https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2024/12/most-people-dont-care-about-quality/ Photo of Terence Eden. He has a beard and is smiling. Terence Eden's Blog Mastodon. LinkedIn. GitHub. Email. Feed. [?] Theme: [ / ] 2024-12-30 Most people don't care about quality @edent[a]design Netflix rant * 10 comments * 1,250 words * read ~20,109 times. --------------------------------------------------------------------- My friend, the photographer Paul Clarke has an uncanny eye for detail. Every single shot he publishes is beautiful - they capture life in a way that I don't have the language to describe. I'm quite content to point my phone at someone, use the default settings, and grab a snap. My photos lack composition, clarity, focus, mise-en-scene, proper lighting and a thousand-and-one details that I've never even thought of. Paul has published an essay about official photographs of politicians . In it, he expertly points out the various deficiencies of some of them and where they show a distinct lack of quality. But, here's the thing, I don't think anyone other than a photographer would notice or care about those "problems". If you're a website designer, you're always noticing "jank" on other sites. Your skin crawls at the poor kerning, the FOUT, the lack of keyboard navigation, improper contrast ratio, and a dozen other flaws. 99% of users just don't care. It doesn't impact them in any meaningful way. A decade ago, I ranted about how designers were chasing a perfection which would never be noticed by non-experts. You may take pride in your craft, but the majority of people physically cannot notice the difference between good and bad design. Not even subconsciously. I include myself in this maddening desire for unnoticeable perfection. I've got several rants about things most people would find inconsequential. There are things which I know to be important in terms of technical correctness, but which most people couldn't give a shit about. There's a brilliant essay by Will Tavlin called "Casual Viewing - Why Netflix looks like that". In it, the author (correctly and fairly) skewers Netflix's model of producing huge amounts of low-quality content for an undiscerning audience. The creatives recoil in horror and the aesthetic choices, poor scripting, and lack of creative pizazz. Everything is mediocre at best and that's destroying the creative industries. But, much like designers fretting about getting things Pixel Perfect or photographers complaining about background composition or musicians ranting about the loudness wars - the hoi polloi just don't care. And, frankly, who can blame them? Take this quote from the Netflix essay: The difference between Netflix and its predecessors is that the older studios had a business model that rewarded cinematic expertise and craft. Bluntly, I don't think that's true. Look at the amount of movies Elvis was in. A couple of good ones, sure. But the majority are literally just "This demographic will pay a dollar to see Elvis on screen; so put him on screen". You only need to look at the various lists of highest grossing movies to see that the viewing public don't necessarily reward expertise and craft. In an essay called "Fraught Pleasures: Domestic Trauma and Cinephilia in American Culture", the author points out that in the movie "Scream" (a movie ostensibly about movies) nobody goes to the cinema. Their entertainment is schlocky VHS tapes of low-budget and low-quality horror films. The nearest they get to discussing the quality of movie making is when one character recommends renting "All The Right Moves" because: If you pause it at just the right place, you can see [Tom Cruise's] penis! Quality! Netflix, so the essay argues, has perfected the art of designing content for "casual viewing". Something you can have on in the background while cooking, playing a game, or doom-scrolling. Several screenwriters who've worked for the streamer told me a common note from company executives is "have this character announce what they're doing so that viewers who have this program on in the background can follow along." So? Not everything should be hard work. After a long day, most people don't want to work for their leisure. People don't want to expend cognitive energy on interpreting what a story means. Forget Subtext - People Don't Even Get Surtext. We also have the problem that close to 100% of culture is now readily available to us. Why take a risk on something new when you could watch something guaranteed to be good? An executive at Amazon's streaming division recalls receiving an email which said: 'here are the one hundred movies that people are watching most on Amazon SVOD today by the minute.' It was always a lot of Tom Cruise sci-fi movies, action movies from the '90s and aughts, and Talladega Nights. You want to get everyone dancing at your party. Do you put on some experimental music that no one has heard of? No - you stick on ABBA and watch the dance-floor fill up. Want something with a guaranteed number of chuckles-per-minute? Friends is there for you. When you visit Paris, do you go to some little art gallery showcasing new artists or do you visit Le Louvre? You, like everyone else, bask in front of the Mona Lisa. Finally, we