https://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/double-anonymous-peer-review-reduces-reviewer-bias-find-three-year-trial/ [ ] Home MENU DONATE - ECOLOGY THE NEXT GENERATION * Home * Policy [ ]Open + Our Position + The future of ecological research in the UK [ ]Open o Launch event o Expert panel o About the project o Read the reports o News release + Reports & Publications [ ]Open o Consultation & Inquiry Responses o Event Reports o Policy Guides o Policy Briefs o Legislative Scans + Protected Areas [ ]Open o Introducing protected areas o Read the report o Executive summary o Conclusion o Hear from the authors o News release o Launch event + Nature-based solutions [ ]Open o What are nature-based solutions? o Read the report o Executive summary o Foreword to the report o Launch event - Wed 12 May o News releases o Solutions in different habitats + Member Opportunities [ ]Open o Consultation and Inquiry Responses o BES Policy Fellowship o Expertise Database + English Policy Group [ ]Open o Meet the Committee o About Us o Consultations o Our Vision and Strategy + Scottish Policy Group [ ]Open o About Us o Consultation Responses o Pie and a Pint o Policy Training o Meet the Committee o Our Vision and Strategy o 2021 Scottish Policy Guide o Regenerative Agriculture and Nature Networks Workshop Brief + Welsh Policy Group [ ]Open o About Us o Newsletters o Caffi Ecology o Policy Training o Meet the Committee o Our Vision and Strategy + IEA Policy Committee + International Policy [ ]Open o About o COP15: What is the UK doing to meet the new Global Biodiversity Targets? o Guide to COP15 o Guide to COP26 * Publications [ ]Open + Our Journals [ ]Open o People and Nature o Ecological Solutions and Evidence o Functional Ecology o Journal of Animal Ecology o Journal of Applied Ecology o Journal of Ecology o Methods in Ecology and Evolution o Ecology and Evolution + Applied Ecology Resources + Ecological Reviews + Guides to Better Science + Publishing opportunities in plant ecology + Associate Editor Support Centre [ ]Open o Guidelines o Training o Checklist o Finding reviewers o Workshops and presentations o External resources o Benefits + Journal policies + Journal Prizes [ ]Open o Georgina Mace Prize o Chico Mendes Prize o Haldane Prize o Elton Prize o Southwood Prize o Harper Prize o Robert May Prize o Rachel Carson Prize + Members' Books [ ]Open o The Most Important Animal of All * Membership & Community [ ]Open + Join us + Membership benefits + Payments Without Borders + The Niche [ ]Open o Share your story + REED Ecological Network [ ]Open o About us o Meet members of the network o International perspective o Our impact o A day in the life o Lunchtime skills seminars o Effective allyship + ALDER Network (LGBTQIA+) [ ]Open o Meet the Committee o About Us o LGBTQIA+ Events at the BES o Resources o Supporting LGBTQIA+ ecologists: pronouns and gender neutral language o Member Stories + EDGE Network [ ]Open o Join the Committee o About the EDGE Network o Keep in Touch + SEED Network [ ]Open o Join the Committee o About the SEED Network o Keep in Touch + Volunteering [ ]Open o Kasia Mikolajczak: Serving on a SIG committee o Will Sheel: Science Communication o Mateo Lewis: Outreach in primary schools o Rhosanna Jenkins: Overseeing a journal blog + Donate Today to Inspire the Next Generation of Ecologists [ ] Open o Our fundraising promise to you + Write your will online or over the phone for FREE today [ ] Open o Our legacy promise to you o The Parkyn Legacy o The Jackson Legacy + Support for individuals [ ]Open o Schools and colleges o Undergraduates o Postgraduates o Teaching and research staff + Special Interest Groups [ ]Open o Agricultural Ecology o Aquatic Ecology o Citizen Science o Climate Change Ecology o Conservation Ecology o Ecological Genetics o Forest Ecology o Invasion Science Group o Macroecology o Microbial Ecology o Movement Ecology o Palaeoecology Group o Parasite and Pathogen Ecology and Evolution o Peatlands Research o Plant Environmental Physiology o Plant, Soils, Ecosystems o Quantitative Ecology o Teaching and Learning o Tropical Ecology + Join a committee [ ]Open o Help shape the future of your Society on a BES Committee + Capturing Ecology: Photography Competition [ ]Open o Capturing Ecology 2022 o Capturing Ecology 2021 Virtual Exhibition o Capturing Ecology 2019 o 2019 Exhibition o Capturing Ecology 2018 o Capturing Ecology 2017 o Capturing Ecology Judges + Honours, awards and prizes [ ]Open o Honorary Membership o President's Medal o Marsh Award for Ecology o Marsh Award for Climate Change Research o Marsh Book of the Year Award o Marsh Award for Ecologists in Africa o Founders' Prize o Journal Prizes o BES Award o Ecological Engagement Award o Equality