https://bigthink.com/hard-science/mars-lost-oceans-magnetic-field/ Skip to content Video * The Big Think Interview * Your Brain on Money * Playlists * Explore the Library Big Questions * Will true AI turn against us? * Do we have free will? * Why are there conspiracy theories? * Is religion helping or hurting us? * Are we alone in the universe? * Should we trust science? Big Thinkers * Michio Kaku * Neil deGrasse Tyson * Michelle Thaller * Zena Hitz * Steven Pinker * Paul Bloom * Ray Kurzweil * Cornel West * Helen Fisher Sections * Neuropsych * Thinking * Leadership * Smart Skills * High Culture * The Past * The Present * The Future * Life * Health * Hard Science * Special Issues * Business Columns * Starts With A Bang * The Well * 13.8 * Strange Maps * The Learning Curve Get Big Think for Your Business. Enable transformation and drive culture at your company with lessons from the biggest thinkers in the world. Learn More - Follow Us View our Youtube channel View our Facebook page View our Instagram feed View our Twitter feed View our LinkedIn account Search for: [ ] Open the Main Navigation Search Return to homepage Newsletters For Business Membership Hard Science -- September 25, 2023 How Mars lost its magnetic field -- and then its oceans Chemical changes inside Mars' core caused it to lose its magnetic field. This, in turn, caused it to lose its oceans. But how? mars oceans Did Mars ever look like this? (Credit: A.R. Bhattarai, reproduced with kind permission / Strange Map #1034 / Frank Jacobs) Key Takeaways * Magnetic fields help a planet hold onto its oceans. * If a planet ever loses its magnetic field, the atmosphere goes next -- and, along with it, water. * Were it not for Earth's strong magnetic field, our planet would look just like Mars. And strong magnetic fields may be rare in the Universe. Elizabeth Fernandez Copy a link to the article entitled http:// How%20Mars%20lost%20its%20magnetic%20field%20--%20and%20then%20its%20oceans Share How Mars lost its magnetic field -- and then its oceans on Facebook Share How Mars lost its magnetic field -- and then its oceans on Twitter Share How Mars lost its magnetic field -- and then its oceans on LinkedIn This article was first published on Big Think in February 2022. It was updated in September 2023. The surface of Mars is barren and dry, with what little water there is tied up in icecaps or perhaps existing below the surface. But if you look closely at the surface, you will see what looks like shorelines or canyons where massive floods once took place. Billions of years ago, the atmosphere of Mars may have been denser and the air slightly warmer. By looking at deltas present on Mars, similar to river deltas on Earth, some have suggested that oceans used to partially cover the planet. (See Strange Map #1043.) Others have looked at the composition of Mars meteorites, which can show how the chemistry of Mars today compares to what the planet looked like billions of years ago. Both lines of evidence suggest that about four billion years ago, Mars' northern hemisphere was covered with a massive ocean. Today, this ocean is just a memory. Research led by the University of Tokyo and published in 2022 in Nature Communications offers one reason why: Billions of years ago, Mars lost its magnetic field. Without the protection that a magnetic field offered, the atmosphere was stripped, and eventually, the oceans evaporated as water vapor in the atmosphere was lost to space. Magnetic fields and oceans The Solar System is a harsh place. Our life-giving Sun can also take life away. The Sun produces enormous amounts of radiation that -- were it not for the protective effect of our magnetic field -- would fry our planet. Without the magnetic field, the solar wind would strip our atmosphere, and the oceans would evaporate and be lost to space. In other words, Earth would end up like Mars. The Earth is the only one of the rocky planets in our Solar System to have a strong magnetic field. Its presence is likely one of the major reasons why Mars and Earth are so vastly different. But billions of years ago, Mars too had a strong magnetic field. So, what happened? How Mars lost its magnetic field and oceans To investigate, a team led by Shunpei Yokoo of the University of Tokyo simulated the core of Mars in a lab here on Earth. The team made a material using a mixture of iron, sulfur, and hydrogen, which are believed to be present in the core of Mars. Sulfur is probably in the core, since Mars meteorites (which sample the crust and mantle) do not contain many elements typically found alongside sulfur. Hydrogen may be plentiful in the core since Mars is close to the "snow line" in our Solar System, where water ice was abundant during planet formation. "We can reasonably assume that it [the core] is Fe-S-H liquid but needs to be verified by further marsquake (Martian earthquake) observations," Yokoo told Big Think. "The ongoing NASA's InSight mission might tell us more in the near future." The team then placed this iron, sulfur, and