reach the inevitble endgame of Netflix. Cut out the authors, actors, directors, make-up artists, sound designers, and the hundreds of other unionised parasites involved in making a modern show. Go straight to AI and create an infinite and endless stream of algorithmically-designed crowd-pleasing content. Streaming platforms are the only place where this [AI Generated] garbage makes any sense -- a place where it would never be watched at all. Hard disagree. Not because I think AI slop is good; but because the audience doesn't care. Most people don't notice the wires on the special effects. They can't see that the lighting is wrong on the CGI shot. The lead actor's shitty accent passes without comment. I'm not trying to slur people when I say that the majority are unsophisticated - because I include myself amongst them. Audiophiles complain about MP3 compression and crappy headphones. Most of us just want to listen to our tunes, not listen to the equipment. Cinephiles complain about poorly calibrated projectors and or motion smoothing on TVs. Most of us just want to crunch popcorn and see big explosions. Fact-checkers complain about fictional quotes from famous people. Most of us just want a daily dose of something that sounds like wisdom. Pornographers complain about the move from gorgeous celluloid to low fidelity videotape. Most of us just want to rent a VHS rather than visit a cinema for our extra-special-personal-time. Fashionistas decry the homogeneity of modern dress. Most of us think jeans and a t-shirt are basically fine. Is the quality of pizza better from a tiny restaurant hidden away in an Italian village using only fresh ingredients? I'm sure it is. But Domino's delivers something good enough, cheap enough, and hot enough. Next year, your pizza will be topped with cheap 3D printed "meat" and, while chefs will decry it as an affront to culinary perfection, it'll be cheap and tasty. Besides, you're munching on it while chatting to friends and watching something dopey on Netflix. Call it the rise of "Casual Eating". --------------------------------------------------------------------- Share this post on... * Mastodon * Facebook * LinkedIn * BlueSky * Threads * Reddit * HackerNews * Lobsters * WhatsApp * Telegram Interactive Relationship Graph 10 thoughts on "Most people don't care about quality" 1. 2024-12-30 13:19 [bafkreia] [bsky] Mike Gifford, CPWA @ FOSDEM said on bsky.app: So where do people care about quality and why? When is "good enough" not good enough? Reply | Reply to original comment on bsky.app 2. 2024-12-30 16:45 [bd3bc567] DinoNerd says: In my opinion, there are multiple types of quality. I notice when the latest app crashes more often than the one it replaces, or when it takes me longer to do the same tasks as before. I don't need to be a software expert to be unhappy that it takes five clicks to do what I used to do with two. I also notice when my new washer takes longer to wash clothes than the old one, and my clothes wear out faster. I'm not an expert on laundry, or appliances. Oddly, though, a lot of people don't seem to be bothered by this sort of thing. I don't know why. Others notice and are motivated by products which are new, different, and perhaps fashionable. Obviously expensive may also be seen positively. They buy the latest styles of clothes, and perhaps this year's iPhone. Every year. They are often impressed with others who do the same - thus the latest iPhone is useful to display when picking up people in bars. While this doesn't float my boat, I'd say it's a type of quality and quality consciousness. Finally there's what I'm going to call connoisseur quality. These are subtleties only an expert will notice. Sometimes (most high art) it requires education to like much of anything in the genre - never mind distinguishing grades of quality within it. Sometimes the differences are a bit more meaningful, but won't be obvious without paying more attention than a non-specialist would, or only show up as resilience against rare events. (Thus, IIRC, the covid death rate was lowest in not-for-profit nursing homes; highest in for-profit, and medium in those government run. Who'd have noticed the relevant issues, before the epidemic? Maybe a few patients who had a more miserable experience in for-profit than friends in non-profit? Or maybe only specialists and regulators.) Finally, I guess there's also suitability to task. I don't need my groceries protected by a steel vault, but I might want to keep expensive jewelry in one. I don't need hot standby resilience in a computer I use at home, but I'd be very unhappy not to have backups - and others wouldn't care about the backups. Personally, I care a lot about quality in the first sense. I wish providers believed they could make money selling to people that share this preference. I find lack of suitability to task often contributes to reduced first sense quality. It's much harder to get a snack when your fridge has bank vault security. And while I haven't encountered that, consider using one's phone as a calculator. Or being sent an email that says there's new info available on the provider's web site, which requires multi-factor authentication. Much more secure than including the information in the email - but often the information in question doesn't need such security. And as for the second sense - fashionistas can keep their uncomfortable clothes that cost too much and wear out too fast. They can also keep their status symbol cell phones and cars. I'll be wearing something comfortable and practical, using an elderly phone that was middle-of-the-pack when purchased, and driving a beater that no one would even consider stealing. Reply 1. 