https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58000-4 Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Advertisement Advertisement Nature Communications * View all journals * Search * Log in * Explore content * About the journal * Publish with us * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed 1. nature 2. nature communications 3. articles 4. article Coupling furfural oxidation for bias-free hydrogen production using crystalline silicon photoelectrodes Download PDF Download PDF * Article * Open access * Published: 19 March 2025 Coupling furfural oxidation for bias-free hydrogen production using crystalline silicon photoelectrodes * Myohwa Ko^1^ na1, * Myounghyun Lee^1^ na1, * Taehyeon Kim^1^ na1, * Wonjoo Jin ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8415-1313^1^ na1, * Wonsik Jang ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-5720-959X^2^ na1, * Seon Woo Hwang ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-4264-6009^1, * Haneul Kim ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-4579^1, * Ja Hun Kwak ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5245-0765^1, * Seungho Cho ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7926-5674^2,3, * Kwanyong Seo ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8443-7933^1,4 & * ... * Ji-Wook Jang ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1251-1011^1,4,5 Show authors Nature Communications volume 16, Article number: 2701 (2025) Cite this article * 4900 Accesses * 85 Altmetric * Metrics details Subjects * Artificial photosynthesis * Catalysis * Photocatalysis Abstract To commercialize the technology of photoelectrochemical hydrogen production, it is essential to surpass the US. Department of Energy target of 0.36 mmol h^-1 cm^-2 for 1-sun hydrogen production rate. In this study, we utilize crystalline silicon, which can exhibit the highest photocurrent density (43.37 mA cm^-2), as the photoelectrode material. However, achieving bias-free water splitting (>1.6 V) remains challenging due to the intrinsic low photovoltage of crystalline silicon (0.6 V). To address this limitation, we replace water oxidation with low-potential furfural oxidation, enabling not only bias-free hydrogen production but also dual hydrogen production at both the cathodic and anodic sides. This approach results in a record 1-sun hydrogen production rate of 1.40 mmol h^-1 cm^-2, exceeding the Department of Energy target by more than fourfold. Similar content being viewed by others [41467_2023] Renewable formate from sunlight, biomass and carbon dioxide in a photoelectrochemical cell Article Open access 23 February 2023 [41467_2023] Oxynitrides enabled photoelectrochemical water splitting with over 3,000 hrs stable operation in practical two-electrode configuration Article Open access 11 April 2023 [41560_2025] Enhanced solar water oxidation and unassisted water splitting using graphite-protected bulk heterojunction organic photoactive layers Article Open access 18 March 2025 Introduction The pressing need to develop alternative energy sources to replace fossil fuels has become increasingly urgent amid growing environmental concerns. In this context, photoelectrochemical (PEC) hydrogen (H[2]) production emerges as one of the most promising technologies, capable of converting inexhaustible solar energy into storable and clean fuels^1,2,3,4,5. Despite dedicated efforts over the past few decades toward the practical implementation of PEC H[2] production, current 1-sun H[2] production rates fall short of reaching practical levels, as defined by the US Department of Energy's (DOE) ultimate target of 0.36 mmol h^-1 cm^-2. Notably, this DOE target is conservatively set, assuming a target price of $2.1/ 1 kg of H[2]^6. However, to commercialize this PEC H[2] production technology, the target H[2] price should compete with that of H[2] produced from fossil fuels ($0.5-1/kg), which currently constitutes over 90% of H[2] production^7. Thus, achieving 1-sun H[2] production rate two to four times higher than the DOE target, corresponding to 40-80 mA cm^-2 of photocurrent density, is imperative to practicalize the PEC H[2] production technology. We selected crystalline silicon (c-Si) as the material for the photocathode because it exhibits the highest photocurrent density among all reported photoelectrodes, which potentially exhibit a theoretical photocurrent density of 43.37 mA cm^-2, attributed to its small band gap of 1.1 eV^8,9. This indicates the potential for maximizing 1-sun H[2] production rate using c-Si. Moreover, its Earth abundance and mature production technologies also make it a promising candidate for photoelectrode material^10. However, a significant challenge in employing c-Si as a photoelectrode is that the photovoltage of c-Si (~0.6 V) is not high enough to provide sufficient photovoltage required for conventional water splitting (> 1.6 V)^11. In particular, water oxidation accounts for a large portion of required photovoltage. Accordingly, most c-Si-based PEC studies have reported half-cell-based performances, which require an additional external bias for overall water splitting^12,13. Hence, to achieve bias-free water splitting, c-Si photoelectrode has essentially been coupled with another wide bandgap photoelectrode (like TiO[2], BiVO[4], WO[3], etc), but this union restricts the overall operating photocurrent to a range of 1-5 mA cm^-2, primarily due to the relatively low photocurrent density of the wide bandgap photoelectrode^14,15,16,17. Alternatively, various research groups have explored different approaches, such as employing c-Si tandem devices or modularization techniques. These methods involve creating multijunction configurations with c-Si and another semiconductor or interconnecting individual c-Si unit solar cells in series. The objective of such strategies is to elevate the photovoltage of the photoelectrode, thereby enabling bias-free water splitting without relying on a secondary photoelectrode^18,19,20,21. However, despite the advancements, the enhancements in photovoltage often come at the cost of a notable reduction in photocurrent density, typically in the range of 8-13 mA cm^-2. This trade-off lowers the maximum achievable photocurrent density of c-Si. Consequently, none of these approaches have fully harnessed the high photocurrent density potential offered by a single c-Si photoelectrode for bias-free H[2] production. In our study, we replace water oxidation with low-potential aldehyde oxidation to reduce the required photovoltage for PEC H[2] production. Consequently, a single c-Si photoelectrode can generate H [2] without external bias or the need for a secondary photoelectrode. Additionally, this low-potential aldehyde oxidation process yields both H[2] and valuable carboxylic acid simultaneously^22, contrasting with the relatively less valuable O[2] produced through water oxidation. Thus, a single c-Si photoelectrode can drive dual H[2] production at both the anode and cathode, effectively utilizing its high photocurrent on both sides. Furthermore, we fabricated a highly efficient p-n junction-based c-Si photocathode using an interdigitated back contact (IBC) structure c-Si solar cell, which shows higher short-circuit current density (J[SC]) and open-circuit voltage (V[OC]) compared to conventional structures^23,24. Moreover, we revealed that the cooling effect induced by the electrolyte helps mitigate temperature rise, allowing the c-Si photocathode to operate at its maximum photovoltage. As a result of these advancements, we demonstrate dual PEC H[2] production with a remarkable photocurrent density of 37.6 mA cm^-2 and an H[2] Faradaic efficiency of 200% (equivalent to 75.2 mA cm^-2 for both sides of H[2] production). This achievement translates to a high H[2] production rate of 1.40 mmol h^ -1 cm^-2, which surpasses the DOE target by approximately fourfold. Results Design of bias-free dual H[2] production system Conventional water splitting, involving the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), is simple, and the produced O[2] is environmentally benign. However, OER demands a high thermodynamic potential (1.23 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)), and