https://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-wont-back-down-on-chip-id-feature/ /> X Trending * What is ChatGPT and why does it matter? Here's what you need to know * Apple sets June date for its biggest conference of 2023, with headset launch expected * What is Lemon8 and why is everyone talking about it on TikTok? * The best AI art generators: DALL-E 2 and other fun alternatives to try * ChatGPT's intelligence is zero, but it's a revolution in usefulness, says AI expert * * ZDNET Recommends * Testing RFID blocking cards: Do they work? Do you need one? * This almost-great Raspberry Pi alternative is missing one key feature * This $75 dock turns your Mac Mini into a Mac Studio (sort of) * Samsung's Galaxy S23 Plus is the Goldilocks of Smartphones * * Mobile World Congress 2023 * Best massage chairs * Best iRobot vacuums * Best headphones for sleeping * Best smart treadmills Tech * Gaming * Headphones * Laptops * Mobile Accessories * Networking * PCs * * Printers * Smartphones * Smart Watches * Speakers * Streaming Devices * Streaming Services * * Tablets * TVs * Wearables * * Kitchen & Household * Office Furniture * Office Hardware & Appliances * Smart Home * Smart Lighting * Yard & Outdoors Innovation * Artificial Intelligence * AR + VR * Cloud * Digital Transformation * Energy * * Robotics * Sustainability * Transportation * Work Life * * Accelerate your tech game Paid Content * How the New Space Race Will Drive Innovation * How the metaverse will change the future of work and society * * Managing the Multicloud * The Future of the Internet * The New Rules of Work * The Tech Trends to Watch in 2023 Business * See all Business * Amazon * Apple * Developer * E-Commerce * * Edge Computing * Enterprise Software * Executive * Google * Microsoft * * Professional Development * Social Media * SMB * Windows * * Digital transformation: Trends and insights for success * Software development: Emerging trends and changing roles Security * See all Security * Cyber Threats * Password Manager * Ransomware * VPN * * Cybersecurity: Let's get tactical * Securing the Cloud Advice * Deals * How-to * Product Comparisons * Product Spotlights * Reviews Buying Guides * See all Buying Guides * Best all-in-one computers * Best budget TVs * Best gaming CPUs * Best gaming laptops * Best gaming PCs * * Best headphones * Best iPads * Best iPhones * Best laptops * Best large tablets * Best OLED TVs * * Best robot vacuum mops * Best rugged tablets * Best Samsung phones * Best smart rings * Best smartphones * Best smartwatches * * Best speakers * Best tablets * Best travel VPNs * Best TVs * Best VPNs tomorrow belongs to those who embrace it today * Asia * Australia * Europe * India * United Kingdom * United States * ZDNET France * ZDNET Germany * ZDNET Korea * ZDNET Japan [ ] Go Most Popular * See all Topics * Finance * Education * Health * Special Features * ZDNET In Depth * ZDNET Recommends * Newsletters * Videos * Editorial Guidelines * Trending * What is ChatGPT and why does it matter? Here's what you need to know * Apple sets June date for its biggest conference of 2023, with headset launch expected * What is Lemon8 and why is everyone talking about it on TikTok? * The best AI art generators: DALL-E 2 and other fun alternatives to try * ChatGPT's intelligence is zero, but it's a revolution in usefulness, says AI expert * ZDNET Recommends * Testing RFID blocking cards: Do they work? Do you need one? * This almost-great Raspberry Pi alternative is missing one key feature * This $75 dock turns your Mac Mini into a Mac Studio (sort of) * Samsung's Galaxy S23 Plus is the Goldilocks of Smartphones * Mobile World Congress 2023 * Best massage chairs * Best iRobot vacuums * Best headphones for sleeping * Best smart treadmills * Tech * Gaming * Headphones * Laptops * Mobile Accessories * Networking * PCs * Printers * Smartphones * Smart Watches * Speakers * Streaming Devices * Streaming Services * Tablets * TVs * Wearables * Kitchen & Household * Office Furniture * Office Hardware & Appliances * Smart Home * Smart Lighting * Yard & Outdoors * Innovation * Artificial Intelligence * AR + VR * Cloud * Digital Transformation * Energy * Robotics * Sustainability * Transportation * Work Life * Accelerate your tech game Paid Content * How the New Space Race Will Drive Innovation * How the metaverse will change the future of work and society * Managing the Multicloud * The Future of the Internet * The New Rules of Work * The Tech Trends to Watch in 2023 * Business * See all Business * Amazon * Apple * Developer * E-Commerce * Edge Computing * Enterprise Software * Executive * Google * Microsoft * Professional Development * Social Media * SMB * Windows * Digital transformation: Trends and insights for success * Software development: Emerging trends and changing roles * Security * See all Security * Cyber Threats * Password Manager * Ransomware * VPN * Cybersecurity: Let's get tactical * Securing the Cloud * Advice * Deals * How-to * Product Comparisons * Product Spotlights * Reviews * Buying Guides * See all Buying Guides * Best all-in-one computers * Best budget TVs * Best gaming CPUs * Best gaming laptops * Best gaming PCs * Best headphones * Best iPads * Best iPhones * Best laptops * Best large tablets * Best OLED TVs * Best robot vacuum mops * Best rugged tablets * Best Samsung phones * Best smart rings * Best smartphones * Best smartwatches * Best speakers * Best tablets * Best travel VPNs * Best TVs * Best VPNs * More * See all Topics * Finance * Education * Health * Special Features * ZDNET In Depth * ZDNET Recommends * Newsletters * Videos * Editorial Guidelines Business Home Business Companies Intel Intel won't back down on chip ID feature Execs point to FreePC.com as proof that privacy and technology can co-exist. zd-defaultauthor-robert-lemos.jpg