https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/03/why-were-suing-protect-right-incarcerated-people-receive-physical-mail Skip to main content * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Email updates on news, actions, and events in your area. Join EFF Lists * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks Electronic Frontier Foundation Donate [htfti-trev]Podcast Episode: Making the Invisible Visible [htfti-trev] Electronic Frontier Foundation * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] Why We're Suing to Protect the Right of Incarcerated People to Receive Physical Mail DEEPLINKS BLOG By Matthew Guariglia March 13, 2023 A letter behind bars inside a spying eye Why We're Suing to Protect the Right of Incarcerated People to Receive Physical Mail Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link A letter behind bars inside a spying eye In 2021, San Mateo County, California, banned people incarcerated in county jails from receiving physical mail. Instead, family and friends were required to mail their letters to Smart Communications, a private for-profit company based in Florida that would scan and destroy those letters so that incarcerated people would be required to access them digitally through a limited number of shared tablets and kiosks in public spaces within the jails. This is why the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, and the Social Justice Legal Foundation filed a complaint last week challenging this unconstitutional policy. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of five people incarcerated in San Mateo County jails, several of their family members, and A.B.O. Comix, a collective of artists who correspond with people in jail. The complaint argues that the new mail policy violates the expressive, associational, and privacy rights of those in the county's jails, and their family, friends, and supporters who send them letters. This lawsuit is the first major challenge to the digitization of personal mail in U.S. jails. The current policy invades the privacy of the 850 people incarcerated in the Redwood City jail, as well as that of their families. With only a few tablets to go around, this procedure is also a cruel way of limiting access to communications from family and friends by drastically reducing the ability of a person to spend time reading them. It's also hard to overstate exactly how important written correspondences are to people inside jails and prisons in the U.S. -- a true lifeline to the world outside. This lawsuit also marks EFF's commitment to stopping the current trend that seeks to privatize aspects of the carceral system for profit as well as strip privacy away from incarcerated individuals. Another such practice is charging exorbitant fees for people to make phone calls to family members--a scheme that Connecticut has just made illegal. Nationwide, over 500,000 people are incarcerated in county jails like the one in Redwood City, 427,000 of whom have not been found guilty and are still awaiting trial. This lawsuit will hopefully set an important precedent that those people and their families, friends, and correspondents have fundamental rights that must not be trampled in the ongoing attempts to squeeze money out of people's interactions with the criminal justice system. You can read EFF's full complaint against San Mateo County here. Related Issues Privacy Related Cases A.B.O Comix, et al. v. San Mateo County Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Join EFF Lists Discover more. Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Related Updates Crossed keys icon with pink & grey starburst pattern in background Deeplinks Blog by Paige Collings, Joe Mullin | March 15, 2023 Tell the UK's House of Lords: Protect End-to-End Encryption in the Online Safety Bill Private communication is a basic, universal right. In the online world, the best tool we have to defend this right is end-to-end encryption. End-to-end encryption ensures that governments, tech companies, social media platforms, and other groups cannot view or access our private messages, the pictures we share with family and... ?Quien defiende tus datos? Deeplinks Blog by Veridiana Alimonti | March 14, 2023 ADC's New Argentina Report Flags How ISPs Can Do More for Users' Data Privacy Argentinian telecommunications providers have made strides in their commitments to protecting users' data privacy, but the gains are uneven--they are doing a better job at informing about data processing and users' data rights, but still a poor job at disclosing how they handle government demands for user data, according to... [icon-2019-privacy] Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley, Adam Schwartz | March 10, 2023 Age Verification Mandates Would Undermine Anonymity Online Age verification systems are surveillance systems. Mandatory age verification, and with it, mandatory identity verification, is the wrong approach to protecting young people online. It would force websites to require visitors to prove their age by submitting information such as government-issued identification. This scheme would lead us further towards an... A multi-colored bullhorn icon surrounded by grey-blue hexagons Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley | March 9, 2023 Utah's Governor Should Veto "Social Media Regulations" Bill S.B. 152 This week, EFF asked Utah's Governor Cox to veto a dangerous "social media regulations" bill, S.B. 152 (McKell). Utah's bill is part of a wave of age verification laws that would make users less secure, and make internet access less private overall. EFF opposes laws that mandate... [mobile-privacy-knight-2_0] Deeplinks Blog by Paige Collings, Adam Schwartz | March 7, 2023 EFF Comments to NTIA on Privacy and Civil Rights EFF recently submitted comments to the U.S. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) on "Privacy, Equity, and Civil Rights". NTIA is a unit of the U.S. Department of Commerce that advises the President on information policy. NTIA is writing a report on privacy and civil rights, and ... The light from a surveillance camera shines on three Black faces, which look directly at the camera. Deeplinks Blog by Electronic Frontier Foundation | March 2, 2023 Coded Resistance, the Comic! In collaboration with The Nib and illustrator Chelsea Saunders, we've adapted "Coded Resistance" into comic form. Explore the stories of slave revolts, the coded songs of Harriet Tubman, civil rights era strategies for circumventing "Ma Bell," and the use of modern day technology to document police abuse. Locational Privacy Deeplinks Blog by Hayley Tsukayama | February 13, 2023 EFF Backs California Bill to Protect People Seeking Abortion and Gender-Affirming Care from Dragnet Digital Surveillance EFF proudly joins ACLU California Action and If/When/How to co-sponsor new California legislation to protect people seeking abortion and gender-affirming care from dragnet-style digital surveillance. A coalition of more than 25 reproductive justice, civil liberties, and privacy groups are supporting the bill at introduction. Support A.B. 793Stop All Digital... woman holding phone with stalker message Deeplinks Blog by Bill Budington | February 8, 2023 Stalkerware Maker Fined $410k and Compelled to Notify Victims Last week, the New York Attorney General secured a $410,000 fine from Patrick Hinchy and 16 companies that he runs which produce and sell spyware and stalkerware. In addition, he and his companies must modify their stalkerware to alert victims that their devices have been compromised. This sends a... digital icons interconnected Deeplinks Blog by Ross Schulman | February 7, 2023 Participation in the Fediverse Parts of the fediverse have been in something of an uproar recently over an experimental search service that was under development called (appropriately enough) Searchtodon. The project aimed to enable people to search their own home timeline and worked by being authorized by a user to access that user's timeline... digital icons interconnected Deeplinks Blog by Ross Schulman | February 2, 2023 The Breadth of the Fediverse The Washington Post recently published an op-ed by Megan McArdle titled "Twitter might be replaced, but not by Mastodon or other imitators." The article argues that Mastodon is falling into a common trap for open source projects: building a look-alike alternative which improves things a typical user doesn't care... Discover more. Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Related Issues Privacy Related cases A.B.O Comix, et al. v. San Mateo County Back to top EFF Home Follow EFF: * twitter * facebook * instagram * youtube * flicker * rss * linkedin Contact * General * Legal * Security * Membership * Press About * Calendar * Volunteer * Victories * History * Internships * Jobs * Staff * Diversity & Inclusion Issues * Free Speech * Privacy * Creativity & Innovation * Transparency * International * Security Updates * Blog * Press Releases * Events * Legal Cases * Whitepapers * EFFector Newsletter Press * Press Contact Donate * Join or Renew Membership Online * One-Time Donation Online * Shop * Other Ways to Give * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks JavaScript license information *