https://www.propublica.org/article/texas-abortion-ban-sepsis-maternal-mortality-analysis Skip to content Menu Donate Investigative Journalism in the Public Interest Menu Search Donate --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Nonprofit Explorer * Local Initiatives * Newsletters * About Us Email Address: [ ] Sign Up Menu Donate Close Donate Search ProPublica: [ ] Search Topics * Racial Justice * Health Care * Politics * Criminal Justice * more... Browse by Place * Midwest * Northwest * South * Southwest * Texas Type * Graphics & Data * Newsletters * Series * Videos * Local Reporting Network * Electionland * Data Store Info * About Us * Impact * Jobs & Fellowships * Contact Us Follow ProPublica * Bluesky * Instagram * Facebook * (Twitter) * YouTube * Threads * LinkedIn * RSS [abortion-deaths-discharge-data-promo-FINAL-v2] Credit: Photo illustration by Andrea Wise/ProPublica; photo by Danielle Villasana for ProPublica Health Care Texas Banned Abortion. Then Sepsis Rates Soared. ProPublica's first-of-its-kind analysis is the most detailed look yet into a rise in life-threatening complications for women experiencing pregnancy loss under Texas' abortion ban. by Lizzie Presser, Andrea Suozzo, Sophie Chou and Kavitha Surana Feb. 20, 2025, 5 a.m. EST Share Change Appearance Change Appearance [Auto ] Republish [abortion-deaths-3x2_preview_maxWidth_3000_maxHeight_3000] Series: Life of the Mother: How Abortion Bans Lead to Preventable Deaths More in this series ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they're published. Pregnancy became far more dangerous in Texas after the state banned abortion in 2021, ProPublica found in a first-of-its-kind data analysis. The rate of sepsis shot up more than 50% for women hospitalized when they lost their pregnancies in the second trimester, ProPublica found. The surge in this life-threatening condition, caused by infection, was most pronounced for patients whose fetus may still have had a heartbeat when they arrived at the hospital. ProPublica previously reported on two such cases in which miscarrying women in Texas died of sepsis after doctors delayed evacuating their uteruses. Doing so would have been considered an abortion. The new reporting shows that, after the state banned abortion, dozens more pregnant and postpartum women died in Texas hospitals than had in pre-pandemic years, which ProPublica used as a baseline to avoid COVID-19-related distortions. As the maternal mortality rate dropped nationally, ProPublica found, it rose substantially in Texas. ProPublica's analysis is the most detailed look yet at a rise in life-threatening complications for women losing a pregnancy after Texas banned abortion. It raises concerns that the same pattern may be occurring in more than a dozen other states with similar bans. To chart the scope of pregnancy-related infections, ProPublica purchased and analyzed seven years of Texas' hospital discharge data. Years abortion was banned Sepsis rate 4.9% 2.9% Note: For hospitalizations involving a pregnancy loss between 13 weeks' gestation and the end of the 21st week. Rates are annual. When abortion was legal in Texas, the rate of sepsis for women hospitalized during second-trimester pregnancy loss was relatively steady. Then the state's first abortion ban went into effect and the rate of sepsis spiked. "This is exactly what we predicted would happen and exactly what we were afraid would happen," said Dr. Lorie Harper, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist in Austin. She and a dozen other maternal health experts who reviewed ProPublica's findings say they add to the evidence that the state's abortion ban is leading to dangerous delays in care. Texas law threatens up to 99 years in prison for providing an abortion. Though the ban includes an exception for a "medical emergency," the definition of what constitutes an emergency has been subject to confusion and debate. Many said the ban is the only explanation they could see for the sudden jump in sepsis cases. The new analysis comes as Texas legislators consider amending the abortion ban in the wake of ProPublica's previous reporting, and as doctors, federal lawmakers and the state's largest newspaper have urged Texas officials to review pregnancy-related deaths from the first full years after the ban was enacted; the state maternal mortality review committee has, thus far, opted not to examine the death data for 2022 and 2023. The standard of care for miscarrying patients in the second trimester is to offer to empty the uterus, according to leading medical organizations, which can lower the risk of contracting an infection and developing sepsis. If a patient's water breaks or her cervix opens, that risk rises with every passing hour. Sepsis can lead to permanent kidney failure, brain damage and dangerous blood clotting. Nationally, it is one of the leading causes of deaths in hospitals. While some Texas doctors have told ProPublica they regularly offer to empty the uterus in these cases, others say their hospitals don't allow them to do so until the fetal heartbeat stops or they can document a life-threatening complication. Last year, ProPublica reported on the repercussions of these kinds of delays. Forced to wait 40 hours as her dying fetus pressed against her cervix, Josseli Barnica risked a dangerous infection. Doctors didn't induce labor until her fetus no longer had a heartbeat. Physicians waited, too, as Nevaeh Crain's organs failed. Before rushing the pregnant