https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-023-01412-1 Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Advertisement Advertisement Nature Plants * View all journals * Search * Log in * Explore content * About the journal * Publish with us * Subscribe * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed 1. nature 2. nature plants 3. articles 4. article * Article * Published: 11 May 2023 Human activities and species biological traits drive the long-term persistence of old trees in human-dominated landscapes * Li Huang ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0012-5391^1,2, * Cheng Jin^2, * Yingji Pan ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-3943^3, * Lihua Zhou^2, * Siwei Hu^2, * Yanpei Guo ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7724-0473^1, * Yuanyuan Meng^1, * Kun Song ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8019-9707^4, * Mingyue Pang^2, * Hong Li^2, * Dunmei Lin^2, * Xiaoting Xu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8126-614X^5, * Jesse Minor ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0879-9983^6, * Chris Coggins^7, * C. Y. Jim ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-8363^8, * Enrong Yan^4, * Yongchuan Yang ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7627-7776^2, * Zhiyao Tang ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-6403^1 & * ... * David B. Lindenmayer ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-4088^9 Show authors Nature Plants (2023)Cite this article * 14 Altmetric * Metrics details Subjects * Biodiversity * Macroecology Abstract Old trees have many ecological and socio-cultural values. However, knowledge of the factors influencing their long-term persistence in human-dominated landscapes is limited. Here, using an extensive database (nearly 1.8 million individual old trees belonging to 1,580 species) from China, we identified which species were most likely to persist as old trees in human-dominated landscapes and where they were most likely to occur. We found that species with greater potential height, smaller leaf size and diverse human utilization attributes had the highest probability of long-term persistence. The persistence probabilities of human-associated species (taxa with diverse human utilization attributes) were relatively high in intensively cultivated areas. Conversely, the persistence probabilities of spontaneous species (taxa with no human utilization attributes and which are not cultivated) were relatively high in mountainous areas or regions inhabited by ethnic minorities. The distinctly different geographic patterns of persistence probabilities of the two groups of species were related to their dissimilar responses to heterogeneous human activities and site conditions. A small number of human-associated species dominated the current cohort of old trees, while most spontaneous species were rare and endemic. Our study revealed the potential impacts of human activities on the long-term persistence of trees and the associated shifts in species composition in human-dominated landscapes. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Access options Access through your institution Access through your institution Change institution Buy or subscribe Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $29.99 per month cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles $119.00 per year only $9.92 per issue Learn more Rent or buy this article Get just this article for as long as you need it $39.95 Learn more Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout Additional access options: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support Fig. 1: Distribution of study counties and photos of two representative old trees. [41477_2023_1412_Fig1_HTML] Fig. 2: Current composition characteristics and distribution of old trees. [41477_2023_1412_Fig2_HTML] Fig. 3: RFR across species. [41477_2023_1412_Fig3_HTML] Fig. 4: Geographic patterns and determinants of SRR. [41477_2023_1412_Fig4_HTML] Data availability The distribution data of old-tree species are available in Atlas of Woody Plants in China: Distribution and Climate^38 and the National Specimen Information Infrastructure (www.nsii.org.cn/). The main source of old-tree species biological traits data is accessible through the 'Flora of China' (https://www.plantplus.cn/foc). The species list and tree abundance data of old trees in China are available in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22545844). References 1. Lindenmayer, D. B. Conserving large old trees as small natural features. Biol. Conserv. 211, 51-59 (2017). Article Google Scholar 2. Lindenmayer, D. B. & Laurance, W. F. The ecology, distribution, conservation and management of large old trees. Biol. Rev. 92, 1434-1458 (2017). Article PubMed Google Scholar 3. Blicharska, M. & Mikusinski, G. Incorporating social and cultural significance of large old trees in conservation policy. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1558-1567 (2014). Article PubMed Google Scholar 4. Cannon, C. H., Piovesan, G. & Munne-Bosch, S. Old and ancient trees are life history lottery winners and vital evolutionary resources for long-term adaptive capacity. Nat. Plants 8, 136-145 (2022). Article PubMed Google Scholar 5. Liu, J. et al. Age and spatial distribution of the world's oldest trees. Conserv. Biol. 36, e1390 (2022). Article Google Scholar 6. Lindenmayer, D. B., Laurance, W. F. & Franklin, J. F. Global decline in large old trees. Science 338, 1305-1306 (2012). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 7. Patrut, A. et al. The demise of the largest and oldest African baobabs. Nat. Plants 4, 423-426 (2018). Article PubMed Google Scholar 8. Liu, J., Yang, B. & Lindenmayer, D. B. The oldest trees in China and where to find them. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 319-322 (2019). Google Scholar 9. Huang, L. et al. Biogeographic and anthropogenic factors shaping the distribution and species assemblage of heritage trees in China. Urban For. Urban Green. 50, 126652 (2020). Article Google Scholar 10. Jin, C. et al. Co-existence between humans and nature: heritage trees in China's Yangtze River region. Urban For. Urban Green. 54 , 126748 (2020). Article Google Scholar 11. Locosselli, G. M. et al. Global tree-ring analysis reveals rapid decrease in tropical tree longevity with temperature. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 33358-33364 (2020). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 12. Liu, J. et al. Diversity and density patterns of large old trees in China. Sci. Total Environ. 655, 255-262 (2019). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 13. Lindenmayer, D. B. & Laurance, W. F. The unique challenges of conserving large old trees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 416-418 (2016). Article PubMed Google Scholar 14. Huang, L. et al. Local cultural beliefs and practices promote conservation of large old trees in an ethnic minority region in southwestern China. Urban For. Urban Green. 49, 126584 (2020). Article Google Scholar 15. Zhou, L. et al. Fengshui forests as a conservation paradigm of the golden larch in China. For. Ecol. Manage. 520, 120358 (2022). Article Google Scholar 16. Tang, C. Q. et al. Evidence for the persistence of wild Ginkgo biloba (Ginkgoaceae) populations in the Dalou Mountains, southwestern China. Am. J. Bot. 99, 1408-1414 (2012). Article PubMed Google Scholar 17. Frascaroli, F., Bhagwat, S., Guarino, R., Chiarucci, A. & Schmid, B. Shrines in Central Italy conserve plant diversity and large trees. Ambio 45, 468-479 (2016). Article PubMed Google Scholar 18. Choat, B. et al. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature 558, 531-539 (2018). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 19. Bennett, A. C., McDowell, N. G., Allen, C. D. & Anderson-Teixeira, K. J. Larger trees suffer most during drought in forests worldwide. Nat. Plants 1, 1-5 (2015). Article Google Scholar 20. Laanisto, L., Sammul, M., Kull, T., Macek, P. & Hutchings, M. J. Trait-based analysis of decline in plant species ranges during the 20th century: a regional comparison between the UK and Estonia. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2726-2738 (2015). Article Google Scholar 21. Osborne, C. P. et al. Human impacts in African savannas are mediated by plant functional traits. New Phytol. 220, 10-24 (2018). Article PubMed Google Scholar 22. Xu, W.-B. et al. Human activities have opposing effects on distributions of narrow-ranged and widespread plant species in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 26674-26681 (2019). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 23. Camara-Leret, R. et al. Fundamental species traits explain provisioning services of tropical American palms. Nat. Plants 3, 1-7 (2017). Article Google Scholar 24. Purugganan, M. D. & Fuller, D. Q. The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature 457, 843-848 (2009). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 25. Lu, M. & He, F. Estimating regional species richness: the case of China's vascular plant species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 835-845 (2017). Article Google Scholar 26. Zhang, H., Lai, P. Y. & Jim, C. Y. Species diversity and spatial pattern of old and precious trees in Macau. Landsc. Urban Plan. 162, 56-67 (2017). Article Google Scholar 27. Qian, S. et al. Biotic homogenization of China's urban greening: a meta-analysis on woody species. Urban For. Urban Green. 18, 25-33 (2016). Article Google Scholar 28. Tang, C. Q. et al. Identifying long-term stable refugia for relict plant species in East Asia. Nat. Commun. 9, 1-14 (2018). Google Scholar 29. Tang, C. Q. et al. Survival of a tertiary relict species, Liriodendron chinense (Magnoliaceae), in southern China, with special reference to village fengshui forests. Am. J. Bot. 100, 2112-2119 (2013). Article PubMed Google Scholar 30. Coggins, C. & Minor, J. Fengshui forests as a socio-natural reservoir in the face of climate change and environmental transformation. Asia Pac. Perspect. 15, 4-29 (2018). Google Scholar 31. Yuan, J. & Liu, J. Fengshui forest management by the Buyi ethnic minority in China. For. Ecol. Manage. 257, 2002-2009 (2009). Article Google Scholar 32. Tang, C. Q. et al. Population structure of relict Metasequoia glyptostroboides and its habitat fragmentation and degradation in south-central China. Biol. Conserv. 144, 279-289 (2011). Article Google Scholar 33. Lobo, D., Leao, T., Melo, F. P., Santos, A. M. & Tabarelli, M. Forest fragmentation drives Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil to biotic homogenization. Divers. Distrib. 17, 287-296 (2011). Article Google Scholar 34. Zhao, Y.-P. et al. Resequencing 545 ginkgo genomes across the world reveals the evolutionary history of the living fossil. Nat. Commun. 10, 1-10 (2019). Article Google Scholar 35. Cubino, J. P. et al. Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional composition and homogenization of residential yard vegetation with contrasting management. Landsc. Urban Plan. 202, 103877 (2020). Article Google Scholar 36. Piovesan, G., Cannon, C. H., Liu, J. & Munne-Bosch, S. Ancient trees: irreplaceable conservation resource for ecosystem restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 1025-1028 (2022). Article PubMed Google Scholar 37. Lu, L.-M. et al. Evolutionary history of the angiosperm flora of China. Nature 554, 234-238 (2018). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 38. Fang, J., Wang, Z. & Tang, Z. Atlas of Woody Plants in China: Distribution and Climate Vol. 1 (Springer, 2011). 39. Wang, Z., Fang, J., Tang, Z. & Lin, X. Patterns, determinants and models of woody plant diversity in China. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 2122-2132 (2011). Article PubMed Google Scholar 40. Li, Y. et al. Leaf size of woody dicots predicts ecosystem primary productivity. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1003-1013 (2020). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 41. Peng, S. et al. Preserving the woody plant tree of life in China under future climate and land-cover changes. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20221497 (2022). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 42. Moles, A. T. et al. Global patterns in plant height. J. Ecol. 97, 923-932 (2009). Article Google Scholar 43. Wang, Y. et al. Drivers of large-scale geographical variation in sexual systems of woody plants. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 546-557 (2020). Article Google Scholar 44. Molina-Venegas, R., Rodriguez, M. A., Pardo-de-Santayana, M., Ronquillo, C. & Mabberley, D. J. Maximum levels of global phylogenetic diversity efficiently capture plant services for humankind. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 583-588 (2021). Article PubMed Google Scholar 45. ArcGIS v.10.1 (ESRI, 2010). 46. Kissling, W. D. & Carl, G. Spatial autocorrelation and the selection of simultaneous autoregressive models. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 59-71 (2008). Google Scholar 47. Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2002). 48. Bivand, R. et al. spatialreg: Spatial Regression Analysis. The R Project for Statistical Computing (2019) https:// r-spatial.github.io/spatialreg/ 49. Jin, Y. & Qian, H. V. PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Ecography 42, 1353-1359 (2019). Article Google Scholar 50. Smith, S. A. & Brown, J. W. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 105, 302-314 (2018). Article PubMed Google Scholar 51. Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217-223 (2012). Article Google Scholar 52. Wood, S. Package 'mgcv'. The R Project for Statistical Computing (2015) https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/mgcv/ mgcv_1.8-38.tar.gz Download references Acknowledgements We thank M. Zheng, J. Wang, R. Liao and L. Tian for help in data collection; our colleagues and local forestry departments that generously provided the original data of old trees; J. Liu for disccussing many sections of the paper; and G. Wheeler for assistance with the English language and grammatical editing of the paper. This study was supported by the Chongqing Technology Innovation and Application Demonstration Major Theme Special Project (cstc2018jszxzdyfxmX0007) to Y.Y., the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071652, 32025025 and 31988102) to Y.Y and Z.T. and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M720254) to L.H. Author information Authors and Affiliations 1. Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Peking University, Beijing, China Li Huang, Yanpei Guo, Yuanyuan Meng & Zhiyao Tang 2. Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China Li Huang, Cheng Jin, Lihua Zhou, Siwei Hu, Mingyue Pang, Hong Li, Dunmei Lin & Yongchuan Yang 3. Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, China Yingji Pan 4. Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China Kun Song & Enrong Yan 5. Key Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China Xiaoting Xu 6. Department of Geography and Environmental Planning, University of Maine at Farmington, Farmington, ME, USA Jesse Minor 7. Faculty in Geography and Asian Studies, Bard College at Simon's Rock, Great Barrington, MA, USA Chris Coggins 8. Department of Social Sciences, Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, China C. Y. Jim 9. Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia David B. Lindenmayer Authors 1. Li Huang View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 2. Cheng Jin View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 3. Yingji Pan View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 4. Lihua Zhou View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 5. Siwei Hu View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 6. Yanpei Guo View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 7. Yuanyuan Meng View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 8. Kun Song View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 9. Mingyue Pang View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 10. Hong Li View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 11. Dunmei Lin View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 12. Xiaoting Xu View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 13. Jesse Minor View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 14. Chris Coggins View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 15. C. Y. Jim View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 16. Enrong Yan View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 17. Yongchuan Yang View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 18. Zhiyao Tang View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar 19. David B. Lindenmayer View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Contributions L.H., Y.Y., Z.T. and D.B.L. conceived the paper. L.H., L.Z., C.J. and S.H. established the database. L.H. and Y.P. analysed the data. L.H. wrote the manuscript. All authors, including Y.G., Y.M., K.S., M.P., H.L., D.L., X.X., J.M., C.C., C.Y.J. and E.Y., contributed substantially to the writing and discussion of the paper. Corresponding authors Correspondence to Yongchuan Yang, Zhiyao Tang or David B. Lindenmayer . Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Peer review Peer review information Nature Plants thanks Charles Cannon, Grzegorz Mikusinski and Fangliang He for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Additional information Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Extended data Extended Data Table 1 Determinants of tree proportion of human-associated species. Summary results of simultaneous autoregressive models explaining the relationships between the explanatory variables and tree proportion of human-associated species at the spatial scale of 100 km x 100 km. A total of 384 grids were used in the analysis. (pseudo-R^2 = 0.43) Full size table Extended Data Table 2 Determinants of spatial recruitment rate (SRR). Summary results of simultaneous autoregressive models explaining the relationships between the explanatory variables and SRR at the spatial scale of 100 km x100 km. A total of 384 grids were used in the analysis Full size table Extended Data Fig. 1 Comparison of species richness and individual counts among the three groups of old trees. a, Comparison of species richness for the three groups of old trees at the national scale. b, Comparison of individual counts for the three groups of old trees at the national scale. HS, human-associated species; SS, semi-spontaneous species; S, spontaneous species. Extended Data Fig. 2 Ordering of old tree species by tree abundance and species observed range size. a, Ordering of old tree species by tree abundance. b, Ordering of old tree species by species observed range size (number of study grids in which a species occurred). Extended Data Fig. 3 Comparison of potential and observed range size for the three groups of old trees. The observed range size refers to the number of grid cells in which a species has been observed to occur. Boxplots in show the median (centre line), 25th and 75th quartiles (hinges), 1.5 times the interquartile range from the hinges (whiskers) and values outside 1.5 times the interquartile range (points). Extended Data Fig. 4 Variations in range filling rate (RFR) among family. Comparison of the mean RFR between the families with more than ten species. Data are presented as mean values +/- SE. Extended Data Fig. 5 Difference of spatial recruitment rate (SRR) between human-associated species and spontaneous species. a, Histogram of SRR of human-associated species and spontaneous species. b, Comparison of the SRR of human-associated species (n = 206) and spontaneous species (n = 931) at the grid scale. In (B), boxplots in show the median (centre line), 25th and 75th quartiles (hinges), 1.5 times the interquartile range from the hinges (whiskers) and values outside 1.5 times the interquartile range (points). Significance test was performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Extended Data Fig. 6 Administrative provinces and topography of China. a, China's administrative provinces. b, Topography with annotations of key landform features of China. Extended Data Fig. 7 Distribution of study counties. Counties (round dots) with species-abundance data of old trees in our database. The red line indicates the Hu Huanyong Line, which separates China into the northwestern and southeastern halves based on human population density. Background data show the distribution of vegetation types in China. Extended Data Fig. 8 Methods for calculating the range filling rate and spatial recruitment rate. a, Methods for calculating the range filling rate. b, Methods for calculating the spatial recruitment rate. Extended Data Fig. 9 Distribution of species human utilization index. Ordering of old tree species by human utilization index. Red vertical dashed line represents the 75th quartile. Extended Data Fig. 10 Correlation among explanatory variables. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients among the explanatory variables. Supplementary information Reporting Summary Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Reprints and Permissions About this article Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark Cite this article Huang, L., Jin, C., Pan, Y. et al. Human activities and species biological traits drive the long-term persistence of old trees in human-dominated landscapes. Nat. Plants (2023). https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41477-023-01412-1 Download citation * Received: 09 October 2022 * Accepted: 10 April 2023 * Published: 11 May 2023 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-023-01412-1 Share this article Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative Access through your institution Buy or subscribe Access through your institution Change institution Buy or subscribe Advertisement Advertisement Explore content * Research articles * Reviews & Analysis * News & Comment * Current issue * Collections * Follow us on Facebook * Follow us on Twitter * Subscribe * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed About the journal * Aims & Scope * Journal Information * Journal Metrics * About the Editors * Our publishing models * Editorial Values Statement * Editorial Policies * Content Types * Advisory Panel * Contact Publish with us * Submission Guidelines * For Reviewers * Language editing services * Submit manuscript Search Search articles by subject, keyword or author [ ] Show results from [All journals] Search Advanced search Quick links * Explore articles by subject * Find a job * Guide to authors * Editorial policies Nature Plants (Nat. Plants) ISSN 2055-0278 (online) nature.com sitemap About Nature Portfolio * About us * Press releases * Press office * Contact us Discover content * Journals A-Z * Articles by subject * Nano * Protocol Exchange * Nature Index Publishing policies * Nature portfolio policies * Open access Author & Researcher services * Reprints & permissions * Research data * Language editing * Scientific editing * Nature Masterclasses * Nature Research Academies * Research Solutions Libraries & institutions * Librarian service & tools * Librarian portal * Open research * Recommend to library Advertising & partnerships * Advertising * Partnerships & Services * Media kits * Branded content Career development * Nature Careers * Nature Conferences * Nature events Regional websites * Nature Africa * Nature China * Nature India * Nature Italy * Nature Japan * Nature Korea * Nature Middle East * Privacy Policy * Use of cookies * Manage cookies/Do not sell my data * Legal notice * Accessibility statement * Terms & Conditions * California Privacy Statement Springer Nature (c) 2023 Springer Nature Limited Close Nature Briefing Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter -- what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Email address [ ] Sign up [ ] I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Close Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing * *