https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/kids-online-safety-act-still-huge-danger-our-rights-online Skip to main content * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast + Annual Reports * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter * Donate + Donate to EFF + Giving Societies + Shop + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Email updates on news, actions, and events in your area. Join EFF Lists * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks Electronic Frontier Foundation Donate Electronic Frontier Foundation * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast + Annual Reports * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter * Donate + Donate to EFF + Giving Societies + Shop + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] The Kids Online Safety Act is Still A Huge Danger to Our Rights Online DEEPLINKS BLOG By Jason Kelley May 2, 2023 [student-pr] The Kids Online Safety Act is Still A Huge Danger to Our Rights Online Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link [student-privacy-og] Congress has resurrected the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), a bill that would increase surveillance and restrict access to information in the name of protecting children online. KOSA was introduced in 2022 but failed to gain traction, and today its authors, Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), have reintroduced it with slight modifications. Though some of these changes were made in response to over 100 civil society organizations and LGBTQ+ rights groups' criticisms of the bill, its latest version is still troubling. Today's version of KOSA would still require surveillance of anyone sixteen and under. It would put the tools of censorship in the hands of state attorneys general, and would greatly endanger the rights, and safety, of young people online. And KOSA's burdens will affect adults, too, who will likely face hurdles to accessing legal content online as a result of the bill. TAKE ACTION TELL CONGRESS: OPPOSE THE KIDS ONLINE SAFETY ACT KOSA Still Requires Filtering and Blocking of Legal Speech Online child safety is a complex issue, but KOSA attempts to boil it down to a single solution. The bill holds platforms liable if their designs and services do not "prevent and mitigate" a list of societal ills: anxiety, depression, eating disorders, substance use disorders, physical violence, online bullying and harassment, sexual exploitation and abuse, and suicidal behaviors. Additionally, platforms would be responsible for patterns of use that indicate or encourage addiction-like behaviors. Deciding what designs or services lead to these problems would primarily be left up to the Federal Trade Commission and 50 individual state attorneys general to decide. Ultimately, this puts platforms that serve young people in an impossible situation: without clear guidance regarding what sort of design or content might lead to these harms, they would likely censor any discussions that could make them liable. To be clear: though the bill's language is about "designs and services," the designs of a platform are not causing eating disorders. As a result, KOSA would make platforms liable for the content they show minors, full stop. It will be based on vague requirements that any Attorney General could, more or less, make up. Attorneys General Would Decide What Content is Dangerous To Young People KOSA's co-author, Sen. Blackburn of Tennessee, has referred to education about race discrimination as "dangerous for kids." Many states have agreed, and recently moved to limit public education about the history of race, gender, and sexuality discrimination. If KOSA passes, platforms are likely to preemptively block conversations that discuss these topics, as well as discussions about substance use, suicide, and eating disorders. As we've written in our previous commentary on the bill, KOSA could result in loss of access to information that a majority of people would agree is not dangerous. Again, issues like substance abuse, eating disorders, and depression are complex societal issues, and there is not clear agreement on their causes or their solutions. To pick just one example: in some communities, safe injection sites are seen as part of a solution to substance abuse; in others, they are seen as part of the problem. Under KOSA, could a platform be sued for displaying content about them--or about needle exchanges, naloxone, or other harm reduction techniques? The latest version of KOSA tries, but ultimately fails, to address this problem in two ways: first, by clarifying that the bill shouldn't stop a platform or its users from "providing resources for the prevention or mitigation" of its listed harms; and second, by adding that claims under the law should be consistent with evidence-informed medical information. Unfortunately, were an Attorney General to claim that content about trans healthcare (for example) poses risks to minors' health, they would have no shortage of 'evidence-informed' medical information on which to base their assertion. Numerous states have laws on the books claiming that gender-affirming care for trans youth is child abuse. In an article for the American Conservative titled "How Big Tech Turns Kids Trans," the authors point to numerous studies that indicate gender-affirming care is dangerous, despite leading medical groups recognizing the medical necessity of treatments for gender dysphoria. In the same article, the authors laud KOSA, which would prohibit "content that poses risks to minors' physical and mental health." The same issue exists on both sides of the political spectrum. KOSA is ambiguous