https://spectrum.ieee.org/ev-batteries-environment [ ] IEEE.orgIEEE Xplore Digital LibraryIEEE StandardsMore Sites Sign InJoin IEEE The March 2024 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here! Download PDF | Close bar The Lithium-ion Battery May Not Be the Best Bet for EVs Share FOR THE TECHNOLOGY INSIDER Search: [ ] Explore by topic AerospaceArtificial IntelligenceBiomedicalClimate TechComputing Consumer ElectronicsEnergyHistory of TechnologyRoboticsSemiconductors TelecommunicationsTransportation IEEE Spectrum FOR THE TECHNOLOGY INSIDER Topics AerospaceArtificial IntelligenceBiomedicalClimate TechComputing Consumer ElectronicsEnergyHistory of TechnologyRoboticsSemiconductors TelecommunicationsTransportation Sections FeaturesNewsOpinionCareersDIYEngineering Resources More NewslettersPodcastsSpecial ReportsCollectionsExplainersTop Programming LanguagesRobots Guide /IEEE Job Site / For IEEE Members Current IssueMagazine ArchiveThe InstituteThe Institute Archive For IEEE Members Current IssueMagazine ArchiveThe InstituteThe Institute Archive IEEE Spectrum About UsContact UsReprints & Permissions /Advertising / Follow IEEE Spectrum Support IEEE Spectrum IEEE Spectrum is the flagship publication of the IEEE -- the world's largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences. Our articles, podcasts, and infographics inform our readers about developments in technology, engineering, and science. Join IEEE Subscribe About IEEEContact & SupportAccessibilityNondiscrimination PolicyTerms IEEE Privacy PolicyCookie Preferences (c) Copyright 2024 IEEE -- All rights reserved. A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. Enjoy more free content and benefits by creating an account Saving articles to read later requires an IEEE Spectrum account The Institute content is only available for members Downloading full PDF issues is exclusive for IEEE Members Downloading this e-book is exclusive for IEEE Members Access to Spectrum 's Digital Edition is exclusive for IEEE Members Following topics is a feature exclusive for IEEE Members Adding your response to an article requires an IEEE Spectrum account Create an account to access more content and features on IEEE Spectrum , including the ability to save articles to read later, download Spectrum Collections, and participate in conversations with readers and editors. For more exclusive content and features, consider Joining IEEE . Join the world's largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to all of Spectrum's articles, archives, PDF downloads, and other benefits. Learn more - Join the world's largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to this e-book plus all of IEEE Spectrum's articles, archives, PDF downloads, and other benefits. Learn more - CREATE AN ACCOUNTSIGN IN JOIN IEEESIGN IN Close Access Thousands of Articles -- Completely Free Create an account and get exclusive content and features: Save articles, download collections, and talk to tech insiders -- all free! For full access and benefits, join IEEE as a paying member. CREATE AN ACCOUNTSIGN IN TransportationEnergyNewsClimate TechJournal WatchClimate Change The Lithium-ion Battery May Not Be the Best Bet for EVs At large scales, lithium-sulfur may be more environmentally friendly Michelle Hampson 29 Feb 2024 3 min read An illustration of a car outline with a battery pack visible, and connected to an external electric vehicle charger. iStock This article is part of our exclusive IEEE Journal Watch series in partnership with IEEE Xplore. As more electric vehicles hit the roads, the environmental impact of their battery production will also increase. This raises a major question: What type of EV battery will be the most environmentally friendly on a large scale? A study published 1 February in IEEE Access suggests that, after considering five different types of EV battery cells, lithium-sulfur cells will be the most environmentally friendly. The results also suggest that cells that don't rely on precious and critical metals are fundamental for ensuring sustainable production. The most common EV battery today is the lithium-ion cell. But many other batteries are being developed and tested, and they are slated to hit the market in the next few years. Each one involves different pros and cons when it comes to energy density and the environmental impacts of its production and use. Batteries that have silicon in their anodes--such as silicon-polyacrylonitrile (SiCPAN) and silicon nanowire (SiNW) cells--have much greater energy density than traditional lithium-ion cells, which are made with graphite anodes. However, these silicon-based cells currently require the incorporation of precious metals, such as silver, to help stabilize them during charging and discharging. Another option is the use of all-solid-state cells, which offer nearly double the energy density of the best-performing lithium-ion batteries, resulting in a smaller and lighter battery pack. However, this technology also requires