https://phys.org/news/2023-12-colorado-wolf-reintroduction-ranchers-legal.html Phys.org Topics * Week's top * Latest news * Unread news * Subscribe [ ] Science X Account [ ] [ ] [*] Remember me Sign In Click here to sign in with or Forget Password? Not a member? Sign up Learn more * Nanotechnology * Physics * Earth * Astronomy & Space * Chemistry * Biology * Other Sciences * Medical Xpress Medicine * Tech Xplore Technology [INS::INS] * * share this! * 32 * Twit * Share * Email 1. Home 2. Biology 3. Plants & Animals 1. Home 2. Biology 3. Ecology * * * --------------------------------------------------------------------- December 18, 2023 Editors' notes This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: fact-checked reputable news agency proofread Colorado wolf reintroduction to move forward as ranchers' legal effort fails by Elise Schmelzer and Katie Langford, The Denver Post gray wolves Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain The reintroduction of wolves in Colorado this month will proceed as planned after a federal judge on Friday 15 Dec. denied ranchers' request to stop the state's efforts to allow for further environmental analysis. U.S. District Judge Regina Rodriguez denied a request by the Colorado Cattlemen's Association and Gunnison County Stockgrowers' Association to halt the reintroduction of the controversial canines, finding it "contrary to the public's interest in seeing gray wolves released in Colorado." Voters approved the reintroduction in 2020, and wolves could be on the ground in Colorado as early as Monday. The request for the delay was filed as part of a federal lawsuit the two ranching groups filed Monday against Colorado Parks and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The lawsuit alleges the government agencies violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to prepare an environmental impact statement about the wolves while renewing a cooperative agreement between the two agencies about conserving endangered species. But Rodriguez found the agencies did comply with the National Environmental Policy Act through "extensive public involvement," including several opportunities for public comment and peer review. "While the Petitioners who have lived and worked on the land for many years are understandably concerned about possible impacts of this reintroduction, neither these possible impacts nor their assertions under the Administrative Procedures Act are sufficient for this Court to grant the extraordinary relief they seek," Rodriguez wrote in the ruling, which was published late Friday. [INS::INS] The lawsuit and subsequent filings by the livestock groups asked to halt the reintroduction, which is mandated to take place by the end of 2023. The cattlemen's lawsuit alleges the reintroduction could harm the endangered Gunnison sage grouse populations and kill or stress cattle. Andrew Spann, president of the Gunnison County Stockgrowers' Association, testified during a court hearing Thursday that he wants to see an analysis of how the eventual population of hundreds of wolves would affect the lands, recreation and economies of Colorado. "This issue is not just producers worried about their cows being killed. ... This about what are the impacts and how are we going to address those going forward," Spann said. But potential harm to sage grouse or cattle does not rise to the level of irreparable harm that would cause the court to intervene, Rodriguez wrote in the ruling. "To satisfy its burden of proving irreparable harm, the party seeking injunctive relief must show that the harm is 'certain and great' and not speculative," Rodriguez wrote. "Here, Petitioners have not presented evidence demonstrating that harm will occur if their requested relief is not granted, nor have they demonstrated such harm, if it did occur, would be irreparable." During the Thursday hearing, Lisa Reynolds, attorney for Colorado Parks and Wildlife, said the ranchers' lawsuit was a "last-ditch effort" to halt the reintroduction, which has been in the works since voters in 2020 approved the reintroduction. "Now, at the eleventh hour they want to put a halt to the three-year plan for reintroduction under the guise of a need for more study and analysis," Reynolds said. Attorneys for Colorado Parks and Wildlife and the Fish and Wildlife Service on Thursday argued that they did not need to conduct an environmental impact review to renew the cooperative agreement, which has been in place for decades. The federal agency has never prepared an environmental impact statement when renewing similar legal agreements across the country, said Brian Herman, attorney for the Fish and Wildlife Service. Further, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service did conduct an environmental impact review for the reintroduction of wolves, although under a different federal process, Herman said. The service analyzed the environmental impact of reintroducing wolves while preparing the federal 10(j) rule that will allow for the killing or hazing of wolves in certain circumstances. Wildlife advocacy groups slammed the lawsuit, calling it "ridiculous," "flimsy" and a "red herring." "For the past three years, the concerns of ranchers and livestock owners have been elevated in painstaking and deliberate state and federal processes," Lindsay Larris, wildlife program director for WildEarth Guardians, said in a statement. "Government officials have bent over backward to accommodate this special interest, but apparently, nothing but the complete absence of wolves on the landscape will be enough." [INS::INS] Although Rodriguez denied the request to delay the reintroduction, the lawsuit will proceed in federal court, along with another lawsuit filed against the reintroduction. Conservation groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife, praised the court order in statements Friday. "I'm relieved that the court saw right through the livestock industry's self-serving and meritless arguments," said Alli Henderson, southern Rockies director at the Center for Biological Diversity, in a statement. "Both science and Colorado voters have very clearly told us that wolves belong here. Once wolves are reintroduced, they'll help restore balance to our state's ecosystems." Colorado Conservation Alliance and two of its board members on Thursday sued the Fish and Wildlife Service and Colorado Parks and Wildlife in federal court alleging the environmental impact statement completed for the 10(j) rule was insufficient. The analysis did not look at potential impacts to the endangered Mexican wolf and did not adequately look at how wolves might affect deer, elk and other prey, the lawsuit states. The lawsuit asks the judge to halt the reintroduction until a more thorough environmental impact statement is completed. A hearing has not yet been set in that lawsuit, nor have the two government agencies filed legal responses to the lawsuit. 