teenager to the operating room, they ran an extra test to confirm her fetus had expired. Both women had hoped to carry their pregnancies to term, both suffered miscarriages and both died. What We're Watching During Donald Trump's second presidency, ProPublica will focus on the areas most in need of scrutiny. Here are some of the issues our reporters will be watching -- and how to get in touch with them securely. [ProPublica-Reporters-Trump_maxWidth_3000_maxHeight_3000_] Learn more about our reporting team. We will continue to share our areas of interest as the news develops. Portrait of Robert Faturechi Robert Faturechi I have been reporting on Trump Media, the parent company of Truth Social. I'm also reporting on the Trump administration's trade policies, including tariffs. * Signal * WhatsApp * Email Portrait of Andy Kroll Andy Kroll I cover justice and the rule of law, with a focus on the Justice Department, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia and the federal courts. * Signal * Phone * Email Photo of Jesse Coburn Jesse Coburn I'm tracking how the Trump administration reshapes policy at the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Transportation. * Email * Signal * WhatsApp * Phone Photo of Maryam Jameel Maryam Jameel I'm an engagement reporter interested in immigration, labor and the federal workforce. * Phone * Signal * Email [20191029-federal-govt-callout-1x1] If you don't have a specific tip or story in mind, we could still use your help. Sign up to be a member of our federal worker source network to stay in touch. We're trying something new. Was it helpful? In response to their stories, 111 doctors wrote a letter to the Legislature saying the abortion ban kept them from providing lifesaving care and demanding a change. "It's black and white in the law, but it's very vague when you're in the moment," said Dr. Tony Ogburn, an OB-GYN in San Antonio. When the fetus has a heartbeat, doctors can't simply follow the usual evidence-based guidelines, he said. Instead, there is a legal obligation to assess whether a woman's condition is dire enough to merit an abortion under a prosecutor's interpretation of the law. Some prominent Texas Republicans who helped write and pass Texas' strict abortion bans have recently said that the law should be changed to protect women's lives -- though it's unclear if proposed amendments will receive a public hearing during the current legislative session. ProPublica's findings indicate that the law is getting in the way of providing abortions that can protect against life-threatening infections, said Dr. Sarah Prager, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Washington. "We have the ability to intervene before these patients get sick," she said. "This is evidence that we aren't doing that." A New View Health experts, specially equipped to study maternal deaths, sit on federal agencies and state-appointed review panels. But, as ProPublica previously reported, none of these bodies have systematically assessed the consequences of abortion bans. So ProPublica set out to do so, first by investigating preventable deaths, and now by using data to take a broader view, looking at what happened in Texas hospitals after the state banned abortion, in particular as women faced miscarriages. "It is kind of mindblowing that even before the bans researchers barely looked into complications of pregnancy loss in hospitals," said perinatal epidemiologist Alison Gemmill, an expert on miscarriage at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Read More [svg] Texas Won't Study How Its Abortion Ban Impacts Women, So We Did In consultation with Gemmill and more than a dozen other maternal health researchers and obstetricians, ProPublica built a framework for analyzing Texas hospital discharge data from 2017 to 2023, the most recent full year available. This billing data, kept by hospitals and collected by the state, catalogues what happens in every hospitalization. It is anonymized but remarkable in its granularity, including details such as gestational age, complications and procedures. To study infections during pregnancy loss, ProPublica identified all hospitalizations that included miscarriages, terminations and births from the beginning of the second trimester up to 22 weeks' gestation, before fetal viability. Since first-trimester miscarriage is often managed in an outpatient setting, ProPublica did not include those cases in this analysis. When looking at stays for second-trimester pregnancy loss, ProPublica found a relatively steady rate of sepsis before Texas made abortion a crime. In late 2021, the state made it a civil offense to end a pregnancy after a fetus developed cardiac activity, and in the summer of 2022, the state made it a felony to terminate any pregnancy, with few exceptions. In 2021, 67 patients who lost a pregnancy in the second trimester were diagnosed with sepsis -- as in the previous years, they accounted for about 3% of the hospitalizations. In 2022, that number jumped to 90. The following year, it climbed to 99. ProPublica's analysis was conservative and likely missed some cases. It doesn't capture what happened to miscarrying patients who were turned away from emergency rooms or those like Barnica who were made to wait, then discharged home before they returned with sepsis. Our analysis showed that patients who were admitted while their fetus was still believed to have a heartbeat were far more likely to develop sepsis. Sepsis Rates