the incorporation of precious metals. Lastly, lithium-sulfur cells are emerging as a promising battery for EVs because, theoretically, they have high capacity and energy density--without containing rare earth metals. Despite that advantage, more technology advancements are needed to realize the full potential of these cells. Overall, lithium-sulfur cells are the most environmentally friendly EV battery. Antonella Accardo is a research fellow at the Polytechnic University of Turin, in Italy, and a member of the university's interdepartmental Center for Automotive Research and Sustainable mobility (CARS) center. Accardo was interested in comparing the environmental impacts of these EV batteries if the manufacturing of each were scaled up to industrial levels. To do so, her team conducted environmental-impact assessments of SiCPAN, SiNW, all-solid-state, and lithium-sulfur cells, compared with the conventional lithium-ion cell. "We selected [these] cells as current representatives of the most promising technologies for the automotive market in the next decades," explains Accardo. "The cells were identified based on their suitability to meet the performance and safety requirements of electric vehicles." They conducted a novel "cradle-to-gate" prospective life-cycle assessment, which looks at the full impact of each cell over the course of its production from sourcing the raw materials to the point when the end product leaves the factory. Specifically, the researchers analyzed the cells in terms of their impact on six criteria: climate change, or total greenhouse gas emissions during production; acidification, or emissions of sulfuric and nitrogen oxides that acidify water and soil; eutrophication of fresh water, or potentially harmful accumulation of algae and sediments in freshwater systems; ecotoxicity of fresh water, or the release of toxic substances into freshwater systems; the use of fossil fuels in production; and the depletion of mineral and metal reserves. The results suggest that, overall, lithium-sulfur cells are the most environmentally friendly EV battery. Lithium-sulfur outperformed the standard lithium-ion battery in four out of six of the key environmental-impact categories assessed (all but climate change and use of fossil fuel resources). However, the lithium-ion cell remains the best in terms of cradle-to-gate impact on climate change, accounting for 30.9 kilograms of emitted carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour generated, followed by the SiCPAN cell. The all-solid-state and SiNW cells had two and three times as much carbon dioxide emissions, respectively, as a lithium-ion cell. The SiNW cells were found not only to have the worst impact in terms of climate change but also in many other categories assessed in the study, including acidification, the use of fossil fuel resources, and eutrophication of fresh water. This is predominantly because SiNWs involve the use of substantial amounts of precious metals (such as the silver nitrate used as a catalyst) and energy-intensive nanoscale manufacturing processes, which also release toxic by-products. Interestingly, the researchers also conducted a "what-if" analysis to explore the impact of SiNW, SiCPAN, and all-solid-state cells if they could theoretically be produced without precious metals. In such a case, all-solid-state cells produced without silver would be the least impactful cell among all of the next-generation cells considered in this study. Ezio Spessa is a professor in the department of energy at the Polytechnic University of Turin and a member of the executive board of the CARS center who supervised and coordinated this study. He notes that these results really underscore that the environmental impact of batteries depends strongly on their material composition. "Our recommendation is to continue researching the best solution in terms of performance and costs, while keeping an eye on the environmental benefits already at this stage," he says. Next, Spessa says his team plans to investigate whether these results differ between those at the individual cell level and those at the battery-pack level. They will also explore the impact of using recycled materials instead of newly resourced materials in cell production. From Your Site Articles * Will an EV-Filled World Pass the Sulfuric-Acid Test? > * The EV Transition Is Harder Than Anyone Thinks > Related Articles Around the Web * Electric Vehicle Myths | US EPA > electric vehiclesev batteriesclimate changeenvironmentjournal watch Michelle Hampson Michelle Hampson is a freelance writer based in Halifax. She frequently contributes to Spectrum's Journal Watch coverage, which highlights newsworthy studies published in IEEE journals. The Conversation (0) Related Stories TransportationNews E-Snowmobile Amps Up Recreation Tech TransportationNews Lucid Floats the Gravity: A High-Stamina Electric SUV TransportationNewsConsumer Electronics Hoverboard Inventor Turns Heads With Two-Wheeled Car