2025-01-02 12:56 [769bd914] Stee Jans says: " Oddly, though, a lot of people don't seem to be bothered by this sort of thing. I don't know why." Doing something like laundry is an asynchronous task. Most of the time it is a set-and-forget task with no place on critical path of your daily routine....again, most of the time. Consequently, if the clothes washing cycle take 10 or 20% longer, unless you're standing there waiting for the cycle to finish, then you won't even notice the difference. Unless your clothes are wearing out significantly faster, to the point where you are replacing them faster than you otherwise would stop wearing them anyways due to style ageing, or body size changes, then you're not going to notice. And even then, chances are you're going to suspect premature fatigue to be caused by the quality of the manufacturing before you consider the root cause is your washing machine. Reply 3. 2024-12-30 18:34 [05d14988] Mr why try says: How do you think we got from damp caves to your cheap ugly T-shirt, your trans fat pizza, your good enough IKEA trash ? People working damned hard - that's how. Yesterday's connoisseur create today's standard. ..and your answer is to ask "why try harder" Here's the future you ordered... https://m.imdb.com/title/ tt0387808/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk Reply 1. 2024-12-30 19:50 [b7a57850] @edent says: Ah! The most pro-eugenics film. Classy Reply 4. 2024-12-31 13:29 [bb847ef0] [mastodon] Giles Turnbull said on mastodon.me.uk: @Edent this is true of words too, and I believe that's one reason why LLMs have caught on as tools for writing and editing. To my professional eye, the results are awful, devoid of heart and full of cliches. But most people don't care. Or even notice. Reply | Reply to original comment on mastodon.me.uk 5. 2025-01-02 07:51 [] [news] news.ycombinator.com said on news.ycombinator.com: Most people don't care about quality | Hacker News Reply | Reply to original comment on news.ycombinator.com 6. 2025-01-02 11:50 [b0d46920] Mohit says: A lot of folks won't care about photographer-grade quality, but there's a quality threshold. The moment that threshold is crossed, the thing instantly falls off in usage for an individual (go poorer on quality, and the threshold is crossed for a significant population together). The problem is that a culture shipping product can either care for quality, or not. I don't think there's an in-between. By the time you realise you need quality, the people who cared for quality left a long time ago and there's little to salvage. Isn't Boeing a great (and literal) example of this? Reply 7. 2025-01-02 15:59 [1fb34730] [srios] Steve says: Interesting read! Maybe this will help me not procrastinate on pushing out projects cause of nitpicking little details. Reply 8. 2025-01-03 06:36 [a38aacb3] Jack says: Actually, people care a lot about quality. All of the examples given (ABBA, friends, etc) are classics. They are remembered when others are forgotten. This alone is a pretty good definition of "good quality". Conneuseurs or hobbyists by definition go beyond mainstream level. But before becoming an enthusiast, they first appreciate mainstream quality. Since they want more, they look for the next level of detail to be good. After all, it's not a hobby if you do the same thing over and over. (Some turn into snobs and forget what they initially appreciated. That's human psychology and has nothing to do with products themselves.) Overall, any enthusiastic endeavour brings diminishing returns. Once crossed a quality threshold, most satisfaction is obtained. Anything better brings only marginal levels of happiness solely from the product. So, the article contains very nice observations but the main conclusion is wrong. Satisfaction vs quality curve is logarithmic and once a certain level of quality is achieved most satisfaction is obtained for general public. Hobbyist and enthusiast go further but get less satisfaction. I think they do it because it's a hobby now and that brings a different type of satisfaction (of being a hobby) that is weakly correlated to quality deltas. Once a hobby, even minor quality improvements matter within the context of the hobby (maybe joy of discovery or going farther). But that aspect doesn't matter for general public. This observation is also nicely there in the article. This is my 2 cents on the topic. Very nice article! Reply 9. [svg] More comments on Mastodon. What are your reckons? Cancel reply All comments are moderated and may not be published immediately. Your email address will not be published. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Comment: [ ] [ ] Allowed HTML:

 