Spiked for Patients Whose Initial Diagnosis Didn't Include Fetal Death For patients in Texas hospitals who lost a pregnancy, about half were not diagnosed with fetal demise when they were admitted, meaning that their fetus may still have had a heartbeat at that time. Those patients saw a dramatic increase in sepsis after the state banned abortion. Years abortion was banned Sepsis rate for hospitalizations without fetal death With fetal death 6.9% 3.7% 3.1% 2.1% Note: For hospitalizations involving a pregnancy loss between 13 weeks' gestation and the end of the 21st week. We identified patients whose fetus had no heartbeat when they were admitted by looking for a diagnosis of "intrauterine death" or "missed abortion." Rates are annual. Credit: Lucas Waldron/ProPublica "What this says to me is that once a fetal death is diagnosed, doctors can appropriately take care of someone to prevent sepsis, but if the fetus still has a heartbeat, then they aren't able to act and the risk for maternal sepsis goes way up," said Dr. Kristina Adams Waldorf, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at UW Medicine and an expert in pregnancy complications. "This is needlessly putting a woman's life in danger." Studies indicate that waiting to evacuate the uterus increases rates of sepsis for patients whose water breaks before the fetus can survive outside the womb, a condition called previable premature rupture of membranes or PPROM. Because of the risk of infection, major medical organizations like the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists advise doctors to always offer abortions. Researchers in Dallas and Houston examined cases of previable pregnancy complications at their local hospitals after the state ban. Both studies found that when women weren't able to end their pregnancies right away, they were significantly more likely to develop dangerous conditions than before the ban. The study of the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, not yet published, found that the rate of sepsis tripled after the ban. Dr. Emily Fahl, a co-author of that study, recently urged professional societies and state medical boards to "explicitly clarify" that doctors need to recommend evacuating the uterus for patients with a PPROM diagnosis, even with no sign of infection, according to MedPage Today. UTHealth Houston did not respond to several requests for comment. ProPublica zoomed out beyond the second trimester to look at deaths of all women hospitalized in Texas while pregnant or up to six weeks postpartum. Deaths peaked amid the COVID-19 pandemic, and most patients who died then were diagnosed with the virus. But looking at the two years before the pandemic, 2018 and 2019, and the two most recent years of data, 2022 and 2023, there is a clear shift: In the two earlier years, there were 79 maternal hospital deaths. In the two most recent, there were 120. Caitlin Myers, an economist at Middlebury College, said it's crucial to examine these deaths from different angles, as ProPublica has done. Data analyses help illuminate trends but can't reveal a patient's history or wishes, as a detailed medical chart might. Diving deep into individual cases can reveal the timeline of treatment and how doctors behave. "When you see them together, it tells a really compelling story that people are dying as a result of the abortion restrictions." Texas has no plans to scrutinize those deaths. The chair of the maternal mortality review committee said the group is skipping data from 2022 and 2023 and picking up its analysis with 2024 to get a more "contemporary" view of deaths. She added that the decision had "absolutely no nefarious intent." "The fact that Texas is not reviewing those years does a disservice to the 120 individuals you identified who died inpatient and were pregnant," said Dr. Jonas Swartz, an assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Duke University. "And that is an underestimation of the number of people who died." The committee is also prohibited by law from reviewing cases that include an abortion medication or procedure, which can also be used during miscarriages. In response to ProPublica's reporting, a Democratic state representative filed a bill to overturn that prohibition and order those cases to be examined. Because not all maternal deaths take place in hospitals and the Texas hospital data did not include cause of death, ProPublica also looked at data compiled from death certificates by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It shows that the rate of maternal deaths in Texas rose 33% between 2019 and 2023 even as the national rate fell by 7.5%. A New Imperative Texas' abortion law is under review this legislative session. Even the party that championed it and the senator who authored it say they would consider a change. On a local television program last month, Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said the law should be amended. "I do think we need to clarify any language," Patrick said, "so that doctors are not in fear of being penalized if they think the life of the mother is at risk." State Sen. Bryan Hughes, who once argued that the abortion ban he wrote was "plenty clear," has since reversed course, saying he is working to propose language to amend the ban. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott told ProPublica, through a spokesperson, that he would "look forward to seeing any clarifying language in any proposed legislation from the Legislature." Patrick, Hughes and Attorney General Ken Paxton did not respond to ProPublica's questions about what changes they would like to see made this session and did not comment on findings ProPublica shared. In response to ProPublica's analysis, Abbott's office said in a statement that Texas law is clear and pointed to Texas health department data that shows 135 abortions have been performed since Roe was overturned without resulting in prosecution. The vast majority of the abortions were categorized as responses to an emergency but the data did not specify what kind. Only five were solely to "preserve [the] health of [the] woman." At least seven bills related to repealing or creating new exceptions to the abortion laws have been introduced in Texas. Doctors told ProPublica they would most like to see the bans overturned so all patients could receive standard care, including the option to terminate pregnancies for health considerations, regardless of whether it's an emergency. No list of exceptions can encompass every situation and risk a patient might face, obstetricians said. "A list of exceptions is always going to exclude people," said Dallas OB-GYN Dr. Allison Gilbert. It seems unlikely a Republican-controlled Legislature would overturn the ban. Gilbert and others are advocating to at least end criminal and civil penalties for doctors. Though no doctor has been prosecuted for violating the ban, the mere threat of criminal charges continues to obstruct care, she said. In 2023, an amendment was passed that permitted physicians to intervene when patients are diagnosed with PPROM. But it is written in such a way that still exposes physicians to prosecution; it allows them to offer an "affirmative defense," like arguing self-defense when charged with murder. Read More [svg] Are Abortion Bans Across America Causing Deaths? The States That Passed Them Are Doing Little to Find Out. "Anything that can reduce those severe penalties that have really chilled physicians in Texas would be helpful," Gilbert said. "I think it will mean that we save patients' lives." Rep. Mihaela Plesa, a Democrat from outside Dallas who filed a bill to create new health exceptions, said that ProPublica's latest findings were "infuriating." She is urging Republicans to bring the bills to a hearing for debate and discussion. Last session, there were no public hearings, even as women have sued the state after being denied treatment for their pregnancy complications. This year, though some Republicans appeared open to change, others have gone a different direction. One recently filed a bill that would allow the state to charge women who get an abortion with homicide, for which they could face the death penalty. Do you live in a state that has passed laws affecting abortion in the last few years? In the time since, have you or a loved one experienced delayed health care while pregnant or experiencing a miscarriage? ProPublica would like to hear from you to better understand the unintended impact of abortion bans across the country. Email our reporters at [email protected] to share your story. We understand this may be difficult to talk about, and we have detailed how we report on maternal health to let you know what you can expect from us. Lucas Waldron contributed graphics. Mariam Elba contributed research. Filed under -- * Health Care * Abortion Portrait of Lizzie Presser Lizzie Presser Lizzie Presser covers health, inequality and how policy is experienced for ProPublica. * More Stories * Contact Me Andrea Suozzo * Andrea is a news applications developer at ProPublica. * More Stories * Contact Me Portrait of Sophie Chou Sophie Chou * Sophie Chou is a data reporter at ProPublica. * More Stories * Contact Me Portrait of Kavitha Surana Kavitha Surana Kavitha Surana is a reporter at ProPublica. * More Stories * Contact Me More in Health Care [svg] Life of the Mother Texas Won't Study How Its Abortion Ban Impacts Women, So We Did Since Texas banned abortion, no one has studied the statewide effects on pregnant women experiencing complications. Here's how we sifted through data on millions of pregnancy hospitalizations and analyzed the outcomes before and after the ban. by Andrea Suozzo, Sophie Chou and Lizzie Presser, Feb. 20, 2025, 4:55 a.m. EST [svg] Georgia Touts Its Medicaid Experiment as a Success. The Numbers Tell a Different Story. Only 6,500 participants have enrolled in a program that has cost taxpayers more than $86 million -- a warning for other states looking to impose restrictions on Medicaid in a second Trump presidency. by Margaret Coker, The Current, Feb. 19, 2025, 6 a.m. EST Local Reporting Network [svg] What a $2 Million Per Dose Gene Therapy Reveals About Drug Pricing Taxpayers and charities helped develop Zolgensma. Then it debuted at a record price, ushering in a new class of wildly expensive drugs. Its story upends the widely held conception that high prices reflect huge industry investments in innovation. by Robin Fields, Feb. 12, 2025, 8 a.m. EST [svg] Three Months After Missouri Voted to Make Abortion Legal, Access Is Still Being Blocked Reproductive rights are now enshrined in the state constitution, but Missouri's main abortion provider is fighting legal hurdles to resume offering the procedure. Meanwhile, anti-abortion lawmakers strategize to prevent a return of abortion services. by Jeremy Kohler, Feb. 5, 2025, 4:40 p.m. EST [svg] Dozens of People Died in Arizona Sober Living Homes as State Officials Fumbled Medicaid Fraud Response