https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/social-media-addiction-share-mindlessly/ Skip to Content Open Site Navigation / Menu Search What are you looking for? What you're looking for [ ] Submit * News and Events * Public Exchange * Info For + Current Students + Faculty + Staff * Directories + Faculty Directory + Staff Directory * Alumni * Giving USC.edu * The Dornsife Difference Back + The Academy in the Public Square Beyond the laboratories, research centers and classrooms, USC Dornsife serves as a dynamic intellectual resource that is woven into the fabric of our communities. + A Vibrant Mosaic Back o Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging + Life in L.A. + Our Students * About Us Back + Our Leadership + Dornsife at a Glance + Dana and David Dornsife * Research Back + The Future of Scholarship Back o Faculty Awards & Honors o News Briefs + Research Centers and Institutes + Signature Research Initiatives Back o The Art + Science of Human Wellbeing o Sustainability: Human Factors o Faculty-Led Research Initiative o Public Exchange + Facilities * Undergraduate Back + Undergraduate Education Back o Your Dornsife Degree o General Education Program o Special Programs o Undergraduate Research o Academic Advising and Support + Majors and Minors + Academic Scholarships + Learning in the World + Preparing for Your Future Back o Career Pathways * Graduate and Professional Back + PhD Studies Back o PhD Programs o PhD Academy + Master's & Professional Studies Back o Master's & Professional Programs * Admission & Aid Back + Undergraduate Admission + Graduate Admission * Departments, Centers, & Institutes Back Departments, Centers, & Institutes + Academic Departments Back Academic Departments o HUMANITIES o American Studies and Ethnicity o Archaeology o Art History o Classics o Comparative Literature o East Asian Languages and Cultures o East Asian Studies Center o English o French and Italian o Gender and Sexuality Studies o History o Jewish Studies o Latin American and Iberian Cultures o Philosophy o Religion o Slavic Languages and Literatures o Writing Program o NATURAL SCIENCES o Biological Sciences o Chemistry o Earth Sciences o Environmental Studies o Mathematics o Neuroscience o Physics and Astronomy o Psychology o Quantitative and Computational Biology o SOCIAL SCIENCES o Anthropology o Economics o Linguistics o Middle East Studies o Political Science and International Relations o Sociology o Spatial Sciences Institute + Centers & Institutes Back Centers & Institutes o CULTURE & SOCIETY o Archaeology Research Center o Casden Institute for the Study of the Jewish Role in American Life o Center for Advanced Genocide Research o Center for Diversity and Democracy o Center for Ethnographic Media Arts o Center for Feminist Research o Center for Islamic Thought, Culture and Practice o Center for Latinx and Latin American Studies o Center for Law and Philosophy o Center for Law, History and Culture o Center for Religion and Civic Culture o Center for the Premodern World o Center for Transpacific Studies o East Asian Studies Center o Equity Research Institute o Francophone Research and Resource Center o Huntington-USC Institute on California and the West o Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies o Institute of Armenian Studies o Korean Studies Institute o Los Angeles Institute for the Humanities o Max Kade Institute for Austrian-German-Swiss Studies o Mind and Society Center o Shinso Ito Center for Japanese Religions and Culture o The West on Fire o USC-Huntington Early Modern Studies Institute o GLOBAL SYSTEMS o Alice, George and Harold Kachigian Center for Active Learning in International Studies o Center for Applied Financial Economics o Center for Economic and Social Research o Center for International Studies o Center for the Political Future o Center on Science, Technology, and Public Life o Spatial Sciences Institute o Unruh Institute of Politics o USC Wrigley Institute for Environment and Sustainability o LANGUAGE & CREATIVITY o American Language Institute o Center for Languages and Cultures o Levan Institute for the Humanities o Visual Studies Research Institute o Writing Center o LIFE SCIENCES o Brain and Creativity Institute o Bridge Institute o Center for Integrated Microbial Systems o Center for Self-Report Science o Center for the Changing Family o Dana and David Dornsife Cognitive Neuroimaging Center o New Microbes For New Beneficial Natural Products o Psychology Services Center o USC Genome Core o USC Sea Grant o PHYSICAL SCIENCES o Agilent Center of Excellence in Biomolecular Characterization o Center for Applied Mathematical Sciences o Center for Peptide and Protein Engineering o Center for Quantum Information and Science Technology o Center of Excellence in Molecular Characterization o Center of Excellence in NanoBiophysics o Convergent Science Institute in Cancer o Core Center of Excellence in Nano Imaging o Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute o Southern California Earthquake Center o The Urban Critical Zone o Translational Imaging Center + Explore All Browse all of our departments, programs, centers, and institutes News and Events MENU * Home * News + News + News Briefs * Events * Media Mentions + Media Mentions + Media Mentions Archive USC Dornsife researchers compared the motivations behind habitual and nonhabitual social media users' behavior. (Image Source: Pixabay/ Mohamed Hassan.) * News * Health Social media's addictive loop compels users to share mindlessly A USC Dornsife study revealed that frequent and infrequent users of social media respond differently to social rewards. Altering a platform's structure may curb negative habits. Ileana Wachtel August 09, 2023 Share Copy Link Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Key points: * A new study by USC Dornsife scholars confirms that the more people engage in social media activities, the more automatic and routine their posting activity becomes. * After a time, habitual or frequent users become desensitized to positive feedback, such as likes and comments, from other users. * Simply telling habitual users not to share certain content or using motivational interventions won't be as effective as it is for nonhabitual users. * The USC researchers argue that changing the structure of social media platforms could address issues like misinformation, hate speech and mental health among habitual users. People join social media to enhance their social lives, make new friends and build an online identity while expressing themselves. However, as they delve deeper into these digital realms, their behavior changes. Engaging in likes, shares, posts and retweets becomes habitual, eclipsing the original motivations that initially drew them to the platform. What was once a conscious choice transforms into automatic, almost impulsive action. Those are the findings of a new study by researchers at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences. Despite public health experts raising concerns about the negative impact on mental health and overall well-being, particularly among young users, a significant majority of Americans -- 70%, according to Pew Research -- still find