https://www.techdirt.com/2024/01/17/study-field-drug-tests-generate-nearly-30000-bogus-arrests-a-year/ [ ] Techdirt. [ ] * Sign In * Register * Preferences Techdirt [ ] * TechDirt * GreenHouse * Free Speech * Error 402 * Deals * Jobs * Support Techdirt [podcast-ti] Google Supports Oregon 'Right To Repair' Reform Telecom Monopolies Are Once Again Funding Covert, Sleazy Local Attacks On Community Broadband Networks Study: Field Drug Tests Generate Nearly 30,000 Bogus Arrests A Year [failures] Failures from the too-big-to-fail,-too-cheap-to-care dept Wed, Jan 17th 2024 08:09pm - Tim Cushing Field drug tests often seem to be more a triumph of imagination than a triumph of science. They're cheap. Some popular tests run less than $3/per. That's the literal selling point. When in doubt, a cop can get probable cause by grabbing a substance, dumping it into a field test, and deciding whatever results are generated are evidence of guilt. It rarely is. Sure, if you run enough tests, you're bound to have some of these field tests confirmed by lab tests that are far more precise and less likely to be interpreted subjectively by the person performing the test. (Theoretically. There's plenty of evidence out there showing lab drug tests can be just as faulty as field drug tests, although in these cases, the problem is usually the person performing the testing [or not!] than the test itself.) Cheap, fast, and easy. And wrong. So very very often wrong. Field drug tests have labeled everything from bird poop (on a car's hood!) to donut crumbs to honey to the ashes of a deceased loved one as contraband, resulting in the immediate arrest of people not actually in possession of anything illegal. This is just what's been observed by those challenging these results in court during criminal trials or filing civil rights lawsuits following wrongful arrests. It's happened often enough that even a few courts are taking notice, in some cases refusing to accept plea deals predicated on nothing more than field drug tests results. Data on field drug tests is difficult to obtain. Cops are in no hurry to turn this information over and the patchwork of public records laws across the nation often allows law enforcement to refuse disclosure simply by stating the results are relevant to a criminal investigation (even if the investigation has long since been closed). What data can be obtained has been collected and parsed by the Quattrone Center for Fair Administration of Justice at the University of Pennsylvania. What's long been assumed based on mainly anecdotal evidence now has at least some scientific backing: field drug tests aren't worth what we're paying for them, even if it is only $3/per. According to the Center's report [PDF], nearly one third of the money spent on field drug tests is misspent. (h/t C.J. Ciaramella at Reason ) Utilizing a nationwide survey of agencies, the report offers national estimates on the frequency of test usage, finding that each year approximately 773,000 drug-related arrests involve the use of presumptive tests. Using the survey data and national estimates of drug arrests, this report examines the impact of the tests on wrongful arrests, racial disparities in their use, and their subsequent impact on drug possession prosecutions and dispositions. Although the true error rate of these tests remains unknown, estimates based on the imperfect data that are available suggest that around 30,000 arrests each year involve people who do not possess illegal substances but who are nonetheless falsely implicated by color-based presumptive tests. Not great. Not even good. Not even close to good. I don't know where it's acceptable to rack up a false arrest rate of nearly 4%, but America shouldn't be one of those places. I realize it's only probable cause at the point of arrest rather than the courtroom standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt." But 30,000 bogus arrests a year from a single cause -- field drug tests -- is unacceptable. Here's how that works out in the greater scheme of things, in terms of criminal justice: The use of presumptive field tests in drug arrests is one of the largest, if not the largest, known contributing factor to wrongful arrests and convictions in the United States. It's not just arrests. It's also convictions. And those convictions aren't happening in bench trials or jury trials. They're plea agreements where people weigh their options and decide that the best option is to "admit" to a crime they haven't committed rather than subject themselves to indefinite detention and the full weight of prosecutorial forces that love to punish people for insisting on their innocence and/or seek to have their rights respected. The whole system is stacked against defendants, beginning with the tests that cops treat as actual probable cause when they realistically should be considered nothing more than a hunch. This is the depressing reality of criminal justice in the United States when it comes to field drug tests and people falsely accused by faulty tests. In our survey, 89% of prosecutors reported that guilty pleas are permitted without confirmatory testing (i.e., follow-up testing by a lab to verify that a field test "positive" result accurately detected an illegal drug). 