https://thewalrus.ca/the-case-for-never-reading-the-book-jacket/ * Newsletters Subscribe [svg] Donate Search Toggle menu [ ] Search [svg] Sections Latest Stories Business Environment Society Politics Arts & Culture Explore Newsletters Events Podcasts Magazine The Walrus Lab Support Donate Subscribe Annual Report The Walrus Gala Follow Twitter LinkedIn YouTube TikTok Facebook Instagram * About Us * Contact Us * My Account * Manage Subscriptions POPULAR - The Rise of AI Fall Books 2023 Retail Madness Housing The Walrus Talks Media Right Now Skip to content The Walrus Fact-based journalism that sparks the Canadian conversation [hmenu id=2] * home * Articles + Business + Environment + Health + Politics + Arts & Culture + Society * Special Series + Hope You're Well + For the Love of the Game + Living Rooms + In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration + Terra Cognita + More special series > * Events + The Walrus Talks + The Walrus Video Room + The Walrus Leadership Roundtables + The Walrus Leadership Forums + Article Club * Subscribe + Renew your subscription + Change your address + Magazine Issues + Newsletters + Podcasts * The Walrus Lab + Hire The Walrus Lab + Amazon First Novel Award * Shop * Donate Books The Case for Never Reading the Book Jacket I don't want to be told what's going to happen and I definitely don't want to be told what the book is "about" November 28, 2023November 28, 2023 - by Tajja IsenTajja Isen Updated 16:31, Nov. 28, 2023 | Published 6:30, Nov. 28, 2023 A photo illustration of a yellow book emerging out of a grey dust jacket.Celina Gallardo / Silvia Yancheva / iStock Point to any book on my shelves and I'll tell you exactly why I bought it: because I heard about it from an essay or a list or a trusted friend or bookseller. Maybe I'm obsessed with reading everything available on the subject. Often, I loved something else the author wrote. I like the cover. I like the publisher. I like--controversially--the constellation of blurbs that tells me who the writer's in community with. Perhaps the writer's in community with me. They're my buddy. My hero. My crush. My nemesis. Rarely do I buy a book because I was seduced by the summary on the back or inside flap. As a reader, I don't find such text all that relevant. I'll skim it if I'm browsing in a bookstore or on a retail page--just enough to get the general contours. But lately, what used to be passive avoidance has evolved into a deliberate stance: these days, I refuse to read the jacket copy in full unless I absolutely have to. Jacket copy offers neither an effective barometer for predicting what I love nor reliable protection from buying things I regret. It is reductive, misleading, and--I have decided--none of my business. Jacket copy is, as the name suggests, the text that appears somewhere on a book's cover or "dust jacket." It usually consists of a bold, punchy tagline followed by two or three short paragraphs--written by the publisher, sometimes with the writer's input--that describe the plot or themes and make a pitch for why you should read the book. For a little sliver of prose, it has a big job: to flaunt a book's authenticity and specialness while simultaneously peddling the inauthentic, ordinary tropes that make people buy stuff. In a blog post for Kirkus Reviews, a trade outlet that reviews titles before their publication, Hannah Guy calls sales copy "one of the most important tools for selling books." Critics have called into question how well jacket copy fulfills these objectives. Writing for the New York Times back in 1996, Pico Iyer railed against the inflated jacket and blurb economies, lamenting the unhelpful trend of hawking a book by chucking author names into a blender--for one book, the copy he quotes opens like a joke about two guys walking into a bar: "If a manic J. G. Ballard and a depressed David Lodge got together . . ." Twenty-five years later, Eric Farwell argued in Slate that book descriptions have become so bland and tropey that they tell us nothing about a title's style or contents. Words like "dazzling," "brilliant," and "amazing" have become so ubiquitous as to lose all meaning. Zoom out far enough on any plot and they all start to sound like versions of the same boilerplate, with arcs about a protagonist journeying to find themself or having to save their marriage. "How did we get to a place," Farwell asks, "where we can't rely on book descriptions to tell us what the book is actually about or what the writing is really like?" * TikTok Is Becoming a Publisher. Will It Ruin the Book Industry? * Last Publisher Left Standing: Why Books Are Facing a Bleak Future * Book Cover Confidential: A Roundtable with Designers While I agree with Iyer and Farwell about jacket copy's general unhelpfulness, I've also drawn the opposite conclusion: not that it tells