https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/election-conspiracist-mike-lindell-must-pay-5m-to-expert-who-proved-him-wrong/ Skip to main content * Biz & IT * Tech * Science * Policy * Cars * Gaming & Culture * Store * Forums Subscribe [ ] Close Navigate * Store * Subscribe * Videos * Features * Reviews * RSS Feeds * Mobile Site * About Ars * Staff Directory * Contact Us * Advertise with Ars * Reprints Filter by topic * Biz & IT * Tech * Science * Policy * Cars * Gaming & Culture * Store * Forums Settings Front page layout Grid List Site theme light dark Sign in $5 million is a lot of pillows -- Election conspiracist Mike Lindell must pay $5M to expert who proved him wrong My Pillow CEO held "Prove Mike Wrong" contest but refused to pay the winner. Jon Brodkin - Apr 20, 2023 6:55 pm UTC Mike Lindell speaks on stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference, flanked by signs that say Enlarge / MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on March 4, 2023, in National Harbor, Maryland. Getty Images | Alex Wong reader comments 155 with Share this story * Share on Facebook * Share on Twitter * Share on Reddit Election conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell was ordered to pay $5 million to the electrical engineer and inventor who won the "Prove Mike Wrong" contest in which Lindell offered the prize to anyone who could prove that his data had nothing to do with the 2020 presidential election. Lindell, the My Pillow CEO who helped finance Donald Trump's baseless election protests, was ordered to pay Robert Zeidman $5 million within 30 days in a ruling issued yesterday by the American Arbitration Association Commercial Arbitration Tribunal. "Based on the foregoing analysis, Mr. Zeidman performed under the contract," a three-member arbitration panel wrote. The panel found that Zeidman proved the files provided by Lindell to contest participants did not contain actual data from the election. Zeidman proved that Lindell's data "unequivocally did not reflect November 2020 election data. Failure to pay Mr. Zeidman the $5 million prized was a breach of the contract, entitling him to recover," the panel said. "I am obviously really happy about the arbitrators' decision," Zeidman said in a press release issued by his lawyers. "They clearly saw this as I did--that the data we were given at the symposium was not at all what Mr. Lindell said it was. The truth is finally out there." The arbitration "decision declares unequivocally that Zeidman proved Mike wrong," the press release said. The arbitration panel's ruling chided Lindell for defining "election data" too broadly: In fact, it would be unreasonable to conclude that any data about the election is "election data." Newspaper articles and broadcast news about the election are transmitted as data over the Internet, for example. It is unreasonable to conclude that any data file containing those accounts--or excerpts from such a file--would qualify as election data in a contest. If such data qualified, the Contest would not really be a contest at all. "This will be going to court!" Lindell appears to be ready to challenge the ruling in court. "They made a terribly wrong decision! This will be going to court!" he told The Washington Post in a text message. Advertisement Lindell gave a similar response to CNN. "In a brief phone interview with CNN, Lindell said 'this will end up in court' and slammed the media and professed the need to get rid of electronic voting machines," CNN reported. Zeidman's attorney, Brian Glasser, told The Washington Post that the arbitration decision can't be appealed directly. Paraphrasing Glasser, the Post wrote that "Lindell could ask a federal court to quash it on the basis that it represented a 'manifest injustice.' The statutory grounds for such a claim are narrow, and it is 'extremely rare' for such a claim to succeed, according to Glasser." Lindell claimed he possessed a great deal of data captured from the Internet during voting in the November 2020 US election, and that his data showed China interfered with the November 2020 election in several states. "Mr. Lindell testified that he was frustrated that his statements about China's election interference were not being taken seriously, and so decided to hold a 'Cyber Symposium,'" the ruling said. "The purpose of the symposium was to provide the data he had to prove China's interference in the November 2020 election. He invited the press, politicians, and cyber experts to attend the symposium, which took place in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, on August 10 and 11, 2021." Lindell promised to provide "cyber data and packet captures from the 2020 November election" and announced the Prove Mike Wrong contest. The contest announcement said that participants "have one goal. Find proof that this cyber data is not valid data from the November Election. For the people who find the evidence, 5 million is their reward." Lindell conceded at the arbitration hearing that he doesn't have the ability to analyze the files himself and thus relied on experts who "assured him that the data was real and proved China's interference with the election." Page: 1 2 Next - reader comments 155 with Share this story * Share on Facebook * Share on Twitter * Share on Reddit Jon Brodkin Jon is Ars Technica's senior IT reporter, covering the FCC and broadband, telecommunications, tech policy, and more. Email jon.brodkin@arstechnica.com // Twitter @JBrodkin Advertisement Channel Ars Technica - Previous story Next story - Related Stories Today on Ars * Store * Subscribe * About Us * RSS Feeds * View Mobile Site * Contact Us * Staff * Advertise with us * Reprints Newsletter Signup Join the Ars Orbital Transmission mailing list to get weekly updates delivered to your inbox. Sign me up - CNMN Collection WIRED Media Group (c) 2023 Conde Nast. All rights reserved. Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (updated 1/1/20) and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement (updated 1/1 /20) and Ars Technica Addendum (effective 8/21/2018). Ars may earn compensation on sales from links on this site. Read our affiliate link policy. Your California Privacy Rights | Do Not Sell My Personal Information The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Conde Nast. Ad Choices