https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm21g0052dno Skip to content Watch Live * Home * News * Sport * Business * Innovation * Culture * Arts * Travel * Earth * Audio * Video * Live * Home * News + Israel-Gaza War + War in Ukraine + US & Canada + UK o UK Politics o England o N. Ireland # N. Ireland Politics o Scotland # Scotland Politics o Wales # Wales Politics + Africa + Asia o China o India + Australia + Europe + Latin America + Middle East + In Pictures + BBC InDepth + BBC Verify * Sport * Business + Executive Lounge + Technology of Business + Future of Business * Innovation + Technology + Science & Health + Artificial Intelligence + AI v the Mind * Culture + Film & TV + Music + Art & Design + Style + Books + Entertainment News * Arts + Arts in Motion * Travel + Destinations o Africa o Antarctica o Asia o Australia and Pacific o Caribbean & Bermuda o Central America o Europe o Middle East o North America o South America + World's Table + Culture & Experiences + Adventures + The SpeciaList * Earth + Natural Wonders + Weather & Science + Climate Solutions + Sustainable Business + Green Living * Audio + Podcasts + Radio * Video * Live + Live News + Live Sport [ ] Home News Sport Business Innovation Culture Arts Travel Earth Audio Video Live Weather Newsletters Critics say new Google rules put profits over privacy 23 hours ago Imran Rahman-Jones Technology reporter [grey-place]Getty Images Stock image of a computer generated image of a multi-coloured fingerprint with red digitally rendered squares in the backgroundGetty Images Privacy campaigners have called Google's new rules on tracking people online "a blatant disregard for user privacy." Changes which come in on Sunday permit so-called "fingerprinting", which allows online advertisers to collect more data about users including their IP addresses and information about their devices. Google says this data is already widely used by other companies, and it continues to encourage responsible data use. However the company had previously come out strongly against this kind of data collection, saying in a 2019 blog that fingerprinting "subverts user choice and is wrong." But in a post announcing the new rule changes, Google said the way people used the internet - such as devices like smart TVs and consoles - meant it was harder to target ads to users using conventional data collection, which users control with cookie consent. It also says more privacy options provide safety to users. Google told the BBC in a statement: "Privacy-enhancing technologies offer new ways for our partners to succeed on emerging platforms... without compromising on user privacy." But opponents to the change say fingerprinting and IP address collection are a blow to privacy because it is harder for users to control what data is collected about them. "By allowing fingerprinting, Google has given itself - and the advertising industry it dominates - permission to use a form of tracking that people can't do much to stop," said Martin Thomson, distinguished engineer at Mozilla, a rival to Google. What is fingerprinting? Fingerprinting collects information about a person's device and browser and puts it together to create a profile of that person. The information is not explicitly collected in order to advertise to people, but it can be used to target specific ads based on that user's data. For example, a person's screen size or language settings are legitimately needed in order to display a website properly. But when that is combined with their time zone, browser type, battery level - and many other data points - it can create a unique combination of settings which makes it easier to work out who is using a web service. These details along with someone's IP address - the unique identifier used by internet devices - were previously prohibited by Google for ad targeting. Privacy campaigners say that unlike cookies, which are small files stored on a local device, users have little control over whether they send fingerprinting information to advertisers. "By explicitly allowing a tracking technique that they previously described as incompatible with user control, Google highlights its ongoing prioritisation of profits over privacy," said Lena Cohen, staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "The same tracking techniques that Google claims are essential for online advertising also expose individuals' sensitive information to data brokers, surveillance companies, and law enforcement," she added. 'Irresponsible' change "My argument would be that fingerprinting sits in a little bit of a grey area," says Pete Wallace, from advertising technology company GumGum. "Should people feel comfortable staying in a grey area of privacy? I'd say no," he adds. GumGum, which has worked with the BBC on ad campaigns before, relies on something called contextual advertising, which uses other data points to target adverts to online users, such as keywords on the website they are on - rather than their personal data. Mr Wallace says allowing fingerprinting represents a shift in the industry. "Fingerprinting feels like it's taking a much more business-centric approach to the use of consumer data rather than a consumer-centric approach," he says. "This sort of flip-flopping is, in my opinion, detrimental to that route that the industry seemed to be taking towards this idea of really putting consumer privacy at the forefront." He adds that he hopes ad tech companies conclude "that it isn't the appropriate way to use consumer data," but expects them to look at fingerprinting as an option in order to better target adverts. Advertising is the lifeblood of the internet business model, and allow many websites to be freely available to users without them having to directly pay to access them. But in return, users often have to give up private information about themselves so that advertisers can show them relevant adverts. The UK's data watchdog, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), says "fingerprinting is not a fair means of tracking users online because it is likely to reduce people's choice and control over how their information is collected." In a blog post in December, the ICO's Executive Director of Regulatory Risk Stephen Almond wrote: "We think this change is irresponsible." He added that advertisers and businesses which decide to use this technology will have to demonstrate how they are staying within data and privacy laws in the UK. "Based on our understanding of how fingerprinting techniques are currently used for advertising this is a high bar to meet," he wrote. Google said in a statement: "We look forward to further discussions with the ICO about this policy change. "We know that data signals like IP addresses are already commonly used by others in the industry today, and Google has been using IP responsibly to fight fraud for years." A spokesperson added: "We continue to give users choice whether to receive personalised ads, and will work across the industry to encourage responsible data use." Should you have to pay for online privacy? Google U-turn over long-running plan to ditch cookies Google Privacy Technology --------------------------------------------------------------------- Related Google Maps blocks Gulf of America reviews after rename criticism 3 days ago Technology Google Maps updates Gulf of Mexico name for US users 5 days ago US & Canada Google joins firms dropping diversity recruitment goals 6 Feb 2025 Business --------------------------------------------------------------------- More 2 days ago [grey-place]Pathfinder 1's untethered flight outside Moffett Field (Credit: LTA Research) The airship that may usher in a new era Pathfinder 1, bankrolled by a Google billionaire, is an attempt to revive the airship. A century after terrifying disasters, is a safe-enough bet? 2 days ago Future 3 days ago [grey-place]A brightly-coloured illustration showing the YouTube logo repeated in a circle around a human eye (Credit: Estudio Santa Rita) YouTube statistics Google doesn't want you to know YouTube is about to turn 20. An unusual research method is unveiling statistics about the platform that Google would rather keep hidden. 3 days ago Future 3 days ago [grey-place]Close up of Eric Schmidt wearing a dark jacket and pinstriped shirt Ex-Google boss fears for AI 'Bin Laden scenario' Eric Schmidt says AI technology could "harm innocent people" if it ends up in the wrong hands. 3 days ago Technology 4 days ago [grey-place]A woman lies on her front on a lounge, holding a phone in one hand and pressing her brow with the other 'DeepSeek moved me to tears': How young Chinese find therapy in AI Some young people in China are finding that AI can offer the unexpected - emotional support 4 days ago Asia 5 days ago [grey-place]A computer with somebody using ChatGPT Law firm restricts AI after 'significant' staff use The chief technology officer of Hill Dickinson warned of the use of AI tools. 5 days ago Technology --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Home * News * Sport * Business * Innovation * Culture * Arts * Travel * Earth * Audio * Video * Live * Weather * BBC Shop BBC in other languages Follow BBC on: * Terms of Use * About the BBC * Privacy Policy * Cookies * Accessibility Help * Contact the BBC * Advertise with us * Do not share or sell my info * Contact technical support Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.