https://digilent.com/blog/why-do-electronic-components-have-such-odd-values/ Skip to content * Shop * Blog * Reference An NI Company Search for: [ ] * Search for: [ ] * Categories + About Us - Digilent Blog + Digilent Education Processes - Blog + Digilent Products: What They Are and How to Use Them + Events - Digilent Blog + Featured Articles - Digilent Blog + How-To Guides and Technical Workflows - Digilent Blog + Latest News & Announcements - Blog + Product Applications - Digilent Blog + * Archive + o June 2024 o May 2024 o April 2024 o March 2024 o February 2024 o January 2024 o December 2023 o November 2023 o October 2023 o September 2023 o August 2023 o July 2023 o June 2023 o May 2023 o April 2023 o March 2023 o February 2023 o January 2023 o December 2022 o November 2022 o September 2022 o August 2022 o July 2022 o June 2022 o May 2022 o April 2022 o March 2022 o February 2022 o January 2022 o December 2021 o October 2021 o September 2021 o August 2021 o July 2021 o June 2021 o May 2021 o April 2021 o March 2021 o February 2021 o January 2021 o December 2020 o September 2020 o August 2020 o July 2020 o June 2020 o May 2020 o April 2020 o March 2020 o February 2020 o January 2020 o December 2019 o November 2019 o October 2019 o September 2019 o August 2019 o July 2019 o June 2019 o May 2019 o April 2019 o March 2019 o February 2019 o January 2019 o December 2018 o November 2018 o October 2018 o September 2018 o August 2018 o July 2018 o June 2018 o May 2018 o April 2018 o March 2018 o February 2018 o January 2018 o December 2017 o November 2017 o October 2017 o September 2017 o August 2017 o July 2017 o June 2017 o May 2017 o April 2017 o March 2017 o February 2017 o January 2017 o December 2016 o November 2016 o October 2016 o September 2016 o August 2016 o July 2016 o June 2016 o May 2016 o April 2016 o March 2016 o February 2016 o January 2016 o December 2015 o November 2015 o October 2015 o September 2015 o August 2015 o July 2015 o June 2015 o May 2015 o April 2015 o March 2015 o February 2015 o January 2015 o December 2014 o November 2014 o October 2014 o September 2014 o August 2014 o July 2014 o June 2014 o May 2014 o April 2014 * * Forum * Projects * Digilent Github * Categories + o About Us - Digilent Blog o Digilent Education Processes - Blog o Digilent Products: What They Are and How to Use Them o Events - Digilent Blog o Featured Articles - Digilent Blog o How-To Guides and Technical Workflows - Digilent Blog o Latest News & Announcements - Blog o Product Applications - Digilent Blog o * Archive + o June 2024 o May 2024 o April 2024 o March 2024 o February 2024 o January 2024 o December 2023 o November 2023 o October 2023 o September 2023 o August 2023 o July 2023 o June 2023 o May 2023 o April 2023 o March 2023 o February 2023 o January 2023 o December 2022 o November 2022 o September 2022 o August 2022 o July 2022 o June 2022 o May 2022 o April 2022 o March 2022 o February 2022 o January 2022 o December 2021 o October 2021 o September 2021 o August 2021 o July 2021 o June 2021 o May 2021 o April 2021 o March 2021 o February 2021 o January 2021 o December 2020 o September 2020 o August 2020 o July 2020 o June 2020 o May 2020 o April 2020 o March 2020 o February 2020 o January 2020 o December 2019 o November 2019 o October 2019 o September 2019 o August 2019 o July 2019 o June 2019 o May 2019 o April 2019 o March 2019 o February 2019 o January 2019 o December 2018 o November 2018 o October 2018 o September 2018 o August 2018 o July 2018 o June 2018 o May 2018 o April 2018 o March 2018 o February 2018 o January 2018 o December 2017 o November 2017 o October 2017 o September 2017 o August 2017 o July 2017 o June 2017 o May 2017 o April 2017 o March 2017 o February 2017 o January 2017 o December 2016 o November 2016 o October 2016 o September 2016 o August 2016 o July 2016 o June 2016 o May 2016 o April 2016 o March 2016 o February 2016 o January 2016 o December 2015 o November 2015 o October 2015 o September 2015 o August 2015 o July 2015 o June 2015 o May 2015 o April 2015 o March 2015 o February 2015 o January 2015 o December 2014 o November 2014 o October 2014 o September 2014 o August 2014 o July 2014 o June 2014 o May 2014 o April 2014 * | * Forum * Projects * Home How-To Guides and Technical Workflows - Digilent Blog Why Do Electronic Components Have Such Odd Values? Why Do Electronic Components Have Such Odd Values? Updated June 17th, 2021 at 08:23 AM - by Brandon Marcum - 5 Comments. If you've been around electronics for a while, you've probably noticed that components like resistors, capacitors, zener diodes, and inductors come in some odd values. Looking at the chart below, there seems to be no clear rationale behind the values, but there is a pattern. 47kO resistors and 22mF capacitors are everywhere, but not 40kO or 50kO resistors, or 20mF or 30mF capacitors. So what's the deal? It all has to do with preferred numbers. resistor-color-codes We have to go back a few years to 1877 France. The French military used balloons for various purposes and of various sizes, and they had to be anchored using cables. Over time, they ended up with 425 different sizes of mooring cables that had to be individually ordered and inventoried. Talk about a nightmare. Enter Charles Renard. He was tasked with improving the balloons, but discovered this rat's nest of cables in the inventory closet instead. He spent some time thinking about it and came up with a series of 17 cable sizes that would allow for every type of balloon to be properly moored. Each size of cable had a max/min rating that just overlapped it's neighbor above and below, so every required value was covered by one or more cable. This system of numbers became known as the "Renard numbers" and was later included in the "preferred numbers" when the concept was expanded for other applications and became an international standard with ISO (International Organization for Standards) 3 in 1952. Since then, numerous international standards have been adopted by ISO for countless things, but one of those is how we identify certain electronic components. Using the same idea that Renard developed, these components are labeled with what are known as E-series values within the preferred number system. The lowest value is E6, which enumerates six values between two consecutive powers of 10, i.e., between 10 and 100 or between 10k and 100k. Starting with 10, we increase that value by roughly half and we get 15. Increase by roughly half again and we get 22. Continuing this trend, rounding as needed, and we end up with the series 10, 15, 22, 33, 47, and 68. Components built to the E6 standard have a 20% relative error tolerance, and if we look at the values again we'll see a trend. Starting with 10 again and adding 20% error we end up with 12. Moving to 15 and subtracting 20% we get... wait for it... 12. Moving up from 15 we get 15 + 20% = 18 and 22 - 20% = 17.6. This trend repeats no matter what range of powers of 10 you use, as long as they are consecutive. So 47kO + 20% = 56400, while 68kO - 20% = 54400. Look again at the values 47 and 68. The max/min values overlap right about 56, don't they? That sounds familiar. The E12 standard uses all of the same values as E6, but with 6 more values mixed in. These 6 additional values are roughly where the E6 values overlap, and now in order to cover the entire range our %-error is reduced to 10%. Starting again at 10, we have 10, 12, 15, 18, 22, 27, 33, 39, 47, 56, 68, and 82. The math holds true here as well, with the error values just slightly overlapping. There are four more E-series as well, namely E24, E48, E96, and E192. The image above lists all values included in the E6/E12/E24 standards. With each doubling of values between consecutive powers of 10, there is an associated halving of the %-error allowance as well. So E24 values have a +/- %-error of 5%, E48 is set at 2%, and so on. The values associated with E192 are also available with 0.25% and 0.1% tolerances, and E24 and E96 are also available with 1% tolerances. Below is a simple graphical view of how the E12 values relate to one another. Along the bottom of the graph you will see the first 13 terms of an ideal geometric sequence as well. (The sequence is given by y=10^(i/b), where b is the value of the series (e.g. 12) and i is the term desired (e.g. the 8th term would yield 10^(8/12)=4.64).) Notice how closely the values are related. E12_series_tolerance.svgThis graph shows how any value between 1 and 10 is within +-10% of an E12 series value, and its difference from the ideal value in a geometric sequence. By Anders Andersson from Wikimedia Commons. While it is possible to have a 3.3kO resistor with 20% tolerance test out between 2.64kO and 3.96kO, I would be hesitant to use it. I want 3.3kO, so I tend to use resistors with a higher tolerance, usually 5%, so I can just reach in my bin and know that I'm reasonably close. Looking back at the table in the beginning, we see that there are values of 68 and 75 listed. If I'm looking for a value of 70 (or some multiple power of 10, like 700), what can I do to achieve it? I can certainly start testing every 68 valued resistor I can find (75 is just out of range of 5% tolerance), hoping to find one that is just right, but just because it says 5%, doesn't mean it is. That is a maximum allowance, and my experience has been that the tolerances are much tighter than that. I could go up to an E96 (681 0r 715) or even E192 (698!), but resistors with that level of %-error tolerance are not common and cost more. I just want something simple that I already have in my bin! The answer is actually quite simple. Just add a 33 and a 47 and call it good. You get your 70 +/- whatever tolerance you want since 33 and 47 are preferred numbers in every E-series. The point is that any value can be made for any circuit requirement simply by adding components together. When you throw in the rules for calculating components in series and parallel, the combinations are endless. Author * Brandon Marcum Brandon Marcum View all posts [pixel]+8 [pixel]0 Post navigation Previous Article Fun With the Project Box Next Article How to Choose a Resistor for Your Design [759a6fe8a05fd] About Brandon Marcum View all posts by Brandon Marcum - 5 Comments on "Why Do Electronic Components Have Such Odd Values?" 1. [8b0d05] Mario says: May 30, 2018 at 10:27 am Good job! I really enjoyed reading this post. Reply 2. [30ff97] Joseph Benedict says: February 19, 2019 at 11:52 pm Fantastic work, It is very informative post. Thanks for sharing. Reply 3. [afd848] James says: September 19, 2019 at 1:04 pm 33+47 equals 80 Reply 4. [685c7f] Andrew says: March 15, 2021 at 5:41 pm Sorry but I could not help myself! There is a slight error in your article. "Just add a 33 and a 47 and call it good. You get your 70 +/- whatever tolerance you want since 33 and 47 are preferred numbers in every E-series." Adding 33 and 47 gives you 80, not 70. Using a 22 and 47 will give you 69, which given the tolerance, will normally be close enough. Otherwise, well written article, clear and to the point. Reply 5. [cde36b] Nick Norod says: July 22, 2021 at 4:57 pm It makes sense now. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Comment * [ ] Name * [ ] Email * [ ] Website [ ] [Post Comment] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] D[ ] Related Articles Power Up Your DAQ Project Hardware & Software Selection by Kyli Dokes - June 3rd, 2024 Exploring Data Acquisition Methods by Kyli Dokes - May 30th, 2024 What is a Data Logger? by Kyli Dokes - May 6th, 2024 Company * About Us * FAQs * Shipping & Returns * Jobs * Legal & Privacy News * Blog * Newsletter * Events Affiliations * List of Distributors * Technology Partners Subscribe to our newsletter Get the latest updates on new products and upcoming sales Contact Us * Support Channels Digilent 1300 NE Henley Ct. Suite 3 Pullman, WA 99163 United States of America * * * * * * *