its substantial overpotential, attributed to sluggish reaction kinetics, further increases the required photovoltage of the PEC cell beyond 1.6 V^2,11. Consequently, the photovoltage of a c-Si photocathode (~0.6 V) is insufficient for overall water splitting (Fig. 1a). Alternatively, OER can be supplanted by reactions that are thermodynamically more favorable and yield higher-value products than O[2]. Recently, Wang et al. reported a low-potential aldehyde oxidation, showing that 5-hydroxymethyl furfural oxidation concurrently produces the corresponding carboxylic acid (5-hydroxymethyl-2-furancarboxylic acid) and H[2] on a metallic Cu surface at a low onset potential of 0.05 V vs. RHE^22. This approach can significantly reduce the required photovoltage for PEC H[2] production. As depicted in Fig. 1a, linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of low-potential aldehyde oxidation and HER on a c-Si photocathode can achieve identical current levels at the same potential, indicating the capability for bias-free operation, unlike conventional water splitting. Thus, we devised a PEC system for dual H[2] production by conducting water reduction on a PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode and furfural oxidation on a Cu anode (Fig. 1b). Furfural, a biomass-derived platform molecule, boasts a global production exceeding 430 kt/year^25. Furthermore, furoic acid, the oxidative carboxylic acid product, serves as a valuable feedstock in the pharmaceutical, flavor, and polymer industries^26. Industrial furoic acid is typically produced via the Cannizzaro reaction, where furfural in a concentrated alkaline solution yields furoic acid along with a stoichiometric amount of furfuryl alcohol as a byproduct. By contrast, the electrochemical furfural oxidation reaction not only produces furoic acid but also generates H[2] with minimal byproduct formation. Furthermore, the production of furoic acid ($6.23 kg^-1) and H[2] ($0.5-1 kg^-1) at the anode is economically attractive compared with other less valuable oxidation products (e.g., O[2]: $0.02-0.04 kg^-1, H[2]O[2]: $0.57 kg^-1, acetic acid: $0.68-0.92 kg^ -1, acetone: $0.9-1.28 kg^-1, and formic acid: $0.97-1.08 kg^-1)^27. The simultaneous production of furoic acid and H[2] during the low-potential furfural oxidation on Cu enables H[2] production at both the anode and cathode, augmenting the solar H[2] production rate (Fig. 1b). Consequently, this system represents an efficient approach to harnessing the high photocurrent of c-Si in PEC H[2] production without the need for external bias or a second light absorber. Fig. 1: Schematic diagram of PEC H[2] production using the PtC/Ni/ c-Si photocathode. figure 1 a LSV curves of aldehyde oxidation, water oxidation, and water reduction. b Bias-free PEC dual H[2] production system with the highly efficient PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode. Full size image Highly efficient PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode To fabricate a p-n junction-based c-Si photocathode^28,29, we initially prepared an IBC structure c-Si solar cell, wherein all electrodes and doping layers are positioned on the rear side (Fig. 2a ). This IBC structure enhances both the J[SC] and V[OC] of the c-Si solar cell, which is achieved by minimizing optical loss associated with the front-side electrode in conventional c-Si solar cells and reducing electrical loss attributed to recombination at the front-side doping layer^23,24. The detailed fabrication process is outlined in the Experimental section and depicted in Supplementary Fig. 1. Subsequently, we encapsulated the c-Si IBC cell using glass and Ni foil to protect it from the electrolyte because c-Si is not stable under alkaline electrolyte conditions. The front side of the c-Si IBC cell was covered with glass (the light-receiving side), while the rear side was connected to the Ni foil (the catalytic reaction side) (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2). However, the glass coverage caused a slight optical loss, leading to a reduction in the J[SC] of the c-Si IBC cell from 39.6 to 37.2 mA cm^-2 (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 3). To mitigate the optical loss caused by the glass, we applied an additional MgF[2] antireflection layer, which exhibits negligible absorption (Supplementary Fig. 4), to minimize the refractive index mismatch between the glass and c-Si. Consequently, the difference in J[SC] between the c-Si IBC cell (39.6 mA cm^-2) and the cell with the MgF[2] layer and glass (39.4 mA cm^-2) was negligible (Supplementary Fig. 3). Subsequently, we affixed a commercial PtC (platinum on graphitized carbon) catalyst loaded on carbon paper, known for its high activity in the HER, to the Ni foil (referred to as PtC/Ni/c-Si) to facilitate rapid electron transfer to the electrolyte, ensuring efficient production of H[2]^30 . Finally, we coated the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode with epoxy on the side to protect c-Si in the electrolyte and secure the catalytic reaction site. Under light illumination, photogenerated electrons in the c-Si IBC cell migrate to the connected Ni foil and PtC catalyst, subsequently reducing water to H[2] (Fig. 2a). Fig. 2: Schematic diagram of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode and its performance. figure 2 a Fabrication scheme of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode. b Absorption spectra of the IBC cell depending on the structure. c LSV curves of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode. d Chronoamperometry measurement of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode at 0.26 V vs. RHE. Changes in the thermal images of the encapsulated c-Si IBC cell in the atmosphere (e) and the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode in the electrolyte (f) under continuous light illumination. g Temperature profile of the encapsulated c-Si IBC cell in the atmosphere and the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode in the electrolyte. h Temperature-dependent current density-voltage curves of the encapsulated c-Si IBC cell. i Temperature-dependent LSV curve of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode. All PEC performances were measured under one sun illumination (AM 1.5 G) in 1 M NaOH. The error bars indicate the standard deviation based on three independent measurements. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Full size image The photoelectrocatalytic performance of the resulting PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode was evaluated in 1 M NaOH under standard one sun (AM 1.5 G) illumination with a three-electrode configuration. It exhibited a saturated photocurrent density of 39.01 mA cm^-2 and an onset potential of 0.63 V vs. RHE at 1 mA cm^-2 (Fig. 2c). The onset potential of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode was positively shifted by ~0.65 V compared to that of the PtC electrocatalyst, which was consistent with the V[OC] of the c-Si IBC cell (Supplementary Fig. 3 ). The Ni/c-Si photocathode without PtC showed a negative shift of ~0.2 V in the onset potential, illustrating the role of PtC as an HER catalyst (Supplementary Fig. 5). This well-matched photocurrent density and onset potential indicate the successful fabrication of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode using glass and Ni foil by efficiently protecting the c-Si IBC cell from the alkaline solution. In contrast, the c-Si photocathode without Ni foil encapsulation showed inferior photocurrent density and onset potential due to the instability of the c-Si IBC cell in alkaline electrolyte and the absence of a suitable catalyst (Supplementary Fig. 6). Conclusively, the PtC/Ni/ c-Si photocathode demonstrated remarkable stability over 24 h at a constant applied potential of 0.26 V vs. RHE, with negligible changes observed in its LSV curve following chronoamperometry measurements (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 7). Furthermore, the H[2] production Faradaic efficiency of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode was confirmed to be 100% (Supplementary Fig. 8). Moreover, we investigated