https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/aug/09/google-says-ai-systems-should-be-able-to-mine-publishers-work-unless-companies-opt-out [p] Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation Print subscriptions Sign in Search jobs Search US edition[ ] * US edition * UK edition * Australia edition * International edition The Guardian - Back to homeThe Guardian [ ] * News * Opinion * Sport * Culture * Lifestyle ShowMoreShow More * [ ]News + View all News + US news + World news + Environment + Soccer + US politics + Business + Tech + Science + Newsletters + Fight for democracy * [ ]Opinion + View all Opinion + The Guardian view + Columnists + Letters + Opinion videos + Cartoons * [ ]Sport + View all Sport + Soccer + NFL + Tennis + MLB + MLS + NBA + NHL + F1 + Golf * [ ]Culture + View all Culture + Film + Books + Music + Art & design + TV & radio + Stage + Classical + Games * [ ]Lifestyle + View all Lifestyle + Fashion + Food + Recipes + Love & sex + Home & garden + Health & fitness + Family + Travel + Money * Search input [ ] google-search Search + Support us + Print subscriptions * [ ]US edition + UK edition + Australia edition + International edition * + Search jobs + Digital Archive + Guardian Puzzles app + Guardian Licensing + The Guardian app + Video + Podcasts + Pictures + Inside the Guardian + Guardian Weekly + Crosswords + Wordiply + Corrections * + Facebook + Twitter * + Search jobs + Digital Archive + Guardian Puzzles app + Guardian Licensing * US * World * Environment * Soccer * US Politics * Business * Tech * Science * Newsletters * Fight for democracy Logo illustrations for Google [ ] How copyright laws deal with generative AI could be one of the biggest issues facing the likes of Google. Photograph: Sheldon Cooper /SOPA Images/Shutterstock How copyright laws deal with generative AI could be one of the biggest issues facing the likes of Google. Photograph: Sheldon Cooper /SOPA Images/Shutterstock Artificial intelligence (AI) Google says AI systems should be able to mine publishers' work unless companies opt out The tech company's latest proposal about generative AI turns copyright law on its head, and could especially hurt smaller content creators, say experts * Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates * Get our morning and afternoon news emails, free app or daily news podcast Josh Taylor @joshgnosis Tue 8 Aug 2023 19.00 EDTLast modified on Tue 8 Aug 2023 19.23 EDT * * * Publishers should be able to opt out of having their works mined by generative artificial intelligence systems, according to Google, but the company has not said how such a system would work. In its submission to the Australian government's review of the regulatory framework around AI, Google said that copyright law should be altered to allow for generative AI systems to scrape the internet. The company has called for Australian policymakers to promote "copyright systems that enable appropriate and fair use of copyrighted content to enable the training of AI models in Australia on a broad and diverse range of data, while supporting workable opt-outs for entities that prefer their data not to be trained in using AI systems". The call for a fair use exception for AI systems is a view the company has expressed to the Australian government in the past, but the notion of an opt-out option for publishers is a new argument from Google. * Sign up for Guardian Australia's free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup When asked how such a system would work, a spokesperson pointed to a recent blog post by Google where the company said it wanted a discussion around creating a community-developed web standard similar to the robots.txt system that allows publishers to opt out of parts of their sites being crawled by search engines. Google's comments come as news companies such as News Corp have already reportedly been initiating conversations with AI companies about payment for scraping news articles. Dr Kayleen Manwaring, a senior lecturer at UNSW Law and Justice, told Guardian Australia that copyright would be one of the big problems facing generative AI systems in the coming years. "The general rule is that you need millions of data points to be able to produce useful outcomes ... which means that there's going to be copying, which is prima facie a breach of a whole lot of people's copyright." Google calls for relaxing of Australia's copyright laws so AI can mine websites for information Read more Manwaring said the laws differed in different countries regarding what AI systems are allowed to ingest, but said the notion of an opt-out system would turn copyright on its head. "If you want to reproduce something that's held by a copyright owner, you have to get their consent, not an opt out type of arrangement ... what they're suggesting is a wholesale revamp of the way that exceptions work." Toby Murray, associate professor at the University of Melbourne's computing and information systems school, said Google's proposal would put the onus on content creators to specify whether AI systems could absorb their content or not, but he indicated existing licensing schemes such as Creative Commons already allowed creators to mark how their works can be used. "They may well be hoping try to create norms early on that say other companies do not to have to pay for this content," he said. Manwaring said copyright could break down if the problem wasn't resolved, which would probably be to the detriment of smaller content creators. "I think it's going to be a big issue that continues, particularly as powerful entities have their copyright ripped off. But at the moment non-powerful entities are very likely getting their copyright infringed left, right and centre, if a lot of people's suspicions are correct and AI training sets are using a lot of material from the internet." At Senate estimates in May, the Liberal senator Sarah Henderson asked the communications department whether the government was considering a scheme similar to the news media bargaining code to force AI companies to pay for scraping sites. In response in July, the department pointed to the government's AI regulation consultation, said the government was examining future policy settings for news media as part of its news media assistance program, and was considering a Treasury review of the news media bargaining code. Submissions to the AI consultation closed last week. It is understood hundreds of submissions have been received, but so far none have been published online. Topics * Artificial intelligence (AI) * Google * Internet * Computing * news * * * * * * Reuse this content Most viewed Most viewed * US * World * Environment * Soccer * US Politics * Business * Tech * Science * Newsletters * Fight for democracy * News * Opinion * Sport * Culture * Lifestyle Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning Sign up for our email * About us * Help * Complaints & corrections * SecureDrop * Work for us * Privacy policy * Cookie policy * Terms & conditions * Contact us * All topics * All writers * Digital newspaper archive * Facebook * YouTube * Instagram * LinkedIn * Twitter * Newsletters * Advertise with us * Guardian Labs * Search jobs Back to top (c) 2023 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. (modern)