https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3589334.3645323 skip to main content * ACM Digital Library home * ACM Association for Computing Machinery corporate logo * Advanced Search * Browse * About * + Sign in + Register * * Advanced Search * Journals * Magazines * Proceedings * Books * SIGs * Conferences * People * * More * Search ACM Digital Library[ ] SearchSearch Advanced Search 10.1145/3589334.3645323acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstract Publication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedings conference-collections thewebconf * Conference * Proceedings * Upcoming Events * Authors * Affiliations * Award Winners * More * Home * Conferences * THEWEBCONF * Proceedings * WWW '24 * QUIC is not Quick Enough over Fast Internet research-article [icon-small] Share on * * * * * * QUIC is not Quick Enough over Fast Internet Authors: [contrib-99]Xumiao Zhang, [default-pr]Shuowei Jin, [default-pr]Yi He, [default-pr]Ahmad Hassan, + 3, [default-pr]Z. Morley Mao, [default-pr]Feng Qian, [default-pr]Zhi-Li Zhang (Less) Authors Info & Claims WWW '24: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 Pages 2713 - 2722 https://doi.org/10.1145/3589334.3645323 Published: 13 May 2024 Publication History 0citation184Downloads Metrics Total Citations0 Total Downloads184 Last 12 Months184 Last 6 weeks48 Get Citation Alerts New Citation Alert added! This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to: You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited. To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below. Manage my Alerts New Citation Alert! Please log in to your account Get Access * Contents WWW '24: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 QUIC is not Quick Enough over Fast Internet Pages 2713 - 2722 PREVIOUS ARTICLE ARES: Predictable Traffic Engineering under Controller Failures in SD-WANs Previous NEXT ARTICLE A Multifaceted Look at Starlink Performance Next + Abstract + Supplemental Material + References ACM Digital Library * + Information & Contributors + Bibliometrics & Citations + Get Access + References + Media + Tables + Share Abstract QUIC is expected to be a game-changer in improving web application performance. In this paper, we conduct a systematic examination of QUIC's performance over high-speed networks. We find that over fast Internet, the UDP+QUIC+HTTP/3 stack suffers a data rate reduction of up to 45.2% compared to the TCP+TLS+HTTP/2 counterpart. Moreover, the performance gap between QUIC and HTTP/2 grows as the underlying bandwidth increases. We observe this issue on lightweight data transfer clients and major web browsers (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Opera), on different hosts (desktop, mobile), and over diverse networks (wired broadband, cellular). It affects not only file transfers, but also various applications such as video streaming (up to 9.8% video bitrate reduction) and web browsing. Through rigorous packet trace analysis and kernel- and user-space profiling, we identify the root cause to be high receiver-side processing overhead, in particular, excessive data packets and QUIC's user-space ACKs. We make concrete recommendations for mitigating the observed performance issues. Supplemental Material MP4 File presentation video * Download * 75.36 MB MP4 File Supplemental video * Download * 36.53 MB References [1] 1998. cURL - command line tool and library for transferring data with URLs. https://curl.se/. Google Scholar [2] 2001. Linux Traffic Control (tc). https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/ man8/tc.8.html. Google Scholar [3] 2012. HTTP Archive (HAR) format. https://w3c.github.io/ web-performance/specs/HAR/Overview.html. Google Scholar [4] 2013. Chromium Blog: Experimenting with QUIC. https:// blog.chromium.org/2013/06/experimenting-with-quic.html. Google Scholar [5] 2015. Chromium Blog: A QUIC update on Google's experimental transport. https://blog.chromium.org/2015/04/ a-quic-update-on-googles-experimental.html. Google Scholar [6] 2018. UDP GSO. https://lwn.net/Articles/752956/. Google Scholar [7] 2020. Accelerating UDP packet transmission for QUIC. https:// blog.cloudflare.com/accelerating-udp-packet-transmission-for-quic/. Google Scholar [8] 2020. Chromium Blog: Chrome is deploying HTTP/3 and IETF QUIC. https: //blog.chromium.org/2020/10/ chrome-is-deploying-http3-and-ietf-quic.html. Google Scholar [9] 2020. How Facebook is bringing QUIC to billions. https:// engineering.fb.com/ 2020/10/21/networking-traffic/ how-facebook-is-bringing-quic-to-billions/. Google Scholar [10] 2020. QUIC vs TCP: Which is Better? https://www.fastly.com/blog/ measuringquic-vs-tcp-computational-efficiency. Google Scholar [11] 2020. What's the Best Bitrate for the Best Video Quality on YouTube? (1080p, 1440p, 4K). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fz479id_Ic. Google Scholar [12] 2021. Chrome HAR capturer. https://github.com/cyrus-and/ chrome-harcapturer. Google Scholar [13] 2021. HTTP/2 vs HTTP/3: A comparison. https://ably.com/topic/ http-2-vs-http-3. Google Scholar [14] 2021. HTTP/3 and QUIC: Past, Present, and Future. https:// www.akamai.com/blog/performance/ http3-and-quic-past-present-and-future. Google Scholar [15] 2021. Improve UDP performance in RHEL 8.5. https:// developers.redhat.com/ articles/2021/11/05/ improve-udp-performance-rhel-85. Google Scholar [16] 2021. Linux Perf. https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/perf.1.html. Google Scholar [17] 2021. Linux Temporary Filesystem (tmpfs). https://man7.org/linux/ man-pages/man5/tmpfs.5.html. Google Scholar [18] 2021. YouTube 4K bitrates enconding. https://support.google.com/ youtube/answer/1722171. Google Scholar [19] 2022. Catapult -Web Page Replay. https://chromium.googlesource.com/ catapult//HEAD/web_page_replay_go/. Google Scholar [20] 2022. Fiddler - Web Debugging Proxy and Troubleshooting Solutions. https://www.telerik.com/fiddler. Google Scholar [21] 2022. GitHub - litespeedtech/lsquic: LiteSpeed QUIC and HTTP/3 Library. https://github.com/litespeedtech/lsquic. Google Scholar [22] 2022. HTTP RFCs have evolved: A Cloudflare view of HTTP usage trends. https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-view-http3-usage/. Google Scholar [23] 2022. SiteSucker. https://ricks-apps.com/osx/sitesucker/index.html. Google Scholar [24] 2023. NGINX QUIC. https://quic.nginx.org/. Google Scholar [25] 2023. OpenLiteSpeed. https://openlitespeed.org/. Google Scholar [26] 2023. The Chromium Projects. https://www.chromium.org/Home/. Google Scholar [27] 2023. The Chromium Projects - Network Service. https:// chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src//HEAD/services/network/. Google Scholar [28] 2024. QUIC-not-Quick: Artifact Release. https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.10679638. Crossref Google Scholar [29] 2024. QUIC-not-Quick GitHub repository. https://github.com/Shawnxm/ QUICnot-Quick. Google Scholar [30] Mohsen Attaran. 2023. The impact of 5G on the evolution of intelligent automation and industry digitization. Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing 14, 5 (2023), 5977--5993. Crossref Google Scholar [31] Arkaprava Basu, Jayneel Gandhi, Jichuan Chang, Mark D Hill, and Michael M Swift. 2013. Efficient virtual memory for big memory servers. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News 41, 3 (2013), 237--248. Digital Library Google Scholar [32] Mike Belshe, Roberto Peon, and Martin Thomson. 2015. Hypertext transfer protocol version 2 (HTTP/2). RFC 7540, IETF (2015). Google Scholar [33] Mike Bishop. 2022. HTTP/3. RFC 9114, IETF (2022). Google Scholar [34] Enrico Bocchi, Luca De Cicco, and Dario Rossi. 2016. Measuring the quality of experience of web users. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 46, 4 (2016), 8--13. Digital Library Google Scholar [35] Michael Butkiewicz, Harsha V Madhyastha, and Vyas Sekar. 2011. Understanding website complexity: measurements, metrics, and implications. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference. 313--328. Digital Library Google Scholar [36] Gaetano Carlucci, Luca De Cicco, and Saverio Mascolo. 2015. HTTP over UDP: an Experimental Investigation of QUIC. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. 609--614. Digital Library Google Scholar [37] Willem de Bruijn and Eric Dumazet. 2018. Optimizing UDP for content delivery: GSO, pacing and zerocopy. In Linux Plumbers Conference. Google Scholar [38] Quentin De Coninck and Olivier Bonaventure. 2017. Multipath quic: Design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on emerging networking experiments and technologies. 160--166. Digital Library Google Scholar [39] Quentin De Coninck and Olivier Bonaventure. 2019. Multipathtester: Comparing mptcp and mpquic in mobile environments. In 2019 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA). IEEE, 221--226. Crossref Google Scholar [40] Quentin De Coninck, Francois Michel, Maxime Piraux, Florentin Rochet, Thomas Given-Wilson, Axel Legay, Olivier Pereira, and Olivier Bonaventure. 2019. Pluginizing quic. In Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication. 59--74. Digital Library Google Scholar [41] Sebastian Endres, Jorg Deutschmann, Kai-Steffen Hielscher, and Reinhard German. 2022. Performance of QUIC implementations over geostationary satellite links. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08228 (2022). Google Scholar [42] Mathis Engelbart and Jorg Ott. 2021. Congestion control for real-time media over QUIC. In Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Evolution, Performance and Interoperability of QUIC. 1--7. Digital Library Google Scholar [43] Godred Fairhurst, Tom Jones, Michael Tuxen, Irene Rungeler, and Timo Volker. 2020. Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery for Datagram Transports. RFC 8899, IETF (2020). Google Scholar [44] Roy Fielding, Mark Nottingham, and Julian Reschke. 2022. HTTP Semantics. RFC 9110, IETF (2022). Google Scholar [45] Anirudh Ganji and Muhammad Shahzad. 2021. Characterizing the Performance of QUIC on Android and Wear OS Devices. In 2021 International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN). IEEE, 1--11. Google Scholar [46] Habtegebreil Haile, Karl-Johan Grinnemo, Simone Ferlin, Per Hurtig, and Anna Brunstrom. 2022. Performance of QUIC congestion control algorithms in 5G networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on 5G and Beyond Network Measurements, Modeling, and Use Cases. 15--21. Digital Library Google Scholar [47] Fahad Hilal and Oliver Gasser. 2023. Yarrpbox: Detecting Middleboxes at Internet- Scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Networking 1, CoNEXT1 (2023), 1--23. Digital Library Google Scholar [48] Te-Yuan Huang, Ramesh Johari, Nick McKeown, Matthew Trunnell, and Mark Watson. 2014. A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: Evidence from a large video streaming service. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on SIGCOMM. 187--198. Digital Library Google Scholar [49] Swett Ian. 2020. As QUIC as TCP, Optimizing QUIC and HTTP/3 CPU Usage - EPIQ 2020. https://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2020/ workshop-epiq. html. Google Scholar [50] Janardhan Iyengar, Ian Swett, and Mirja Kuhlewind. 2023. QUIC Acknowledgement Frequency. IETF (2023). https://datatracker.ietf.org/ doc/draft-ietf-quicack- frequency/04/ Work in Progress. Google Scholar [51] Jana Iyengar and Martin Thomson. 2021. QUIC: A UDP-based multiplexed and secure transport. RFC 9000, IETF (2021). Digital Library Google Scholar [52] Benedikt Jaeger, Johannes Zirngibl, Marcel Kempf, Kevin Ploch, and Georg Carle. 2023. QUIC on the Highway: Evaluating Performance on High-Rate Links. In 2023 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking). 1--9. Google Scholar [53] Arash Molavi Kakhki, Samuel Jero, David Choffnes, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, and Alan Mislove. 2017. Taking a long look at QUIC: an approach for rigorous evaluation of rapidly evolving transport protocols. In proceedings of the 2017 internet measurement conference. 290--303. Digital Library Google Scholar [54] Mike Kosek, Hendrik Cech, Vaibhav Bajpai, and Jorg Ott. 2022. Exploring Proxying QUIC and HTTP/3 for Satellite Communication. In 2022 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking). IEEE, 1--9. Crossref Google Scholar [55] Mike Kosek, Luca Schumann, Robin Marx, Trinh Viet Doan, and Vaibhav Bajpai. 2022. DNS privacy with speed? evaluating DNS over QUIC and its impact on web performance. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference. 44--50. Digital Library Google Scholar [56] Adam Langley, Alistair Riddoch, Alyssa Wilk, Antonio Vicente, Charles Krasic, Dan Zhang, Fan Yang, Fedor Kouranov, Ian Swett, Janardhan Iyengar, et al. 2017. The quic transport protocol: Design and internet-scale deployment. In Proceedings of the conference of the ACM special interest group on data communication. 183--196. Digital Library Google Scholar [57] Robert Lychev, Samuel Jero, Alexandra Boldyreva, and Cristina Nita-Rotaru. 2015. How secure and quick is QUIC? Provable security and performance analyses. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE, 214--231. Digital Library Google Scholar [58] Hongzi Mao, Ravi Netravali, and Mohammad Alizadeh. 2017. Neural adaptive video streaming with pensieve. In Proceedings of the conference of the ACM special interest group on data communication. 197--210. Digital Library Google Scholar [59] Robin Marx, Joris Herbots, Wim Lamotte, and Peter Quax. 2020. Same standards, different decisions: A study of QUIC and HTTP/3 implementation diversity. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Evolution, Performance, and Interoperability of QUIC. 14--20. Digital Library Google Scholar [60] Peter Megyesi, Zsolt Kramer, and Sandor Molnar. 2016. How quick is QUIC?. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 1--6. Crossref Google Scholar [61] Ayush Mishra, Sherman Lim, and Ben Leong. 2022. Understanding speciation in QUIC congestion control. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference. 560--566. Digital Library Google Scholar [62] Arvind Narayanan, Eman Ramadan, Rishabh Mehta, Xinyue Hu, Qingxu Liu, Rostand AK Fezeu, Udhaya Kumar Dayalan, Saurabh Verma, Peiqi Ji, Tao Li, et al. 2020. Lumos5G: Mapping and predicting commercial mmWave 5G throughput. In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference. 176--193. Digital Library Google Scholar [63] Arvind Narayanan, Xumiao Zhang, Ruiyang Zhu, Ahmad Hassan, Shuowei Jin, Xiao Zhu, Xiaoxuan Zhang, Denis Rybkin, Zhengxuan Yang, Zhuoqing Morley Mao, et al. 2021. A variegated look at 5G in the wild: performance, power, andQoE implications. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Conference. 610--625. Digital Library Google Scholar [64] Louis Navarre, Olivier Pereira, and Olivier Bonaventure. 2023. MCQUIC: Multicast and unicast in a single transport protocol. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06633 (2023). Google Scholar [65] Marcin Nawrocki, Raphael Hiesgen, Thomas C Schmidt, and Matthias Wahlisch. 2021. Quicsand: quantifying quic reconnaissance scans and dos flooding events. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM internet measurement conference. 283--291. Digital Library Google Scholar [66] Marcin Nawrocki, Pouyan Fotouhi Tehrani, Raphael Hiesgen, Jonas Mucke, Thomas C Schmidt, and Matthias Wahlisch. 2022. On the interplay between TLS certificates and QUIC performance. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies. 204--213. Digital Library Google Scholar [67] Javad Nejati and Aruna Balasubramanian. 2016. An in-depth study of mobile browser performance. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. 1305--1315. Digital Library Google Scholar [68] Thomas William do Prado Paiva, Simone Ferlin, Anna Brunstrom, Ozgu Alay, and Bruno Yuji Lino Kimura. 2023. A First Look at Adaptive Video Streaming over Multipath QUIC with Shared Bottleneck Detection. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on ACM Multimedia Systems. 161--172. Digital Library Google Scholar [69] Mirko Palmer, Thorben Kruger, Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran, and Anja Feldmann. 2018. The quic fix for optimal video streaming. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Evolution, Performance, and Interoperability of QUIC. 43--49. Digital Library Google Scholar [70] Gustavo Pantuza, Marcos AM Vieira, and Luiz FM Vieira. 2021. eQUIC gateway: Maximizing QUIC throughput using a gateway service based on eBPF XDP. In 2021 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC). IEEE, 1--6. Crossref Google Scholar [71] Maxime Piraux, Quentin De Coninck, and Olivier Bonaventure. 2018. Observing the evolution of QUIC implementations. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Evolution, Performance, and Interoperability of QUIC. 8--14. Digital Library Google Scholar [72] Alexander Rabitsch, Per Hurtig, and Anna Brunstrom. 2018. A stream-aware multipath QUIC scheduler for heterogeneous paths. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Evolution, Performance, and Interoperability of QUIC. 29--35. Digital Library Google Scholar [73] Costin Raiciu, Mark Handley, and Damon Wischik. 2011. Coupled congestion control for multipath transport protocols. RFC 6356, IETF (2011). Google Scholar [74] Florentin Rochet, Emery Assogba, Maxime Piraux, Korian Edeline, Benoit Donnet, and Olivier Bonaventure. 2021. TCPLS: modern transport services with TCP and TLS. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies. 45--59. Digital Library Google Scholar [75] Jan Ruth, Ingmar Poese, Christoph Dietzel, and Oliver Hohlfeld. 2018. A First Look at QUIC in the Wild. In International Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement. Springer, 255--268. Crossref Google Scholar [76] Jan Ruth, Konrad Wolsing, Klaus Wehrle, and Oliver Hohlfeld. 2019. Perceiving QUIC: Do users notice or even care?. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments And Technologies. 144--150. Digital Library Google Scholar [77] Marten Seemann and Jana Iyengar. 2020. Automating quic interoperability testing. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Evolution, Performance, and Interoperability of QUIC. 8--13. Digital Library Google Scholar [78] Tanya Shreedhar, Rohit Panda, Sergey Podanev, and Vaibhav Bajpai. 2021. Evaluating QUIC Performance Over Web, Cloud Storage, and Video Workloads. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 19, 2 (2021), 1366--1381. Digital Library Google Scholar [79] Iraj Sodagar. 2011. The mpeg-dash standard for multimedia streaming over the internet. IEEE multimedia 18, 4 (2011), 62--67. Digital Library Google Scholar [80] Mukesh Soni and Brajendra Singh Rajput. 2021. Security and performance evaluations of QUIC protocol. In Data Science and Intelligent Applications. Springer, 457--462. Google Scholar [81] Lizhuang Tan, Wei Su, Yanwen Liu, Xiaochuan Gao, and Wei Zhang. 2021. DCQUIC: Flexible and Reliable Software-defined Data Center Transport. In IEEE INFOCOM 2021-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS). IEEE, 1--8. Google Scholar [82] JingWang, Yunfeng Gao, and Chenren Xu. 2019. A multipath QUIC scheduler for mobile HTTP/2. In Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Workshop on Networking 2019. 43--49. Google Scholar [83] Xiao Sophia Wang, Aruna Balasubramanian, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and David Wetherall. 2013. Demystifying Page Load Performance with {WProf}. In 10th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 13). 473--485. Google Scholar [84] Xiao Sophia Wang, Aruna Balasubramanian, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and David Wetherall. 2014. How speedy is {SPDY}?. In 11th usenix symposium on networked systems design and implementation (nsdi 14). 387--399. Google Scholar [85] Damon Wischik, Costin Raiciu, Adam Greenhalgh, and Mark Handley. 2011. Design, implementation and evaluation of congestion control for multipath {TCP}. In 8th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 11). Google Scholar [86] Konrad Wolsing, Jan Ruth, Klaus Wehrle, and Oliver Hohlfeld. 2019. A performance perspective on web optimized protocol stacks: TCP TLS HTTP/2 vs. QUIC. In Proceedings of the Applied Networking Research Workshop. 1--7. Digital Library Google Scholar [87] Shichang Xu, Subhabrata Sen, and Z Morley Mao. 2020. CSI: Inferring mobile ABR video adaptation behavior under HTTPS and QUIC. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth European Conference on Computer Systems. 1--16. Digital Library Google Scholar [88] Yihui Yan and Zhice Yang. 2021. When QUIC's Connection Migration Meets Middleboxes A case study on mobile Wi-Fi hotspot. In 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM). IEEE, 1--6. Digital Library Google Scholar [89] Xiangrui Yang, Lars Eggert, Jorg Ott, Steve Uhlig, Zhigang Sun, and Gianni Antichi. 2020. Making quic quicker with nic offload. In Proceedings of theWorkshop on the Evolution, Performance, and Interoperability of QUIC. 21--27. Digital Library Google Scholar [90] Shou-Cheng Yen, Ching-Ling Fan, and Cheng-Hsin Hsu. 2019. Streaming 360deg videos to head-mounted virtual reality using DASH over QUIC transport protocol. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Workshop on Packet Video. 7--12. Digital Library Google Scholar [91] Alexander Yu and Theophilus A Benson. 2021. Dissecting performance of production QUIC. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 1157--1168. Digital Library Google Scholar [92] Xumiao Zhang, Xiao Zhu, Yihua Ethan Guo, Feng Qian, and Z Morley Mao. 2019. Poster: characterizing performance and power for mmWave 5G on commodity smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Wireless of the Students, by the Students, and for the Students Workshop. 14--14. Digital Library Google Scholar [93] Zhilong Zheng, Yunfei Ma, Yanmei Liu, Furong Yang, Zhenyu Li, Yuanbo Zhang, Jiuhai Zhang, Wei Shi, Wentao Chen, Ding Li, et al. 2021. Xlink: Qoe-driven multi-path quic transport in large-scale video services. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Conference. 418--432. Digital Library Google Scholar [94] Johannes Zirngibl, Philippe Buschmann, Patrick Sattler, Benedikt Jaeger, Juliane Aulbach, and Georg Carle. 2021. It's over 9000: analyzing early QUIC deployments with the standardization on the horizon. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference. 261--275. Digital Library Google Scholar Index Terms 1. QUIC is not Quick Enough over Fast Internet 1. Networks 1. Network performance evaluation 1. Network measurement 2. Network performance analysis 2. Network protocols 1. Transport protocols Recommendations * Poster: QUIC is not Quick Enough over Fast Internet IMC '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference QUIC is a multiplexed transport-layer protocol over UDP and comes with enforced encryption. It is expected to be a game-changer in improving web application performance. Together with the network layer and layers below, UDP, QUIC, and HTTP/3 form a new ... Read More * ECN with QUIC: Challenges in the Wild IMC '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference TCP and QUIC can both leverage ECN to avoid congestion loss and its retransmission overhead. However, both protocols require support of their remote endpoints and it took two decades since the initial standardization of ECN for TCP to reach 80% ECN ... Read More * A QUIC Implementation for ns-3 WNS3 '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Workshop on ns-3 Quick UDP Internet Connections (QUIC) is a recently proposed transport protocol, currently being standardized by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It