67% of drug labs in the U.S. report that they are not asked to review samples when there are plea agreements, and 24% do not receive samples for confirmatory testing when there are field test results available. Even when labs receive samples, 46% report that they will not conduct a confirmatory test if there has been a guilty plea, and 8% report that they will not retest if there has been a presumptive identification This isn't justice. This isn't even a polite hat tip in the direction of justice. This is railroading, aided and abetted by drug labs beholden to cops and almost as disinterested in what happens to people facing criminal charges possibly predicated on incorrect test results. On the law enforcement side, the fact is no one cares and no one cares that no one cares. Courts are the last hope, and even most of those are more than willing to clear dockets quickly and easily by signing off on any plea deal placed in front of them. As the report notes, it's not as though cops and prosecutors aren't aware of the limitations of field drug tests. It's that they don't care. All tests come packaged with plenty of verbiage stating how any field test should be verified with a lab test, how dozens of legal substances can trigger false positives, and how tests can be rendered useless by exposure to UV light or elevated temperatures. But none of that is legally binding. It's not like improper use results in a voided warranty. It's not like field drug test makers are going to stop selling to cops just because cops ignore every single instruction printed on the package. Again, this is up to the courts. And low level courts that handle a large percentage of possession cases aren't going to increase their own workload by forcing prosecutors to verify tests or refuse plea deals based on nothing more than what a cop claimed to have observed while misusing a cheap test prone to false positives. It's not that better field drug test tech doesn't exist. It does. Portable Raman spectrometers, which are capable of producing results comparable to lab equipment (at least according to the Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs), very few law enforcement agencies are going to trade in cheap drug tests they can buy in bulk with actually accurate testing equipment than can cost up to $20,000 per device. As the report states, the 30,000 wrongful arrests is an extreme undercount. Its survey managed to only find 93 law enforcement agencies willing to discuss field drug test use and only 82 of those actually provided enough information to warrant being included in this report. Of the few that did respond, there's even more bad news. This is quite the pair of sentences: Twelve agencies recently stopped using the tests due to concerns about fentanyl exposure (i.e., a belief that physical contact with fentanyl is, by itself, dangerous for the officer), and two agencies reported that the tests were an unnecessary expense as suspects were arrested and charged regardless of the test outcome . Did you get all of that? Twelve agencies have gone full fainting goat and two agencies flat out admitted they arrested people whether or not the tests indicated illegal substances. And if arrest is the inevitable outcome, why blow money on field drug tests? There's nothing positive in this report, other than the recommendations it suggests, like refusing plea deals backed by nothing but field tests and ensuring all field tests are verified by lab testing. But if very little of this is happening yet, it's hard to believe there will be widespread adoption in the future. So, we'll just get what we've been getting for years: tens of thousands of bogus arrests every year -- arrests that will be touted by those performing them as indicative of their tireless service to the War on Drugs. The reality, however, will be tens of thousands of destroyed lives and violated rights by tests so questionable they should never have been considered evidence of anything. Filed Under: drug tests, evidence, false arrest, field drug tests 13 CommentsLeave a Comment If you liked this post, you may also be interested in... * Utah Governor Absolutely Positive That Social Media Harms Kids Despite Study After Study After Study After Study After Study Saying He's Wrong * Body Cam Report Shows Fewer Agencies Are Allowing Cops To View Footage Before Making Statements * Judge Is Rightly Skeptical That Montana Can Just Ban TikTok * Google Is Still The Search Engine Of Choice For Law Enforcement * Cops Lose CSAM Evidence Because They Couldn't Be Bothered To Include Probable Cause In Their