https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/08/federal-appeals-court-finds-geofence-warrants-are-categorically-unconstitutional Skip to main content * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast + Annual Reports * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter + Street Level Surveillance + apkeep * Donate + Donate to EFF + Giving Societies + Shop + Org. Membership + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Email updates on news, actions, and events in your area. Join EFF Lists * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks Electronic Frontier Foundation Donate [summersecu] [summersecu] Electronic Frontier Foundation * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast + Annual Reports * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter + Street Level Surveillance + apkeep * Donate + Donate to EFF + Giving Societies + Shop + Org. Membership + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] Federal Appeals Court Finds Geofence Warrants Are "Categorically" Unconstitutional DEEPLINKS BLOG By Andrew Crocker August 12, 2024 An animated image showing location pins dropping onto a street map from above, tracing several paths Federal Appeals Court Finds Geofence Warrants Are "Categorically" Unconstitutional Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link An animated image showing location pins dropping onto a street map from above, tracing several paths In a major decision on Friday, the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that geofence warrants are "categorically prohibited by the Fourth Amendment." Closely following arguments EFF has made in a number of cases, the court found that geofence warrants constitute the sort of "general, exploratory rummaging" that the drafters of the Fourth Amendment intended to outlaw. EFF applauds this decision because it is essential that every person feels like they can simply take their cell phone out into the world without the fear that they might end up a criminal suspect because their location data was swept up in open-ended digital dragnet. The new Fifth Circuit case, United States v. Smith, involved an armed robbery and assault of a US Postal Service worker at a post office in Mississippi in 2018. After several months of investigation, police had no identifiable suspects, so they obtained a geofence warrant covering a large geographic area around the post office for the hour surrounding the crime. Google responded to the warrant with information on several devices, ultimately leading police to the two defendants. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit reached several important holdings. First, it determined that under the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Carpenter v. United States, individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location data implicated by geofence warrants. As a result, the court broke from the Fourth Circuit's deeply flawed decision last month in United States v. Chatrie, noting that although geofence warrants can be more "limited temporally" than the data sought in Carpenter, geofence location data is still highly invasive because it can expose sensitive information about a person's associations and allow police to "follow" them into private spaces. Second, the court found that even though investigators seek warrants for geofence location data, these searches are inherently unconstitutional. As the court noted, geofence warrants require a provider, almost always Google, to search "the entirety" of its reserve of location data "while law enforcement officials have no idea who they are looking for, or whether the search will even turn up a result." Therefore, "the quintessential problem with these warrants is that they never include a specific user to be identified, only a temporal and geographic location where any given user may turn up post-search. That is constitutionally insufficient." Unsurprisingly, however, the court found that in 2018, police could have relied on such a warrant in "good faith," because geofence technology was novel, and police reached out to other agencies with more experience for guidance. This means that the evidence they obtained will not be suppressed in this case. Nevertheless, it is gratifying to see an appeals court recognize the fundamental invasions of privacy created by these warrants and uphold our constitutional tradition prohibiting general searches. Police around the country have increasingly relied on geofence warrants and other reverse warrants, and this opinion should act as a warning against narrow applications of Fourth Amendment precedent in these cases. Related Issues Street-Level Surveillance Locational Privacy Related Cases Carpenter v. United States Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Join EFF Lists Discover more. Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Related Updates 2 protestors in silhouette on retro starburst background Deeplinks Blog by Matthew Guariglia | August 1, 2024 Atlanta Police Must Stop High-Tech Spying on Political Movements The Atlanta Police Department has been snooping on social media to closely monitor the meetings, protests, canvassing-even book clubs and pizza parties-of the political movement to stop "Cop City," a police training center that would destroy part of an urban forest. Activists already believed they were likely under surveillance by... This image shows a person's face with layers of pixelation throughout. Deeplinks Blog by Tori Noble | July 15, 2024 Detroit Takes Important Step in Curbing the Harms of Face Recognition Technology In a first-of-its-kind agreement, the Detroit Police Department recently agreed to adopt strict limits on its officers' use of face recognition technology as part of a settlement in a lawsuit brought by a victim of this faulty technology. Robert Williams, a Black resident of a Detroit suburb, filed... Three ominous robot dogs with glowing eyes, running toward you. Deeplinks Blog by Matthew Guariglia, Beryl Lipton | July 1, 2024 The SFPD's Intended Purchase of a Robot Dog Triggers Board of Supervisors' Oversight Obligations The San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) wants to get a robot quadruped, popularly known as a robot dog. The city's Board of Supervisors has a regulatory duty to probe into this intended purchase, including potentially blocking it altogether.The SFPD recently proposed the acquisition of a new robot dog in... Automated License Plate Readers Deeplinks Blog by Hudson Hongo | June 27, 2024 Victory! Grand Jury Finds Sacramento Cops Illegally Shared Driver Data For the past year, EFF has been sounding the alarm about police in California illegally sharing drivers' location data with anti-abortion states, putting abortion seekers and providers at risk of prosecution. We thus applaud the Sacramento County Grand Jury for hearing this call and investigating two police agencies that... Several spying drones with eyeballs Deeplinks Blog by Beryl Lipton | June 27, 2024 Drone As First Responder Programs Are Swarming Across the United States Law enforcement wants more drones, and we'll probably see many more of them overhead as police departments seek to implement a popular project justifying the deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): the "drone as first responder" (DFR).Police DFR programs involve a fleet of drones, which can range in number... [drone-banner_0] Deeplinks Blog by Matthew Guariglia, Beryl Lipton | June 20, 2024 Police are Using Drones More and Spending More For Them Police in Minnesota are buying and flying more drones than ever before, according to an annual report recently released by the state's Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA). Minnesotan law enforcement flew their drones without a warrant 4,326 times in 2023, racking up a state-wide expense of over $1... [og-policealpr-2] Deeplinks Blog by Dave Maass, Cooper Quintin | June 18, 2024 New ALPR Vulnerabilities Prove Mass Surveillance Is a Public Safety Threat Government officials across the U.S. frequently promote the supposed, and often anecdotal, public safety benefits of automated license plate readers (ALPRs), but rarely do they examine how this very same technology poses risks to public safety that may outweigh the crimes they are attempting to address in the first... This image shows a person's face with layers of pixelation throughout. Deeplinks Blog by Matthew Guariglia | June 17, 2024 California's Facial Recognition Bill Is Not the Solution We Need California Assemblymember Phil Ting has introduced A.B. 1814, a bill that would supposedly regulate police use of facial recognition technology. The problem is that it would do little to actually change the status quo of how police use this invasive and problematic technology. Police use of facial recognition... [og-stingrayfcc_6] Deeplinks Blog by Beryl Lipton, Cooper Quintin | June 12, 2024 The Next Generation of Cell-Site Simulators is Here. Here's What We Know. Dozens of policing agencies are currently using cell-site simulators (CSS) by Jacobs Technology and its Engineering Integration Group (EIG), according to newly-available documents on how that company provides CSS capabilities to local law enforcement. A proposal document from Jacobs Technology, provided to the Massachusetts State Police (MSP)... 2 protestors in silhouette on retro starburst background Deeplinks Blog by Rory Mir, Thorin Klosowski, Christian Romero | June 7, 2024 Surveillance Defense for Campus Protests The recent wave of protests calling for peace in Palestine have been met with unwarranted and aggressive suppression from law enforcement, universities, and other bad actors. It's clear that the changing role of surveillance on college campuses exacerbates the dangers faced by all of the communities colleges... Discover more. Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Related Issues Street-Level Surveillance Locational Privacy Related cases Carpenter v. United States Back to top EFF Home Follow EFF: * x * facebook * instagram * youtube * flicker * linkedin * mastodon * tiktok * threads Check out our 4-star rating on Charity Navigator. Contact * General * Legal * Security * Membership * Press About * Calendar * Volunteer * Victories * History * Internships * Jobs * Staff * Diversity & Inclusion Issues * Free Speech * Privacy * Creativity & Innovation * Transparency * International * Security Updates * Blog * Press Releases * Events * Legal Cases * Whitepapers * EFFector Newsletter Press * Press Contact Donate * Join or Renew Membership Online * One-Time Donation Online * Giving Societies * Shop * Other Ways to Give * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks JavaScript license information *