us too little but rather that it tells us too much--moreover, too much of the wrong thing. Being spoon-fed a crude distillation of plot and theme dictates, and therefore circumscribes, the terms of my reading. It tells me what to expect and how to feel in a way that strikes me as controlling, even demeaning. Somebody is trying to sell me something, which prompts me into a defensive pose--skeptical, closed off, incurious--that I don't want anywhere near my experience of art. I just want to get a premise and some vibes, a taste of tone, a flicker of the voice the book contains. I don't want to be told what's about to happen, even in the vaguest sense. And I definitely don't want to be told what it's "about." There's a difference between knowing a story's contours and having its pithiest sound bites pressed into your hand like a coupon flyer. The former is helpful; the latter risks offence. In 2021, British writer Jeanette Winterson, whose bibliography includes the classics Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit and Written on the Body, was so revulsed by the "cosy little domestic" copy added to the reissued versions of her books that she decided to burn them and post a photo of the conflagration online. (In a subsequent statement to the Guardian, she noted that her publishers were "fixing the problem.") Or consider the analogous diminishment performed by buzzwords like "urgent" or "necessary," examples of the kind of insistent language that frequently crops up in jacket copy. In 2018, critic Lauren Oyler wrote that "necessary" was being appended to more and more works of art--often by artists from underrepresented backgrounds--as a kind of diffuse moral corrective, "a discursive crutch for describing a work's right-minded views . . . that is so distinct from aesthetics it can be affixed to just about anything." The work, in other words, doesn't have to be good. It just has to make the audience feel like they are for buying it. This is a reason for purchasing a book that's totally divorced from the point of the form. In recent years, we've only seen this kind of acquisitive reading escalate. Books are marketed for being "about race"--a phrase I agonized about including in my own jacket copy before deciding it was useful shorthand--or even "anti-racist," shrinking the entire aesthetic spectrum to the pinprick of self-improvement. Such terms risk implying that that sole selling point forms the extent of the writer's project, ambitions, or creative ability and, what's more, that it's all the reader can expect to take away from the text. This is what happened in the summer of 2020, with the explosion of so-called anti-racist titles. Writing about this surge of interest for Vulture, Lauren Michele Jackson observed that it was unfair to the work to corral it all into a one-note micro canon: "If you want to read a novel, read a damn novel, like it's a novel." But here's the rub: a pithy little sales pitch can work. Even though it's aesthetically and politically lazy to reduce a work to its lowest common denominator, doing so can also sell books--in June 2020, the New York Times bestseller list was full of titles "about race." The role jacket copy can play in a book's success is what makes me stop short of calling to abolish it entirely. After all, publishing is--I lament daily--a business. As a reader, I'd love to live in a world of blank back covers that preserve a text's essential mystery. As a writer, the idea of my book bobbing around out there unadorned, stripped of any wiles to woo a reader, absolutely terrifies me. Who would pick it up? To do away with jacket copy would be to exclude the segment of the reading population that encounters books that way, readers for whom knowing what a book is about helps them decide whether to give or withhold their attention. And in the end, it's readers that jacket copy--and the books it adorns--is truly for. But I still believe there's value in separating our encounter with the text from the commercial aims that copy embodies. Because how much do you need to know going in, really? How much more would you get out of a book if you submitted to the pleasure of figuring out its internal logic as you went along rather than memorizing the map before you even set out? Widen the channels by which you let titles into your life. Pick up a book because you like the cover or you trust the publisher or you think the author's hot. Pick it up for the city where it's set or the literary trend it's supposedly part of or the language it was translated from. There are so many more rewarding, representative ways to choose a book than the stew of adjectives on the back. Tajja Isen Tajja Isen Tajja Isen is the author of the essay collection Some of My Best Friends and the forthcoming memoir Tough Love. She is also a contributing writer for The Walrus. She has edited for Catapult, The Walrus, and Electric Literature. Taggedaudiohomepage Related Posts A photo illustration of a black-and-white photo of Britney Spears, Pamela Anderson and Paris Hilton with handwriting in the background. There is a red border around the image. When Britney and Pamela and Paris Tell All November 23, 2023November 27, 2023 A photo illustration of a bookshelf against an indigo-coloured wall. On the shelves, the books are in black and white while miscellaneous items like mugs, blankets and a portable grill are in colour. Indigo May Have Lost the Plot November 3, 2023November 13, 2023 A black-and-white photo of author Sarah Bernstein standing in front of a tree with her arms crossed. There is a green border around the image. Sarah Bernstein Breaks the Rules in Study for Obedience October 27, 2023November 13, 2023 Post navigation Previous Article At McMaster University, Building a Better 2080 Starts Now Our Latest Issue The cover for the December 2023 issue of The Walrus, featuring an illustration of an elderly woman 2023 Dec Issue walking on a floating, crumbling The end of retirement, how path towards a doorway to a beach. Canada-India relations crumbled, Cover lines: The End of why the opioid and housing crises Retirement: Why no one can afford are linked, and more! to stop working; How Canada-India relations crumbled. Start my subscription todayYour Account Part of The Trust Project Read more about The Trust Project and how this article fits in it Part of The Trust Project [svg] The Trust Project is a collaboration among news organizations around the world. Its goal is to create strategies that fulfill journalism's basic pledge: to serve society with a truthful, intelligent and comprehensive account of ideas and events. Learn more. Behind The Story Behind The Story Type: Analysis Analysis: Based on factual reporting, although it incorporates the expertise of the author/producer and may offer interpretations and conclusions. The Walrus newsletter Don't let news disappear from your feed. Sign up for The Walrus newsletter and get trusted Canadian journalism straight in your inbox. View all newsletters >> Walrus logo with tusks and Canada's Conversation The Walrus sparks conversations about Canada and its place in the world through our award-winning independent journalism, fact checking, events, podcasts, and content solutions. The Walrus is a registered charity with an educational mandate. Read more on our About Us page. [svg][svg][svg][svg][svg][svg] About The Walrus * About Us * Our Staff * Contact * Submissions * Careers & Fellowships * Advertise with us The Walrus About The Walrus About Us Our Staff Contact Us Careers & Fellowships Submissions Advertise with Us Events Get Tickets The Walrus Talks The Walrus Gala Get in Touch Subscribe Customer Care Purchase a Subscription Renew Your Subscription Newsletters Shop The Walrus Store Podcasts Articles The Conversation Piece The Walrus Podcasts The Walrus Lab Amazon Canada First Novel Award Content Services Podcast Services Our Clients Get in Touch Follow Us Twitter LinkedIn YouTube TikTok Facebook Instagram Support independent Canadian reporting and storytelling Make a donation The Walrus Accessibility Help Privacy Policy Cookie Policy The Walrus is located within the bounds of Treaty 13 signed with the Mississaugas of the Credit. This land is also the traditional territory of the Anishnabeg, the Haudenosaunee, and the Wendat peoples. Learn more >> (c) 2023 The Walrus. All Rights Reserved. Charitable Registration Number: No. 861851624-RR0001 (c) 2023 The Walrus. All Rights Reserved. Charitable Registration Number: No. 861851624-RR0001 Accessibility Help Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Subscribe * Magazine Subscription * Weekly Newsletter * Events Newsletter * The Walrus Lab Newsletter * The Conversation Piece Podcast More * The Walrus Talks @Home * The Walrus Books * The Walrus Podcasts * Magazine Archives * Policies and Standards * Privacy Policy * Cookie Policy (c) 2023 The Walrus. All Rights Reserved. Charitable Registration Number: No. 861851624-RR0001 The Walrus is located within the bounds of Treaty 13 signed with the Mississaugas of the Credit. This land is also the traditional territory of the Anishnabeg, the Haudenosaunee, and the Wendat peoples. * * * The Walrus uses cookies for personalization, to customize its online advertisements, and for other purposes. Learn more or change your cookie preferences. x x Make this GivingTuesday GIVING NEWSDAY [svg] Help us reach our $10,000 GivingTuesday goal in support of Canadian journalism DONATE TO THE WALRUS Or make a one-time donation x Make this GivingTuesday GIVING NEWSDAY [svg] Help us reach our $10,000 GivingTuesday goal in support of Canadian journalism DONATE TO THE WALRUS Or make a one-time donation x