https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/dec/21/meta-facebook-instagram-pro-palestine-censorship-human-rights-watch-report [p] Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation Print subscriptions Sign in Search jobs Search US edition[ ] * US edition * UK edition * Australia edition * International edition * Europe edition The Guardian - Back to homeThe Guardian [ ] * News * Opinion * Sport * Culture * Lifestyle ShowMoreShow More * [ ]News + View all News + US news + World news + Environment + US politics + Ukraine + Soccer + Business + Tech + Science + Newsletters + Wellness * [ ]Opinion + View all Opinion + The Guardian view + Columnists + Letters + Opinion videos + Cartoons * [ ]Sport + View all Sport + Soccer + NFL + Tennis + MLB + MLS + NBA + NHL + F1 + Golf * [ ]Culture + View all Culture + Film + Books + Music + Art & design + TV & radio + Stage + Classical + Games * [ ]Lifestyle + View all Lifestyle + Wellness + Fashion + Food + Recipes + Love & sex + Home & garden + Health & fitness + Family + Travel + Money * Search input [ ] google-search Search + Support us + Print subscriptions * [ ]US edition + UK edition + Australia edition + International edition + Europe edition * + Search jobs + Digital Archive + Guardian Puzzles app + Guardian Licensing + About Us + The Guardian app + Video + Podcasts + Pictures + Inside the Guardian + Guardian Weekly + Crosswords + Wordiply + Corrections * + Facebook + Twitter * + Search jobs + Digital Archive + Guardian Puzzles app + Guardian Licensing + About Us * World * Europe * US * Americas * Asia * Australia * Middle East * Africa * Inequality * Global development Protesters unfurl the Palestinian flag in front of a sign with the Meta name, symbol and address. [ ] Protesters at Meta's headquarters demand the company stop removing pro-Palestine content on 12 December. Photograph: Calvin Stewart/Zuma Press Wire/Shutterstock Protesters at Meta's headquarters demand the company stop removing pro-Palestine content on 12 December. Photograph: Calvin Stewart/Zuma Press Wire/Shutterstock Meta Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims Rights group says Facebook and Instagram routinely engage in 'six key patterns of undue censorship' of content supporting Palestine Richard Luscombe @richlusc Thu 21 Dec 2023 11.58 ESTLast modified on Thu 21 Dec 2023 12.47 EST * * * Meta has engaged in a "systemic and global" censorship of pro-Palestinian content since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war on 7 October, according to a new report from Human Rights Watch (HRW). Meta wrong to remove graphic Israel-Gaza videos, oversight board says Read more In a scathing 51-page report, the organization documented and reviewed more than a thousand reported instances of Meta removing content and suspending or permanently banning accounts on Facebook and Instagram. The company exhibited "six key patterns of undue censorship" of content in support of Palestine and Palestinians, including the taking down of posts, stories and comments; disabling accounts; restricting users' ability to interact with others' posts; and "shadow banning", where the visibility and reach of a person's material is significantly reduced, according to HRW. Examples it cites include content originating from more than 60 countries, mostly in English, and all in "peaceful support of Palestine, expressed in diverse ways". Even HRW's own posts seeking examples of online censorship were flagged as spam, the report said. "Censorship of content related to Palestine on Instagram and Facebook is systemic and global [and] Meta's inconsistent enforcement of its own policies led to the erroneous removal of content about Palestine," the group said in the report, citing "erroneous implementation, overreliance on automated tools to moderate content, and undue government influence over content removals" as the roots of the problem. In a statement to the Guardian, Meta acknowledged it makes errors that are "frustrating" for people, but said that "the implication that we deliberately and systemically suppress a particular voice is false. Claiming that 1,000 examples, out of the enormous amount of content posted about the conflict, are proof of 'systemic censorship' may make for a good headline, but that doesn't make the claim any less misleading. Meta said it was the only company in the world to have publicly released human rights due diligence on issues related to Israel and Palestine . "This report ignores the realities of enforcing our policies globally during a fast-moving, highly polarized and intense conflict, which has led to an increase in content being reported to us. Our policies are designed to give everyone a voice while at the same time keeping our platforms safe," the company's statement reads. It is the second time this month that Meta has been challenged over accusations that it routinely silences pro-Palestinian content and voices. Last week Elizabeth Warren, Democratic senator for Massachusetts, wrote to Meta's co-founder and chief executive officer, Mark Zuckerberg, demanding information following hundreds of reports from Instagram users dating back to October that their content was demoted or removed, and their accounts subjected to shadow banning. skip past newsletter promotion Sign up to TechScape Free weekly newsletter Alex Hern's weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. after newsletter promotion On Tuesday, Meta's oversight board said the company had been wrong to remove two videos of the conflict in particular from Instagram and Facebook. The board said the videos were valuable for "informing the world about human suffering on both sides". One showed the aftermath of an airstrike near al-Shifa hospital in Gaza via Instagram, the other a woman being taken hostage during the 7 October attack via Facebook. The clips were reinstated. Users of Meta's products have documented what they say is technological bias in favor of pro-Israel content and against pro-Palestinian posts. Instagram's translation software replaced "Palestinian" followed by the Arabic phrase "Praise be to Allah" to "Palestinian terrorists" in English. WhatsApp's AI, when asked to generate images of Palestinian boys and girls, created cartoon children with guns, whereas its images Israeli children did not include firearms. Explore more on these topics * Meta * Palestinian territories * Facebook * Instagram * Israel * Israel-Gaza war * Middle East and north Africa * news * * * * * * Reuse this content More on this story More on this story * [4000] Live Israel-Gaza war live: 'People in Gaza are people,' says UNRWA; death toll from Israeli attacks tops 20,000 Palestinians 19m ago * [5472] Israeli airstrike kills Gaza aid worker and 70 of his extended family, UN says 9h ago * [3000] London protest calls for Gaza ceasefire and boycott of Israel-linked brands 5h ago * [6000] Revealed: how US residents are funding illegal settlements in the West Bank 10h ago * [3500] Flooding Hamas tunnels with seawater risks 'ruining basic life in Gaza', says expert 17h ago * [1600] Israeli campaign to kill Hamas leaders likely to backfire, say earlier assassination targets 18h ago * [8688] Will the new UN Gaza aid resolution make a difference on the ground? 1d ago * [3500] Joe Biden's reluctance to call for ceasefire may leave him at odds with his party 24h ago * [2738] UN security council backs resolution on large-scale aid to Gaza but not ceasefire 1d ago * [3000] New York college students who support Palestine fear post-9/ 11-style retaliation 1d ago Most viewed Most viewed * World * Europe * US * Americas * Asia * Australia * Middle East * Africa * Inequality * Global development * News * Opinion * Sport * Culture * Lifestyle Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning Sign up for our email * About us * Help * Complaints & corrections * SecureDrop * Work for us * * Privacy policy * Cookie policy * Terms & conditions * Contact us * All topics * All writers * Digital newspaper archive * Facebook * YouTube * Instagram * LinkedIn * Twitter * Newsletters * Advertise with us * Guardian Labs * Search jobs Back to top (c) 2023 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. (dcr)