the cooling effect induced by the electrolyte, which impacts the photovoltage of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode. Typically, light-induced temperature elevation activates defect sites in the c-Si, accelerating internal carrier recombination and resulting in a decrease in V[OC]^31. To examine this, we captured thermal camera images of the encapsulated c-Si IBC cell (equivalent to the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode) in the atmosphere and the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode immersed in the electrolyte under continuous solar light exposure. As depicted in Fig. 2e, f, after 180 min, the temperature of the encapsulated c-Si IBC cell in the atmosphere was over 15 degC higher than that of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode in the electrolyte. Additionally, the temperature of the encapsulated c-Si IBC cell in the atmosphere reached saturation faster than the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode in the electrolyte (Fig. 2g ). Consequently, the V[OC] of the encapsulated c-Si IBC cell at saturation decreased by over 40 mV (Fig. 2h), whereas the photovoltage of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode in the electrolyte exhibited a comparatively minor decrease of 10 mV (Fig. 2i). This indicates that the cooling effect induced by the electrolyte minimized the photovoltage loss of the c-Si. Despite the efficient fabrication of the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode with minimal photovoltage loss, the LSV curves for the HER on the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode and the OER on Ni foam do not intersect due to the inherent photovoltage limit of c-Si (Supplementary Fig. 9). Low-potential furfural oxidation on Cu As discussed earlier, Wang et al. reported on the low-potential aldehyde oxidation on metallic Cu at a lower onset potential (~0 V vs. RHE) compared with conventional organic oxidation (>1.0 V vs. RHE) and OER (>1.23 V vs. RHE)^22,26,27. This reaction enables the release of H atoms from the aldehyde as H[2] gas, yielding value-added carboxylic acid as oxidation products of the aldehyde (R - CHO + 2OH^--R - COO^- + 1/2 H[2] + H[2]O + e^-). We also fabricated a metallic Cu wire matrix using the same procedure involving chemical oxidation, annealing, and electroreduction of Cu foam to increase surface area^22. The successful fabrication of metallic Cu wires was confirmed through X-ray diffraction, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The X-ray diffraction pattern and HRTEM image indicated that Cu[2]O was well converted to metallic Cu through electroreduction (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Fig. 10). Additionally, the SEM image revealed the formation of a bent wire structure (Fig. 3c). Fig. 3: Characterization and furfural oxidation activities of the Cu wire catalyst. figure 3 a X-ray diffraction patterns of Cu wire and bare Cu. b HRTEM image of Cu wire. Inset: fast Fourier transform pattern. c SEM images of Cu wire and bare Cu. d LSV curves of Cu wire in 1 M NaOH with and without 50 mM furfural e The amount of reactant and products and carbon balance over time during the electrolysis at 0.3 V vs. RHE. f Furoic acid and H[2] Faradaic efficiency of Cu wire at 0.2-0.3 V vs. RHE. All electrocatalytic activities were measured in 1 M NaOH with 50 mM furfural. The error bars indicate the standard deviation based on three independent measurements. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Full size image The LSV curves of the Cu wire in 1 M NaOH, with and without furfural, confirmed the activity of furfural on Cu, displaying an anodic onset potential (0.0 V vs. RHE) and a distinct oxidation peak of Cu^0 to Cu ^+ at ~0.5 V vs. RHE (Fig. 3d). This lower onset potential of furfural oxidation compared with that of OER allowed bias-free operation with the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode, achieving an intersecting point at 38.61 mA cm^-2 at 0.26 V vs. RHE (Supplementary Fig. 11). We analyzed the organic products in the electrolyte using high-performance liquid chromatography (Supplementary Fig. 12). During electrolysis on the Cu wire at a constant potential of 0.3 V vs. RHE in 1 M NaOH solution containing furfural, the furfural concentration decreased over time as it was converted to furoic acid by electrooxidation on Cu, accounting for the fast decrease in current density (Fig. 3e, Supplementary Fig. 13 and 14). When the solution was refreshed, the decreased current caused by the reduction in the furfural concentration recovered (Supplementary Fig. 15). We also detected a small amount of furfural alcohol generated by the non-Faradaic Cannizzaro reaction. The carbon balances of all reactant and products were well-matched during the reaction (Fig. 3e). The Faradaic efficiencies (%) of furoic acid, after subtracting those produced from the Cannizzaro reaction, ranged from 95 to 100% near the expected operating potential (Fig. 3f). This confirms that furfural oxidation on the Cu wire can successfully work with the HER on the prepared PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode. Furthermore, there was no observed electrocatalytic activity of the Cu wire for both products (Supplementary Fig. 16). The gaseous H[2] was also separately analyzed by gas chromatography, and the Faradaic efficiencies of H[2] were also high (95-100%) over the same potential range (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Fig. 17). This suggests the feasibility of achieving a high 1-sun H[2] production rate through dual H[2] production when integrating the Cu wire with the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode. Chronoamperometry measurement with continuous furfural supply at a constant applied potential of 0.26 V vs. RHE showed that the anodic current of the Cu wire slightly decreased over 10 h (Supplementary Fig. 18). While no changes were observed in the crystalline structure or morphology after electrolysis (Supplementary Fig. 19), partial oxidation and Cu leaching were noted. The Cu K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra of the spent Cu wire catalyst displayed a slightly lower pre-edge peak intensity (1 s-4p[z]) and a higher white-line peak intensity (1 s-4p[x,y]) than the fresh Cu wire catalyst, indicating a higher oxidation state (Supplementary Fig. 20) ^32. Furthermore, the Cu[2]O catalyst without electroreduction pretreatment exhibited significantly lower activity than the metallic Cu catalyst, suggesting that Cu^0 species in the Cu wire catalyst serve as the main active sites for the furfural oxidation reaction (Supplementary Fig. 21). Therefore, the partial oxidation of the Cu wire, as observed through XANES, likely contributed to the reduced catalytic activity^33. In addition, Cu leaching during electrolysis was observed, leading to the loss of active sites (Supplementary Table 1). Consequently, the partial oxidation of Cu^0 species and Cu leaching during the furfural oxidation reaction were the primary factors causing the slight decrease in the anodic current of the Cu wire catalyst. Bias-free dual H[2] production: fourfold increase over DOE target Finally, we established a PEC dual H[2] production system utilizing the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode and the Cu wire. The PEC reactor comprised two compartments, one each of oxidation and reduction cell, separated by an anion exchange membrane, akin to a conventional water-splitting reactor. To evaluate the bias-free PEC H[2] production of the system, we measured PEC performances in a two-electrode configuration under AM 1.5 G illumination (Fig. 4a). The observed photocurrent density (37.8 mA cm^-2) stemming from furfural oxidation and HER at 0 V clearly indicates that the PtC/Ni/ c-Si photocathode can produce H[2] without requiring an additional potential, efficiently utilizing the maximum photocurrent of the PtC/ Ni/c-Si photocathode. Conversely, conventional water splitting using the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode and Ni foam exhibited no photoactivity at 0 V, affirming the unattainability of bias-free operation. Additionally, we compared water splitting using a modularized PtC/Ni/ c-Si photocathode, aligning with strategies reported by various groups, including our own, which involve modularization techniques or the use of Si triple-junction for bias-free water splitting^19,20,21, 34. The modularized PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode, constructed by interconnecting three c-Si IBC unit cells in series, effectively tripled the total photovoltage but concurrently reduced the current density to one-third of its original photocurrent density due to the increased illumination area (Supplementary Fig. 22). Consequently, the modularized PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode achieved an intersecting point with Ni foam (Supplementary Fig. 23). However, it fell short of fully harnessing the high inherent photocurrent of c-Si, resulting in a lower operating photocurrent density (9.4 mA cm^-2), compared with the dual H[2] production (Fig. 4a). Fig. 4: Overall bias-free PEC H[2] production. figure 4 a LSV curves of furfural oxidation with HER, OER with HER using the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode, and LSV curves of OER with HER using the modularized PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode in the two-electrode configuration. b Chronoamperometry of dual H[2] production using the PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode at 0 V. c Produced H[2] and its Faradaic efficiency for dual H[2] production. d Mass spectra of collected gas from anode and cathode sides during the bias-free C[6]H[5]-CDO oxidation and HER. e H[2] production rate comparison with previously reported bias-free PEC H[2] production system. Biomass: Biomass oxidation reaction, IOR: iodide oxidation reaction, Dual photoelectrode (Photoanode|Photocathode). The experiments were conducted in 1 M NaOH with (for dual H[2] production) and without 50 mM furfural (for water splitting) in the two-electrode configuration under AM 1.5 G illumination. The error bars indicate the standard deviation based on three independent measurements. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Full size image The actual PEC dual H[2] production was carried out by continuously supplying 50 mM furfural in 1 M NaOH to the oxidation cell, exhibiting a high photocurrent density for over 10 h (Fig. 4b). Although a slight decrease was observed after 4 h due to Cu wire deactivation, the overall performance degradation was less pronounced compared to the stability of Cu wire after integration with the PtC/ Ni/c-Si photocathode (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 18 and 24). The Faradaic efficiency of our system approached 200% during PEC operation, achieving a remarkable solar H[2] production rate of 1.40 mmol h^-1 cm^-2 (Fig. 4c). This rate was 8.1 times higher than that of water splitting using the modularized PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode, attributed not only to a higher operating photocurrent density but also to dual-sided H[2] production. The different H[2] sources at the anode and cathode were confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using deuterated benzaldehyde (C[6]H [5]-CDO) as the oxidative reactant. The mass spectrum of collected H [2] from the anode and cathode cells showed an intense signal at m/z = 4 (D[2]) and at m/z = 2 (H[2]), respectively, indicating that the proton source for produced H[2] at the anode was the aldehyde group, while at the cathode, it was water (Fig. 4d). In conclusion, our 1-sun H[2] production rate (1.40 mmol h^-1 cm^-2) establishes a high record value, far surpassing previously reported bias-free PEC H[2] production (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Table. 2)^14,15,16,20,21,35,36, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59, 60. Discussion Notably, electrolysis using electricity is expected to demand a higher current than PEC H[2] production for practical implementation. However, increasing the current by applying a high potential over 0.5 V vs. RHE is impeded by the electrooxidation of Cu^0 to Cu^+ (Fig. 3d)^61. Moreover, the cost of electricity must be considered. Nevertheless, the photocurrent density of bias-free PEC H[2] production in our system is ~40 mA cm^-2, corresponding to a potential of ~0.3 V vs. RHE where Cu oxidation does not occur easily (Supplementary Fig. 11). Therefore, dual H[2] production using a Cu catalyst is highly suitable in the PEC system. We achieved a 1.40 mmol h^-1 cm^-2 1-sun H[2] production rate, surpassing the DOE target by fourfold. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the partial oxidation and leaching of Cu^0 species during the furfural oxidation reaction led to a slight decrease in the stability of the Cu wire catalyst. Thus, as the stability of the Cu catalyst improves through further studies, such as utilizing redox polymers^62 and doping with secondary metals^63 to mitigate its oxidation and leaching, this accomplishment potentially aligns PEC H[2] production technology with H[2] production from fossil fuels. To support this advancement, the supply of furfural must be increased. Although the current annual furfural production is lower than that of H[2] production (85 million tons/year)^64, furfural is a prominent biomass-derived platform molecule that can be produced from the most abundant lignocellulosic biomass, which has an estimated annual production of 200,000 million tons^65. However, scalable furfural production is challenging due to current technical limitations arising from the chemical and structural diversity of lignocellulose^66. Fortunately, there has been increasing interest in research on utilizing lignocellulosic biomass to produce bio-platform molecules such as furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF)^66,67. Furthermore, if the demand for furfural increases, driven by the outcomes of H[2] production, we anticipate further advancements in furfural production technologies. In addition, the furfural oxidation reaction in the proposed system can also be replaced with other aldehydes, following the same mechanism^22,68. A range of aldehydes, such as formaldehyde (32 million tons/year), acetaldehyde (1-2 million tons/year), and HMF, can be used^69,70. Therefore, the abundant supply of lignocellulosic biomass for furfural production and the applicability of this technology to other aldehydes indicate that, in the long term, it could satisfy a substantial portion of the H[2] production demand. We believe that this highly efficient system, maximizing the high photocurrent of c-Si, represents a significant advancement toward practical solar-to-H[2] production in real-world applications. Methods Materials Commercial Cu (99.96%) and Ni foam (99.97%) were purchased from MTI, Korea. Isopropanol, hydrochloric acid (1 M), and alkaline solutions (1, 2 M NaOH, and 1 M KOH) were obtained from Samchun Chemical. Ni foil (99.5%, 100 um thickness), NaOH pellets (98%), methanol (HPLC grade, 99.8%), and 10 mM ammonium formate in water (HPLC grade) were sourced from Alfa Aesar. Furfural (99%), furoic acid (98%), furfural alcohol (98%), ammonium persulfate (98%), sulfuric acid (98%, HPLC grade), Nafion dispersion (5 wt%), and platinum on graphitized carbon (PtC, 20 wt%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Water (HPLC grade) was obtained from JT Baker. Benzaldehyde-a-d[1] (98 atom % D) was acquired from CDN isotopes Inc. Ag paste (Elcoat P-100) was sourced from CANS. Selemion ion exchange membrane (AMVN) was obtained from AGC Engineering Co. Hydrophilic carbon paper (HCP020N) was purchased from WizMAC. P-type c-Si wafers were procured from Zhejiang Zhongguang Electrical Co. Ltd. Spin-on dopant sources (P509 and B155) were sourced from Filmtronics. Epoxy was obtained from JB Weld. DPR-i 1549 photoresist was sourced from Dongjin Semichem. Ag pellets with 99.99% purity, used as metal electrodes for IBC c-Si solar cells, were sourced from KRT. Transparent ultraviolet-curable polymer (NOA 63) was purchased from Norland Products, Inc. Fabrication of c-Si IBC solar cells The c-Si IBC solar cells were fabricated using p-type c-Si wafers with a resistivity of 1-3 O cm and a thickness of 120 mm. On the rear side of the c-Si IBC cell, interdigitated emitter and back surface field were formed in selective areas. For selective doping, patterned SiO[2] (900 nm thickness) served as a diffusion barrier. Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PE-CVD; PEH-600, Sorona, Anseong-si, South Korea) was utilized to deposit SiO[2], followed by photolithography using DPR-i 1549 photoresist and an etch-back process using buffered oxide etchant (BOE) solution. The back surface field (BSF) layer was formed in a mixed atmosphere of O[2] (250 sccm) and N[2] (1000 sccm) at 1000 degC in a tube furnace, using a boron dopant source. The emitter doping was carried out under the same process conditions. After fabricating the patterned SiO[2], the emitter layer was formed using a phosphorus dopant source at 840 degC in a tube furnace with an O[2] (125 sccm) and N[2] (500 sccm) atmosphere. An Al[2]O[3] passivation layer was deposited via atomic layer deposition (Lucida D100, NCD), followed by annealing in a mixed atmosphere of Ar/H[2] (96:4) at 500 degC with a flow rate of 500 sccm. A 60 nm-thick SiNx layer was deposited via PE-CVD as an anti-reflection layer. A photolithography process was carried out using DPR-i 1549 photoresist to develop an interdigitated electrode as the rear electrode. The electrodes were formed by depositing 1 mm-thick Ag films using a thermal evaporator. Fabrication of c-Si IBC module The c-Si IBC cells were aligned on the glass substrate for series connection. Each c-Si IBC unit cell was affixed to the glass using NOA 63, while connections between the emitter of one unit cell and the BSF portion of another were established using the Ag paste. Characterization of c-Si IBC cells and modules The optical transmittance and reflectance of the c-Si IBC cells were assessed across the wavelength range of 300-1100 nm using a UV-Vis/ NIR spectrophotometer (Cary 5000, Agilent) equipped with a 110 mm integrating sphere to capture total light (diffuse and specular) reflection. Current density-voltage characteristics of both c-Si IBC cells and modules were examined using an Oriel Sol3A class AAA solar simulator (Newport) under AM 1.5 G illumination at 25 degC in air. Incident flux was measured using a calibrated power meter and confirmed using a solar cell calibrated by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA (PV Measurements, Inc.). Thermal distribution images of the c-Si IBC cells were captured using an infrared camera (Testo 870, Testo Korea Ltd). Fabrication of PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode The front side of the c-Si IBC cell (1 x 1 cm) was passivated with NOA 63 and glass, while the Cu wire was attached to the p-type region on the rear side using the Ag paste to fabricate the photocathode. NOA 63 is a colorless and transparent optical adhesive used to adhere glass to the c-Si IBC cell (Supplementary Fig. 25). Subsequently, a PtC-attached Ni foil (1 x 1 cm) was connected to the n-type region on the rear side using the Ag paste. Epoxy was applied to cover the entire area, excluding the c-Si IBC cell and the PtC. The PtC-attached Ni foil was prepared as follows: PtC catalyst ink was prepared by mixing 5 mg of PtC powder, 1 mL of ethanol, and 10 mL of Nafion dispersion. This ink was then drop-casted onto a hydrophilic carbon paper (178 mL cm^-2), and the PtC-loaded carbon paper (0.88 mg cm^-2) was connected to Ni foil using the electroconductive Ag paste. The fabrication scheme and digital photographs of the fabricated PtC/Ni/c-Si photocathode are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2 . Fabrication of Cu wire Commercial Cu foam (1 x 1 cm) underwent a thorough cleaning process with isopropanol followed by 1 M HCl to cleanse the surface. The cleaned Cu foam was immersed in an aqueous solution containing 2.67 M NaOH and 0.13 M (NH[4])[2]S[2]O[8] for 2 h at 40 degC to facilitate the growth of the Cu(OH)[2] wire on the surface. After washing, the synthesized Cu(OH)[2] wire was annealed in a flowing Ar atmosphere at 550 degC for 3 h, converting it to Cu[2]O. Finally, an electrochemical reduction step was performed in a three-electrode configuration at -100 mA cm^-2 for 10 min in 1 M KOH to convert Cu[2]O to metallic Cu. Characterization of Cu wire X-ray diffraction patterns of Cu catalysts were recorded using a D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Bruker AXS) with Cu Ka radiation (l = 1.5406 A) over a diffraction angle (2th) range of 10-80deg, with a step size of 0.02deg. SEM and high-resolution HRTEM images were acquired using a SU8220 microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies) and a JEM-2100F microscope (JEOL), respectively. For HRTEM analysis, sample preparation was conducted using a Helios 450HP FIB (FEI). The Cu K-edge XANES spectra (E[0] = 8979 eV) were recorded in the fluorescence mode at the 6D beamline in the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, Republic of Korea. The incident beam was detuned to 70% of its maximum value using a Si (111) double-crystal monochromator to eliminate higher-order harmonics. For XANES measurements, Cu wire catalysts were ultrasonicated in ethanol and then spray-coated onto the carbon paper substrate. The concentration of Cu in the electrolyte was determined through inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (Varian 700-ES). Electrochemical measurements and product analysis for furfural oxidation All electrochemical measurements were performed using an IviumStat.h electrochemical workstation (Ivium Technologies). The LSV curve of the Cu catalyst for furfural oxidation was obtained in a three-electrode configuration utilizing a Hg/HgO reference electrode (RE-61AP, ALS Co., Ltd) and a Pt wire counter electrode in 17 mL of 1 M NaOH with 50 mM furfural from -0.1 to 0.7 V vs. RHE at a scan rate of 1.5 mV s^-1. iR (i, current; R, resistance)-Compensation was not performed. Chronoamperometry measurements were carried out in a custom-made H-type acryl reactor with 17 mL of anolyte (1 M NaOH with 50 mM furfural) and 35 mL of catholyte (1 M NaOH). For liquid product analysis, anolyte and catholyte samples were subjected to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, 1260 Infinity, Agilent) using a UV-Vis detector at 220 nm. Each sample was mixed with 0.5 M H[2]SO[4] to adjust the pH to 7 and then diluted with deionized water to fall within the calibration curve range. The analysis utilized a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (Agilent) with the following parameters: analysis time of 10 min, flow rate of 0.6 mL min^-1, and column temperature of 50 degC. The mobile carrier was a 3:7 ratio mixture of methanol and 5 mM ammonium formate solution. The quantification of the reaction was based on a linear external standard curve (R^2 > 0.99) of the respective compound. Carbon balance and Faradaic efficiency of furoic acid (after subtracting furoic acid produced from the Cannizzaro reaction) were calculated according to the following equations: $$ {{\rm{Carbon}}}\,{{\rm{balance}}}\,(\%) \\ =\frac{{{\rm{total}}}\, {{\rm{amount}}}\,{{\rm{of}}}\,{{\rm{reactant}}}\,{{\rm{and}}}\,{{\rm {products}}}\,{{\rm{during}}}\,{{\rm{the}}}\,{{\rm{reaction}}}\,}{{{\ rm{total}}}\,{{\rm{amount}}}\,{{\rm{of}}}\,{{\rm{reactant}}}\,{{\rm {and}}}\,{{\rm{product}}}\,{{\rm{at}}}\,{{\rm{the}}}\,{{\rm {beginning}}}}\times 100$$ (1) $$ {{\rm{Faradaic}}}\,{{\rm{efficiency}}}\,{{\rm{of}}}\,{{\rm {furoic}}}\,{{\rm{acid}}}\,(\%) \\ =\frac{({{\rm{amount}}}\,{{\rm {of}}}\,{{\rm{furoic}}}\,{{\rm{acid}}}-{{\rm{amount}}}\,{{\rm{of}}}\, {{\rm{furfural}}}\,{{\rm{alcohol}}})\times nF}{Q}\times 100$$ (2) where n, F, and Q indicate the number of transferred electrons (1), Faraday constant, and total charge passed during the reaction, respectively. Gas product analysis involved continuously bubbling Ar gas (99.999%) into the anode electrolyte, with outlet gas lines connected directly to a gas chromatograph (6500GC system, YL Instrument) equipped with a molecular sieve 13X column (Supelco) and thermal conductivity detector. The Faradaic efficiency of H[2] was calculated as follows: $${{\rm{Faradaic}}}\,{{\rm{efficiency}}}\,{{\rm{of}}}\,{{{\rm{H}}}}_ {2}\,(\%)=\frac{{{\rm{detected}}}\,{{\rm{amount}}}\,{{\rm{of}}}\,{{{\ rm{H}}}}_{2}\times nF}{Q}\,\times 100$$ (3) where n, F, and Q indicate the number of transferred electrons (2), Faraday constant, and total charge passed during the reaction, respectively. PEC measurements All PEC measurements were conducted using the same electrochemical workstation. The performance of the c-Si photocathode (1 cm^2) was assessed in a three-electrode configuration from 1.0 to -0.4 V vs. RHE in 1 M NaOH, with illumination from an Oriel Sol3A class AAA solar simulator (Newport) directed onto the glass side. The light intensity at the sample position was adjusted to 100 mW cm^-2 (AM 1.5 G) using a reference Si cell (91,150 V, Newport). Bias-free PEC H[2] production The overall H[2] production was conducted in an H-type acrylic reactor comprising an anode cell and a cathode cell, each equipped with a quartz window. The anode and cathode cells contained 17 mL of 1 M NaOH with 50 mM furfural and 35 mL of 1 M NaOH, respectively. Separation between the anode and cathode cells was achieved using a Selemion anion exchange membrane. To facilitate dual H[2] production involving furfural oxidation and the HER simultaneously, a two-electrode configuration was employed, with a Cu wire catalyst as the working electrode and the c-Si photocathode as the counter electrode. For continuous furfural supply, fresh electrolyte was delivered to the anodic cell at a total flow rate of 1.4 mL min^-1 (0.7 mL min^-1 of 100 mM furfural and 0.7 mL min^-1 of 2 M NaOH) using a peristaltic pump (JWTE 600, JenieWell). Ar gas (99.999%) was continuously purged into both cells to detect H[2] gas, and the outlet gas lines were directly connected to a gas chromatograph (6500GC system, YL Instrument). Mass spectra of collected gases from benzaldehyde-a-d[1] oxidation and HER were recorded using a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMG 220, Pfeiffer). For PEC water splitting involving the OER and HER, commercial Ni foam was utilized as the working electrode for the OER catalyst, while the c-Si photocathode functioned as the counter electrode for HER. Data availability The data generated in this study have been deposited in the Figshare repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28477688)^71. Source data are provided with this paper. References 1. Lewis, N. S. Research opportunities to advance solar energy utilization. Science 351, aad1920 (2016). Article PubMed MATH Google Scholar 2. Walter, M. G. et al. Solar water splitting cells. Chem. Rev. 110, 6446-6473 (2010). Article CAS PubMed MATH Google Scholar 3. Gao, R.-T. et al. Single-atomic-site platinum steers photogenerated charge carrier lifetime of hematite nanoflakes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nat. Commun. 14, 2640 (2023). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 4. Gao, R.-T. et al. Dynamic semiconductor-electrolyte interface for sustainable solar water splitting over 600 h under neutral conditions. Sci. Adv. 9, eade4589 (2023). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 5. Gao, R.-T. et al. Ru-P pair sites boost charge transport in hematite photoanodes for exceeding 1% efficient solar water splitting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 120, e2300493120 (2023). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 6. Pal, A. et al. Powering squarely into the future: a strategic analysis of hydrogen energy in QUAD nations. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 49, 16-41 (2024). Article ADS CAS MATH Google Scholar 7. Safari, F. & Dincer, I. A review and comparative evaluation of thermochemical water splitting cycles for hydrogen production. Energy Convers. Manag. 205, 112182 (2020). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 8. Kim, N., Choi, D., Kim, H., Um, H.-D. & Seo, K. Silicon microwire arrays with nanoscale spacing for radial junction c-si solar cells with an efficiency of 20.5. ACS Nano 15, 14756-14765 (2021). Article CAS PubMed MATH Google Scholar 9. Fan, R., Mi, Z. & Shen, M. Silicon based photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Opt. Express 27, A51-A80 (2019). Article ADS CAS PubMed MATH Google Scholar 10. Luo, Z., Wang, T. & Gong, J. Single-crystal silicon-based electrodes for unbiased solar water splitting: current status and prospects. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 2158-2181 (2019). Article CAS PubMed MATH Google Scholar 11. Shih, A. J. et al. Water electrolysis. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 2, 84 (2022). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 12. Zhou, X. et al. 570 mV photovoltage, stabilized n-Si/CoO[X] eterojunction photoanodes fabricated using atomic layer deposition. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 892-897 (2016). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 13. Wu, B. et al. Stable solar water splitting with wettable organic-layer-protected silicon photocathodes. Nat. Commun. 13, 4460 (2022). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 14. Liu, B. et al. Bifacial passivation of n-silicon metal-insulator-semiconductor photoelectrodes for efficient oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 221-228 (2020). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 15. Liu, B. et al. Double-side Si photoelectrode enabled by chemical passivation for photoelectrochemical hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2007222 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar 16. Moon, C. et al. Dual-purpose tunnel oxide passivated contact on silicon photoelectrodes with high photovoltages for tandem photoelectrochemical devices enabling unassisted water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 4194-4204 (2023). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 17. Shaner, M. R., McDowell, M. T., Pien, A., Atwater, H. A. & Lewis, N. S. Si/TiO[2] tandem-junction microwire arrays for unassisted solar-driven water splitting. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, H261 (2016). Article CAS Google Scholar 18. Reece, S. Y. et al. Wireless solar water splitting using silicon-based semiconductors and earth-abundant catalysts. Science 334, 645-648 (2011). Article ADS CAS PubMed MATH Google Scholar 19. Urbain, F. et al. Multijunction Si photocathodes with tunable photovoltages from 2.0 V to 2.8 V for light induced water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 145-154 (2016). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 20. Fu, H.-C., Varadhan, P., Lin, C.-H. & He, J.-H. Spontaneous solar water splitting with decoupling of light absorption and electrocatalysis using silicon back-buried junction. Nat. Commun. 11, 3930 (2020). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 21. Jin, W. et al. Natural leaf-inspired solar water splitting system. Appl. Catal. B 322, 122086 (2023). Article CAS Google Scholar 22. Wang, T. et al. Combined anodic and cathodic hydrogen production from aldehyde oxidation and hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Catal. 5, 66-73 (2022). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 23. Richter, A. et al. Design rules for high-efficiency both-sides-contacted silicon solar cells with balanced charge carrier transport and recombination losses. Nat. Energy 6, 429-438 (2021). Article ADS CAS MATH Google Scholar 24. Richter, A., Glunz, S. W., Werner, F., Schmidt, J. & Cuevas, A. Improved quantitative description of Auger recombination in crystalline silicon. Phys. Rev. B 86, 165202 (2012). Article ADS MATH Google Scholar 25. Liu, H. et al. Ultra-low voltage bipolar hydrogen production from biomass-derived aldehydes and water in membrane-less electrolyzers. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 4175-4189 (2022). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 26. Wang, T. et al. Transforming electrocatalytic biomass upgrading and hydrogen production from electricity input to electricity output. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202115636 (2022). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar 27. Na, J. et al. General technoeconomic analysis for electrochemical coproduction coupling carbon dioxide reduction with organic oxidation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5193 (2019). Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 28. Cox, C. R., Winkler, M. T., Pijpers, J. J. H., Buonassisi, T. & Nocera, D. G. Interfaces between water splitting catalysts and buried silicon junctions. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 532-538 (2013). Article CAS Google Scholar 29. Li, Z. et al. Solar hydrogen. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2203019 (2023). Article CAS Google Scholar 30. Li, Y. et al. Implanting Ni-O-VO[X] sites into Cu-doped Ni for low-overpotential alkaline hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun. 11, 2720 (2020). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 31. Dubey, S., Sarvaiya, J. N. & Seshadri, B. Temperature dependent photovoltaic (PV) efficiency and its effect on PV production in the world - a review. Energy Procedia 33, 311-321 (2013). Article Google Scholar 32. Li, S. et al. Reconstruction-induced NiCu-based catalysts toward paired electrochemical refining. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 3004-3014 (2022). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 33. Yang, M. et al. Correlating the valence state with the adsorption behavior of a Cu-based electrocatalyst for furfural oxidation with anodic hydrogen production reaction. Adv. Mater. 35, 2304203 (2023). Article CAS Google Scholar 34. Trompoukis, C. et al. Porous multi-junction thin-film silicon solar cells for scalable solar water splitting. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 182, 196-203 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar 35. Wang, Y., Schwartz, J., Gim, J., Hovden, R. & Mi, Z. Stable unassisted solar water splitting on semiconductor photocathodes protected by multifunctional gan nanostructures. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 1541-1548 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar 36. Wang, Y. et al. A single-junction cathodic approach for stable unassisted solar water splitting. Joule 3, 2444-2456 (2019). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 37. Varadhan, P., Fu, H.-C., Kao, Y.-C., Horng, R.-H. & He, J.-H. An efficient and stable photoelectrochemical system with 9% solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency via InGaP/GaAs double junction. Nat. Commun. 10, 5282 (2019). Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 38. Li, H. et al. Construction of uniform buried pn junctions on pyramid Si photocathodes using a facile and safe spin-on method for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 224-230 (2020). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 39. Yang, W. et al. Benchmark performance of low-cost Sb[2]Se[3] photocathodes for unassisted solar overall water splitting. Nat. Commun. 11, 861 (2020). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 40. Vanka, S. et al. InGaN/Si double-junction photocathode for unassisted solar water splitting. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 3741-3751 (2020). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 41. Ye, S. et al. Unassisted photoelectrochemical cell with multimediator modulation for solar water splitting exceeding 4% solar-to-hydrogen efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 12499-12508 (2021). Article CAS PubMed MATH Google Scholar 42. Lee, H. et al. Crystal facet-controlled efficient SNS photocathodes for high performance bias-free solar water splitting. Adv. Sci. 8, 2102458 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar 43. Butson, J. D. et al. Surface-structured cocatalyst foils unraveling a pathway to high-performance solar water splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2102752 (2022). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 44. Wang, M. et al. Integrated and unassisted solar water-splitting system by monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell. Sol. RRL 6, 2100748 (2022). Article CAS Google Scholar 45. Hwang, S. W. et al. Sharp-edged nanoflakes array of CuO with enhanced optical and charge transport properties for bias-free tandem solar water-splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 585, 152632 (2022). Article CAS Google Scholar 46. Bhattacharjee, S. et al. Reforming of soluble biomass and plastic derived waste using a bias-free Cu30Pd70|perovskite|Pt photoelectrochemical device. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2109313 (2022). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 47. Choi, Y. et al. Bias-free solar hydrogen production at 19.8 mA cm ^-2 using perovskite photocathode and lignocellulosic biomass. Nat. Commun. 13, 5709 (2022). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 48. Park, Y. S. et al. High-performance Sb[2]S[3] photoanode enabling iodide oxidation reaction for unbiased photoelectrochemical solar fuel production. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 4725-4737 (2022). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 49. Wang, S. et al. An integrated n-Si/BiVO[4] photoelectrode with an interfacial bi-layer for unassisted solar water splitting. Chem. Sci. 14, 2192-2199 (2023). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 50. Moon, S. et al. Bi[2]S[3]-Cu[3]BiS[3] mixed phase interlayer for high-performance Cu[3]BiS[3]-photocathode for 2.33% unassisted solar water splitting efficiency. Adv. Sci. 10, 2206286 (2023). Article CAS Google Scholar 51. Rhee, R. et al. Unassisted overall water splitting with a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of over 10% by coupled lead halide perovskite photoelectrodes. Carbon Energy 5, e232 (2023). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 52. Meng, X. et al. Enabling unassisted solar water splitting with concurrent high efficiency and stability by robust earth-abundant bifunctional electrocatalysts. Nano Energy 109, 108296 (2023). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 53. Fehr, A. M. K. et al. Integrated halide perovskite photoelectrochemical cells with solar-driven water-splitting efficiency of 20.8. Nat. Commun. 14, 3797 (2023). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 54. Song, Z. et al. All-perovskite tandem photoelectrodes for unassisted solar hydrogen production. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 2611-2619 (2023). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 55. Park, J. et al. Hybrid perovskite-based wireless integrated device exceeding a solar to hydrogen conversion efficiency of 11. Small 19, 2300174 (2023). Article CAS Google Scholar 56. Choi, H. et al. Organometal halide perovskite-based photoelectrochemical module systems for scalable unassisted solar water splitting. Adv. Sci. 10, 2303106 (2023). Article CAS Google Scholar 57. Mubarok, M. A. et al. Efficient and stable tin-lead perovskite photoconversion devices using dual-functional cathode interlayer. Adv. Energy Mater. 14, 2302555 (2024). Article CAS Google Scholar 58. Yang, J. W. et al. High-efficiency unbiased water splitting with photoanodes harnessing polycarbazole hole transport layers. Energy Environ. Sci. 17, 2541-2553 (2024). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 59. Hwang, S. et al. TiO[2]/TiN interface enables integration of Ni [5]P[4] electrocatalyst with a III-V tandem photoabsorber for stable unassisted solar-driven water splitting. ACS Energy Lett. 9, 789-797 (2024). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 60. Jeong, W. et al. Large-area all-perovskite-based coplanar photoelectrodes for scaled-up solar hydrogen production. Energy Environ. Sci. 17, 3604-3617 (2024). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 61. Xiao, L. et al. Coupling electrocatalytic cathodic nitrate reduction with anodic formaldehyde oxidation at ultra-low potential over Cu[2]O. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 2696-2704 (2023). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 62. He, W. et al. Enhanced nitrate-to-ammonia efficiency over linear assemblies of copper-cobalt nanophases stabilized by redox polymers. Adv. Mater. 35, 2303050 (2023). Article CAS Google Scholar 63. Yang, M. et al. A self-reactivated PdCu catalyst for aldehyde electro-oxidation with anodic hydrogen production. Nat. Commun. 15, 9852 (2024). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 64. Osman, A. I. et al. Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 20, 153-188 (2022). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 65. Wang, T., Nolte, M. W. & Shanks, B. H. Catalytic dehydration of C [6] carbohydrates for the production of hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as a versatile platform chemical. Green. Chem. 16, 548-572 (2014). Article CAS Google Scholar 66. Jaswal, A., Singh, P. P. & Mondal, T. Furfural - a versatile, biomass-derived platform chemical for the production of renewable chemicals. Green. Chem. 24, 510-551 (2022). Article CAS Google Scholar 67. Jing, Y., Guo, Y., Xia, Q., Liu, X. & Wang, Y. Catalytic production of value-added chemicals and liquid fuels from lignocellulosic biomass. Chem 5, 2520-2546 (2019). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 68. Li, G. et al. Dual hydrogen production from electrocatalytic water reduction coupled with formaldehyde oxidation via a copper-silver electrocatalyst. Nat. Commun. 14, 525 (2023). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central MATH Google Scholar 69. Mondal, I., Groves, M., Driver, E. M., Vittori, W. & Halden, R. U. Carcinogenic formaldehyde in US Residential buildings: mass inventories, human health impacts, and associated healthcare costs. Sci. Total Environ. 944, 173640 (2024). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 70. Salthammer, T. Acetaldehyde in the indoor environment. Environ. Sci. Atmos. 3, 474-493 (2023). Article CAS MATH Google Scholar 71. Ko, M. et al. Source data for coupling furfural oxidation for bias-free hydrogen production using crystalline silicon photoelectrodes. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/ m9.figshare.28477688 (2025). Download references Acknowledgements We thank UNIST Central Research Facilities (UCRF) for the support of its facilities and equipment. This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (RS-2024-00488176) through funding to K.S. and J.-W.J. The National Research Foundation (NRF; 2022H1D3A3A01081140, RS-2024-00456139 and RS-2023-00222006) sponsored this study through funding to J.-W.J. This work was also supported by the New Renewable Energy Core Technology Development Project of KETEP granted financial resources from MOTIE (No. 20223030010240) through funding to K.S. In addition, this work was supported by NRF grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIP) (RS-2023-00281706) and MOTIE (RS-2024-00432416) through funding to S.C. and the Ministry of Education (RS-2023-00248296) through funding to M. K. Author information Author notes 1. These authors contributed equally: Myohwa Ko, Myounghyun Lee, Taehyeon Kim, Wonjoo Jin, Wonsik Jang. Authors and Affiliations 1. School of Energy and Chemical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea Myohwa Ko, Myounghyun Lee, Taehyeon Kim, Wonjoo Jin, Seon Woo Hwang, Haneul Kim, Ja Hun Kwak, Kwanyong Seo & Ji-Wook Jang 2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea Wonsik Jang & Seungho Cho 3. Graduate School of Semiconductor Materials and Devices Engineering, Center for Future Semiconductor Technology (FUST), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea Seungho Cho 4. Graduate School of Carbon Neutrality, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea Kwanyong Seo & Ji-Wook Jang 5. Emergent Hydrogen Technology R&D Center, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea Ji-Wook Jang Authors 1. Myohwa Ko View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar 2. Myounghyun Lee View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar 3. Taehyeon Kim View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar 4. Wonjoo Jin View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar 5. Wonsik Jang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar 6. Seon Woo Hwang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar 7. Haneul Kim View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar 8. Ja Hun Kwak View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar 9. Seungho Cho View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar 10. Kwanyong Seo View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar 11. Ji-Wook Jang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar Contributions M.K. and M.L. proposed and designed the experiments under the supervision of J.-W.J., K.S., and S.C. W.Ji. and M.L. fabricated solar cells, solar modules, and photocathodes and measured their performances. M.K., T.K., and W.Ja. synthesized and characterized the Cu wire catalyst with assistance from S.W.H. M.K. and T.K. measured the performance of photocathodes and H[2] productivity. M.K. measured isotopes of H[2] gas using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with assistance from H.K. and J.H.K. M.K., M.L., T.K., W.Ji., W.Ja., S.C., K.S., and J.-W.J. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the discussion and interpretation of the results. Corresponding authors Correspondence to Seungho Cho, Kwanyong Seo or Ji-Wook Jang. Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Peer review Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Jingying Shi, Rui-Ting Gao, Anna Hankin, and the other anonymous reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available. Additional information Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary information Supplementary Information Peer Review File Source data Source Data Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Reprints and permissions About this article Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark Cite this article Ko, M., Lee, M., Kim, T. et al. Coupling furfural oxidation for bias-free hydrogen production using crystalline silicon photoelectrodes. Nat Commun 16, 2701 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-025-58000-4 Download citation * Received: 29 July 2024 * Accepted: 10 March 2025 * Published: 19 March 2025 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58000-4 Share this article Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative Download PDF Advertisement Advertisement Explore content * Research articles * Reviews & Analysis * News & Comment * Videos * Collections * Subjects * Follow us on Facebook * Follow us on Twitter * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed About the journal * Aims & Scope * Editors * Journal Information * Open Access Fees and Funding * Calls for Papers * Editorial Values Statement * Journal Metrics * Editors' Highlights * Contact * Editorial policies * Top Articles Publish with us * For authors * For Reviewers * Language editing services * Submit manuscript Search Search articles by subject, keyword or author [ ] Show results from [All journals] Search Advanced search Quick links * Explore articles by subject * Find a job * Guide to authors * Editorial policies Nature Communications (Nat Commun) ISSN 2041-1723 (online) nature.com sitemap About Nature Portfolio * About us * Press releases * Press office * Contact us Discover content * Journals A-Z * Articles by subject * protocols.io * Nature Index Publishing policies * Nature portfolio policies * Open access Author & Researcher services * Reprints & permissions * Research data * Language editing * Scientific editing * Nature Masterclasses * Research Solutions Libraries & institutions * Librarian service & tools * Librarian portal * Open research * Recommend to library Advertising & partnerships * Advertising * Partnerships & Services * Media kits * Branded content Professional development * Nature Careers * Nature Conferences Regional websites * Nature Africa * Nature China * Nature India * Nature Italy * Nature Japan * Nature Middle East * Privacy Policy * Use of cookies * Your privacy choices/Manage cookies * Legal notice * Accessibility statement * Terms & Conditions * Your US state privacy rights Springer Nature (c) 2025 Springer Nature Limited Close Nature Briefing Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter -- what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Email address [ ] Sign up [ ] I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Close Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing *