https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/11/style/ai-search-slop.html Skip to contentSkip to site index Style Today's Paper Style|First Came 'Spam.' Now, With A.I., We've Got 'Slop' https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/11/style/ai-search-slop.html * Share full article * * * U.S. * World * Business * Arts * Lifestyle * Opinion * Audio * Games * Cooking * Wirecutter * The Athletic Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load. Supported by SKIP ADVERTISEMENT First Came 'Spam.' Now, With A.I., We've Got 'Slop' A new term has emerged to describe dubious A.I.-generated material. Listen to this article * 5:11 min Learn more * Share full article * * A photo of a computer screen showing a black arrow pointing to the word "Search." Google's so-called A.I. Overview feature has changed online searches, and some internet users are not pleased.Credit...Andrew Paterson/ Alamy Stock Photo Benjamin Hoffman By Benjamin Hoffman June 11, 2024Updated 9:10 a.m. ET You may not know exactly what "slop" means in relation to artificial intelligence. But on some level you probably do. Slop, at least in the fast-moving world of online message boards, is a broad term that has developed some traction in reference to shoddy or unwanted A.I. content in social media, art, books and, increasingly, in search results. Google suggesting that you could add nontoxic glue to make cheese stick to a pizza? That's slop. So is a low-price digital book that seems like the one you were looking for, but not quite. And those posts in your Facebook feed that seemingly came from nowhere? They're slop as well. The term became more prevalent last month when Google incorporated its Gemini A.I. model into its U.S.-based search results. Rather than pointing users toward links, the service attempts to solve a query directly with an "A.I. Overview" -- a chunk of text at the top of a results page that uses Gemini to form its best guess at what the user is looking for. The change was a reaction to Microsoft having incorporated A.I. into its search results on Bing, and it had some immediate missteps, leading Google to declare it would roll back some of its A.I. features until problems can be ironed out. But with the dominant search engines having made A.I. a priority, it appears that vast quantities of information generated by machines, rather than largely curated by humans, will be served up as a daily part of life on the internet for the foreseeable future. @etymologynerd More great discussion of this in Alan Metcalf's book "Predicting New Words" #etymology #linguistics #language # memehistory #rizz #skibidi original sound - etymologynerd We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in. Want all of The Times? Subscribe. Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT Site Index Site Information Navigation * (c) 2024 The New York Times Company * NYTCo * Contact Us * Accessibility * Work with us * Advertise * T Brand Studio * Your Ad Choices * Privacy Policy * Terms of Service * Terms of Sale * Site Map * Canada * International * Help * Subscriptions * Manage Privacy Preferences