https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13775 close this message arXiv smileybones arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science. View Jobs Skip to main content Cornell University arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer View Jobs We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2505.13775 [ ] Help | Advanced Search [All fields ] Search arXiv logo Cornell University Logo [ ] GO quick links * Login * Help Pages * About Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2505.13775 (cs) [Submitted on 19 May 2025] Title:Beyond Semantics: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Reasonless Intermediate Tokens Authors:Kaya Stechly, Karthik Valmeekam, Atharva Gundawar, Vardhan Palod, Subbarao Kambhampati View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Semantics: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Reasonless Intermediate Tokens, by Kaya Stechly and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Recent impressive results from large reasoning models have been interpreted as a triumph of Chain of Thought (CoT), and especially of the process of training on CoTs sampled from base LLMs in order to help find new reasoning patterns. In this paper, we critically examine that interpretation by investigating how the semantics of intermediate tokens-often anthropomorphized as "thoughts" or reasoning traces and which are claimed to display behaviors like backtracking, self-verification etc.-actually influence model performance. We train transformer models on formally verifiable reasoning traces and solutions, constraining both intermediate steps and final outputs to align with those of a formal solver (in our case, A* search). By constructing a formal interpreter of the semantics of our problems and intended algorithm, we systematically evaluate not only solution accuracy but also the correctness of intermediate traces, thus allowing us to evaluate whether the latter causally influences the former. We notice that, despite significant improvements on the solution-only baseline, models trained on entirely correct traces still produce invalid reasoning traces when arriving at correct solutions. To further show that trace accuracy is only loosely connected to solution accuracy, we then train models on noisy, corrupted traces which have no relation to the specific problem each is paired with, and find that not only does performance remain largely consistent with models trained on correct data, but in some cases can improve upon it and generalize more robustly on out-of-distribution tasks. These results challenge the assumption that intermediate tokens or "Chains of Thought" induce predictable reasoning behaviors and caution against anthropomorphizing such outputs or over-interpreting them (despite their mostly correct forms) as evidence of human-like or algorithmic behaviors in language models. Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2505.13775 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2505.13775v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.13775 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Karthik Valmeekam [view email] [v1] Mon, 19 May 2025 23:29:23 UTC (205 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Semantics: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Reasonless Intermediate Tokens, by Kaya Stechly and 4 other authors * View PDF * HTML (experimental) * TeX Source * Other Formats view license Current browse context: cs.LG < prev | next > new | recent | 2025-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations * NASA ADS * Google Scholar * Semantic Scholar a export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation x [loading... ] Data provided by: Bookmark BibSonomy logo Reddit logo (*) Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools [ ] Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) [ ] Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) [ ] Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) [ ] scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) ( ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article [ ] alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) [ ] Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) [ ] DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) [ ] GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) [ ] Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) [ ] Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) [ ] ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) ( ) Demos Demos [ ] Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) [ ] Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) [ ] Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) ( ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools [ ] Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) [ ] Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) [ ] IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) * Author * Venue * Institution * Topic ( ) About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?) * About * Help * Click here to contact arXiv Contact * Click here to subscribe Subscribe * Copyright * Privacy Policy * Web Accessibility Assistance * arXiv Operational Status Get status notifications via email or slack