https://www.niemanlab.org/2023/08/not-a-replacement-of-journalists-in-any-way-ap-clarifies-standards-around-generative-ai/ [foundation] Fellowships Reports Lab Storyboard Nieman Foundation at Harvard HOME About Fuego Subscribe Archives Foundation Reports Storyboard LATEST STORY "Not a replacement of journalists in any way": AP clarifies standards around generative AI Business Models Mobile & Apps Audience & Social Aggregation & Discovery Reporting & Production [lab-logo-c] ABOUT [ ] [Search] SUBSCRIBE * Business Models * Mobile & Apps * Audience & Social * Aggregation & Discovery * Reporting & Production * Translations * Fuego [ap-ai] Aug. 16, 2023, 1:33 p.m. "Not a replacement of journalists in any way": AP clarifies standards around generative AI One new AP Stylebook entry cautions journalists to avoid "language that attributes human characteristics to these systems." By Sarah Scire @SarahScire Aug. 16, 2023, 1:33 p.m. Aug. 16, 2023, 1:33 p.m. The Associated Press has updated its standards -- and will publish 10 new AP Stylebook entries -- to caution journalists about common pitfalls in coverage of artificial intelligence. When the AP became the first major news organization to strike a deal with OpenAI, the ChatGPT maker committed to paying to train its models on AP news stories going back to 1985. The joint announcement also said the deal would allow the AP to "examine potential use cases for generative AI in news products and services." But while the Associated Press has used AI technology to automate some "rote tasks" -- think corporate earnings reports, sporting event recaps, transcribing press conferences, etc. -- since 2014, the standards unveiled on Wednesday sound a skeptical note about using generative AI for journalism's most essential work. As Amanda Barrett , vice president for standards and inclusion at AP, wrote: Accuracy, fairness and speed are the guiding values for AP's news report, and we believe the mindful use of artificial intelligence can serve these values and over time improve how we work. However, the central role of the AP journalist -- gathering, evaluating and ordering facts into news stories, video, photography and audio for our members and customers -- will not change. We do not see AI as a replacement of journalists in any way. The AP's standards around AI now include this guidance: While AP staff may experiment with ChatGPT with caution, they do not use it to create publishable content. Any output from a generative AI tool should be treated as unvetted source material. AP staff must apply their editorial judgment and AP's sourcing standards when considering any information for publication. In accordance with our standards, we do not alter any elements of our photos, video or audio. Therefore, we do not allow the use of generative AI to add or subtract any elements. We will refrain from transmitting any AI-generated images that are suspected or proven to be false depictions of reality. However, if an AI-generated illustration or work of art is the subject of a news story, it may be used as long as it clearly labeled as such in the caption. We urge staff to not put confidential or sensitive information into AI tools. We also encourage journalists to exercise due caution and diligence to ensure material coming into AP from other sources is also free of AI-generated content. Generative AI makes it even easier for people to intentionally spread mis- and disinformation through altered words, photos, video or audio, including content that may have no signs of alteration, appearing realistic and authentic. To avoid using such content inadvertently, journalists should exercise the same caution and skepticism they would normally, including trying to identify the source of the original content, doing a reverse image search to help verify an image's origin, and checking for reports with similar content from trusted media. Ultimately, Barrett writes, "if journalists have any doubt at all about the authenticity of the material, they should not use it." I asked how journalists can best exercise due caution, given concerns about the reliability of AI detectors. (OpenAI quietly shut down its own tool, AI Classifier, over its "low rate of accuracy" last month.) "I would say that a good example comes from the polling and investigative teams," Barrett said in an email. "They often ask sources where the data they have is coming from, who put it together and to see the full data so they can draw their own conclusions. That kind of diligence is going to be standard for so many other journalists on so many other beats." Separate updates to the AP Stylebook -- which will be published on Thursday -- tell journalists to "beware far-fetched claims from AI developers." Journalists should "avoid quoting company representatives about the power of their technology without providing a check on their assertions, and avoid focusing entirely on far-off futures over current-day concerns about the tools," according to the updated guidance. A new entry for artificial intelligence also cautions journalists to avoid "language that attributes human characteristics to these systems, since they do not have thoughts or feelings but can respond in ways that give the impression that they do." Reporters should also refrain from referring to artificial intelligence with gendered pronouns. (If New York Times tech columnist Kevin Roose can refer to the Sydney chatbot persona that creepily declared love for him as "it" throughout this classic piece, you can too.) Hallucinations? Falsehoods? Lies? In a new "generative artificial intelligence" entry, the AP Stylebook provides guidance on referring to the inaccurate -- if confidently stated -- answers