themselves drawn to their apps daily, some even hourly. Psychology researchers Wendy Wood and Ian Anderson at USC Dornsife compared posting rates of frequent, habitual users with those of infrequent, nonhabitual users. They wanted to know if those groups' rates varied in response to the reactions and comments they received from others. The research was published online earlier this year in Motivation Science. Building on previous work, the researchers conducted three consecutive studies focused on Instagram and Facebook posting behavior. They found evidence that users develop posting habits that differ based on how frequently they use the two apps. The studies highlighted how a daily habit of posting can become insidious over time -- shifting from posting with a goal in mind to posting automatically with little thought. And this behavior can lead to a never-ending urge to share content on these platforms. Using metrics from Facebook and comparing habitual users with infrequent or new users, the researchers investigated whether social rewards motivate the two types of users in the same way. Anderson said he and Wood also looked at whether automatic, habitual, repeated posting on Facebook or Instagram happens when social motivation is limited or absent. "In other words, do these frequent users just post no matter if they are receiving likes or comments from their posting? Or are they posting just out of sheer habit?" he asked. Social rewards only work for some The researchers found that likes, comments and shares had less impact on frequent habitual users' motivation to post than on infrequent users and new users. In a preliminary study using Instagram user data gathered from a study conducted by Emilio Ferrara of the USC Viterbi School of Engineering, Woods and Anderson found, as expected, that social rewards in the form of likes indeed did motivate users to engage more frequently and faster. The more likes a user received, the more frequently they posted. Fewer likes resulted in a slower posting rate. However, digging a little deeper, the researchers made an intriguing discovery: Social rewards such as likes increased engagement primarily among new or infrequent users. In contrast, frequent users continued posting at their usual rate regardless of the reactions they received from others. Woods and Anderson conducted a second study to test this theory further, examining more than 1,900 Facebook posts. They found that positive reactions motivated increased and faster engagement only among infrequent and new users but not among frequent users. Replicating the results from Instagram, habitual Facebook users continued to post quickly regardless of whether they received positive or negative recognition. Habitual users don't care what you think The findings confirmed what Woods and Anderson suspected: With enough repetition, users form habits or mental associations tied to specific contextual cues. Context cues include factors such as the location or time when they use the app or receive notifications. For example, a user who frequently uses the app while lying in bed, sitting on the couch or at a particular time of day will start associating using the app with those specific situations. Once these habits are formed, users respond quickly and automatically whenever they encounter these context cues, with minimal deliberation. In this second study, the researchers also surveyed the participants and found that for those with really strong habits, even though they said they cared about the social rewards and reactions from other people, their behavior told a different story. These users post at roughly the same rate, no matter how many likes they get. This can have adverse consequences, Anderson said. "They're not just ignoring the likes, they're also ignoring the consequences of posting, which is how misinformation starts to spread," he said. The study indicates that motivational interventions won't impact habitual and nonhabitual users in the same way. Simply telling people not to share certain types of content that could be harmful, dangerous or false will not be effective for habitual users, even if it works for nonhabitual users. Structural site changes may work To further test the hypothesis that frequent habitual users are not motivated by positive feedback or warnings about not posting harmful or misinformation, the researchers examined whether a structural change in a social media platform would alter the posting rates of such users. In 2007, Facebook changed its platform design to increase engagement, launching a status update bar and placing content from a user's friends at the forefront of their news feed. The change initially slowed down highly frequent posters' automatic responses. But, for infrequent users, the structural change did what it intended to do: increase engagement with others and speed up their posting rate after receiving positive reactions. The study demonstrated that the design of social platforms could have an impact for the better on the posting rates of habitual posters by slowing them down for a moment. However, over time, these users regained their posting speed, suggesting that they re-trained their habitual posting behavior to fit the platform's new design. Anderson concluded that if social media companies are serious about addressing issues such as misinformation, hate speech and adolescent mental health, they must also change their platforms' structure to impact habitual users. "Interventions that work for one type of user just don't work for the other. There will have to be something really disruptive structurally on these social media sites to change the behavior of habitual users," he said. He said that if Facebook and Instagram wanted to move behavior in another direction, they would have had to change the structures to make users post accurate content. That has not happened to the degree necessary to break frequent users' bad habits. About the study This study was funded by grants from the USC Department of Psychology. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Featured USC Dornsife researchers: Wendy Wood, Professor Emerita of Psychology Ian Anderson, PhD candidate, Psychology Related News: Social media can in fact be made better: Research shows it is possible to reward users for sharing accurate information instead of misinformation Brain scans reveal that lonely people process the world in unique ways Birth of a story: How new parents find meaning after childbirth hints at how they will adjust Categories: * Health * Science and Technology * Social Impact Topics: * natural sciences * psyc * psychology * research * social media * Academics + Majors and Minors + Undergraduate Education + Master's & Professional Studies + PhD Studies * Directories & Maps + Our Faculty + Our Staff + Social Media Directory + Campus Maps * Access & Support + Dornsife Technology Services + MyDornsife + 365 Web + USC Zoom * Trojan Family + Alumni Relations + USC Dornsife Magazine + Dornsife Dialogues + Commencement + Career Pathways * * * * * * Dornsife at a Glance * Contact Us * Privacy * Emergency Information * Notice of Non-Discrimination Copyright (c) 2023 University of Southern California