Your Name (required): [ ] Your Email (required): [ ] Your Website (optional): [ ] [Post Comment] To respond on your own website, write a post which contains a link to this post - then enter the URl of your page here. Learn more about WebMentions. [ ] [Ping me!] Search Search for: [ ] [Search] [?] Explore The Archives * 2024 + January 31 posts February 29 posts March 31 posts April 30 posts May 31 posts June 30 posts July 19 posts August 18 posts September 18 posts October 29 posts November 31 posts December 30 posts * 2023 + January 31 posts February 28 posts March 31 posts April 30 posts May 31 posts June 30 posts July 31 posts August 31 posts September 30 posts October 31 posts November 30 posts December 31 posts * 2022 + January 30 posts February 23 posts March 15 posts April 19 posts May 19 posts June 19 posts July 19 posts August 18 posts September 12 posts October 8 posts November 30 posts December 31 posts * 2021 + January 31 posts February 28 posts March 31 posts April 30 posts May 31 posts June 30 posts July 31 posts August 31 posts September 30 posts October 31 posts November 30 posts December 31 posts * 2020 + January 31 posts February 29 posts March 31 posts April 30 posts May 31 posts June 30 posts July 31 posts August 31 posts September 30 posts October 31 posts November 30 posts December 31 posts * 2019 + January 31 posts February 12 posts March 17 posts April 12 posts May 12 posts June 10 posts July 7 posts August 5 posts September 6 posts October 14 posts November 30 posts December 17 posts * 2018 + January 8 posts February 4 posts March 6 posts April 14 posts May 5 posts June 6 posts July 6 posts August 13 posts September 14 posts October 8 posts November 30 posts December 4 posts * 2017 + January 12 posts February 9 posts March 8 posts April 4 posts May 10 posts June 5 posts July 5 posts August 6 posts September 3 posts October 4 posts November 30 posts December * 2016 + January 10 posts February 10 posts March 11 posts April 9 posts May 8 posts June 9 posts July 6 posts August 9 posts September 4 posts October 2 posts November 30 posts December 14 posts * 2015 + January 8 posts February 11 posts March 10 posts April 4 posts May 9 posts June 3 posts July 7 posts August 9 posts September 10 posts October 2 posts November 30 posts December 4 posts * 2014 + January 13 posts February 13 posts March 15 posts April 14 posts May 8 posts June 7 posts July 9 posts August 5 posts September 5 posts October 1 post November 30 posts December 20 posts * 2013 + January 25 posts February 17 posts March 15 posts April 18 posts May 11 posts June 14 posts July 6 posts August 14 posts September 6 posts October 4 posts November 30 posts December 15 posts * 2012 + January 14 posts February 8 posts March 13 posts April 15 posts May 10 posts June 16 posts July 8 posts August 8 posts September 6 posts October 6 posts November 30 posts December 30 posts * 2011 + January 13 posts February 11 posts March 12 posts April 12 posts May 8 posts June 8 posts July 6 posts August 5 posts September 11 posts October 7 posts November 30 posts December 17 posts * 2010 + January 6 posts February 15 posts March 12 posts April 13 posts May 4 posts June 3 posts July 15 posts August 8 posts September 11 posts October 10 posts November 30 posts December 9 posts * 2009 + January 1 post February 5 posts March 3 posts April 7 posts May 12 posts June 8 posts July 10 posts August 10 posts September 12 posts October 22 posts November 31 posts December 15 posts * 2008 + January 2 posts February March 2 posts April 3 posts May 2 posts June July 1 post August 3 posts September 1 post October 3 posts November 2 posts December 1 post * 2007 + January February March April May June July August September October November 4 posts December 5 posts * 2006 + January February March April 1 post May June July August September October November 1 post December * 2005 + January February March 1 post April May June July August September 1 post October November December * 2004 + January February March April May 5 posts June 3 posts July 1 post August September October November December * 2003 + January February March 2 posts April May June July August September October November December * 2002 + January February 1 post March April 3 posts May June July August September October November December * 2001 + January February March April May June July 1 post August September October 1 post November December * 2000 + January February March 1 post April May June July August September October 1 post November 1 post December * 1999 + January February March April May June July August September 1 post October November December 1 post * 1998 + January February March April May 1 post June July August September October November December * 1997 + January 1 post February March April May June July August September October November December * 1995 + January February March 1 post April May 1 post June July August September October November December * 1993 + January February March April May June 1 post July August September October November December * 1987 + January February March April May June July August September October November December 1 post Subscribe by Email [ ] [ ] [Subscribe] * (c) Terence Eden * Contact Me * Subscribe * Citations * Support My Blog * Library * On This Day * Trending Posts * About Me ISSN 2753-1570 MMXXV *