable imprint the past has left on today's solar system: "It's astonishing that even after 4.5 billion years, enough clues remain to let us reconstruct Jupiter's physical state at the dawn of its existence." Importantly, these insights were achieved through independent constraints that bypass traditional uncertainties in planetary formation models--which often rely on assumptions about gas opacity, accretion rate, or the mass of the heavy element core. Instead, the team focused on the orbital dynamics of Jupiter's moons and the conservation of the planet's angular momentum--quantities that are directly measurable. Their analysis establishes a clear snapshot of Jupiter at the moment the surrounding solar nebula evaporated, a pivotal transition point when the building materials for planet formation disappeared and the primordial architecture of the solar system was locked in. The results add crucial details to existing planet formation theories, which suggest that Jupiter and other giant planets around other stars formed via core accretion, a process by which a rocky and icy core rapidly gathers gas. These foundational models were developed over decades by many researchers, including Caltech's Dave Stevenson, the Marvin L. Goldberger Professor of Planetary Science, Emeritus. This new study builds upon that foundation by providing more exact measurements of Jupiter's size, spin rate, and magnetic conditions at an early, pivotal time. Batygin emphasizes that while Jupiter's first moments remain obscured by uncertainty, the current research significantly clarifies our picture of the planet's critical developmental stages. "What we've established here is a valuable benchmark," he says. "A point from which we can more confidently reconstruct the evolution of our solar system." More information: Konstantin Batygin et al, Determination of Jupiter's primordial physical state, Nature Astronomy (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41550-025-02512-y Journal information: Nature Astronomy Provided by California Institute of Technology Citation: Jupiter was formerly twice its current size and had a much stronger magnetic field, study says (2025, May 20) retrieved 24 May 2025 from https://phys.org/news/ 2025-05-jupiter-current-size-stronger-magnetic.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Explore further Citizen science contributes to imaging Jupiter's turbulent atmosphere --------------------------------------------------------------------- 387 shares * Facebook * Twitter * Email Feedback to editors * Featured * Last Comments * Popular Binary star system with millisecond pulsar and a helium star companion discovered May 23, 2025 0 Detecting the primordial black holes that could be today's dark matter May 23, 2025 6 Rare giant shrimp is more widespread than previously believed, new findings reveal May 23, 2025 0 Quantum simulator realizes strongly interacting Mott-Meissner phases in bosonic flux ladders May 23, 2025 0 Odd binary star system has a huge planetary companion May 22, 2025 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [INS::INS] [gif] Targeting malaria at the source: Drug-treated nets eliminate parasites in resistant mosquitoes 9 hours ago [gif] Diamond nanoparticles get a quantum upgrade with shell inspired by TV technology 14 hours ago [gif] Hopes for alien life dim as doubts emerge over exoplanet K2-18b chemical signals 14 hours ago [gif] After two setbacks, SpaceX could try to launch massive Starship next week 15 hours ago [gif] Plankton adapt cell membrane chemistry to temperature, nutrients, and light in global oceans May 23, 2025 [gif] Scientists identify new 2D copper boride material with unique atomic structure May 23, 2025 [gif] Numerical simulations reveal the origin of barred olivine crystals in early solar system May 23, 2025 [gif] Why are some rocks on the moon highly magnetic? Scientists may have an answer May 23, 2025 [gif] Unique chemistry discovered in critical lithium deposits May 23, 2025 [gif] Binary star system with millisecond pulsar and a helium star companion discovered May 23, 2025 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Relevant PhysicsForums posts The James Webb Space Telescope 13 hours ago Help with my Polar Aligning Star Tracker please May 21, 2025 IRAF 2025? May 19, 2025 Things to try while watching the solar eclipse May 19, 2025 If We Crack the Neutron Star Equation of State, How Will It Change Our Daily Lives? May 19, 2025 Colliding Gas Cloud to form a Star May 18, 2025 More from Astronomy and Astrophysics --------------------------------------------------------------------- [INS::INS] [INS::INS] * Related Stories [gif] Citizen science contributes to imaging Jupiter's turbulent atmosphere May 12, 2025 [gif] Video: The secrets of Jupiter Jul 19, 2022 [gif] Solar wind compresses Jupiter's magnetosphere, creating a hot region spanning half the planet's circumference Apr 3, 2025 [gif] Astrophysicists suggest shaded outer disk regions formed Jupiter's largest moons Feb 12, 2025 [gif] Astronomer finds gas giant exoplanets formed earlier than previously thought Mar 5, 2025 [gif] Spot the king of planets: Observe Jupiter Feb 15, 2024 * Recommended for you [gif] Hopes for alien life dim as doubts emerge over exoplanet K2-18b chemical signals 14 hours ago [gif] Detecting the primordial black holes that could be today's dark matter May 23, 2025 [gif] Why are some rocks on the moon highly magnetic? Scientists may have an answer May 23, 2025 [gif] Possible sign of life in deep space faces new doubts May 23, 2025 [gif] Binary star system with millisecond pulsar and a helium star companion discovered May 23, 2025 [gif] Numerical simulations reveal the origin of barred olivine crystals in early solar system May 23, 2025 Load comments (1) Get Instant Summarized Text (Gist) Jupiter was about twice its current radius and possessed a magnetic field roughly 50 times stronger than today around 3.8 million years after the solar system's first solids formed. Analysis of the orbits of its inner moons enabled precise reconstruction of these early properties, providing key constraints on Jupiter's primordial state and informing models of giant planet and solar system formation. This summary was automatically generated using LLM. Full disclaimer Let us know if there is a problem with our content Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines). Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request [-- please select one -- ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message to the editors [ ] Your email (optional, only if you'd like a response) [ ] Send Feedback Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors. Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages. E-mail the story Jupiter was formerly twice its current size and had a much stronger magnetic field, study says Your friend's email [ ] Your email [ ] [ ] I would like to subscribe to Science X Newsletter. Learn more Your name [ ] Note Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message [ ] Send Newsletter sign up Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties. [ ] Subscribe More information Privacy policy Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account. Remove ads Maybe later Medical Xpress Medical Xpress Medical research advances and health news Tech Xplore Tech Xplore The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances Science X Science X The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web Newsletters [ ] Subscribe Science X Daily and the Weekly Email Newsletter are free features that allow you to receive your favorite sci-tech news updates in your email inbox Follow us * * * * * * * * Top * Home * Search * Mobile version * Help * FAQ * About * Contact * Science X Account * Premium Account * Archive * News wire * Android app * iOS app * RSS feeds * Push notification (c) Phys.org 2003 - 2025 powered by Science X Network Privacy policy Terms of use E-mail newsletter [ ] Subscribe Follow us * * * * It appears that you are currently using Ad Blocking software. What are the consequences? x Quantcast