Arizona officials acknowledged that a fraud scheme targeting Indigenous people with addictions cost taxpayers $2.5 billion. But they haven't accounted publicly for the number of deaths tied to the scheme. by Mary Hudetz, ProPublica, and Hannah Bassett, Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting, Jan. 27, 2025, 7 a.m. EST [svg] Committed to Jail Is a New Mississippi Law Decreasing Jailings of People Awaiting Mental Health Treatment? The State Doesn't Know. Community mental health centers, counties and a state agency have reported vastly different numbers of people who spent time in jail while waiting to be treated for serious mental illness. by Gwen Dilworth, Mississippi Today, Jan. 23, 2025, 5 a.m. EST Local Reporting Network Most Read [svg] Life of the Mother Texas Banned Abortion. Then Sepsis Rates Soared. ProPublica's first-of-its-kind analysis is the most detailed look yet into a rise in life-threatening complications for women experiencing pregnancy loss under Texas' abortion ban. by Lizzie Presser, Andrea Suozzo, Sophie Chou and Kavitha Surana, Feb. 20, 2025, 5 a.m. EST [svg] These Soldiers Risked Their Lives Serving in Afghanistan. Now They Plead With Trump to Let Their Sister Into the U.S. Trump's executive orders have blocked entrance to the country for thousands of Afghans, including those who worked with the U.S. military and their relatives. Two brothers hope answers come quickly for their sister and her husband, who they say are in danger. by Lomi Kriel, ProPublica and The Texas Tribune, Feb. 19, 2025, 3:15 p.m. CST [svg] Trump Vowed to Clean Up Washington, Then His Team Hired a Man Who Pushed a Scam the IRS Called the "Worst of the Worst" Frank Schuler was a leading promoter of a tax deduction derided as a scam by prosecutors, senators and the IRS. Now he's a senior adviser to the General Services Administration, which manages the federal government's property. by Peter Elkind, Feb. 18, 2025, 6 a.m. EST [svg] Trump Official Destroying USAID Secretly Met With Christian Nationalists Abroad in Defiance of U.S. Policy Now one of the most powerful people in the U.S. government, Peter Marocco's turbulent tenure during the first Trump administration sheds light on his current efforts to dismantle the American foreign aid system from the inside out. by Brett Murphy and Anna Maria Barry-Jester, Feb. 15, 2025, 9 p.m. EST [svg] Life of the Mother Texas Won't Study How Its Abortion Ban Impacts Women, So We Did Since Texas banned abortion, no one has studied the statewide effects on pregnant women experiencing complications. Here's how we sifted through data on millions of pregnancy hospitalizations and analyzed the outcomes before and after the ban. by Andrea Suozzo, Sophie Chou and Lizzie Presser, Feb. 20, 2025, 4:55 a.m. EST Stay informed with the Daily Digest. Email Address: [ ] Sign Up Investigative Journalism in the Public Interest (c) Copyright 2025 Pro Publica Inc. Sites * ProPublica * Local Reporting Network * Texas Tribune Partnership * The Data Store * Electionland Sections * Topics * Series * Videos * News Apps * Get Involved * The Nerd Blog * @ProPublica * Events Info * About * Board and Advisors * Officers and Staff * Diversity * Jobs and Fellowships * Media Center * Reports * Impact * Awards * Corrections Policies * Code of Ethics * Advertising Policy * Privacy Policy Follow * Newsletters * iOS and Android * RSS Feed More * Send Us Tips * Steal Our Stories * Browse via Tor * Contact Us * Donate * More Ways to Give Close this dialogue Republish This Story for Free Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for your interest in republishing this story. You are free to republish it so long as you do the following: * You have to credit ProPublica and any co-reporting partners. In the byline, we prefer "Author Name, Publication(s)." At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: "This story was originally published by ProPublica." You must link the word "ProPublica" to the original URL of the story. * If you're republishing online, you must link to the URL of this story on propublica.org, include all of the links from our story, including our newsletter sign up language and link, and use our PixelPing tag. * If you use canonical metadata, please use the ProPublica URL. For more information about canonical metadata, refer to this Google SEO link. * You can't edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, "yesterday" can be changed to "last week," and "Portland, Ore." to "Portland" or "here.") * You cannot republish our photographs or illustrations without specific permission. Please contact [email protected]. * It's okay to put our stories on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories. You can't state or imply that donations to your organization support ProPublica's work. * You can't sell our material separately or syndicate it. This includes publishing or syndicating our work on platforms or apps such as Apple News, Google News, etc. * You can't republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually. (To inquire about syndication or licensing opportunities, contact [email protected].) * You can't use our work to populate a website designed to improve rankings on search engines or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements. * We do not generally permit translation of our stories into another language. * Any website our stories appear on must include a prominent and effective way to contact you. [ ] Copy HTML undefined undefined