https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01237 Skip to main content Cornell University We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2502.01237 [ ] Help | Advanced Search [All fields ] Search arXiv logo Cornell University Logo [ ] GO quick links * Login * Help Pages * About Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2502.01237 (cs) [Submitted on 3 Feb 2025] Title:The Differences Between Direct Alignment Algorithms are a Blur Authors:Alexey Gorbatovski, Boris Shaposhnikov, Viacheslav Sinii, Alexey Malakhov, Daniil Gavrilov View a PDF of the paper titled The Differences Between Direct Alignment Algorithms are a Blur, by Alexey Gorbatovski and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs) simplify language model alignment by replacing reinforcement learning (RL) and reward modeling (RM) in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) with direct policy optimization. DAAs can be classified by their ranking losses (pairwise vs. pointwise), by the rewards used in those losses (e.g., likelihood ratios of policy and reference policy, or odds ratios), or by whether a Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) phase is required (two-stage vs. one-stage). We first show that one-stage methods underperform two-stage methods. To address this, we incorporate an explicit SFT phase and introduce the $\beta$ parameter, controlling the strength of preference optimization, into single-stage ORPO and ASFT. These modifications improve their performance in Alpaca Eval 2 by +$3.46$ (ORPO) and +$8.27$ (ASFT), matching two-stage methods like DPO. Further analysis reveals that the key factor is whether the approach uses pairwise or pointwise objectives, rather than the specific implicit reward or loss function. These results highlight the importance of careful evaluation to avoid premature claims of performance gains or overall superiority in alignment algorithms. Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2502.01237 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2502.01237v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.01237 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Boris Shaposhnikov [view email] [v1] Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:54:14 UTC (118 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled The Differences Between Direct Alignment Algorithms are a Blur, by Alexey Gorbatovski and 4 other authors * View PDF * HTML (experimental) * TeX Source * Other Formats license icon view license Current browse context: cs.LG < prev | next > new | recent | 2025-02 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations * NASA ADS * Google Scholar * Semantic Scholar a export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation x [loading... ] Data provided by: Bookmark BibSonomy logo Reddit logo (*) Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools [ ] Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) [ ] Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) [ ] Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) [ ] scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) ( ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article [ ] alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) [ ] Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) [ ] DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) [ ] GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) [ ] Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) [ ] Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) [ ] ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) ( ) Demos Demos [ ] Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) [ ] Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) [ ] Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) ( ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools [ ] Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) [ ] Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) [ ] IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) * Author * Venue * Institution * Topic ( ) About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?) * About * Help * Click here to contact arXiv Contact * Click here to subscribe Subscribe * Copyright * Privacy Policy * Web Accessibility Assistance * arXiv Operational Status Get status notifications via email or slack