https://phys.org/news/2023-05-james-webb-massive-galaxies.html Phys.org Topics * Week's top * Latest news * Unread news * Subscribe [ ] Science X Account [ ] [ ] [*] Remember me Sign In Click here to sign in with or Forget Password? Not a member? Sign up Learn more * Nanotechnology * Physics * Earth * Astronomy & Space * Chemistry * Biology * Other Sciences * Medical Xpress Medicine * Tech Xplore Technology [INS::INS] * * share this! * 459 * 38 * Share * Email 1. Home 2. Astronomy & Space 3. Astronomy * * * --------------------------------------------------------------------- May 17, 2023 Editors' notes This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: fact-checked peer-reviewed publication trusted source proofread James Webb's 'too massive' galaxies may be even more massive by Niels Bohr Institute James Webb's "too massive" galaxies may be even more massive This image of galaxy cluster SMACS 0723 and its surroundings was the first image released from the James Webb Space Telescope in July 2023. The five zoom-ins are each roughly 19,000 lightyears across, and show galaxies seen some 13 billion years back in time. Careful analysis of these galaxies reveals that if we cannot resolve a galaxy, we may severely underestimate the total mass of its stars. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI / Gimenez-Arteaga et al. (2023), Peter Laursen (Cosmic Dawn Center) The first results from the James Webb Space Telescope have hinted at galaxies so early and so massive that they are in tension with our understanding of the formation of structure in the universe. Various explanations have been proposed that may alleviate this tension. But now a new study from the Cosmic Dawn Center suggests an effect which has never before been studied at such early epochs, indicating that the galaxies may be even more massive. If you have been following the first results from the James Webb Space Telescope, you have probably heard about the paramount issue with the observations of the earliest galaxies: They are too big. From a few days after the release of the first images, and repeatedly through the coming months, new reports of ever-more distant galaxies appeared. Disturbingly, several of the galaxies seemed to be "too massive." From our currently accepted concordance model of the structure and evolution of the universe, the so-called LCDM model, they simply shouldn't have had the time to form so many stars. Although LCDM is not a holy indestructible grail, there are many reasons to wait claiming a paradigm shift: The measured epochs at which we see the galaxies could be underestimated. Their stellar masses could be overestimated. Or we could just have been lucky and somehow have discovered the most massive of the galaxies at that time. A closer look But now Clara Gimenez Arteaga, Ph.D. student at the Cosmic Dawn Center, proposes an effect that could further increase the tension. In essence, a galaxy's stellar mass is estimated by measuring the amount of light emitted by the galaxy, and calculating how many stars are needed to emit this amount. The usual approach is to consider the combined light from the whole galaxy. However, taking a closer look at a sample of five galaxies, observed with James Webb, Gimenez Arteaga found that if the galaxy is regarded not as one big blob of stars, but as an entity build up of multiple clumps, a different picture emerges. "We used the standard procedure to calculate stellar masses from the images that James Webb has taken, but on a pixel-by-pixel basis rather than looking at the whole galaxy," says Gimenez Arteaga. "In principle, one might expect the results to be the same: Adding the light from all pixels and finding the total stellar mass, versus calculating the mass of each pixel and adding all individual stellar masses. But they're not." In fact the inferred stellar masses now turned out to be up to ten times larger. The figure below shows the five galaxies with their stellar masses determined by both ways. If the two different approaches agreed, all galaxies would lie along the slanted line named "The same." But they all lie above this line. James Webb's "too massive" galaxies may be even more massive The five galaxies placed in a diagram that shows both the stellar mass inferred in the "usual" way (blue numbers) and Clara Gimenez-Arteaga's pixel-by-pixel method (red numbers). In all cases, the masses found using the pixel-by-pixel method are larger. Credit: Gimenez-Arteaga et al. (2023), Peter Laursen (Cosmic Dawn Center) [INS::INS] Outshined So what is the reason that the stellar masses turn out to be so much larger? Gimenez Arteaga explains, "Stellar populations are a mixture of small and faint stars on one hand, and bright, massive stars on the other hand. If we just look at the combined light, the bright stars will tend to completely outshine the faint stars, leaving them unnoticed. Our analysis shows that bright, star-forming clumps may dominate the total light, but the bulk of the mass is found in smaller stars." Stellar mass is one of the main properties used to characterize a galaxy, and Gimenez-Arteaga's result highlights the importance of being able to resolve the galaxies. But for the most distant and faint ones, this is not always possible. The effect has been studied before, but only at much later epochs in the history of the universe. The next step is therefore to look for signatures that does not require the high resolution, and which correlate with the "true" stellar mass. "Other studies at much later epochs have also found this discrepancy. If we can determine how common and severe the effect is at earlier epochs, and quantify it, we will be closer to inferring robust stellar masses of distant galaxies, which is one of the main current challenges of studying galaxies in the early universe," concludes Clara Gimenez Arteaga. The study has just been published in The Astrophysical Journal. The LCDM model "LCDM"--pronounced "Lambda-CDM"--is the moniker given to the best