https://crookedtimber.org/2024/03/16/occasional-paper-when-armor-met-lips * Home * Comments policy * Subscribe Occasional paper: When Armor Met Lips by Doug Muir on March 16, 2024 So about five hundred million years ago, give or take, there was this little creature called Plectronoceras. It was about 2 cm long -- just under an inch -- and it had a conical shell with a bunch of tentacles sticking out. It was a cephalopod, an early member of the group that includes octopuses and squid. And it was an /armored/ cephalopod, with most of its soft body protected by that hard little shell. Let's pause here and rewind: this was five hundred million years ago. That's the late Cambrian, if you're a geology nerd. It's before the dinosaurs. It's before sharks or cockroaches or ferns. This is *old*. Complex life had barely gotten started. Life in general was pretty much confined to the oceans. But there were no fish yet -- just invertebrates. Half a billion years, yeah? Long, long time. And a lot of the stuff swimming around was weirdly alien. Again, if you're a geology nerd, you know about stuff like Opabinia, Anomalocaris, or Hallucigenia. If you don't, then let's just say that you wouldn't have recognized much from those ancient seas. Not just "no fish". There were no clams or lobsters, no starfish or barnacles or crabs or anemones, no coral or kelp. The world was new. Those things hadn't evolved yet. But almost from the beginning, there was this thing: shell, plus tentacles. If you have even the slightest interest in the ancient world, you've probably heard of ammonites. The usual narrative goes something like this: "Ammonites were armored cephalopods, relatives of squids and octopi (1), but with a hard external shell. They lived in the oceans for hundreds of millions of years. Then they all died out in the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous, the same extinction that wiped out the dinosaurs. Today there are only chambered nautiluses, which look somewhat like ammonites but are a different sort of creature." Human-size ammonites swam the Atlantic Ocean 80 million years ago | Live Science And this is true as far as it goes, but it misses a couple of key points. First, ammonites were just one sort of armored cephalopod. That design seems to have evolved independently several times. And... sure, think about it. It's actually a great design. It combines the two best features of being a mollusk: a hard protective shell, and grasping manipulative tentacles. Modern mollusks have to choose one or the other. But hey, por que no los dos? Armored cephalopods were free-swimming, or rather free-floating: they filled their shells with gas, so they floated along at zero buoyancy. (2) They were mostly slow, but could put on sudden short bursts of jet-propelled speed, just enough to catch prey or avoid danger. They didn't "rule the seas" or anything like that, but for hundreds of millions of years they were around pretty much everywhere, in every marine ecosystem from the poles to the equator. If you want to buy a fossil today? and you want something that looks cool but is not too expensive? A fossil ammonite is your go-to. Some years back my kid found one, pretty intact, just lying in a field. That's how ubiquitous they were. Because it was a great design, yeah? Like the cockroach or the shark: basic, efficient, central. Ammonoidea - Wikipedia Second thing, the chambered nautilus. It's not an ammonite, no, but it's like an ammonite -- it's another armored cephalopod, a spiral snail-like shell plus a bunch of tentacles.(3) But where earlier armored cephalopods were everywhere, the nautilus is restricted to a small-ish patch of ocean in the western Pacific, from northern Australia through Indonesia up to Vietnam or so. And while ammonites floated boldly everywhere, the nautilus is a shy creature that lives fairly deep down, mostly in the twilight zone 100 to 500 meters deep. Ammonites - British Geological Survey (Years ago, I used to scuba dive in that area. My dive instructor told me that a nautilus never comes above 100 meters depth unless it's seriously ill or injured. Meanwhile, a recreational diver should never go below 40 meters depth -- nitrogen narcosis, oxygen poisoning, the bends, just don't. "So if you're diving and you see a nautilus," he said, "at least one of you is in big trouble.") Okay, so: why? Why is the nautilus restricted to this small area, when older armored cephalopods roamed worldwide? Is the nautilus just... worse? An inferior design, or something? No. Here's where things get mysterious and interesting. After the asteroid hit, the ammonites all died out. But chambered nautiluses survived, and they thrived! They weren't as ubiquitous as the ammonites, but for about 30 million years they were found all over the world. Dozens of species, all sorts of different habitats. The "shell, but also tentacles" design was still solid. But then around 30 million years ago -- halfway through the Age of Mammals, give or take -- something happened. The nautiloids started disappearing. Fewer species, less diversity. Bit by bit they shrank back into their current small range. What happened halfway through the Age of Mammals? Well, here's one clue: the nautiloids' long