https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-023-01980-4 Skip to main content SpringerLink Log in Menu Find a journal Publish with us Track your research Search Cart 1. Home 2. Sports Medicine 3. Article Acute Effects of Ad Libitum Use of Commercially Available Cannabis Products on the Subjective Experience of Aerobic Exercise: A Crossover Study * Original Research Article * Published: 26 December 2023 * (2023) * Cite this article [40279] Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript * Laurel P. Gibson ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6684-2126^1, * Gregory R. Giordano^1, * L. Cinnamon Bidwell^1, * Kent E. Hutchison^2 & * ... * Angela D. Bryan^1 Show authors * 118 Accesses * 257 Altmetric * 33 Mentions * Explore all metrics Abstract Objective The present study aimed to examine the acute effects of legal-market cannabis on regular cannabis users' subjective responses to exercise in a controlled laboratory environment. Background Given the stereotype that cannabis is associated with extreme sedentary behavior, there are concerns that cannabis legalization may exacerbate the US physical inactivity epidemic. However, despite these concerns, recent years have seen considerable public interest in the use of cannabis concurrently with exercise (e.g., running). Methods The present study compared participants' experiences of exercise without cannabis to their experiences of exercise after acute ad libitum use of one of two commercially available cannabis flower products: a D9-tetrahydrocannabinol-dominant or a cannabidiol-dominant product. Participants (N = 42) were regular cannabis users between the ages of 21 and 39 years (mean = 30.81 years, standard deviation = 4.72 years). Results Although participants reported a more positive affect (p < 0.001), enjoyment (p < 0.001), and runner's high symptoms (p < 0.001) during their cannabis (vs non-cannabis) exercise appointment, they also reported more exertion (p = 0.04). Pain levels were very low and did not differ between appointments (p = 0.45). Effects appeared to depend, in part, on cannabinoid content; there was a larger difference in enjoyment (p = 0.02), and a smaller difference in exertion (p = 0.02), between the cannabis and non-cannabis exercise appointments among participants in the cannabidiol (vs D9-tetrahydrocannabinol) condition. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the acute effects of commercially available cannabis on subjective responses to exercise in a laboratory environment. Our findings suggest that, among regular cannabis users who use cannabis in combination with exercise, cannabis use prior to exercise may lead to increases in both positive and negative aspects of the subjective exercise experience. Research using diverse samples, exercise modalities, and methodologies (e.g., placebo-controlled trials) is needed to establish the generalizability of these findings. This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access. Access this article Log in via an institution Buy article PDF USD 39.95 Price excludes VAT (USA) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout. Instant access to the full article PDF. Rent this article via DeepDyve Institutional subscriptions Fig. 1 [40279_2023_1980_Fig1_HTML] Fig. 2 [40279_2023_1980_Fig2_HTML] Fig. 3 [40279_2023_1980_Fig3_HTML] Notes 1. We began collecting heart rate data midway through the study. As such, heart rate data are only available for 73.8% of participants (n = 31). 2. Runner's high symptoms and RHR were only assessed at one timepoint (runner's high symptoms: post-exercise; RHR: pre-exercise). As such, these models only included one within-subjects factor (i.e., exercise appointment [cannabis vs. non-cannabis] but not time) and estimated random intercepts (but not slopes) for participant. These models therefore examined (1) average runner's high symptoms/RHR, (2) the effect of exercise appointment on runner's high symptoms/RHR, (3) the effect of cannabis condition on runner's high symptoms/RHR, and (4) the exercise appointment by cannabis condition interaction. References 1. Hasin D, Walsh C. Trends over time in adult cannabis use: a review of recent findings. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021;38:80-5. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 2. Martins SS, Segura LE, Levy NS, Mauro PM, Mauro CM, Philbin MM, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in cannabis use following legalization in US states with medical cannabis laws. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(9): e2127002. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 3. Gallup. Support for legal marijuana holds a record high of 68%. Available from: Available from: https://news.gallup.com/poll/ 356939/support-legal-marijuana-holds-record-high.aspx. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 4. Pew Research Center. Americans overwhelmingly say marijuana should be legal for medical or recreational use. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/11/22/ americans-overwhelmingly-say-marijuana-should-be-legal-for-medical-or-recreational-use /. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 5. Greenway FL, Kirwan JP. Medical marijuana: an obesity problem or opportunity? Int J Obesity. 2019;43(4):761-2. Article Google Scholar 6. Korn L, Haynie DL, Luk JW, Simons-Morton BG. Prospective associations between cannabis use and negative and positive health and social measures among emerging adults. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;58:55-63. Article PubMed Google Scholar 7. Ong LQ, Bellettiere J, Alvarado C, Chavez P, Berardi V. Cannabis use, sedentary behavior, and physical activity in a nationally representative sample of US adults. Harm Reduct J. 2021;18 (1):1-10. Article Google Scholar 8. Smith L, Sherratt F, Barnett Y, Cao C, Tully MA, Koyanagi A, et al. Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cannabis use in 15,822 US adults: cross-sectional analyses from NHANES. Public Health. 2019;193:76-82. Article Google Scholar 9. Vidot DC, Bispo JB, Hlaing WM, Prado G, Messiah SE. Moderate and vigorous physical activity patterns among marijuana users: results from the 2007-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;178:43-8. Article PubMed Google Scholar 10. York Williams SL, Gust CJ, Mueller R, Bidwell L, Hutchison KE, Gillman AS, et al. The new runner's high? Examining relationships between cannabis use and exercise behavior in states with legalized cannabis. Front Public Health. 2019;7:99. Article PubMed Google Scholar 11. YorkWilliams SL, Gibson LP, Gust CJ, Giordano G, Hutchison KE, Bryan AD. Exercise intervention outcomes with cannabis users and nonusers aged 60 and older. Am J Health Behav. 2020;44(4):420-31. Article PubMed Google Scholar 12. Darling M. Runners are using weed to make long runs less miserable. In: Vice. 2018. Available from: https://www.vice.com/ en_us/article/59k878/ runners-are-using-weed-to-make-long-runs-less-miserable. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 13. Gamerman E. Runner's high gets new meaning. In: The Wall Street Journal. 2021. Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/ new-book-marijuana-usage-runners-high-11631309227. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 14. O'Conner A. Can marijuana make you a better athlete? In: The New York Times. 2021. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07 /11/well/move/marijuana-olympics-ban.html. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 15. Borchardt D. These athletes add cannabis to their workout regimen. In: Forbes. 2016. Available from: https://www.forbes.com /sites/debraborchardt/2016/08/31/ these-athletes-add-cannabis-to-their-workout-regimen/# 3dc4888d19ad. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 16. Alm D. Thai Richards is creating a new kind of running community with a radical mission: to destigmatize the way we think about weed and wellness. In: Runner's World. 2022. Available from: https://www.runnersworld.com/runners-stories/a38911565/ thai-richards-running-cannabis/. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 17. deBara D. Let's get physical: how active people use cannabis to get in the zone. 2019. In: Weed Maps. Available from: https:// weedmaps.com/news/2019/04/ lets-get-physical-how-active-people-use-cannabis-to-get-in-the-zone /. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 18. Drier F. The debate over running while high. 2015. In: The Wall Street Journal. Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/ the-debate-over-running-while-high-1423500590. [Accessed 14 Dec 2022]. 19. Nguyen T. Working out with weed. In: Nature. 2019. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02529-0. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 20. Hudzik TJ, Huestis MA, Rossi SS, Schumacher YO, Harcourt P, Budgett R, et al. Cannabis and sport: a world anti-doping perspective. Addiction. 2023;118(11):2040-2. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/add.16315. Article PubMed Google Scholar 21. Charron J, Carey V, Roy P, Comtois AS, Ferland PM. Acute effects of cannabis consumption on exercise performance: a systematic and umbrella review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020;61(4):551-61. PubMed Google Scholar 22. Gillman AS, Hutchison KE, Bryan AD. Cannabis and exercise science: a commentary on existing studies and suggestions for future directions. Sports Med. 2015;45:1357-63. Article PubMed Google Scholar 23. Bird KD, Boleyn T, Chesher GB, Jackson DM, Starmer GA, Teo RKC. Intercannabinoid and cannabinoid-ethanol interactions and their effects on human performance. Psychopharmacology. 1980;71:181-8. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 24. Kvalseth TO. Effects of marijuana on human reaction time and motor control. Percept Mot Skills. 1977;45(3):935-9. Article PubMed Google Scholar 25. Renaud AM, Cormier YVON. Acute effects of marihuana smoking on maximal exercise performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986;18 (6):685-9. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 26. Steadward RD, Singh M. The effects of smoking marihuana on physical performance. Med Sci Sports. 1975;7(4):309-11. CAS PubMed Google Scholar 27. Avakian EV, Horvath SM, Michael ED, Jacobs S. Effect of marihuana on cardiorespiratory responses to submaximal exercise. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979;26(6):777-81. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 28. Ewell TR, Bomar MC, Abbotts KSS, Butterklee HM, Dooley GP, Bell C. Edible marijuana and cycle ergometer exercise. Front Physiol. 2022;13:2552. Article Google Scholar 29. Ogle WL, Gold GJ, Coppen LE, Copriviza C. How and why adults use cannabis during physical activity. J Cannabis Res. 2022;4 (1):1-10. Article Google Scholar 30. Gibson LP, Bryan AD. Running high: cannabis users' subjective experience of exercise during legal market cannabis use versus no use in a naturalistic setting. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2022.0338. Article PubMed Google Scholar 31. Sparling PB, Giuffrida A, Piomelli D, Rosskopf L, Dietrich A. Exercise activates the endocannabinoid system. NeuroReport. 2003; 14(17):2209-11. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 32. Koltyn KF, Brellenthin AG, Cook DB, Sehgal N, Hillard C. Mechanisms of exercise-induced hypoalgesia. J Pain. 2014;15 (12):1294-304. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 33. Raichlen DA, Foster AD, Gerdeman GL, Seillier A, Giuffrida A. Wired to run: exercise-induced endocannabinoid signaling in humans and cursorial mammals with implications for the 'runner's high.' J Exp Biol. 2012;215(8):1331-6. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 34. Heyman E, Gamelin FX, Goekint M, Piscitelli F, Roelands B, Leclair E, et al. Intense exercise increases circulating endocannabinoid and BDNF levels in humans: possible implications for reward and depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37 (6):844-51. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 35. Dishman RK, O'Connor PJ. Lessons in exercise neurobiology: the case of endorphins. Ment Health Phys Activity. 2009;2(1):4-9. Article Google Scholar 36. Hicks SD, Jacob P, Perez O, Baffuto M, Gagnon Z, Middleton FA. The transcriptional signature of a runner's high. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(5):970-8. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 37. Lu HC, Mackie K. Review of the endocannabinoid system. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021;6(6):607-15. PubMed Google Scholar 38. Gibson LP, Karoly HC, Ellingson JM, Klawitter J, Sempio C, Squeri JE, et al. Effects of cannabidiol in cannabis flower: Implications for harm reduction. Addict Biol. 2022;27(1): e13092. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 39. Okey SA, Meier MH. A within-person comparison of the subjective effects of higher vs. lower-potency cannabis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;216: 108225. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 40. Raedeke TD. The relationship between enjoyment and affective responses to exercise. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2007;19(1):105-15. Article Google Scholar 41. Kwan BM, Bryan A. In-task and post-task affective response to exercise: translating exercise intentions into behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(1):115-31. Article PubMed Google Scholar 42. Abrams DI. The therapeutic effects of cannabis and cannabinoids: an update from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine report. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;49:7-11. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 43. Morrison PD, Zois V, McKeown DA, Lee TD, Holt DW, Powell JF, et al. The acute effects of synthetic intravenous D9-tetrahydrocannabinol on psychosis, mood and cognitive functioning. Psychol Med. 2009;39(10):1607-16. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 44. Martin-Santos R, Crippa JA, Batalla A, Bhattacharyya S, Atakan Z, Borgwardt S, et al. Acute effects of a single, oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) administration in healthy volunteers. Curr Pharm Design. 2012;18 (32):4966-79. Article CAS Google Scholar 45. Crippa JA, Zuardi AW, Martin-Santos R, Bhattacharyya S, Atakan Z, McGuire P, et al. Cannabis and anxiety: a critical review of the evidence. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp. 2009;24(7):515-23. Article CAS Google Scholar 46. Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J. 1986;111(2):383-90. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 47. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-60. Article PubMed Google Scholar 48. Linke SE, Gallo LC, Norman GJ. Attrition and adherence rates of sustained vs. intermittent exercise interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42(2):197-209. Article PubMed Google Scholar 49. Persinger R, Foster C, Gibson M, Fater DC, Porcari JP. Consistency of the talk test for exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(9):1632-6. PubMed Google Scholar 50. Reed JL, Pipe AL. The talk test: a useful tool for prescribing and monitoring exercise intensity. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2014;29 (5):475-80. Article PubMed Google Scholar 51. Foster C, Porcari JP, Anderson J, Paulson M, Smaczny D, Webber H, et al. The talk test as a marker of exercise training intensity. J Cardiopul Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(1):24-30. Article Google Scholar 52. Woltmann ML, Foster C, Porcari JP, Camic CL, Dodge C, Haible S, et al. Evidence that the talk test can be used to regulate exercise intensity. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(5):1248-54. Article PubMed Google Scholar 53. Bidwell LC, Mueller R, York Williams SL, Hagerty S, Bryan AD, Hutchison KE. A novel observational method for assessing acute responses to cannabis: preliminary validation using legal market strains. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2018;3(1):35-44. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 54. Gibson LP, Skrzynski CJ, Giordano GR, Bryan AD. A daily diary investigation of cannabis use and its diet and exercise correlates. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1217144. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 55. Klawitter J, Sempio C, Morlein S, De Bloois E, Klepacki J, Henthorn T, et al. An atmospheric pressure ionization MS/MS assay using online extraction for the analysis of 11 cannabinoids and metabolites in human plasma and urine. Ther Drug Monit. 2017;39 (5):556. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 56. Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10(3):141-6. CAS PubMed Google Scholar 57. Morean ME, de Wit H, King AC, Sofuoglu M, Rueger SY, O'Malley SS. The drug effects questionnaire: psychometric support across three drug types. Psychopharmacology. 2013;227:177-92. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 58. Borg GA. Perceived exertion: a note on "history" and methods. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1973;5:90-3. Article CAS Google Scholar 59. Borg G. Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. 1st ed. Human Kinetics; 1998. 60. Hardy CJ, Rejeski WJ. Not what, but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1989;11(3):304-17. Article Google Scholar 61. Svebak S, Murgatroyd S. Metamotivational dominance: a multimethod validation of reversal theory constructs. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;48(1):107. Article Google Scholar 62. Gillman AS, Bryan AD. Effects of performance versus game-based mobile applications on response to exercise. Ann Behav Med. 2016; 50(1):157-62. Article PubMed Google Scholar 63. Bates D, Machler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1-48. Article Google Scholar 64. Sahinovic A, Irwin C, Doohan PT, Kevin RC, Cox AJ, Lau NS, et al. Effects of cannabidiol on exercise physiology and bioenergetics: a randomised controlled pilot trial. Sports Med Open. 2022;8 (1):1-8. Article Google Scholar 65. Lisano J, Phillips K, Smith J, Barnes M, Stewart L. Patterns and perceptions of cannabis use with physical activity. Cannabis. 2019;2(2):151-64. Article Google Scholar 66. Bidwell LC, Karoly HC, Torres MO, Master A, Bryan AD, Hutchison KE. A naturalistic study of orally administered vs. inhaled legal market cannabis: cannabinoids exposure, intoxication, and impairment. Psychopharmacology. 2022;239(2):385-97. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 67. Machado Bergamaschi M, Helena Costa Queiroz R, Waldo Zuardi A, Crippa AS. Safety and side effects of cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent. Curr Drug Saf. 2011;6(4):237-49. Article Google Scholar 68. Bryan AD, Magnan RE, Nilsson R, Marcus BH, Tompkins SA, Hutchison KE. The big picture of individual differences in physical activity behavior change: a transdisciplinary approach. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011;12(1):20-6. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 69. Gasparini VH, Azevedo P, Carletti L, Perez AJ. Oxygen consumption and heart rate obtained in a ramp protocol are equivalent during exercise session of rectangular loading at ventilatory thresholds for athletes. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2019;21:1-13. Article Google Scholar 70. Weltman A, Weltman J, Rutt R, Seip R, Levine S, Snead D, et al. Percentages of maximal heart rate, heart rate reserve, and VO2peak for determining endurance training intensity in sedentary women. Int J Sports Med. 1989;10(03):212-6. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 71. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 2021. Available from: https:// www.acsm.org/education-resources/books/ guidelines-exercise-testing-prescription. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 72. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. The relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses demystified: to crack the 40-year-old nut, replace the 40-year-old nutcracker! Ann Behavl Med. 2008;35(2):136-49. Article Google Scholar 73. Mann T, Lamberts RP, Lambert MI. Methods of prescribing relative exercise intensity: physiological and practical considerations. Sports Med. 2013;43:613-25. Article PubMed Google Scholar 74. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity guidelines for Americans. 2018. Available from: https:// health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/ Physical_Activity_Guidelines_2nd_edition.pdf. [Accessed 14 Dec 2023]. 75. Lucas CJ, Galettis P, Schneider J. The pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84 (11):2477-82. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 76. Martin-Willett R, Helmuth T, Abraha M, Bryan AD, Hitchcock L, Lee K, et al. Validation of a multisubstance online timeline followback assessment. Brain Behav. 2020;10(1): e01486. Article PubMed Google Scholar 77. Russo EB. Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163(7):1344-64. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 78. Heishman SJ, Singleton EG, Liguori A. Marijuana Craving Questionnaire: development and initial validation of a self-report instrument. Addiction. 2001;96(7):1023-34. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 79. Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(16):1789-95. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 80. Kiernan M, Schoffman DE, Lee K, Brown SD, Fair JM, Perri MG, et al. The Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical Item (L-Cat): a single categorical item sensitive to physical activity changes in overweight/obese women. Int J Obesity. 2013;37(12):1597-602. Article CAS Google Scholar Download references Author information Authors and Affiliations 1. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA Laurel P. Gibson, Gregory R. Giordano, L. Cinnamon Bidwell & Angela D. Bryan 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA Kent E. Hutchison Authors 1. Laurel P. Gibson View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 2. Gregory R. Giordano View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 3. L. Cinnamon Bidwell View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 4. Kent E. Hutchison View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 5. Angela D. Bryan View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Corresponding author Correspondence to Laurel P. Gibson. Ethics declarations Funding This work was supported by an Interdisciplinary Research Scholar Award from the University of Colorado Boulder's Center for Research and Education Addressing Cannabis and Health (Principal Investigator: Laurel P. Gibson). Laurel P. Gibson is funded by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE 1650115). Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests Laurel P. Gibson, Gregory R. Giordano, L. Cinnamon Bidwell, Kent E. Hutchison, and Angela D. Bryan have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. Ethics Approval Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Colorado Boulder (Protocol #19-0596; approval date: 01/22/20). The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent to Participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for Publication Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Code Availability The R code is available by contacting the corresponding author. Authors' Contributions LPG, LCB, KEH, and ADB designed the research; LPG and GRG performed the research; LPG analyzed the data; LPG wrote the paper; GRG, LCB, KEH, and ADB provided feedback on the paper. All authors read and approved the final version. Supplementary Information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (DOCX 859 KB) Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Reprints and permissions About this article Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark Cite this article Gibson, L.P., Giordano, G.R., Bidwell, L.C. et al. Acute Effects of Ad Libitum Use of Commercially Available Cannabis Products on the Subjective Experience of Aerobic Exercise: A Crossover Study. Sports Med (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01980-4 Download citation * Accepted: 03 December 2023 * Published: 26 December 2023 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01980-4 Share this article Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative Access this article Log in via an institution Buy article PDF USD 39.95 Price excludes VAT (USA) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout. Instant access to the full article PDF. Rent this article via DeepDyve Institutional subscriptions Advertisement search Search by keyword or author [ ] Search Navigation * Find a journal * Publish with us * Track your research Discover content * Journals A-Z * Books A-Z Publish with us * Publish your research * Open access publishing Products and services * Our products * Librarians * Societies * Partners and advertisers Our imprints * Springer * Nature Portfolio * BMC * Palgrave Macmillan * Apress * Your privacy choices/Manage cookies * Your US state privacy rights * Accessibility statement * Terms and conditions * Privacy policy * Help and support 68.32.53.220 Not affiliated Springer Nature (c) 2024 Springer Nature