https://news.mit.edu/2024/mit-study-explains-laws-incomprehensible-writing-style-0819 Skip to content | Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT Top Menu| * Education * Research * Innovation * Admissions + Aid * Campus Life * News * Alumni * About MIT * More | Search MIT Search websites, locations, and people [ ] See More Results Suggestions or feedback? MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology Subscribe to MIT News newsletter Browse Enter keywords to search for news articles: [ ] Submit Browse By Topics View All - Explore: * Machine learning * Sustainability * Startups * Black holes * Classes and programs Departments View All - Explore: * Aeronautics and Astronautics * Brain and Cognitive Sciences * Architecture * Political Science * Mechanical Engineering Centers, Labs, & Programs View All - Explore: * Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) * Picower Institute for Learning and Memory * Media Lab * Lincoln Laboratory Schools * School of Architecture + Planning * School of Engineering * School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences * Sloan School of Management * School of Science * MIT Schwarzman College of Computing View all news coverage of MIT in the media - Listen to audio content from MIT News - Subscribe to MIT newsletter - Close Breadcrumb 1. MIT News 2. MIT study explains why laws are written in an incomprehensible style MIT study explains why laws are written in an incomprehensible style The convoluted "legalese" used in legal documents conveys a special sense of authority, and even non-lawyers have learned to wield it. Anne Trafton | MIT News Publication Date: August 19, 2024 Press Inquiries Press Contact: MIT Media Relations Email: expertrequests@mit.edu Phone: 617-253-2700 Close Stack of legal papers and gavel Caption: MIT cognitive scientists believe the convoluted language of legalese acts to convey a sense of authority. Credits: Credit: iStock Previous image Next image Legal documents are notoriously difficult to understand, even for lawyers. This raises the question: Why are these documents written in a style that makes them so impenetrable? MIT cognitive scientists believe they have uncovered the answer to that question. Just as "magic spells" use special rhymes and archaic terms to signal their power, the convoluted language of legalese acts to convey a sense of authority, they conclude. In a study appearing this week in the journal of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers found that even non-lawyers use this type of language when asked to write laws. "People seem to understand that there's an implicit rule that this is how laws should sound, and they write them that way," says Edward Gibson, an MIT professor of brain and cognitive sciences and the senior author of the study. Eric Martinez PhD '24 is the lead author of the study. Francis Mollica, a lecturer at the University of Melbourne, is also an author of the paper. Casting a legal spell Gibson's research group has been studying the unique characteristics of legalese since 2020, when Martinez came to MIT after earning a law degree from Harvard Law School. In a 2022 study, Gibson, Martinez, and Mollica analyzed legal contracts totaling about 3.5 million words, comparing them with other types of writing, including movie scripts, newspaper articles, and academic papers. That analysis revealed that legal documents frequently have long definitions inserted in the middle of sentences -- a feature known as "center-embedding." Linguists have previously found that this kind of structure can make text much more difficult to understand. "Legalese somehow has developed this tendency to put structures inside other structures, in a way which is not typical of human languages," Gibson says. In a follow-up study published in 2023, the researchers found that legalese also makes documents more difficult for lawyers to understand. Lawyers tended to prefer plain English versions of documents, and they rated those versions to be just as enforceable as traditional legal documents. "Lawyers also find legalese to be unwieldy and complicated," Gibson says. "Lawyers don't like it, laypeople don't like it, so the point of this current paper was to try and figure out why they write documents this way." The researchers had a couple of hypotheses for why legalese is so prevalent. One was the "copy and edit hypothesis," which suggests that legal documents begin with a simple premise, and then additional information and definitions are inserted into already existing sentences, creating complex center-embedded clauses. "We thought it was plausible that what happens is you start with an initial draft that's simple, and then later you think of all these other conditions that you want to include. And the idea is that once you've started, it's much easier to center-embed that into the existing provision," says Martinez, who is now a fellow and instructor at the University of Chicago Law School. However, the findings ended up pointing toward a different hypothesis, the so-called "magic spell hypothesis." Just as magic spells are written with a distinctive style that sets them apart from everyday language, the convoluted style of legal language appears to signal a special kind of authority, the researchers say. "In English culture, if you want to write something that's a magic spell, people know that the way to do that is you put a lot of old-fashioned rhymes in there. We think maybe center-embedding is signaling legalese in the same way," Gibson says. In this study, the researchers asked about 200 non-lawyers (native speakers of English living in the United States, who were recruited through a crowdsourcing site called Prolific), to write two types of texts. In the first task, people were told to write laws prohibiting crimes such as drunk driving, burglary, arson, and drug trafficking. In the second task, they were asked to write stories about those crimes. To test the copy and edit hypothesis, half of the participants were asked to add additional information after they wrote their initial law or story. The researchers found that all of the subjects wrote laws with center-embedded clauses, regardless of whether they wrote the law all at once or were told to write a draft and then add to it later. And, when they wrote stories related to those laws, they wrote in much plainer English, regardless of whether they had to add information later. "When writing laws, they did a lot of center-embedding regardless of whether or not they had to edit it or write it from scratch. And in that narrative text, they did not use center-embedding in either case," Martinez says. In another set of experiments, about 80 participants were asked to write laws, as well as descriptions that would explain those laws to visitors from another country. In these experiments, participants again used center-embedding for their