https://arstechnica.com/health/2024/12/journal-that-published-faulty-black-plastic-study-removed-from-science-index/ Skip to content Ars Technica home Sections Forum Subscribe * AI * Biz & IT * Cars * Culture * Gaming * Health * Policy * Science * Security * Space * Tech * Feature * Reviews * Store * AI * Biz & IT * Cars * Culture * Gaming * Health * Policy * Science * Security * Space * Tech Forum Subscribe Story text Size [Standard] Width * [Standard] Links [Standard] * Subscribers only Learn more Pin to story Theme * HyperLight * Day & Night * Dark * System Search dialog... Sign In Sign in dialog... Sign in Retraction Watch Journal that published faulty black plastic study removed from science index Chemosphere cut from Web of Science, which calculates impact factors. Beth Mole - Dec 19, 2024 12:36 pm | 93 [GettyImages-2186195890-640x427] [GettyImages-2186195890-1152x648] Black non stick kitchen utensils Credit: Getty | Kinga Krzeminska Black non stick kitchen utensils Credit: Getty | Kinga Krzeminska Text settings Story text Size [Standard] Width * [Standard] Links [Standard] * Subscribers only Learn more Minimize to nav The publisher of a high-profile, now-corrected study on black plastics has been removed from a critical index of academic journals after failing to meet quality criteria, according to a report by Retraction Watch. On December 16, Clarivate--a scholarly publication analytics company--removed the journal Chemosphere from its platform, the Web of Science, which is a key index for academic journals. The indexing platform tracks citations and calculates journal "impact factors," a proxy for relevance in its field. It's a critical metric not only for the journals but for the academic authors of the journal's articles, who use the score in their pursuit of promotions and research funding. To be included in the Web of Science, Clarivate requires journals to follow editorial quality criteria. In an email to Ars Technica, Clarivate confirmed that Chemosphere was removed for "not meeting one or more of the quality criteria." According to Retraction Watch, Chemosphere has retracted eight articles this month and published 60 expressions of concern since April. In a December 12 news release, Chemosphere acknowledged the quality concerns and laid out steps it will take to improve its editorial process. Those include improvements to article vetting and peer review, along with assurances that articles will be retracted if there's evidence of policy breaches. "We believe that these measures will help us regain the standard of research integrity that has always been so important to us," the news release stated. Questioned conclusions The removal from the Web of Science on December 16 came just a day after a correction was issued on the black plastic study. That study claimed to find a "high exposure potential" of toxic flame retardants in plastic household items, particularly kitchen utensils, that are made from recycled electronics. The findings sparked a firestorm of media coverage imploring people to immediately throw away any black plastic utensils in their kitchens. However, the authors made a math error in their analysis that put their estimate of exposure to toxins from kitchen utensils off by an order of magnitude. Corrected, the article notes that the exposure potential from kitchen utensils is actually less than a tenth of the limit considered safe by the Environmental Protection Agency. Further, the study found flame retardant contamination in less than 10 percent of the 203 household products it examined--and only about 8 percent of 109 kitchen utensils. Despite this, the correction notice on the article states that the error "does not affect the overall conclusion of the paper." When Ars Technica reported on the correction earlier this week, we reached out to the lead author of the study to ask why the error didn't change the paper's conclusions. Since publication, the author--Megan Liu of the environmental health advocacy group Toxic-Free Future--got back to us. She didn't respond directly to our question, but she pointed to an updated statement on Toxic-Free Future's site about the correction. The statement says that, regardless of the math error, the study still found unnecessary flame retardants in some products and that the compounds can "significantly contaminate" those products. 12/20/2024 8:50am: This post has been updated to include additional information from Clarivate. Photo of Beth Mole Beth Mole Senior Health Reporter Beth Mole Senior Health Reporter Beth is Ars Technica's Senior Health Reporter. Beth has a Ph.D. in microbiology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and attended the Science Communication program at the University of California, Santa Cruz. She specializes in covering infectious diseases, public health, and microbes. 93 Comments Comments Forum view Loading Loading comments... Prev story Next story Most Read 1. Listing image for first story in Most Read: Human versus autonomous car race ends before it begins 1. Human versus autonomous car race ends before it begins 2. 2. Ars Technica's top 20 video games of 2024 3. 3. Film Technica: Our favorite movies of 2024 4. 4. $2,100 mechanical keyboard has 800 holes, NYC skyscraper looks 5. 5. How might NASA change under Trump? Here's what is being discussed Customize Ars Technica has been separating the signal from the noise for over 25 years. With our unique combination of technical savvy and wide-ranging interest in the technological arts and sciences, Ars is the trusted source in a sea of information. After all, you don't need to know everything, only what's important. More from Ars * About Us * Staff Directory * Newsletters * Ars Videos * General FAQ * RSS Feeds Contact * Contact us * Advertise with us * Reprints Do Not Sell My Personal Information (c) 2024 Conde Nast. All rights reserved. Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement and Ars Technica Addendum and Your California Privacy Rights. Ars Technica may earn compensation on sales from links on this site. Read our affiliate link policy. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Conde Nast. Ad Choices