https://www.lieffcabraser.com/antitrust/academic-journals/ Skip to content Lieff Cabraser Logo Lieff Cabraser Logo Search for: [ ] [] * Practice Areas + Antitrust + Civil Rights & Social Justice + Consumer Protection + Defective Products + Employment Law + Environmental Law + Fertility, IVF, and Embryo/Egg Loss Injuries + Native American Cases + Personal Injury/Mass Tort + Privacy & Cybersecurity + Securities & Financial Fraud + Survivors' Rights + Whistleblower/False Claims Act * Contact * Attorneys * Cases * Our Firm + About Us + Awards + Class Action FAQ + Commitment to Diversity + Community Involvement + Firm Brochures & Resume + Employment at Lieff Cabraser + Offices + Robert L. Lieff, Founder & Former Partner * News * Lieff Cabraser Europe * Search for: [ ] [] Loading... * Antitrust * Antitrust Academic Journal Publishers Antitrust LitigationLieffCabraser 2024-09-14T16:39:40+00:00 Academic Journal Publishers Antitrust Litigation On September 12, 2024, Lieff Cabraser and co-counsel at Justice Catalyst Law filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against six commercial publishers of academic journals, including Elsevier B.V., John Wiley & Sons, Wolters Kluwer NV, and the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (STM), on behalf of a putative class of scientists and scholars who allege that these six world's-largest for-profit publishers of peer-reviewed scholarly journals conspired to unlawfully appropriate billions of dollars that would otherwise have funded scientific research. As detailed in the complaint, the defendants' alleged scheme has three main components. First, an agreement to fix the price of peer review services at zero that includes an agreement to coerce scholars into providing their labor for nothing by expressly linking their unpaid labor with their ability to get their manuscripts published in the defendants' preeminent journals. Second, the publisher defendants agreed not to compete with each other for manuscripts by requiring scholars to submit their manuscripts to only one journal at a time, which substantially reduces competition by removing incentives to review manuscripts promptly and publish meritorious research quickly. Third, the publisher defendants agreed to prohibit scholars from freely sharing the scientific advancements described in submitted manuscripts while those manuscripts are under peer review, a process that often takes over a year. As the complaint notes, "From the moment scholars submit manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants behave as though the scientific advancements set forth in the manuscripts are their property, to be shared only if the Publisher Defendant grants permission. Moreover, when the Publisher Defendants select manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants will often require scholars to sign away all intellectual property rights, in exchange for nothing. The manuscripts then become the actual property of the Publisher Defendants, and the Publisher Defendants charge the maximum the market will bear for access to that scientific knowledge." As the complaint notes, the three major elements of defendants' scheme are each individually per se unlawful under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. NewScientist described aspects of the Scheme as "indefensible," and the "most profitable business in the world," explaining that the "reason it is so lucrative is because most of the costs of its content is picked up by taxpayers. Publicly funded researchers do the work, write it up and judge its merits. And yet the resulting intellectual property ends up in the hands of the publishers. To rub salt into the wound they then sell it via exorbitant subscriptions and paywalls, often paid for by taxpayers too." Deutsche Bank aptly describes the Scheme as a "bizarre" "triple pay system" whereby "the state funds most of the research, pays the salaries of most of those checking the quality of the research, and then buys most of the published product." As another observer explained, the Publishing Defendants' Scheme "is as if the New Yorker or the Economist demanded that journalists write and edit each other's work for free, and asked the government to foot the bill." In addition, the scheme has resulted in a variety of perverse market failures that impair the ability of scientists to do their jobs and slow dramatically the pace of scientific progress. The scheme has resulted in a worsening peer-review crisis, whereby it has become increasingly difficult to coerce busy scholars into providing their valuable labor for nothing. The Scheme has held back science, delaying advances across all fields of research. It will take longer to find effective treatments for cancer. It will take longer to make advancements in material science that will support quantum computing. It will take longer to find technological tools to combat climate change. The lawsuit, filed in federal district court in New York, seeks treble damages and injunctive and other relief, including an order to enjoin the defendants from continuing to violate the law by requiring them to dissolve the challenged unlawful agreements. Contact us If you are a member of the academic community and want more information about the lawsuit, or seek to join the plaintiffs, please use the form on this page to send us a confidential message today. There is no charge or obligation for our review of your information, which will help us hold the publisher defendants accountable for their pervasive illegal actions. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [State] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [Send] x Related News * September 13, 2024 Academic publishers face class action over 'peer review' pay, other restrictions Reuters * September 13, 2024 'Illegal Conspiracy'?: EDNY Antitrust Class Action Challenges Publishers' 'Unpaid Peer Review Rule' Law.com * September 12, 2024 Elsevier, Others Publishers Hit With Peer Review Services Lawsuit Bloomberg Law [banner-NLJ-290x120-1] [banner-Benchmark-290x120-1] [banner-NYLJ-290x120-2] [banner-Super-290x120-1] [banner-Lawdragon-290x120-1] [banner-Recorder-290x120-1] AAJ Founders Circle 2024 Close product quick viewx Title Lieff Cabraser's lawyers represent clients in individual, group, and class action lawsuits in federal courts nationwide. We have affiliations in specific cases with attorneys licensed to practice in almost every state court in the U.S. We also are affiliated with Rochon Genova, a law firm in Canada, and serve as co-counsel in lawsuits filed in Canada. We do not engage in client data-sharing. This website may be considered an advertisement in certain jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. You should be aware that the Statute of Limitations (the deadline imposed by law within which you may bring a lawsuit) may severely limit the time remaining for you to file any potential claim. Please read our disclaimer. privacy | careers | employee login German Legal Notices/GDPR Contact Us 275 Battery Street, Suite 2900 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: +1.415.956.1000 Fax: +1.415.956.1008 Email: mail@lchb.com Web: www.lieffcabraser.com 250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10013 Phone: +1.212.355.9500 Fax: +1.212.355.9592 Email: mail@lchb.com Web: www.lieffcabraser.com 222 2nd Ave. South, Suite 1640 Nashville, Tennessee 37201 Phone: +1.615.313.9000 Fax: +1.615.313.9965 Email: mail@lchb.com Web: www.lieffcabraser.com Frauenplatz 2, 80331 Munich Germany Phone: +49.89.2555.2361 Fax: +49.89.2555.2359 Email: mail@lchb.com Web: munich.lieffcabraser.com (c) Copyright | Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP | All Rights Reserved FacebookTwitterInstagramPinterest Page load link You can opt-out of our analytic cookies. We use third party cookies on our website. We use some site-local cookies that relate to core site functioning and for the functioning of this cookie advisory popup. Lieff Cabraser does not share or sell user information. GDPR info Opt out Understood Manage consent Close Privacy Overview We currently three cookies that relate solely to the functioning of the cookie compliance policy. Necessary [*] Necessary Always Enabled Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information. Save & Accept