2023 MediaNews Group, Inc. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Citation: Colorado wolf reintroduction to move forward as ranchers' legal effort fails (2023, December 18) retrieved 26 December 2023 from https://phys.org/news/ 2023-12-colorado-wolf-reintroduction-ranchers-legal.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Explore further Colorado could capture wolves within days, unless a judge delays the state's reintroduction efforts --------------------------------------------------------------------- 32 shares * Facebook * Twitter * Email Feedback to editors * Featured * Last Comments * Popular Astronomers detect new pulsar wind nebula and its associated pulsar 11 hours ago 0 Team develops transistors with sliding ferroelectricity based on polarity-switchable molybdenum disulfide Dec 23, 2023 0 Mapping magma chambers under the Hunga volcano before and after the 2022 eruption Dec 22, 2023 0 A sweater made from new aerogel fiber tests warmer than one made from down Dec 22, 2023 3 Swift 4-D printing with shape-memory polymers Dec 22, 2023 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [gif] Astronomers detect new pulsar wind nebula and its associated pulsar 11 hours ago [gif] 'Maintain Asian forest diversity to avoid climate change impact,' suggests new study Dec 25, 2023 [gif] Researchers develop 'electronic soil' that enhances crop growth Dec 25, 2023 [gif] A whiff of tears reduces male aggression, says study Dec 25, 2023 [gif] Japan moon lander enters lunar orbit Dec 25, 2023 [gif] New AI model can predict human lifespan, researchers say. They want to make sure it's used for good Dec 23, 2023 [gif] Team develops transistors with sliding ferroelectricity based on polarity-switchable molybdenum disulfide Dec 23, 2023 [gif] Researchers use VLT exoplanet hunter to study Jupiter's winds Dec 22, 2023 [gif] Reindeer sleep while chewing their cud, a strategy that may help them in the summer Dec 22, 2023 [gif] Mapping magma chambers under the Hunga volcano before and after the 2022 eruption Dec 22, 2023 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Relevant PhysicsForums posts Do fluctuations in Earth's magnetic field cause heart attacks? 1 hour ago How a-priori intelligence is even possible? 6 hours ago What do large moles on the body indicate? 7 hours ago Protein Folding thoughts/help Dec 25, 2023 Is Richard Dawkins a "recognized scientist"? Dec 23, 2023 And Now, here comes COVID-19 version BA.2, BA.4, BA.5,... Dec 22, 2023 More from Biology and Medical --------------------------------------------------------------------- [INS::INS] * Related Stories [gif] Colorado could capture wolves within days, unless a judge delays the state's reintroduction efforts Dec 15, 2023 [gif] Livestock associations sue Colorado, U.S. Fish and Wildlife to delay gray wolf reintroduction Dec 12, 2023 [gif] Another Western state says it won't send wolves to Colorado, citing 'enormous price' of managing the species Jul 24, 2023 [gif] Colorado secures the first wolves for reintroduction from Oregon Oct 9, 2023 [gif] Colorado cements plan to reintroduce gray wolves but a snag lingers May 4, 2023 [gif] Biologists are keeping a close eye on a rare Mexican wolf that is wandering out of bounds Nov 3, 2023 * Recommended for you [gif] Reindeer sleep while chewing their cud, a strategy that may help them in the summer Dec 22, 2023 [gif] How jellyfish regenerate functional tentacles in days Dec 22, 2023 [gif] Scientists find malaria parasite takes its time within mosquito host to reap an evolutionary advantage Dec 22, 2023 [gif] Researchers surprised at levels of toxicity in standard plastic products Dec 21, 2023 [gif] Blind spiders living in completely dark caves are able to sense light, scientists show Dec 21, 2023 [gif] New study reveals five new species of soft-furred hedgehogs from Southeast Asia Dec 21, 2023 Load comments (4) Let us know if there is a problem with our content Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines). Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request [-- please select one -- ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message to the editors [ ] Your email (only if you want to be contacted back) [ ] Send Feedback Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors. Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages. E-mail the story Colorado wolf reintroduction to move forward as ranchers' legal effort fails Your friend's email [ ] Your email [ ] [ ] I would like to subscribe to Science X Newsletter. Learn more Your name [ ] Note Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message [ ] Send Newsletter sign up Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties. [ ] Subscribe More information Privacy policy Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account. Remove ads Maybe later Medical Xpress Medical Xpress Medical research advances and health news Tech Xplore Tech Xplore The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances Science X Science X The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web Newsletters [ ] Subscribe Science X Daily and the Weekly Email Newsletter are free features that allow you to receive your favorite sci-tech news updates in your email inbox Follow us * * * * * Top * Home * Search * Mobile version * Help * FAQ * About * Contact * Science X Account * Premium Account * Archive * News wire * Android app * iOS app * RSS feeds * Push notification (c) Phys.org 2003 - 2023 powered by Science X Network Privacy policy Terms of use E-mail newsletter [ ] Subscribe Follow us * * * * It appears that you are currently using Ad Blocking software. What are the consequences? x Quantcast