https://www.wired.com/story/usps-mail-surveillance-letter/ Skip to main content Open Navigation Menu To revist this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories. Close Alert WIRED The Post Office Is Spying on the Mail. Senators Want to Stop It * Backchannel * Business * Culture * Gear * Ideas * Science * Security More To revist this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories. Close Alert Sign In Search * Backchannel * Business * Culture * Gear * Ideas * Science * Security * Podcasts * Video * Artificial Intelligence * Climate * Games * Newsletters * Magazine * Events * Wired Insider * Jobs * Coupons A United States Postal Service worker Photograph: Luke Sharrett/Getty Images Dell Cameron Security May 17, 2023 2:05 PM The Post Office Is Spying on the Mail. Senators Want to Stop It The USPS carries out warrantless surveillance on thousands of parcels every year. Lawmakers are working to end it--right now. * * * * * * * * Each year, at the request of police and intelligence agents across the country, the United States Postal Service conducts surveillance on physical pieces of mail going to and from the homes and businesses of tens of thousands of Americans, a group of United States senators says. To initiate this surveillance, the department or agency has at least one hurdle to climb. First, they must submit the request in writing. Then ... well, nothing. That is the entire hurdle. In practice, this serves less as an evidentiary threshold than an IT ticketing system. For more than a handful of senators, that's unacceptable. And in a letter today to the nation's chief postal inspector, Gary Barksdale, the group explains why: "There is a long history of documented abuses of postal surveillance." The letter, first obtained by WIRED, is signed by an equal number of Republicans and Democrats, including senators Ron Wyden, Rand Paul, Edward Markey, Cynthia Lummis, Elizabeth Warren, Mike Lee, Cory Booker, and Steve Daines. It opens with a warning about a request devised by the postal service known as a "mail cover," which the lawmakers say "threatens both our privacy and First Amendment rights." The lawmakers equate mail covers with the "unchecked government monitoring" of Americans' mail. Here's how the Postal Service describes them: A mail cover is an investigative tool used to record data appearing on the outside of a mailpiece. Law enforcement agencies use this information to protect national security; locate fugitives; obtain evidence; or help identify property, proceeds, or assets forfeitable under criminal law. A mail cover is justified when it will further an investigation or provide evidence of a crime. The phrase "further an investigation" likely means little to the person whose mail is being surveilled. It doesn't indicate that they're the target of an investigation nor even suspected of doing anything illegal. It doesn't necessarily mean that anyone in a position to charge someone with a crime knows for certain that a crime has occurred. And as the Postal Service itself says, a law enforcement agency can also freely use the data recorded from the outside of a piece of mail--commonly known as metadata in the context of digital communications--to "identify property" it intends to seize. In contrast, the senators note, the government can usually only monitor metadata associated with electronic messages (e.g., email or text messages) "with a court order." Admittedly, expectations of privacy when it comes to email and written letters likely differ: People don't ordinarily expect what they print on the outside of their letters and packages to have the same level of privacy as what's inside. It's understood that whatever is printed on a piece of mail will, at some point, be viewed by a stranger before it reaches its destination. But those people are also generally understood to be mail carriers, not intelligence agents. Most Popular * A man in a suit looking upwards in front of an unfinished house. Culture The Fanfic Sex Trope That Caught a Plundering AI Red-Handed Rose Eveleth * [undefined] Gear The Best Nintendo Switch Games for Every Kind of Player WIRED Staff * Illustration of the EU flag surrounded by a fence, blocking out Google's colors Business More Penguins Than Europeans Can Use Google Bard Morgan Meaker * Red, blue, yellow and green paint smudges Business The Curious Case of the Missing Google Assistant Khari Johnson * The notion that only a mail carrier will view a piece of mail is based on a quainter understanding of the mail handling process; a Norman Rockwell view of what a modern postal delivery system entails. In the US, the exterior of every piece of mail is photographed. And the information obtained from these photos, such as religious and political affiliations, is more intimate than people may realize. This data has been described by one former FBI agent as "easily abused" and a "treasure trove." In comparing mail covers to the National Security Agency surveillance exposed during the Edward Snowden scandal, the renowned security technologist Bruce Schneier once called them "basically ... the same thing." The letter to Barksdale is not merely aimed at telling the chief inspector--an official who oversees dozens of field offices and labs and an army of law enforcement agents and other technical resources--things that he already likely knows. Instead, they'd like him to simply end the process. The USPS declined to comment. There is no federal statute requiring the post office to allow mail covers. The Postal Service authorizes this through its own regulations, conforming to interpretations of what is most permissive under the Fourth Amendment. Those protections were strengthened in 1967 as a result of a US Supreme Court ruling that established a legal test--which is still used--known as an "expectation of privacy." And while intercepting electronic metadata, as the senators note, generally requires a court order--because the courts have decided Americans do reasonably expect that information to be private--judges haven't exactly ruled the same way in cases