hydrogen mix between two diamonds and heated it with a laser, simulating the high temperatures and pressures present within the core of a rocky planet. The material separated into two distinct liquids -- one with iron and sulfur, the other with iron and hydrogen. Because the liquid containing hydrogen was less dense, it rose to the top. And as the liquids separated, convective currents formed. This is similar to what would have happened in the early history of Mars. The iron-sulfur-hydrogen liquid would form convective currents as the sulfur separates from the hydrogen. These currents would have formed a protective magnetic field around the planet. But such currents are short-lived. As soon as the two liquids fully separated, the currents would stop, and the magnetic field would vanish. Eventually, the atmosphere would be stripped and the oceans would disappear. Similar physics in the Earth's core This separation of iron-sulfur and iron-hydrogen liquids is also seen within the Earth, but with a key difference: temperature. "The temperature of the Earth's core (~6,740 degF) is much higher than that of Mars' core," Yokoo told Big Think. At these high temperatures, the iron-sulfur and iron-hydrogen liquids mix together. However, we do see stratification higher in the core, where the temperatures are lower. "This is the reason why the Earth's core is stratified only at its top, while Mars' core is entirely stratified," Yokoo said. "It should take a very long time (like one billion years) for the Earth's core to be fully stratified." We've got time, in other words. These results, however, have implications in the search for habitable exoplanets. A common metric used to determine if an extrasolar planet can host life is the presence of liquid water on the surface in a location that is neither too cold nor too hot. But perhaps a strong magnetic field should be another key metric to determine whether the planet can hold onto its water. And it may very well be that magnetic fields as strong as the Earth's are relatively rare in the Universe. Tags chemistryearth scienceSpace & Astrophysics In this article chemistryearth scienceSpace & Astrophysics --------------------------------------------------------------------- Related [yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7] Starts With A Bang Ask Ethan: Were Mars And Venus Ever Living Planets? While Mars is known as a frozen, red planet today, it has all the evidence we could ask for of a watery past, lasting for approximately the first 1.5 billion [...] A large impact from an asteroid billions of years ago may have created the moons of Mars, including an inner, larger one that no longer exists today! (Credit: Medialab, ESA 2001) Starts With A Bang How did Mars get its two "impossible" moons? Phobos and Deimos only have two explanations, and neither one adds up. mars volcano Hard Science Ancient Mars was once home to thousands of supervolcanoes Research from NASA reveals Mars' spectacular volcanic past. [yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7] Starts With A Bang Ask Ethan: Is it foolishness to dream of terraforming Mars? The red planet is nearby, cool, sunny, and was once potentially habitable. Could it someday be that way again? "It would be great some day to have astronauts in a rover [...] [yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7] Mind & Brain How NASA is using personality psychology to pick astronauts for a Mars journey A new paper published in the journal American Psychologist shows how NASA is using personality research to learn what makes the best team of astronauts. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Up Next most distant gravitational lens Starts With A Bang JWST discovers the farthest gravitational lens ever A more distant galaxy liked the lens so much that it went and put a ring on it. Here's the science behind this remarkable cosmic object. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Footer Subscribe Get counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday. Notice: JavaScript is required for this content. Follow Us View our Youtube channel View our Facebook page View our Instagram feed View our Twitter feed View our LinkedIn account Sections * Neuropsych * Thinking * Leadership * Smart Skills * High Culture * The Past * The Present * The Future * Life * Health * Hard Science * Special Issues * Business Columns * Starts With A Bang * The Well * 13.8 * Strange Maps * The Learning Curve Video * The Big Think Interview * Your Brain on Money * Playlists * Explore the Library About * Our Mission * Work With Us * Contact * Privacy Policy * Terms of Use * Accessibility * Careers * The Weekly Crossword Get Big Think for Your Business. Enable transformation and drive culture at your company with lessons from the biggest thinkers in the world. Learn More - (c) Copyright 2007-2023 & BIG THINK, BIG THINK PLUS, SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by Freethink Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Close Advertisement