AI can spit out: Humans can interact with generative AI models in a seemingly natural way but the models aren't reliably capable of distinguishing between facts and falsehoods or fantasy. Generative AI systems often are powered by large language models. They sometimes generate inaccurate or fabricated responses to queries, an effect AI scientists call hallucination. If using the term hallucination, describe it as an issue associated with the technology that produces falsehoods or inaccurate or illogical information. Some in the field prefer the term confabulation or simpler terms to describe the inaccuracies that don't draw comparisons with human mental illness. Read more at the AP blog here. POSTED Aug. 16, 2023, 1:33 p.m. AP AP Stylebook Associated Press generative AI OpenAI standards Show tagsHide tags TWITTER FACEBOOK EMAIL SHARE ON FACEBOOK TWEET AP AP Stylebook Associated Press generative AI OpenAI standards Show comments Hide comments Show tagsHide tags What's the best way to follow how the news is changing? Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news. [ ] [Subscribe] Prefer a once-a-week email? >> Cite this articleHide citations CLOSE MLA Scire, Sarah. ""Not a replacement of journalists in any way": AP clarifies standards around generative AI." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 16 Aug. 2023. Web. 16 Aug. 2023. APA Scire, S. (2023, Aug. 16). "Not a replacement of journalists in any way": AP clarifies standards around generative AI. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved August 16, 2023, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2023/ 08/ not-a-replacement-of-journalists-in-any-way-ap-clarifies-standards-around-generative-ai / Chicago Scire, Sarah. ""Not a replacement of journalists in any way": AP clarifies standards around generative AI." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified August 16, 2023. Accessed August 16, 2023. https:// www.niemanlab.org/2023/08/ not-a-replacement-of-journalists-in-any-way-ap-clarifies-standards-around-generative-ai /. Wikipedia {{cite web | url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2023/08/ not-a-replacement-of-journalists-in-any-way-ap-clarifies-standards-around-generative-ai / | title = "Not a replacement of journalists in any way": AP clarifies standards around generative AI | last = Scire | first = Sarah | work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]] | date = 16 August 2023 | accessdate = 16 August 2023 | ref = {{harvid|Scire|2023}} }} The latest from Nieman Lab Could "prying open the vault" to small business loans help save local news? Sarah Scire Journalism with a PhD: The Conversation is pairing up academics with reporters for big investigations Sophie Culpepper Are libraries the future of news? Kate Harloe The New York Times wants to go its own way on AI licensing Joshua Benton In The Verge's new newsletter, there are links and there are links Joshua Benton Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email. [ ] [Subscribe] Could "prying open the vault" to small business loans help save local news? The precarity of local news outlets has left them with "little to no access to capital." A new report imagines what state and local government, philanthropies, and community-minded institutions could do to change that. Journalism with a PhD: The Conversation is pairing up academics with reporters for big investigations "It is elevating investigative reporting to a level where we are able to access ... jewels lying on the beach in the research of the academic world." Are libraries the future of news? "We share a lot of the same goals. When we talked about mission statements, there were so many similarities." Sarah Scire Could "prying open the vault" to small business loans help save local news? The precarity of local news outlets has left them with "little to no access to capital." A new report imagines what state and local government, philanthropies, and community-minded institutions could do to change that. Sophie Culpepper Journalism with a PhD: The Conversation is pairing up academics with reporters for big investigations "It is elevating investigative reporting to a level where we are able to access ... jewels lying on the beach in the research of the academic world." Kate Harloe Are libraries the future of news? "We share a lot of the same goals. When we talked about mission statements, there were so many similarities." [lab-logo-c] * Subscribe * Twitter * Facebook * RSS * * About * Contact * Archives * Encyclo * Fuego Help advance the Nieman Foundation's mission "to promote and elevate the standards of journalism" by making a donation. [foundation] To promote and elevate the standards of journalism [reports-lo] Covering thought leadership in journalism [lab-logo-c] Pushing to the future of journalism [storyboard] Exploring the art and craft of story (c) 2023 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College / Some rights reserved Harvard Trademark Privacy Digital Accessibility Walter Lippmann House One Francis Ave. Cambridge, MA 02138 617 495 2237 The Nieman Journalism Lab is a collaborative attempt to figure out how quality journalism can survive and thrive in the Internet age. It's a project of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. Follow us * Subscribe to our email * Follow us on Twitter * Like us on Facebook * Download our iPhone app * Subscribe via RSS Subscribe to our work - The basics * About us * Contact * Archives Projects * Encyclo * Fuego * Tweet archive About us - Director Joshua Benton Staff writers Justin Ellis Caroline O'Donovan (c) President and Fellows of Harvard College, unless otherwise noted. Some rights reserved. Quantcast