aims at overcoming some of the shortcomings of TCP, while maintaining the logic related to ... Read More Comments Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus. Information & Contributors Information Published In cover image ACM Conferences WWW '24: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 May 2024 4826 pages ISBN:9798400701719 DOI:10.1145/3589334 * General Chairs: * Author PictureTat-Seng Chua National University of Singapore , * Author PictureChong-Wah Ngo Singapore Management University , * Proceedings Chair: * Author PictureRoy Ka-Wei Lee Singapore University of Technology and Design , * Program Chairs: * Author PictureRavi Kumar Google , * Author PictureHady W. Lauw Singapore Management University Copyright (c) 2024 ACM. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]. Sponsors * SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web Publisher Association for Computing Machinery New York, NY, United States Publication History Published: 13 May 2024 Permissions Request permissions for this article. Request Permissions Check for updates Badges * [icon-large]Artifacts Available / v1.1 Author Tags 1. http 2. network measurement 3. quic 4. transport 5. web performance Qualifiers * Research-article Funding Sources * NSF (National Science Foundation) Conference WWW '24 Sponsor: * SIGWEB WWW '24: The ACM Web Conference 2024 May 13 - 17, 2024 Singapore, Singapore Acceptance Rates Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23% Contributors [loader-7e6] Other Metrics View Article Metrics Bibliometrics & Citations Bibliometrics Article Metrics * 0 Total Citations * 184 Total Downloads * Downloads (Last 12 months)184 * Downloads (Last 6 weeks)48 Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024 Other Metrics View Author Metrics Citations View Options Get Access Login options Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article. Sign in Full Access Get this Publication View options PDF View or Download as a PDF file. PDF eReader View online with eReader. eReader Media Figures Other Tables Share Share Share this Publication link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share on social media XLinkedInRedditFacebookemail Affiliations [contrib-99] Xumiao Zhang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-4074 View Profile [default-pr] Shuowei Jin University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5817-9029 View Profile [default-pr] Yi He University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3204-6252 View Profile [default-pr] Ahmad Hassan University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7886-7531 View Profile [default-pr] Z. Morley Mao University of Michigan & Google, Ann Arbor, MI, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9844-2055 View Profile [default-pr] Feng Qian University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8509-2650 View Profile [default-pr] Zhi-Li Zhang University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8584-2319 View Profile Download PDF Go to Go to Show all references Request permissionsExpand All Collapse Expand Table Authors Info & Affiliations View Table of Contents Export Citations Select Citation format[BibTeX ] * Please download or close your previous search result export first before starting a new bulk export. Preview is not available. By clicking download,a status dialog will open to start the export process. The process may takea few minutes but once it finishes a file will be downloadable from your browser. You may continue to browse the DL while the export process is in progress. Download + Download citation + Copy citation Footer Categories * Journals * Magazines * Books * Proceedings * SIGs * Conferences * Collections * People About * About ACM Digital Library * ACM Digital Library Board * Subscription Information * Author Guidelines * Using ACM Digital Library * All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library * ACM Computing Classification System * Accessibility Statement Join * Join ACM * Join SIGs * Subscribe to Publications * Institutions and Libraries Connect * Contact us via email * ACM on Facebook * ACM DL on X * ACM on Linkedin * Send Feedback * Submit a Bug Report The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Copyright (c) 2024 ACM, Inc. * Terms of Usage * Privacy Policy * Code of Ethics ACM Digital Library home ACM Association for Computing Machinery corporate logo Your Search Results Download Request We are preparing your search results for download ... We will inform you here when the file is ready. Download now! Your Search Results Download Request Your file of search results citations is now ready. Download now! Your Search Results Download Request Your search export query has expired. Please try again.