enough that an Attorney General who wanted to censor content regarding gun ownership, or Christianity, could argue that it has harmful effects on young people. TAKE ACTION TELL CONGRESS: OPPOSE THE KIDS ONLINE SAFETY ACT KOSA Would Still Lead to Age Verification On Platforms Another change to KOSA comes in response to concerns that the law would lead to age verification requirements for platforms. For a platform to know whether or not it is liable for its impact on minors, it must, of course, know whether or not minors use its platform, and who they are. Age verification mandates create many issues -- in particular, they undermine anonymity by requiring all users to upload identity verification documentation and share private data, no matter their age. Other types of "age assurance" tools such as age estimation also require users to upload biometric information such as their photos, and have accuracy issues. Ultimately, no method is sufficiently reliable, offers complete coverage of the population, and has respect for the protection of individuals' data and privacy and their security. France's National Commission on Informatics and Liberty, CNIL, reached this conclusion in a recent analysis of current age verification methods. In response to these concerns, KOSA's authors have made two small changes, but they're unlikely to stop platforms from implementing age verification. Earlier versions would have held platforms liable if they "knew or should have known" that an impacted user was sixteen years of age or younger. The latest version of KOSA adds "reasonableness" to this requirement, holding platforms liable if they "know or reasonably should know" a user is a minor. But legally speaking, this doesn't result in giving platforms any better guidance. The second change is to add explicit language that age verification is not required under the "Privacy Protections" section of the bill. The bill now states that a covered platform is not required to implement an age gating or age verification functionality. But there is essentially no outcome where sites don't implement age verification. There's no way for platforms to block nebulous categories of content for minors without explicitly requiring age verification. If a 16-year-old user truthfully identifies herself, the law will hold platforms liable, unless they filter and block content. If a 16-year-old user identifies herself as an adult, and the platform does not use age verification, then it will still be held liable, because it should have "reasonably known" the user's age. A platform could, alternatively, skip age verification and simply institute blocking and filtering of certain types of content for all users regardless of age--which would be a terrible blow for speech online for everyone. So despite these bandaids on the bill, it still leaves platforms with no choices except to institute heavy-handed censorship and age verification requirements. These impacts would affect not just young people, but every user of the platform. There Are Better Ways to Fix The Internet While we appreciate that lawmakers have responded to concerns raised about the bill, its main requirements--that platforms must "prevent and mitigate" complex issues that researchers don't even agree the platforms are responsible for in the first place--will lead to a more siloed, and more censored, internet. We also stand by our previous criticisms of KOSA--that it unreasonably buckets all young people into a single category, and that it requires surveillance of minors by parents. They remain troubling aspects of the law. There is no question that some elements of social media today are toxic to users. Companies want users to spend as much time on their platforms as possible, because they make money from targeted ad sales, and these ad sales are fueled by invasive data collection. EFF has long supported stronger competition laws and comprehensive data privacy legislation in part because they can open the field to competitors to today's social media options, and force platforms to innovate, offering more user choice. If users are unhappy with the content or design of current platforms, they should be able to move to other options that offer different forms of content moderation, better privacy protections, and other features that improve the experience for everyone, including young people. KOSA would not enhance the ability of users to choose where they spend their time. Instead, it would shrink the number of options, by making strict requirements that only today's largest, most profitable platforms could follow. It would solidify today's Big Tech giants, while forcing them to collect more private data on all users. It would force them to spy on young people, and it would hand government the power to limit what topics they can see and discuss online. It is not a safety bill--it is a surveillance and censorship bill. Please tell your Senators and representatives not to pass it. TAKE ACTION TELL CONGRESS: OPPOSE THE KIDS ONLINE SAFETY ACT Related Issues Free Speech Student Privacy Anonymity Big Tech Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Join EFF Lists Discover more. Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Related Updates Free Speech banner, an colorful graphic representation of a megaphone Deeplinks Blog by Karen Gullo | July 26, 2023 Rights Groups Urge EU's Thierry Breton: No Internet Shutdowns for Hateful Content EFF and 66 human rights and free speech advocacy groups across the globe today called on EU Internal Commissioner Thierry Breton to clarify that the Digital Services Act (DSA)--new regulations aimed at reining in Big Tech companies that control the lion's share of online speech worldwide--does not allow internet shutdowns... [OG-Encryption-GoldenKey] Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley, Sophia Cope | July 24, 2023 The NDAA is No Place for Sweeping Internet Legislation Like the STOP CSAM Act The STOP CSAM Act of 2023 would undermine services offering end-to-end encryption and push internet companies to take down lawful user speech. This dangerous bill would threaten security and free speech on the internet--but incredibly, it may pass Congress without even being seriously debated. Some lawmakers are seeking to attach... [student-privacy-og] Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley | July 21, 2023 Young People Should Oppose the Kids Online Safety Act Next week, Congress plans to move a bill forward that is opposed by dozens of organizations, digital rights protectors, LGBTQ+ activists, and human rights defenders: the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA). As we've written before, KOSA would lead to censorship and privacy invasions for all social media users.... A multi-colored bullhorn icon surrounded by grey-blue hexagons Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley | July 18, 2023 You Can Help Stop These Bad Internet Bills Red alert! For the last six months, EFF, our supporters, and dozens of other groups have been sounding the alarm about several # BadInternetBills that have been put forward in Congress. We've made it clear that these bills are terrible ideas, but Congress is now considering packaging them together--possibly into must-pass... EU-flag-circuits Deeplinks Blog by Paige Collings, Christoph Schmon | July 12, 2023 EU Media Freedom Act: A Media Privilege in Content Moderation Is a Really Bad Idea Introduced in September 2022 by the European Commission as part of the "new push for European Union Democracy," the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) seeks to promote media pluralism and independence across the EU. EMFA in a NutshellThe EMFA sets out rights and obligations for 'media service providers',... EFF Cat Speaking Freely Deeplinks Blog by Jillian C. York | July 10, 2023 EFF's Comment to the Meta Oversight Board on United States Posts Discussing Abortion This post was co-authored with EFF legal intern Virginia Kennedy.EFF recently submitted comments to the Meta Oversight Board's call for submissions last month about posts in the United States discussing abortion that were removed under the company's violence and incitement policy.EFF's comments address the over-removal of abortion-related content and... Privacy issue banner, a colorful graphical representation of a padlock Deeplinks Blog by Veridiana Alimonti, Agneris Sampieri | July 7, 2023 Brazil's Platform Regulation Debate: Concerning Duty of Care Obligations ** This post is one section of a more extensive piece on Brazil's platform accountability and regulation debate. Click here to read the entire content.The progression of PL 2630's versions was an expression of opting for a process-based approach instead of a content-focused one within a regulation initiative aiming... Privacy issue banner, a colorful graphical representation of a padlock Deeplinks Blog by Veridiana Alimonti, Daly Barnett, Agneris Sampieri | July 7, 2023 Brazil's Platform Regulation Debate: Repel Rules and Interpretations That Can Lead to Content Monitoring Obligations ** This post is one section of a more extensive piece on Brazil's platform accountability and regulation debate. Click here to read the entire content.The Special Rapporteurs for Freedom of Expression have stated: "At a minimum, intermediaries should not be required to monitor user-generated content." And that:... International issues banner, a colorful graphic of a globe Deeplinks Blog by Veridiana Alimonti, Agneris Sampieri | July 7, 2023 Brazil's Platform Regulation Debate: Robust Checks, Balances and Due Process Safeguards for Exceptional Measures in Crisis Situations ** This post is one section of a more extensive piece on Brazil's platform accountability and regulation debate. Click here to read the entire content.PL 2630 establishes special obligations for when there is an imminent risk of damage or negligence of an application provider (Articles 12-15). In assessing this... Privacy issue banner, a colorful graphical representation of a padlock Deeplinks Blog by Veridiana Alimonti, Agneris Sampieri | July 7, 2023 Brazil's Platform Regulation Debate: Proper Independent and Participative Oversight Structure ** This post is one section of a more extensive piece on Brazil's platform accountability and regulation debate. Click here to read the entire content.The bill stipulates obligations to internet applications and powers to an unspecified administrative authority to oversee compliance with PL 2630's rules. The bill's enforcement without... Discover more. Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Related Issues Free Speech Student Privacy Anonymity Big Tech Back to top EFF Home Follow EFF: * twitter * facebook * instagram * youtube * flicker * rss * linkedin Check out our 4-star rating on Charity Navigator. Contact * General * Legal * Security * Membership * Press About * Calendar * Volunteer * Victories * History * Internships * Jobs * Staff * Diversity & Inclusion Issues * Free Speech * Privacy * Creativity & Innovation * Transparency * International * Security Updates * Blog * Press Releases * Events * Legal Cases * Whitepapers * EFFector Newsletter Press * Press Contact Donate * Join or Renew Membership Online * One-Time Donation Online * Giving Societies * Shop * Other Ways to Give * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks JavaScript license information *