Written by Robert Lemos, Contributor on Feb. 23, 1999 * * * * * PALM SPRINGS, Calif. -- Intel Corp. has little intention of backing away from plans to ship Pentium III chips with a controversial ID tracking technology, two Intel executives say. Indeed, if Intel has learned anything, it is the value of patience. "The issue is what will be acceptable and when," said Paul Otellini, executive vice president of Intel's architecture business group during an interview at the Intel Developers Forum here. While surprised at the level of public outcry at Intel's (Nasdaq:INTC ) decision to add electronically identifiable serial numbers in its next generation of processors, Otellini has no doubt that the Santa Clara, Calif. company's security scheme will eventually gain acceptance in the market. He pointed to the 500,000-plus people who signed up for FreePC.com's giveaway of computers. To get one of the 30,000 PCs, each customer would be subject to constant advertisements and give up a great deal of personal information. "The people who are willing to give up their privacy for a free PC are our market," he said. Intel announced it had added a 64-bit serial number to its processors that, along with a previous 32-bit CPU ID, identifies every processor, acting like a vehicle ID number. While Intel will not collect the serial numbers, the company expects e-commerce companies and corporations to use the identifiers to enhance security. After outraged privacy advocates called for a boycott of Intel products, the company backed off somewhat: Although it preferred computer makers to keep the chip 'on" by default, it gave them the option of turning it off. On Monday, a report from a German computer magazine that the serial number could be turned on by hackers -- even when the consumer had turned it off -- has left the status of the ID number at shipping in doubt. What's the problem? In the wake of the debate, Intel is having trouble reconciling a public worried about privacy with consumers who are willing to give it up for a free product. "Why does adding 64 fuses to a chip raise such a brouhaha?" said Pat Gelsinger, vice president and general manager of Intel's desktop products group. "You have no less than three ID numbers on your computer that can be used to identify you." But to one online privacy advocate, Junkbusters Corp. CEO Jason Catlett, the Intel executive's argument leaves out an important point. "Gelsinger is right when he says that there are several numbers on parts of a PC that could be used to identify people, but none of the manufacturers of those parts has proposed the numbers be used as an ID in an e-commerce transaction," Catlett said. Since the Pentium III ID number is included for the express purpose of identifying consumers to marketers, he predicted it would usher in privacy problems similar to those that have arisen with Social Security numbers. "We all know what happened with Social Security numbers -- we didn't get much security, but we did get a whole lot of privacy problems, theft of identity, and thousands of databases full of personal profiles," Catlett said. Gelsinger believes that the actual debate is less about Intel's plans and more about privacy-conscious consumers becoming accustomed to the current lack of privacy on the Internet. "I think there is a bubbling concern about developing relationships on the Internet," he said. "In our Internet society, the mores and procedures for privacy and social norms have yet to be developed. The Pentium III just released the tension." Intel had tried to avoid the controversy by polling privacy advocates and the industry alike. "We had the discussion -- whether to have it on or off -- and there was no clear consensus," said Otellini. "Our belief is that as long as people had informed choice there would be no problem." Shouldn't be regulated Privacy advocates argue that there would be little choice left to the consumers. Instead, key features -- such as financial transactions at banks and stock trading at online services -- may require the consumer to turn the processor on. Still, Intel has taken a firm stance against regulating privacy online. "The technology industry -- just like we don't want the Internet regulated -- we don't want to be regulated by privacy policies," said Pat Gelsinger. "You will never hear Intel say they need regulation." David Sobel, general counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, called Otellini's and Gelsinger's comments at the conference "disappointing and a little bit surprising" given the outcry over the chip ID number. "We have never been satisfied with the so-called fix they have proposed," which involved asking OEMs to turn the ID feature off before shipping systems equipped with the chip, Sobel said. "For them to claim they have made a concession on this is disingenuous," particularly in light of reports that the feature is vulnerable to hacking, he said. ZDNN's Maria Seminerio contributed to this story. Editorial standards Show Comments Log In to Comment Community Guidelines Related How to use ChatGPT How to use ChatGPT: What you need to know now Placeholder product image alt text The best AI art generators: DALL-E 2 and other fun alternatives to try robot hand typing on a laptop What is Auto-GPT? Everything to know about the next powerful AI tool Footer background image ZDNET we equip you to harness the power of disruptive innovation, at work and at home. * Topics * Galleries * Videos * Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information * about ZDNET * Meet The Team * Sitemap * Reprint Policy * Join | Log In * Newsletters * Site Assistance * Licensing * * * * * * (c) 2023 ZDNET, A Red Ventures company. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Advertise | Terms of Use