retreat showed a pattern. It wasn't everywhere and all at once. They disappeared first in the northern arctic regions; then in the Antarctic; then in temperate zones; finally across most of the tropics except that one small patch. This pattern suggested a culprit: a warm-blooded predator that evolved in the Arctic and then spread around the world. But... the armored cephalopod design had been around forever. They'd been living with predators for *half a billion years*. Sharks. Primitive armored fish. Not-so-primitive modern fish. In the age of dinosaurs, they had to deal with ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, and mosasaurs. Back in the Paleozoic, they were hunted by eight-foot-long giant sea scorpions. Way back in the Cambrian, they had to live with the anomalocariids. In the early Age of Mammals, there were primitive whales and sea-going crocodiles. The armored cephalopod design took them all in stride and kept going. So what happened? -- The authors of this paper here think that they've found the answer. To understand, we have to zoom in on exactly what happens when something tries to eat an armored cephalopod. Threatened, the beast withdraws its tentacles into its shell and clams up. Okay, so now either you're big enough to crunch through the shell, or you're not. We know that some large predators did crunch through, because we've found fragments of ammonite shell fossilized in the stomachs of plesiosaurs and ancient sharks and such. But if you do that, now you have a stomach full of tasty mollusk meat... mixed with unpleasantly sharp and indigestible shell chunks. An option if you're hungry enough, but hardly ideal. Shark, ichthyosaurs, marine crocodiles: it's not that they couldn't eat armored cephalopods. It's just that it usually wasn't worth it. Predators have to do a cost-benefit analysis, yeah? And for half a billion years, armored cephalopods were in the black. But then something evolved with a feeding apparatus that could separate the meat from the shell. And suddenly, armored cephalopods were in the red. The paper says: it was seals. Are leopard seals dangerous towards humans? - Quora Seals -- pinnipeds, if you're fancy -- aren't usually that large, and aren't usually apex predators. (Predators, absolutely yes. Apex, no.) (4) So what do seals have that mosasaurs and sharks and sea scorpions didn't have? Lips. Seals have lips. Lips, cheeks, and a muscular tongue. A seal can grab a shelled prey, and puncture the shell with sharp strong teeth -- and then just *schlorp* out the tasty meat inside. The technical term for this is "suction feeding". Pinnipeds generally are good at it, and some are so good that they prefer to eat shelly prey -- clams, crabs, mussels, whatever -- and don't eat much else. Stuff that lives on or near the ocean floor -- clams, crabs, lobsters, and such -- could evolve various defensive and avoidance strategies. But free-floating armored cephalopods? All they had was a quick burst of speed, and that wouldn't help much against a hot-blooded predator that could maintain high speeds much longer. And everything else matches, too. Pinnipeds evolved about thirty million years ago. They showed up first in the colder parts of the northern hemisphere, then in the Antarctic, then in temperate zones. Even today, although there are some tropical species, they're mostly cold-to-cool water creatures. And -- here's the smoking gun -- the one part of the globe they still haven't colonized? The southwestern Pacific, from northern Australia across Indonesia. The modern range of nautiloids is exactly the one part of the ocean that those sucking, slurping seals haven't reached yet. And that's all: just a little story about evolution. "Persons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted; persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished; persons attempting to find a plot will be shot." Share this: * * Tweet * { 14 comments... read them below or add one } 1 Doug Muir 03.16.24 at 3:49 pm (1) If you're inclined to be pedantic about the plural of "octopus", pause and ask yourself this question: "Am I a sophomore in college?" If yes, please go right ahead! If no... dude. (2) They could actually control their buoyancy, and in a very cool way, but this post is really long enough already. (3) If you're inclined to be pedantic about the nautilus' limbs and say that /actually/ they are "arms" and not "tentacles" because tentacles have suckers on them, then (a) congratulations on remembering that long-ago biology class, and (b) see Footnote 1, above. (4) Yes I am aware of walruses and elephant seals. Most seals are medium-sized animals, human size or smaller. As for being an apex predator, seals are a very popular food item for the larger sharks, and even leopard seals get bodied by orcas. 2 oldster 03.16.24 at 4:20 pm So, you're saying the nautiloids did okay until the pinnipeds sealed their fate? 3 oldster 03.16.24 at 5:11 pm And als0 -- congratulations on finding a photo of a seal saying, "yeah, it was me. And I'm not saying sorry. What are you going to do about it?" 4 Cervantes 03.16.24 at 5:35 pm There seems to be an obvious logical flaw here. Cephalopods without shells, that are just as tasty, are doing just fine, and there are a lot more critters that eat them than just seals. 