involving physical pieces of mail. There are many intricacies involved, but in at least one major case, judges pointed to another legal test, known as the "plain view doctrine," which applies to evidence investigators can clearly see. "The risk of abuse of mail covers is not theoretical," the lawmakers write in the letter. The history of abuse of mail covers, as the lawmakers note, is a long one. A famous incident occurred in the 1970s, when a 15-year-old girl mistakenly wrote to the Socialist Workers Party--a communist organization strongly supportive of Cuba--while researching a school assignment involving the Socialist Labor Party. The teenager was thoroughly investigated by the FBI, which even sent an agent into her school. The senators note that Church Committee, which was formed in 1975 to investigate US intelligence abuses, uncovered that the Central Intelligence Agency had photographed "the exteriors of over 2 million pieces of mail," while opening hundreds of thousands of others, that belonged to "prominent activists and authors." Indeed, the senators say, modern fears of postal abuse hearken back to the Founding Fathers themselves, who decried what Thomas Jefferson called the "infidelities of the post office," surveillance that broadly forced those at odds with the British occupation to resort to encrypting messages they wished to keep private. These messages include, the lawmakers note, "an early proposal for the Bill of Rights." The lawmakers ask that Barksdale cease allowing mail covers without the permission of a federal judge, "except in emergencies." And to increase transparency, they say, the post office should begin publishing annual statistics on the mail covers it does allow. It has not done so since at least 2014 (in conjunction with an Inspector General report). "While mail covers do not reveal the contents of correspondence, they can reveal deeply personal information about Americans' political leanings, religious beliefs, or causes they support," the senators write. Consequently, any such abuses are a threat, they say, to not only Americans' right to associate politically and religiously, but to assemble "without the government watching." Get More From WIRED * Don't miss our biggest stories, delivered to your inbox every day * Our new podcast wants you to Have a Nice Future * Reality TV saved me * The team of sleuths hunting cyberattack-for-hire services * Self-driving cars are being put on a data diet * Google doesn't need you to buy its folding phone * Your dog is a secret weapon in the fight against cancer * Our Gear team sounds off on audiophile-grade speakers, vinyl accessories and the best wireless headphones for anyone Dell Cameron is a Texas-based privacy, policy, and security reporter. Prior to joining WIRED, he was a staff reporter at the Daily Dot and senior reporter at Gizmodo. Senior Reporter, Politics and Policy * Topicsprivacysurveillancecongress More from WIRED Small, wrinkled piece of blank paper in a human hand Twitter Encrypted DMs Are Deeply Inferior to Signal and WhatsApp The social network's new privacy feature is technically flawed, opt-in, and limited in its functionality. All this for just $8 a month. Andy Greenberg Smartphones falling like dominos and displaying a thumbs-up icon ChatGPT Scams Are Infiltrating the App Store and Google Play An explosion of interest in OpenAI's sophisticated chatbot means a proliferation of "fleeceware" apps that trick users with sneaky in-app subscriptions. Lily Hay Newman macbook Apple's Macs Have Long Escaped Ransomware. That May Be Changing The discovery of malicious encryptors for Apple computers could herald new risks for macOS users if the malware continues to evolve. Lily Hay Newman [undefined] Meta Is Trying to Push Attackers to the Brink The company is adding new tools as bad actors use ChatGPT-themed lures and mask their infrastructure in an attempt to trick victims and elude defenders. Lily Hay Newman Illustration of the EU flag surrounded by a fence, blocking out Google's colors The UK's Secretive Web Surveillance Program Is Ramping Up A government effort to collect people's internet records is moving beyond its test phase, but many details remain hidden from public view. Matt Burgess Attorney General Merrick Garland Cops Just Revealed a Record-Breaking Dark Web Dragnet Operation SpecTor likely drew on leads from multiple dark web market busts, including the secret takedown of Monopoly Market in 2021. Andy Greenberg Many old routers stacked on top of each other Used Routers Often Come Loaded With Corporate Secrets More than half of the enterprise routers researchers bought secondhand hadn't been wiped, exposing sensitive info like login credentials and customer data. Lily Hay Newman Photo-illustration containing a figure standing in a streetlight, thread pinned to paper, and a shadowy hacker figure, with binary code separating them all The Team of Sleuths Quietly Hunting Cyberattack-for-Hire Services For a decade, a group called Big Pipes has worked behind the scenes with the FBI to target the worst cybercriminal "booter" services plaguing the internet. Andy Greenberg WIRED WIRED is where tomorrow is realized. It is the essential source of information and ideas that make sense of a world in constant transformation. The WIRED conversation illuminates how technology is changing every aspect of our lives--from culture to business, science to design. The breakthroughs and innovations that we uncover lead to new ways of thinking, new connections, and new industries. * * * * * * More From WIRED * Subscribe * Newsletters * FAQ * Wired Staff * Press Center * Coupons * Editorial Standards * Black Friday * Archive Contact * Advertise * Contact Us * Customer Care * Jobs * RSS * Accessibility Help * Conde Nast Store * Conde Nast Spotlight * Do Not Sell My Personal Info (c) 2023 Conde Nast. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement and Your California Privacy Rights. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Conde Nast. Ad Choices Select international siteUnited States * UK * Italia * Japon