laws, but not for the descriptions of those laws. The origins of legalese Gibson's lab is now investigating the origins of center-embedding in legal documents. Early American laws were based on British law, so the researchers plan to analyze British laws to see if they feature the same kind of grammatical construction. And going back much farther, they plan to analyze whether center-embedding is found in the Hammurabi Code, the earliest known set of laws, which dates to around 1750 BC. "There may be just a stylistic way of writing from back then, and if it was seen as successful, people would use that style in other languages," Gibson says. "I would guess that it's an accidental property of how the laws were written the first time, but we don't know that yet." The researchers hope that their work, which has identified specific aspects of legal language that make it more difficult to understand, will motivate lawmakers to try to make laws more comprehensible. Efforts to write legal documents in plainer language date to at least the 1970s, when President Richard Nixon declared that federal regulations should be written in "layman's terms." However, legal language has changed very little since that time. "We have learned only very recently what it is that makes legal language so complicated, and therefore I am optimistic about being able to change it," Gibson says. Share this news article on: * X * Facebook * LinkedIn * Reddit * Print Paper Paper: "Even laypeople use legalese" Check for open access version(s) of the research mentioned in this article. Press Mentions Los Angeles Times A study by researchers at MIT and elsewhere has found that both lawyers and non-lawyers use legalese when asked to write about laws, reports June Casagrande for The Los Angeles Times. The "researchers tested the hypothesis by asking 200 participants to write laws prohibiting crimes like drunk driving and burglary," explains Casagrande. "Then they asked them to write stories about those crimes. The laws they wrote contained unnecessarily long, labyrinthine sentences with lots of parenthetical explanations crammed in. The stories, however, were written simply, without the parenthetical information stuffing." Full story via Los Angeles Times - Fast Company Researchers at MIT have uncovered a possible reason why legal documents can be so difficult to read, finding that "convoluted legalese often acts as a way to convey authority," reports Joe Berkowitz for Fast Company. The researchers "tested whether nonlawyers would end up using legalese if asked to write legal documents," explains Berkowitz. "In the end, all subjects wrote their laws with complex, center-embedded clauses." Full story via Fast Company - Futurism Researchers at MIT have found that the use of legalese in writing "to assert authority over those less versed in such language," reports Noor Al-Sibai for Futurism. "By studying this cryptic take on the English language, the researchers are hoping to make legal documents much easier to read in the future," explains Al-Sibai. Full story via Futurism - Previous item Next item Related Links * Gibson Lab * Eric Martinez * Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences * School of Science Related Topics * Research * Language * Law * Writing * Communications * Literature, languages and writing * Brain and cognitive sciences * School of Science Related Articles Two multi-colored talk bubbles. The right bubble fills more of the screen than the left. How "blue" and "green" appeared in a language that didn't have words for them A magnifying glass on top of a law document; it warps the text. A large wavey "?" icon is in the magnifying glass. Even lawyers don't like legalese legal document with question mark graphic Objection: No one can understand what you're saying Previous item Next item More MIT News Photo of Katie Spivakovsky sitting at a lab bench, holding a pen and surrounded by lab equipment. When MIT's interdisciplinary NEET program is a perfect fit Junior Katie Spivakovsky describes her path through New Engineering Education Transformation to biomedical research and beyond. Read full story - Deborah Liverman stands in front of a glass building 3 Questions: Tracking MIT graduates' career trajectories Deborah Liverman, executive director of MIT Career Advising and Professional Development, offers a window into undergraduate and graduate students' post-graduation paths. Read full story - Front view of Commonwealth Fusion Systems facility MIT spinout Commonwealth Fusion Systems unveils plans for the world's first fusion power plant The company has announced that it will build the first grid-scale fusion power plant in Chesterfield County, Virginia. Read full story - Three people stand in Killian Court with Great Dome in background. MIT researchers introduce Boltz-1, a fully open-source model for predicting biomolecular structures With models like AlphaFold3 limited to academic research, the team built an equivalent alternative, to encourage innovation more broadly. Read full story - Green-and-pink aurora in the sky with a tree silhouetted in the foreground Aurora mapping across North America Haystack Observatory researchers and citizen scientists team up to map the aurora. Read full story - Two out-of-focus scientists in a lab. One holds up a small potted plant; the other, two small glass vials containing powder in different shades of red A new method to detect dehydration in plants Sensors developed by SMART researchers are capable of detecting pH changes in plant xylem enable farmers to detect drought stress up to 48 hours before visible physical symptoms manifest. Read full story - * More news on MIT News homepage - More about MIT News at Massachusetts Institute of Technology This website is managed by the MIT News Office, part of the Institute Office of Communications. News by Schools/College: * School of Architecture and Planning * School of Engineering * School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences * MIT Sloan School of Management * School of Science * MIT Schwarzman College of Computing Resources: * About the MIT News Office * MIT News Press Center * Terms of Use * Press Inquiries * Filming Guidelines * RSS Feeds Tools: * Subscribe to MIT Daily/Weekly * Subscribe to press releases * Submit campus news * Guidelines for campus news contributors * Guidelines on generative AI Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT Top Level Links: * Education * Research * Innovation * Admissions + Aid * Campus Life * News * Alumni * About MIT * Join us in building a better world. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, USA Recommended Links: * Visit * Map (opens in new window) * Events (opens in new window) * People (opens in new window) * Careers (opens in new window) * Contact * Privacy * Accessibility * + Social Media Hub + MIT on X + MIT on Facebook + MIT on YouTube + MIT on Instagram