5 Kenny Easwaran 03.16.24 at 5:59 pm I love this! 6 Doug Muir 03.16.24 at 7:02 pm @4, what flaw? Cephalopods without shells are either much faster and more maneuverable (squid) or mostly hang out on or near the ocean floor (octopi) where, if threatened, they can suddenly squeeze their amorphous bodies into the tiniest of shelters. Or they're cuttlefish, who do both. Also, most non-armored cephalopods can change color, allowing some very sophisticated camouflage; can't do that with armor on. (There are some interesting edge cases. The vampire squid is not a squid, but rather a rare octopus that hangs out in open water instead of crawling along the bottom. It survives because (1) it mostly lurks in deep, low-oxygen waters with almost no predators, and (2) it has an astonishing threat display.) Doug M. 7 Michael Allen 03.16.24 at 7:37 pm "Threatened, the beast withdraws its tentacles into its shell and clams up." I see what you did there. Well played. 8 Michael Allen 03.16.24 at 8:55 pm Lots of videos about the vampire not really a squid on YouTube. I had no idea. 9 Alan White 03.16.24 at 11:36 pm Another lovely post in both content and expression. The thesis makes sense to me. Now to go on amazon for ammonites. . . 10 Matt 03.17.24 at 12:55 am the plural of "octopus", It's octopuseses, right? 11 Phil 03.17.24 at 11:11 am Strong Wikipedia opening: "The vampire squid (Vampyroteuthis infernalis, lit. 'vampire squid from hell')" The vampire squid, or, to give it its technical name, the vampire squid from hell... 12 Cervantes 03.17.24 at 3:43 pm I dunno about that Doug, what's the diet of Physeter Catodon? 13 Spongebob 03.17.24 at 7:10 pm Does it gaze at the sun with its wandering eye? 14 CO 03.17.24 at 7:54 pm You've gotten "in the red" and "in the black" backwards. Thanks for this article! Leave a Comment [ ]Name [ ]E-mail [ ]Website [ ] You can use these HTML tags and attributes:
[Submit] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] D[ ] * Recent Comments + Kromhout on The Bezzle + CO on Occasional paper: When Armor Met Lips + Spongebob on Occasional paper: When Armor Met Lips + jsrtheta on Sunday photoblogging: starling + Cervantes on Occasional paper: When Armor Met Lips * Search [To search, type and ] * Archives Archives [Select Month ] * * + RSS - Posts + RSS - Comments * Pages + Comments policy * March 2024 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 << Feb * Book Events + Charles Stross / Various + China Mieville / Iron Council + Chris Mooney / The Republican War on Science + Dani Rodrik / One Economics, Many Recipes + Doug Henwood / After the New Economy + George Scialabba/What Are Intellectuals Good For? + Joseph Carens / The Ethics of Immigration + Levitt & Dubner / Freakonomics + Sheri Berman / The Primacy of Politics + Susanna Clarke / Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell + Yochai Benkler / The Wealth of Networks * Contributors + Belle Waring + Chris Armstrong + Chris Bertram + Eric Schliesser + Eszter Hargittai + Gina Schouten + Harry Brighouse + Henry Farrell + Ingrid Robeyns + John Holbo + John Quiggin + Kevin Munger + Macarena Marey + Maria Farrell + Miriam Ronzoni + Paul Segal + Serene Khader + Speranta Dumitru * Fine Print + Banner courtesy of David Krewinghaus + Comments Policy * Lumber Room + 11D + 3 Quarks Daily + Ampersand + Atrios + Balkinization + Best of Both Worlds + Blood and Treasure + Brad DeLong + Cosma Shalizi + Daily Kos + Daily Nous + Daniel Drezner + Digby + Digressions and Impressions + Ed Felten + Edge of the American West + Fabians UK + Joshua Marshall + Juan Cole + Kevin Drum + Lawrence Solum + Lawyers, Guns and Money + Making Light + Marc Lynch + Marginal Revolution + Mark Kleiman + Maud Newton + Michael Froomkin + Miriam Burstein + Naked Capitalism + Political Theory Daily Review + Russell Arben Fox + Slugger O'Toole + Sociological Images + Steven Johnson + Suburban Guerilla + Talk Left + Tapped + The New Inquiry + Timothy Burke + Unfogged + Washington Monthly * Old Wood + Astra Taylor + Brian Weatherson + Corey Robin + Daniel Davies + Eric Rauchway + Jon Mandle + Kieran Healy + Micah Schwartzman + Michael Berube + Montagu Norman + Niamh Hardiman + Rich Yeselson + Scott McLemee + Ted Barlow + Tedra Osell + Tom Runnacles * Meta + Log in + Entries feed + Comments feed + WordPress.org * Recent Posts + Sunday photoblogging: starling + Occasional paper: When Armor Met Lips + Sunday photoblogging: blue tit + Occasional Paper: The Iron Snow Beneath Your Feet + The Bezzle * Tags Add new tag Alan Greenspan autism Barack Obama Bill Clinton Biology books Bruce Bartlett capabilities capability approach Carl Menger China climate change conservatism Daniel Rodgers Ellen Schrecker Ethics Friedrich Hayek George Scialabba seminar George W. Bush Germany Seminar GOP internetpolitics John Kenneth Galbraith Jude Wanniski labor unions limitarianism Ludvig von Mises Ludwig von Mises Matt Yglesias Milton Friedman Netherlands Obama Oliver Wendell Holmes Paris Paul Krugman philosophy Ronald Reagan Schenck v. United States seminar on David Graeber's Debt sustainability tesco art banksy mural van der Bellen wealth worthwhile Canadian initiatives