https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03196-y Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Advertisement Advertisement Nature * View all journals * Search * Log in * Explore content * About the journal * Publish with us * Subscribe * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed 1. nature 2. career column 3. article * CAREER COLUMN * 10 October 2023 Dear journals: stop hoarding our papers Why single-submission policies need to die (and what to do in the meantime). * Dritjon Gruda^0 1. Dritjon Gruda 1. Dritjon Gruda is an organizational behaviour researcher at the Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Catolica Porto Business School and the Research Centre in Management and Economics. View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar * Twitter * Facebook * Email You have full access to this article via your institution. Download PDF Portrait of Jon Gruda outside on a sunny day in a park near the ocean. Dritjon Gruda thinks that it's time to allow researchers to submit manuscripts to multiple journals.Credit: Jon Gruda During the COVID-19 pandemic, my colleagues and I submitted a paper to a premier journal in our field, examining the effects of the onset of the pandemic on individuals' mental health, on the basis of their personality traits. This was a time-sensitive piece because people began to adapt as the pandemic accelerated. The paper languished for several months without even being sent out for peer review. Multiple e-mails to the journal yielded no progress. We had to withdraw the paper and submit it elsewhere, losing valuable time. This could have been avoided had we been allowed to submit the manuscript elsewhere simultaneously. Another time, we submitted a paper to a journal, and it was promptly reviewed by one reviewer. The editor, however, couldn't find another and asked us to suggest any possible reviewers. We did, although with hesitation. Asking authors to recommend reviewers can compromise the objectivity and rigour of the peer-review process. There's an obvious potential for bias because authors might suggest individuals who are more likely to provide favourable reviews. It took nine months and several proactive follow-ups for the editor to realize that our paper had been overlooked and was severely delayed. Eventually, after a revision request, our paper was published -- almost a year later. Imagine the absurdity of being able to apply for only one job at a time, waiting months for feedback before considering another opportunity. Such a scenario would undeniably hinder career progression. Yet, this exact practice persists in scientific publishing. Falling behind Scientific publishing has evolved to accommodate open access, preprints and even X (previously Twitter) threads. But the prohibition against simultaneously submitting a paper to several journals continues. This rule was conceived to protect the quality of the scientific record, with singular peer review acting as the key filter to ensure that only validated, high-quality research enters academia, one submission at a time. Yet, nowadays, this rule seems outdated and, at times, grossly unfair. And sometimes a paper can undergo multiple rounds of review at one journal over the course of months or years, only to be rejected. Instead of accepting the existing system, why not change it? [d41586-023] Anonymizing peer review makes the process more just The multiple-submission ban stems from the pre-digital era, in which copyrights were more difficult to enforce, journal editors sifted through physical manuscripts and peer reviewers were scarce. But today, digitization has automated much of the administrative work. Identifying relevant reviewers, no matter their location, is easier and more straightforward than before. The fear that multiple submissions would overwhelm the peer-review system lacks empirical evidence and is outweighed by the burden placed on researchers. This is particularly detrimental to early-career scientists and those from under-represented backgrounds, for whom the delay isn't just frustrating; it's a barrier to career advancement. The ban also hampers the speed of scientific dissemination, a crucial factor in many fields such as climate science, health and medicine, in which timely knowledge sharing is paramount. The rapid proliferation of preprint articles during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the benefits of swift information sharing, even if those papers were not yet peer reviewed. The time is ripe to reassess the single-submission policy. But what can authors do? While the scientific community awaits a much-needed overhaul of the single-submission policy, here are a few proactive suggestions to minimize the impact of protracted publishing timelines: * Early communication: establish preliminary contact with journal editors to gauge interest in your paper before formal submission. Some editors offer constructive feedback and might even fast-track promising manuscripts. * Journal tiering: have a well-researched list of target journals, tiered from high-impact to low-impact. If rejected from your top choice, you can quickly move on to the next journal on your list without wasting time on more research. * Follow up: after submission, regularly check up with the journal. If a journal states that most reviews are completed in 90 days, nudge them shortly after that time. I have found this strategy to be the most useful. The key is to be respectful and professional in your communication throughout. Remember, respectful persistence. Don't nag. In praise of peer review * Professional networks: use your professional connections to find out which journals offer quicker review times or are known for efficient communication, even if their impact factor is not top tier. This is one of the many reasons why attending conferences is so important. * Preprint archives: use preprint servers relevant to your field to upload your manuscript. This serves as a public record of your work and allows others to see, cite and build on it while it's undergoing peer review. * Use social media: share your preprint on platforms such as ResearchGate or LinkedIn to gather informal feedback and attract early attention to your work. * Parallel projects: working on several projects can help to maintain productivity levels while one paper is stuck in the submission pipeline. * Advocate change: join or initiate discussions that challenge the current system. Use academic blogs, webinars or professional meetings to shed light on the inefficiencies and inequities perpetuated by the single-submission rule. Throughout my career, I've grappled with the frustrations of the single-submission rule. Each delay was more than a professional hiccup; it touched a nerve. Over coffee chats, my peers and I have shared these challenges, yearning for a better system. Although I haven't spearheaded a publishing revolution, I'm driven by the collective hope of reshaping a system that recognizes our work's value and the urgency of our time. Until publishing norms catch up with the needs and pace of contemporary research, the strategies that I've outlined can help authors to navigate the existing landscape more effectively. Nevertheless, in an era in which timely publications can make a difference in job security and research funding, a crucial re-evaluation of the single-submission rule is long overdue. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03196-y This is an article from the Nature Careers Community, a place for Nature readers to share their professional experiences and advice. Guest posts are encouraged. Competing Interests The author declares no competing interests. Related Articles * [d41586-023] Anonymizing peer review makes the process more just * In praise of peer review Subjects * Authorship * Lab life * Ethics * Peer review * Policy Latest on: Authorship AI will transform science -- now researchers must tame it AI will transform science -- now researchers must tame it Editorial 27 SEP 23 How I used weaponized laziness to build better collaborations How I used weaponized laziness to build better collaborations Career Column 16 AUG 23 Is it time for tenure to evolve? Is it time for tenure to evolve? Career Feature 07 AUG 23 Lab life Facing racism in science, 'I decided to prove them wrong' Facing racism in science, 'I decided to prove them wrong' Career Q&A 11 OCT 23 'I wrote my first piece of code at seven': women share highs and lows in computer science for Ada Lovelace Day 'I wrote my first piece of code at seven': women share highs and lows in computer science for Ada Lovelace Day Comment 10 OCT 23 Postdoc career optimism rebounds after COVID in global Nature survey Postdoc career optimism rebounds after COVID in global Nature survey Career Feature 09 OCT 23 Ethics Are leprosy and Hansen's disease identical? Correspondence 03 OCT 23 How my broken elbow made the ableism of computer programming personal How my broken elbow made the ableism of computer programming personal Career Column 14 SEP 23 Human trials of artificial wombs could start soon. Here's what you need to know Human trials of artificial wombs could start soon. Here's what you need to know News Feature 14 SEP 23 Nature Careers Jobs * Branch Director, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch Rockville, Maryland National Cancer Institute - National Institutes of Health [] * Postdoctoral Associate Houston, Texas (US) Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) [] * Postdoctoral Associate- Cardiac Regeneration Houston, Texas (US) Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) [] * Post-Doctoral Fellowship in Computational Biology with a focus on Spatial Omics Post-Doctoral Fellowship in Computational Biology with a focus on Spatial Omics The Nirmal laboratory at the Harvard Medical School and Brigham a... Boston, Massachusetts (US) Brigham and Women's Hospital - Department of Dermatology * Assistant, Associate or Full Professor Princeton EEB is seeking candidates for multiple tenure-track faculty positions in ecology, evolution, and behavior. Review of applications will be... Princeton, New Jersey Princeton University - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology [] You have full access to this article via your institution. Download PDF Related Articles * [d41586-023] Anonymizing peer review makes the process more just * In praise of peer review Subjects * Authorship * Lab life * Ethics * Peer review * Policy Advertisement Sign up to Nature Briefing An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday. Email address [ ] [ ] Yes! Sign me up to receive the daily Nature Briefing email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Sign up * Close Nature Briefing Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter -- what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Email address [ ] Sign up [ ] I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Close Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing Explore content * Research articles * News * Opinion * Research Analysis * Careers * Books & Culture * Podcasts * Videos * Current issue * Browse issues * Collections * Subjects * Follow us on Facebook * Follow us on Twitter * Subscribe * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed About the journal * Journal Staff * About the Editors * Journal Information * Our publishing models * Editorial Values Statement * Journal Metrics * Awards * Contact * Editorial policies * History of Nature * Send a news tip Publish with us * For Authors * For Referees * Language editing services * Submit manuscript Search Search articles by subject, keyword or author [ ] Show results from [All journals] Search Advanced search Quick links * Explore articles by subject * Find a job * Guide to authors * Editorial policies Nature (Nature) ISSN 1476-4687 (online) ISSN 0028-0836 (print) nature.com sitemap About Nature Portfolio * About us * Press releases * Press office * Contact us Discover content * Journals A-Z * Articles by subject * Nano * Protocol Exchange * Nature Index Publishing policies * Nature portfolio policies * Open access Author & Researcher services * Reprints & permissions * Research data * Language editing * Scientific editing * Nature Masterclasses * Live Expert Trainer-led workshops * Research Solutions Libraries & institutions * Librarian service & tools * Librarian portal * Open research * Recommend to library Advertising & partnerships * Advertising * Partnerships & Services * Media kits * Branded content Career development * Nature Careers * Nature Conferences * Nature events Regional websites * Nature Africa * Nature China * Nature India * Nature Italy * Nature Japan * Nature Korea * Nature Middle East * Privacy Policy * Use of cookies * Your privacy choices/Manage cookies * Legal notice * Accessibility statement * Terms & Conditions * Your US state privacy rights Springer Nature (c) 2023 Springer Nature Limited