Warrant Application * * * * * * * * * * * * * Rate this comment as insightful Rate this comment as funny You have rated this comment as insightful You have rated this comment as funny Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam You have flagged this comment The first word has already been claimed The last word has already been claimed Lightbulb icon Laughing icon Flag icon Lightbulb icon Laughing icon Comments on "Study: Field Drug Tests Generate Nearly 30,000 Bogus Arrests A Year" Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment * Filter comments in by Time * Filter comments as Threaded * Filter only comments rated Insightful * Filter only comments rated funny LOL * Filter only comments that are Unread 13 Comments Collapse all replies This comment has been deemed insightful by the community. [user-default]That One Guy (profile) says: January 17, 2024 at 9:23 pm Convict by the drug test, be convicted by the drug test All members of a police department that uses a particular drug test must be tested by a third party using the same drug test on a randomized, monthly basis. All politicians that support such testing must be tested by a third party using the same drug test on a randomized, monthly basis. All judges and prosecutors involved in cases where drug test results are considered valid evidence must be tested by a third party using the same drug test on a randomized, monthly basis. Any attempt to obstruct this testing, either by preventing it or influencing the results will result in the result automatically and irrevocably being treated as a reading of 'positive', regardless of what it might have otherwise been. Do nothing more than use the same tests on the very people that insist they be used on others and you could solve the problem overnight as suddenly accuracy would be considered vitally important. Collapse replies (7) Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word Threaded [2] [u14086_100x0-1]Bergman (profile) says: January 18, 2024 at 12:06 am Re: In a lot of states (currently 48 out of 50), private citizens have at least some arrest authority. It varies from state to state, but police are not immune to arrest in any state, and in some states, private citizens have the same arrest authority that police do. I think it'd be hilarious if some people started using those field 'test' kits on cops innthe states where private citizens have the same arrest authority police do. I bet the cops won't be so uncaring about inaccurate test kits when it's their asses on the line. Collapse replies (6) Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word Threaded [3] [b1e3a62c72]Anonymous Coward says: January 18, 2024 at 12:13 am Re: Re: You're beyond deranged. Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word Threaded [3] This comment has been deemed insightful by the community. [57525c186a]Anonymous Coward says: January 18, 2024 at 2:21 am Re: Re: Hilarious, sure, but also incredibly dangerous. Finding a cop willing to play ball would make him either indescribably stupid or one of the rare good ones, and if not you'd have to use the threat of force. On a cop. Then take him to the police station for processing. Anyone seriously considering this option should probably go play with lit matches inside a fertilizer storage building instead. It's probably less deadly. Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it. Threaded [3] [f0d3604fb7]Muhammad Babuddin Siddiqui (user link) says: January 18, 2024 at 5:21 am Re: Re: Nice contents Keep it up Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word Threaded [3] [user-default]That One Guy (profile) says: January 18, 2024 at 5:58 am Re: Re: If by 'hilarious' you mean 'a near guaranteed way to get arrested and /or shot for 'assaulting' a cop' then yes, very 'hilarious' indeed. Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word Threaded [3] [user-default]SonicAnatidae (profile) says: January 18, 2024 at 8:37 am Re: Re: Sounds like you need a drug screen, but not one of these, because they aren't known for accuracy. Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word Threaded [3] [6251ca44be]mick says: January 18, 2024 at 11:06 am Re: Re: If you have zero understanding of how a citizen's arrest works, why bother commenting? Just to show ignorance? Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word [b56472c1d5]Anonymous Coward says: January 18, 2024 at 5:48 am Cop bootlickers arriving in 3, 2, 1... Collapse replies (1) Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it. Threaded [2] [38f6c2db4f]davec says: January 18, 2024 at 6:30 am Re: davec's here!!!!!!! Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word [d4c31cd8f8]me says: January 18, 2024 at 6:06 am Which two agencies admitted that They deserve a public doxxing Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word [user-default]SonicAnatidae (profile) says: January 18, 2024 at 8:36 am Not surprising What they use in the field is the same tech as POC (point of care) screening cups. At best, they can determine if a class of drugs is in your system. For example, an Opiate, but not which Opiate. The problem is when they generate a POS, that means one thing. It's possible there is a drug present and that an actual drug screen, with something like an LCMS needs to be done. POC cups and similar are slightly better than simply eyeballing someone and guessing, without the confirmation test. This was these people being railroaded by those that are ignorant about the tools they used or just callously uncaring. I'm sure the people responsible will get a paid vacation, so there's that. Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word [u2515_100x0-1]ECA (profile) says: January 18, 2024 at 1:02 pm Always wondered WHY? With all the false tests, that there are NOT more False arrest cases? CAuse, while sitting in Jail waiting to be taken to court, they try to get you to admit to a lower crime to GET out of jail? To PAY a very low FINE or anything to SHOW that You NOW have a record. If this alone is the only justification to get you In jail and prosecuted, WITHOUT a final test to see if its accurate. How does this get passed in court? Even if they take you to Jail, Arrested, and do a 2nd BETTER test immediately. Even if it was for being Drunk. And the findings are true/false, THERE IS A CASE for false arrest? Or have they covered that? even tho you HAVE been arrested AND your car Hijacked and taken away to be Searched? To find NOTHING. There has to be some recourse to Stop this or SHOW it does not work. With a TON of cases filed against the false arrests. OR is it that the Lawyers think they ARNT going to get enough money? Reply View in chronology Make this comment the first word Make this comment the last word --------------------------------------------------------------------- says: Add Your Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here Name [ ] Email [ ] [ ]Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter URL [ ] Subject [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Comment * [ ] Comment Options: (*)Use markdown. ( )Use plain text. Make this the ( )First Word or ( )Last Word.(*)No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this? What's this? Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop >> [Post Comment][Preview] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] D[ ] Google Supports Oregon 'Right To Repair' Reform Telecom Monopolies Are Once Again Funding Covert, Sleazy Local Attacks On Community Broadband Networks Follow Techdirt Techdirt Daily Newsletter [ ] [Subscribe] Essential Reading The Techdirt Greenhouse Read the latest posts: * Winding Down Our Latest Greenhouse Panel: The Lessons Learned From SOPA/PIPA * From The Revolt Against SOPA To The EU's Upload Filters * Did We Miss Our Best Chance At Regulating The Internet? Read All >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Trending Posts * Study: Field Drug Tests Generate Nearly 30,000 Bogus Arrests A Year * Florida Has Yet Another Unconstitutional Social Media Bill; Wants To Ban Kids From Social Media * Colorado Journalist Says Fuck Prior Restraint, Dares Court To Keep Violating The 1st Amendment Techdirt Deals Techdirt Insider Discord The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel... Loading... Become an Insider! Recent Stories Thursday 13:32 San Francisco Bets Big On Surveillance, Blankets City With 400 Automatic License Plate Readers (6) 11:15 Ousted Prosecutor's First Amendment Lawsuit Against Ron DeSantis Revived By Appeals Court (8) 11:10 Daily Deal: The 2024 AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner & Architect Bundle (0) 09:23 Florida Has Yet Another Unconstitutional Social Media Bill; Wants To Ban Kids From Social Media (25) 05:24 Telecom Monopolies Are Once Again Funding Covert, Sleazy Local Attacks On Community Broadband Networks (10) Wednesday 20:09 Study: Field Drug Tests Generate Nearly 30,000 Bogus Arrests A Year (13) 15:37 Google Supports Oregon 'Right To Repair' Reform (2) 13:37 Techdirt Podcast Episode 376: Beeper And The Power Of Protocols (2) My Comments To Attorney General Rob Bonta Regarding Common 12:00 Sense Media's Dangerous 'Protect The Kids' Ballot Initiative (34) 10:49 Colorado Journalist Says Fuck Prior Restraint, Dares Court To Keep Violating The 1st Amendment (31) More arrow x Email This Story This feature is only available to registered users. You can register here or sign in to use it. Tools & Services * Twitter * Facebook * RSS * Podcast * Research & Reports Company * About Us * Advertising Policies * Privacy Contact * Help & Feedback * Media Kit * Sponsor / Advertise More * Copia Institute * Insider Shop * Support Techdirt Techdirt Brought to you by Floor64 Proudly powered by WordPress. Hosted by Pressable. [Got it] This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy