https://spectrum.ieee.org/diy-muon-tomography [ ] IEEE.orgIEEE Xplore Digital LibraryIEEE StandardsMore Sites Sign InJoin IEEE This $100 Muon Detector Lets You Harness the Cosmos Share FOR THE TECHNOLOGY INSIDER Search: [ ] Explore by topic AerospaceAIBiomedicalClimate TechComputingConsumer ElectronicsEnergy History of TechnologyRoboticsSemiconductorsTelecommunications Transportation IEEE Spectrum FOR THE TECHNOLOGY INSIDER Topics AerospaceAIBiomedicalClimate TechComputingConsumer ElectronicsEnergy History of TechnologyRoboticsSemiconductorsTelecommunications Transportation Sections FeaturesNewsOpinionCareersDIYEngineering Resources More NewslettersSpecial ReportsCollectionsExplainersTop Programming LanguagesRobots Guide /IEEE Job Site / For IEEE Members Current IssueMagazine ArchiveThe InstituteThe Institute Archive For IEEE Members Current IssueMagazine ArchiveThe InstituteThe Institute Archive IEEE Spectrum About UsContact UsReprints & Permissions /Advertising / Follow IEEE Spectrum Support IEEE Spectrum IEEE Spectrum is the flagship publication of the IEEE -- the world's largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences. Our articles, podcasts, and infographics inform our readers about developments in technology, engineering, and science. Join IEEE Subscribe About IEEEContact & SupportAccessibilityNondiscrimination PolicyTerms IEEE Privacy PolicyCookie PreferencesAd Privacy Options (c) Copyright 2025 IEEE -- All rights reserved. A public charity, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. Enjoy more free content and benefits by creating an account Saving articles to read later requires an IEEE Spectrum account The Institute content is only available for members Downloading full PDF issues is exclusive for IEEE Members Downloading this e-book is exclusive for IEEE Members Access to Spectrum 's Digital Edition is exclusive for IEEE Members Following topics is a feature exclusive for IEEE Members Adding your response to an article requires an IEEE Spectrum account Create an account to access more content and features on IEEE Spectrum , including the ability to save articles to read later, download Spectrum Collections, and participate in conversations with readers and editors. For more exclusive content and features, consider Joining IEEE . Join the world's largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to all of Spectrum's articles, archives, PDF downloads, and other benefits. Learn more about IEEE - Join the world's largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to this e-book plus all of IEEE Spectrum's articles, archives, PDF downloads, and other benefits. Learn more about IEEE - CREATE AN ACCOUNTSIGN IN JOIN IEEESIGN IN Close Access Thousands of Articles -- Completely Free Create an account and get exclusive content and features: Save articles, download collections, and talk to tech insiders -- all free! For full access and benefits, join IEEE as a paying member. CREATE AN ACCOUNTSIGN IN DIYMagazineHands On This $100 Muon Detector Lets You Harness the Cosmos Uncover hidden mine shafts and more David Schneider 24 Feb 2025 5 min read Inside a mine tunnel, a tripod supports a rectangular enclosure. A cutaway diagram shows two sensor boards separated by layer of metal and a microcontroller. With this detector, muons can be used to map underground structures. James Provost In the mid-1960s, the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Luis Alvarez had a wild idea. He proposed using muons, highly penetrating subatomic particles created when cosmic rays strike Earth's atmosphere, to search for hidden chambers within one of the pyramids of Giza. These muon particles are heavyweight cousins of electrons that travel close to the speed of light. They can penetrate through many meters of solid rock, including the limestone and granite blocks used to build the pyramids. But some of the muons will be absorbed by this dense material, meaning that they can be used to essentially "X-ray" a pyramid, revealing its inner structure. So in 1968, Alvarez and his colleagues began making muon measurements from a chamber located at the base of the Pyramid of Khafre. They didn't find a hidden chamber, but they did confirm the feasibility of what has come to be called muon tomography. Physicists have since used the technique to discover hidden access shafts above tunnels, study magma chambers within volcanos, and even probe the damaged reactors at Fukushima. And, in 2017, muon measurements finally revealed a hidden chamber in one of the pyramids of Giza--just not the pyramid that Alvarez had chosen to explore. You too can perform similar experiments with equipment that you can build yourself for only US $100 or so. While some well-documented designs are available for low-cost muon detectors (in particular, the Cosmic Watch project from MIT), I decided to pursue a simpler--and slightly cheaper--approach. I purchased two Geiger-counter kits, each costing only $23. Although it's called a "kit," this board in fact comes fully assembled minus the key component: a Geiger-Muller (or GM) tube for detecting ionizing radiation. It also comes with no documentation. The lack of documentation wasn't a problem once I found a good source for information about this board--including a pointer to valuable instructions for how to set the tube's anode voltage. Key components for the muon detectorThe muon detector uses two Geiger-Muller tubes [top], each inserted into a sensor board [bottom right]. Both boards are connected to an Arduino Nano microcontroller [bottom left].James Provost For the GM tubes, I decided to buy what I understood to be good ones: Russian-made SBM-20 tubes. Many of these are listed on eBay by sellers in Ukraine, but I was able to obtain a pair of such tubes from a supplier in the United States for just $49. "Why two kits and two tubes?" you might ask. It's because GM tubes don't react just to muons. Most of the time, they're triggered by ionizing particles given off by radioactive substances in the environment, such as the daughter products of radon in the air. Proving that the results reflected the flux of cosmic-ray muons wasn't difficult. To distinguish the high-energy cosmic-ray muons from the other, lower-energy particles isn't hard, though. Just apply what physicists call the coincidence method: Detect only when two nearby tubes are triggered practically simultaneously, meaning one particle has barreled through both tubes. The two tubes in my device are separated by 25-millimeter spacers, making it unlikely that a particle coming from a nearby radioactive decay would be energetic enough to pass through both tubes. I reduced the likelihood even more by placing a layer of fishing-sinker lead between the tubes. To turn the stacked pair of GM counters into a coincidence detector, I hooked up the output of each board (oddly labeled VIN, which usually means a pin for a voltage supply input!) to a spare Arduino Nano, programmed to record a hit only when one board registers a count within 1 millisecond of the other. Naturally this means the detector can recognize only muons with trajectories roughly aligned with the plane of the GM tubes so that the muons pass through both tubes. A diagram showing the outlines of two tubes separated by a thin layer of lead. Red lines pass through both tubes and the lead, while green lines stop inside one of the tubes or within the lead. A chart below shows a red line following a curve from 1.1 muon counts per minute at zenith angle of 0 degrees to 0 zero counts per minute at a zenith angle of 90 degrees. Black measurement bars follow the red line closely, except toward 90 degrees where they show a muon flux of 0.1 counts per minute above zero. Geiger-Muller tubes are activated by ionizing radiation, but unlike cosmic-ray muons [red particles], most terrestrial sources [green particles] are not powerful enough to travel through the detector's two tubes. By registering only activations that occur almost simultaneously, we can plot the muon flux as a function of the angle from vertical of the detector, with the observed data following the predicted model closelyJames Provost Proving to myself that the results indeed reflected the flux of cosmic-ray muons wasn't difficult: I just measured the count rate as a function of how far away from vertical my detector was oriented. You see, the flux of cosmic-ray muons coming in vertically from the sky is greater than the flux of muons traveling horizontally. Between these extremes, the flux should have a cosine-squared dependence on the angle as the detector's plane rotates from vertical to horizontal. So I set about counting events with my device oriented at different angles from vertical, allowing at least 12 hours for each measurement. The results were pretty consistent with the expected cosine-squared variation. For example, when completely horizontal, the detector registered a value that was less than 10 percent of that obtained when vertical, but it wasn't zero. Getting nonzero muon counts even when horizontal isn't so surprising. With only a 2.5-centimeter separation between the two 1-cm-diameter tubes, my detector's angular resolution is pretty broad (+-22 degrees). So even when I set the unit to sense horizontal flux, it was surely detecting muons coming in from as much as 22 degrees above the horizon. With a working muon detector in hand, I set off to probe the Earth--or at least a small part of it--by visiting the Reed Gold Mine, in Midland, N.C., the first commercial gold mine in the United States. I spent about two and a half hours in the mine, making five 30-minute measurements. I easily detected the increasingly thick layer of rock above the mine's main horizontal tunnel. My detector was even able to sense the presence of a vertical shaft at one spot, as the absence of rock allowed more muons to reach me than I measured nearby in the tunnel. These measurements take a long time because you need to accumulate enough counts to provide reasonable statistical precision. So you'll need patience. But it's not a bad way to harness the power of the cosmos, even deep underground! This article appears in the March 2025 print issue as "See the World With Muons." From Your Site Articles * Muon Scanning Finds Hidden Chamber in Great Pyramid of Giza > * Cosmic Muons Can 3D-Scan Hurricanes > * Cosmic Rays Can Now 3D-Scan Nuclear Reactors > arduinogeiger countermuonsremote sensingtomographytype:departments {"imageShortcodeIds":[]} David Schneider David Schneider is a former editor at IEEE Spectrum, and continues to contribute Hands On articles. He holds a bachelor's degree in geology from Yale, a master's in engineering from UC Berkeley, and a doctorate in geology from Columbia. The Conversation (0) Illustrated pattern made up of multiple word documents with large language model symbols pointing at each of them. The InstituteIEEE Member NewsAIGuest Article The Challenges and Upsides of Using AI in Scientific Writing 3h 4 min read An illustration of a series of chips surrounding a white ball of white. ComputingMagazineNews The Future of Quantum Computing Is Modular 7h 4 min read An illustration shows four colorful steps positioned against a background of graph paper. A line that goes from step to step has a long math equation written above it. AINews AI Solves Million-Step Math Problems 8h 3 min read Related Stories TelecommunicationsNews Mozambique Retools Weather Tech for Effective Forecasting DIYHands On Detect Migrating Birds With a Plastic Dish and a Cheap Microphone Climate TechNewsJournal WatchClimate ChangeTelecommunications When Waters Rise, Satellites Now Lag