https://medium.com/@m.finks/nasas-metallic-orbs-the-surprising-briefing-everyone-missed-70a6ff6a231c Open in app Sign up Sign in [ ] Write Sign up Sign in [1] NASA's Metallic Orbs: The Surprising Briefing Everyone Missed Finks Finks * Follow 6 min read * 3 days ago -- 7 Listen Share How One Quiet Announcement May Change Our Understanding of Technology -- Past and Present On July 1, 2023, a Pentagon official at NASA headquarters calmly stated, 'We see these metallic spheres all over the world, making maneuvers we can't explain...moving at Mach 2 against the wind, with no apparent propulsion." This was a government scientist, discussing objects that defy the laws of physics, in a briefing where the Pentagon and NASA were sharing findings like this after a year of study. This should have been front-page news. Instead, it barely made a ripple in the mainstream media. NASA's Briefing: Key Details & Quotes You can watch the entire briefing here on Youtube. All of the quotes that I am using will be time-stamped, when possible. Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, who is the director of the Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), didn't beat around the bush. Showing a video of a metallic sphere captured by military sensors, he stated matter-of-factly: "This is a typical example of the thing that we see most of... Then came the kicker that should have sent shockwaves through the scientific community: "We see these all over the world, and we see these making very interesting apparent maneuvers." [36:12-36:29] Wait...what? Here is a top government official, speaking at NASA headquarters, describing something that defied our understanding of physics: metallic spheres -- as he clearly said in an example -- "moving at Mach 2 against the wind with no apparent propulsion." [1:03:41-1:03:55] * That's twice the speed of sound. * Into the wind. * With no visible engines. Dr. Kirkpatrick noted that they now have over 800 cases, [54:51-55:06] and that of these cases.- "The numbers I would say that we see are possibly really anomalous are less than single digit percentages... maybe two to five-ish percent." That sounds like a small number, but there are still at least 20-40 anomalous cases...of metallic spheres, many the size of small cars, that can travel at high speeds with no means of propulsion. Examining the Orbs This image is from a slideshow that was shared during the public briefing. The objects have showed up consistently enough, and with such similar characteristics, that they demanded a graph! * Size: About as big as a small car (3-13 feet across) * Altitude: Flying in the same airspace as commercial planes (10,000-30,000 feet) * Appearance: Metallic, spherical, solid * Movement: Could hover motionless, then accelerate to incredible speeds * Technology: No visible engines, no heat signature, no exhaust Here's what makes this truly strange. They are admitting that these objects, which by all laws of physics known to humans, shouldn't be able to fly...are able to hover, and then accelerate to speeds up to Mach 2. Imagine one of the jets from Top Gun, hovering silent in the sky, and then accelerating to top speed. Without any engines. Again -- "We see these all over the world," Kirkpatrick said. Notice his choice of words: "We see these." Present tense. Not "We saw these once" or "Someone reported seeing these." [36:16-36:29] He's describing something happening regularly, consistently, all around the globe. The Logical Dilemma Could we be witnessing non-human technology? Occam's Razor tells us that the simplest, most elegant explanation is usually the one closest to the truth. So, when something this strange appears in our skies, it's natural to look for simple explanations. Let's do what NASA's scientists did: examine each possibility with an open but critical mind. Could these be conventional aircraft? No. They need huge engines to fly. Natural phenomena? No. NASA's Dr. Fox emphasized, they're dealing with solid objects showing "signatures that could be anomalous." That's scientist-speak for "things that shouldn't be able to do what they're doing." Secret military technology? This is what some people hope it could be. But no country would test their most advanced tech over other nations' sensitive facilities. And, even more important, these orbs have been appearing for decades. No one had anything close to this kind of technology 40 years ago. The Answer Nobody Wants to Discuss This brings us to the possibility most scientists are uncomfortable discussing: non-human technology. Here's where it gets interesting. This explanation actually fits all the evidence: * Advanced technology beyond our current capabilities? Check. * Global presence? Check. * Consistent characteristics over decades? Check. * Ability to operate without conventional propulsion? Check. Is this a comfortable conclusion? No. Is it where the technological evidence points? Yes. A Brief Historical Context Here's what makes NASA's current study so fascinating: these metallic orbs aren't new. They match a pattern of observations stretching back decades: * WWII pilots called them "foo fighters" * Navy crews tracked them underwater in the 1950s * Commercial pilots have quietly reported them for years The same characteristics keep showing up: * Metallic spheres * Impossible maneuvers * No visible propulsion * Strategic locations * Apparent intelligence It's not a comfortable conclusion. I look at the evidence, and my mind still thinks, "This is not as much fun as I had thought it would be. If non-human technology does exist, that's kind of...scary." I have always been curious about the possibility of "non-human technology", but if it's actually real....that will change our actual understanding of reality. It's as if all those speculative "what if" debates suddenly got real. No longer is this a fringe rumor or a conspiracy theory; now it's official data about objects doing the impossible in our skies. This is what changes when NASA confirms it is seeing anomalies like these metallic orbs across the globe. Where do we go from here? So what does NASA plan next? Dr. Spergel, who led Princeton's astrophysics department, essentially said we need better data -- more sensors, more rigorous collection methods -- if we want answers. Meanwhile, Dr. Nicola Fox admitted scientists studying these phenomena face plenty of harassment, which only deepens the stigma. It's frustrating because here we have top-tier experts openly saying, "We see anomalies we can't explain," yet the public conversation remains stuck in old skepticism. For me, that means there's a window of opportunity to explore these sightings with fresh eyes, free from the usual ridicule. If NASA's data proves something beyond our current technology can exist now, then maybe some ancient technological mysteries aren't as much of a mystery as the conflicting theories would have us believe. It's a big leap, but so was NASA going public about impossible flight maneuvers. The Pattern I've spent the past few months investigating this connection between NASA's modern metallic orbs and historical technological anomalies. The pattern that emerged was so compelling that I've documented it in my upcoming book "The Pattern: from 'Drones' to NASA's Orbs to Ancient History." [Link if interested in checking it out] From the precise engineering of Puma Punku in Bolivia to the impossible knowledge embedded in ancient sites, we're seeing evidence of technological gaps that seemed to exist then...just as they do today with these metallic orbs. Using NASA's current observations as our foundation, we can finally examine these historical mysteries through a new lens. If you've found these revelations as eye-opening (or as uncomfortable) as I have, you can follow this investigation in several ways: * Check out the book to explore the full pattern [link] * Follow me here on Medium for regular updates * Share this article if you think others should know about NASA's overlooked briefing At this point, I'd rather keep an open mind than miss what could be the biggest story of our time. UFO NASA Uap Ancient History Tech -- -- 7 Finks Finks Follow Written by Finks 46 Followers *3 Following When I'm not exploring the mysteries of the past, I write fun, educational adventures for children. Author - Capybara Guardians and the upcoming "The Pattern." Follow Responses (7) See all responses Help Status About Careers Press Blog Privacy Terms Text to speech Teams