model we have for describing the structure and evolution of our universe. The model is based upon one of the most well-tested theories in physics, the theory of general relativity, which describes how matter affects space, and how space affects matter. In this model, the universe is assumed to consist primarily of an unknown substance known as dark energy, denoted by the Greek letter L, and cold dark matter (CDM), where "cold" means that it does not move around too fast. LCDM has been extremely successful in describing and predicting numerous phenomena. But we still do not know what dark matter and energy is, and we know that general relativity, despite its success, is not a complete theory. We therefore do expect LCDM eventually to be expanded or replaced by a better theory. More information: Clara Gimenez-Arteaga et al, Spatially Resolved Properties of Galaxies at 5 < z < 9 in the SMACS 0723 JWST ERO Field, The Astrophysical Journal (2023). DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc5ea Journal information: Astrophysical Journal Provided by Niels Bohr Institute Citation: James Webb's 'too massive' galaxies may be even more massive (2023, May 17) retrieved 18 May 2023 from https://phys.org/ news/2023-05-james-webb-massive-galaxies.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Explore further James Webb Space Telescope images challenge theories of how universe evolved --------------------------------------------------------------------- 500 shares * Facebook * Twitter * Email Feedback to editors [INS::INS] * Featured * Last Comments * Popular Could dark photon dark matter be directly detected using radio telescopes? 7 hours ago 5 Using an organic catalyst to make chlorine more energy efficiently 7 hours ago 0 Optimized prime editing alters genes of living mice, marking major advance 8 hours ago 1 XTE J1906+090 is a persistent low-luminosity Be X-ray binary, study suggests 9 hours ago 0 Use of pesticides and herbicides found to be biggest cause of bird decline in Europe May 17, 2023 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [gif] Study: Wildfire spread risk increases where trees, shrubs replace grasses 2 hours ago [gif] Smart material prototype challenges Newton's laws of motion 3 hours ago [gif] Researchers transform our understanding of crystals 3 hours ago [gif] Disentanglement: Breaking the activity-selectivity 'tradeoff' effect in catalytic conversion 4 hours ago [gif] Coyotes, bobcats move into human-inhabited areas to avoid apex predators, only to be killed by people 5 hours ago [gif] Half of the world's largest lakes are losing water, shows new study 5 hours ago [gif] Wiring up quantum circuits with light 5 hours ago [gif] In years after El Nino, global economy loses trillions 5 hours ago [gif] A perfect 'pathogen' storm: Vibrio bacteria, Sargassum and plastic marine debris 5 hours ago [gif] Humanity's earliest recorded kiss occurred in Mesopotamia 4,500 years ago, claims new study 5 hours ago [INS::INS] * Related Stories [gif] James Webb Space Telescope images challenge theories of how universe evolved Apr 13, 2023 [gif] Hubble observes lenticular galaxy NGC 3489 May 2, 2023 [gif] Observations shed more light on the morphology and environment of a very distant galaxy Feb 22, 2023 [gif] Webb spots surprisingly massive galaxies in early universe Feb 26, 2023 [gif] Webb offers never-before-seen details of early universe Oct 26, 2022 [gif] Is the James Webb Space Telescope finding the furthest, oldest, youngest or first galaxies? An astronomer explains Aug 1, 2022 * Recommended for you [gif] Could dark photon dark matter be directly detected using radio telescopes? 7 hours ago [gif] XTE J1906+090 is a persistent low-luminosity Be X-ray binary, study suggests 9 hours ago [gif] MeerKAT radio telescope catches a 'Mini Mouse' in the sky May 17, 2023 [gif] Radio signal reveals supernova origin May 17, 2023 [gif] Temperature of solar flares helps understand nature of solar plasma May 16, 2023 [gif] Astronomers observe the first radiation belt seen outside of our solar system May 15, 2023 Load comments (15) Let us know if there is a problem with our content Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines). Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request [-- please select one -- ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message to the editors [ ] Your email (only if you want to be contacted back) [ ] Send Feedback Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors. Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages. E-mail the story James Webb's 'too massive' galaxies may be even more massive Your friend's email [ ] Your email [ ] [ ] I would like to subscribe to Science X Newsletter. Learn more Your name [ ] Note Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message [ ] Send Newsletter sign up Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties. [ ] Subscribe More information Privacy policy Medical Xpress Medical Xpress Medical research advances and health news Tech Xplore Tech Xplore The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances Science X Science X The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web Newsletters [ ] Subscribe Science X Daily and the Weekly Email Newsletter are free features that allow you to receive your favorite sci-tech news updates in your email inbox Follow us * * * * * Top * Home * Search * Mobile version * Help * FAQ * About * Contact * Science X Account * Sponsored Account * Archive * News wire * Android app * iOS app * RSS feeds * Push notification (c) Phys.org 2003 - 2023 powered by Science X Network Privacy policy Terms of use Your Privacy This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, collect data for ads personalisation and provide content from third parties. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Ok Cookie options E-mail newsletter [ ] Subscribe Follow us * * * * It appears that you are currently using Ad Blocking software. What are the consequences? x Quantcast