and Diversity Champion o Anne Keymer Prize o Best Poster Prize o BES Lecture o Tansley Lecture + Irish Ecological Association * Learning & resources [ ]Open + Connecting schools to nature [ ]Open o Project Overview o BES Encounters o Articles o Green Schools Competition o Privacy Policy o Safeguarding and Code of Conduct Policies + Engaging the Public [ ]Open o Engagement with the BES o Citizen Science Hub o Public Engagement Newsletter o BES Public Engagement Strategy o Public Engagement and Science Communication Awards o Training o Inspiring Ecology Fund o Events o Engagement resources + Developing your Career [ ]Open o Next Generation Bursary Scheme o Undergraduate Summer School o 16-18 Summer School o Students Futures & Research Conference o Career Development Resources o Peer Group Mentoring o Mentoring opportunities at the BES o Job and Study Opportunities + Teaching and Learning [ ]Open o Incredible Creatures Activity Booklet o Learning during lockdown o Maths in Ecology o Climate Change Teacher Toolkit * Funding [ ]Open + Research Grants [ ]Open o Past awards - Research Grants + Training & Travel Grants + Outreach Grants [ ]Open o Past awards - Outreach + Ecologists in Africa [ ]Open o Past awards - Ecologists in Africa + Launching our new grants programme [ ]Open o Synthesis grants o Long-term research grants o Pedagogical research and development grants o Connecting ecologists with other disciplines grants o Ecologists in the Global South o Outreach and engagement grants + Grant Stories [ ]Open o Kulbhushan's Story o Joanne's Story o Adam's Story o Laure's Story o Francois-Xavier's Story o Oju's Story o Sara's Story o Owen's Story + Example applications + Success Rates + BES Review College [ ]Open o Apply to join o Scoring criteria + Other funders * News & Opinion [ ]Open + Media Centre [ ]Open o For BES members o Media training + Sign up for our newsletter * Events [ ]Open + Call for Symposia * About us [ ]Open + Who we are + People [ ]Open o Xanthe Thompson o Caitlin Thomas o Charlotte Harrison-Littlefield o Rachel Kudlick o Dylan Byrne o Eve Miller o Amy Harrison o Benn o Joanna Bromley o Rebecca Walley o Rowena Gordon o Daniela Russi o Samantha Ponton o Aada Orava o Alexa Roditi o Sammy Mason o Fiona Le Ray o Rachel Roy o Charlie Gulliford o Frank Harris o Benjamin Hunt o Davy Falkner o Milly Anderson o Helen Peri o Hazel Norman o Andrea Baier o Kirsty Scandrett o Minhyuk Seo o Paul Bower o Karen Devine o Sarah McKain o Amy Padfield o Philip Dooner o Lydia Groves o Amaia Urquia Samele o Jennifer Meyer o Kate Harrison o India Stephenson + What is ecology? + Strategy + Board of Trustees [ ]Open o What's it like on the Board? + Governance [ ]Open o Annual Review 2021-22 o Annual Review 2020-21 o Annual Review 2019-20 o Annual Review 2018-19 + Vacancies [ ]Open o EDGE Network - Call for Committee Vacancies + Our Environmental Impact + Diversity and the BES [ ]Open o Equality and Diversity Monitoring Form + Safeguarding + Get involved Search [ ] [search] View all News & Opinion Double-anonymous peer review reduces reviewer bias, finds three-year trial 04 April 2023 By BES Press Office The results of a three-year randomised trial comparing double and single-anonymous peer review methods have been published today by the British Ecological Society, highlighting the inequalities present in the academic publishing process. [question-ver-8-710x394] About the peer review process In scholarly publishing, scientific papers go through a peer review process before they are accepted for publication in a journal; other researchers will be invited to comment on the quality of the methods and conclusions presented in the paper. These comments play an important role in determining which papers the journal will accept and publish. However, there are concerns that the peer review process is not entirely fair for all authors. Most life science disciplines currently utilise the practice of single-anonymous peer review to decide which papers are suitable for publishing. This involves hiding the reviewers' identity from the authors, but not the authors' identity from the reviewers. This had led to concerns of conscious or unconscious bias regarding gender, nationality or affiliation corrupting the review process. The BES set out to explore if hiding authors' identities in addition to reviewers' identities would reduce the potential for bias in the publishing process. This is a method known as double-anonymous peer review. [eyes-ver-1-710x444] A randomised trial, using real manuscripts submitted to Functional Ecology between 2019 and 2022, required authors to submit their paper for review with their identities anonymised. This included papers from authors of various backgrounds. Half of the submissions were then randomly chosen to have author details added to their title pages. The double-anonymous peer review trial indicates reviewer bias is reduced when author identities are anonymised: when reviewers did not know whose paper they were reviewing, peer review outcomes were similar across author demographics; in contrast, when reviewers did know whose paper they were reviewing (e.g. single-anonymous peer review), papers with first authors residing in higher-income countries and in countries with higher English proficiency were favored. Interestingly, anonymising author details had no effect on gender differences in reviewer ratings or editor decisions. What can we take away from the results? Professor Charles Fox, the lead author of the paper and the previous Executive Editor of Functional Ecology, explains "Our trial provides strong evidence that authors from higher-income and/or English-speaking countries receive significant benefits to being identified to reviewers during the peer review process, and that anonymizing author-identities (e.g., double-blind review) reduces this bias, making the peer review process more equitable. "It's critical for science, and for the scientists involved, that peer review be a fair and unbiased process. The results of this trial will help inform publishers on the best ways to minimise some sources of bias in the publishing process." The British Ecological Society will begin transitioning its journals to mandatory double-anonymous peer review. This decision is based off of the strong evidence uncovered in the study. This will begin with Functional Ecology, with other journals published by the BES to follow. Andrea Baier, Director of Publishing at the British Ecological Society, said "The British Ecological Society is committed to promoting equitable practices in international ecological science. Authors from all over the world submit to our seven journals and it is vitally important that the research we publish is reviewed and selected in the most impartial way, regardless of the authors' backgrounds." Professor Rob Freckleton, University of Sheffield and Chair of the British Ecological Society's publications committee, said: "On behalf of the British Ecological Society, the publications committee supported this important experiment, and from the outset we committed to being led by the results it would produce. We now have the evidence that double-anonymous peer review is an important building block towards greater equity in publishing and we are acting on it." Read more here: Fox, C. W., Meyer, J., & Aime, E. (2023). Double-blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology, 00, 1- 14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1365-2435.14259 Like what we stand for? Support our mission and help develop the next generation of ecologists by donating to the British Ecological Society. Donate And please share this Share this on --------------------------------------------------------------------- Email Facebook Twitter Related Stories Biodiversity threats managed by cost effective new framework Publications | 03 April 2023 Biodiversity threats managed by cost effective new framework How can we manage biodiversity threats in a more cost effective way? Australian scientists have the solution READ MORE about Biodiversity threats managed by cost effective new framework Making space for agriculture and rewilding in England Policy | 03 April 2023 Making space for agriculture and rewilding in England Opportunities to adopt rewilding practices across England's agricultural countryside. READ MORE about Making space for agriculture and rewilding in England Lynx reintroduction in Scotland evokes mixed opinions Publications | 31 March 2023 Lynx reintroduction in Scotland evokes mixed opinions Opinions of lynx reintroduction in Scotland produce varied results - providing a foundation for future dialogue. READ MORE about Lynx reintroduction in Scotland evokes mixed opinions 1. Home 2. News and Opinion 3. Double-anonymous peer review reduces reviewer bias, finds three-year trial * About us * Equality & Diversity * Vacancies * Accessibility * Media Centre * Contact Us * Our People * Terms & Conditions * Privacy Policy Connect TwitterFacebookInstagramYouTubeSoundCloud British Ecological Society 42 Wharf Road, London, N1 7GS, UK T: +44 20 3994 8282 E: hello@britishecologicalsociety.org Charity Registration Number: 281213 Copyright (c) 2023 The British Ecological Society. All rights reserved. * Sitemap We use cookies to make our website work properly and get anonymous information about how the site is used. See our terms & conditions . Click OK to accept, or Essential cookies if you don't want us to have this anonymous data. OK Essential cookies