https://diff.wikimedia.org/2023/02/21/u-s-supreme-court-declines-to-hear-wikimedia-foundations-challenge-to-nsa-mass-surveillance/ Skip to content Diff Diff * Categories + Equity & Inclusion + Education & Open Access + Technology + Partnerships & Events + Policy & Advocacy + Movement Strategy * About * Submit * Calendar Choose a language[English] Search [ ] U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Wikimedia Foundation's Challenge to NSA Mass Surveillance 21 February 202321 February 2023 by Wikimedia Foundation Translate This Post [Supreme_Court_Of_The_United_States_193413861] On February 21st 2023, the Wikimedia Foundation circulated the below joint statement with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. As a final development in our case, Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA, the United States Supreme Court denied our petition asking for a review of the National Security Agency's (NSA) mass surveillance of internet communications and activities. This denial represents a big hit to both privacy and freedom of expression. While it marks the end of our suit against the NSA, it does not mark the end of the Foundation's advocacy work to protect free knowledge worldwide. We plan to direct our efforts toward urging the United States Congress to make changes to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in order to protect individual privacy. Section 702 is the legislation that the NSA relies on to conduct Upstream surveillance, the very subject of our lawsuit. We hope to work together with Wikimedia communities to encourage Congress to take privacy into account when looking at reauthorization later this year. If you wish to share the news, you can use this social media toolkit. --James Buatti. Legal Director, Wikimedia Foundation Wikimedia Foundation, ACLU, and Knight Institute Call on Congress to Limit the NSA's Surveillance of Internet Communications WASHINGTON, February 21, 2023 -- The U.S. Supreme Court today denied the Wikimedia Foundation's petition for review of its legal challenge to the National Security Agency's (NSA) "Upstream" surveillance program. Under this program, the NSA systematically searches the contents of internet traffic entering and leaving the United States, including Americans' private emails, messages, and web communications. The Supreme Court's denial leaves in place a divided ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which dismissed Wikimedia's case based on the government's assertion of the "state secrets privilege." "The Supreme Court's refusal to grant our petition strikes a blow against an individual's right to privacy and freedom of expression -- two cornerstones of our society and the building blocks of Wikipedia," said James Buatti, legal director at the Wikimedia Foundation. "We will continue to champion everyone's right to free knowledge, and urge Congress to take on the issue of mass surveillance as it evaluates whether to reauthorize Section 702 later this year." In its petition, the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit that operates Wikipedia and other Wikimedia free knowledge projects, argued that its challenge should be allowed to proceed, despite the government's sweeping invocation of "state secrets." This privilege allows the government to withhold information in legal proceedings if disclosure would harm national security. Wikimedia sought to move forward in the case based on the wealth of public information about the breadth and operation of Upstream surveillance, including numerous official disclosures by the government itself. The American Civil Liberties Union, the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, and the law firm Cooley LLP represented the Wikimedia Foundation in the litigation. Upstream surveillance is conducted under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which permits the government to intercept Americans' international communications without a warrant, so long as it is targeting individuals located outside the U.S. for foreign intelligence purposes. Section 702 will expire later this year unless it is reauthorized by Congress. In the course of this surveillance, both U.S. residents and individuals located outside the U.S. are impacted. The NSA copies and combs through vast amounts of internet traffic, including private data showing what millions of people around the world are browsing online, from communications with friends and family to reading and editing knowledge on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. This government surveillance has had a measurable chilling effect on Wikipedia users, with research documenting a drop in traffic to Wikipedia articles on sensitive topics, following public revelations about the NSA's mass surveillance in 2013. "The Supreme Court let secrecy prevail today, at immense cost to Americans' privacy," said Patrick Toomey, deputy director of the ACLU's National Security Project. "We depend on the courts to hold the government to account, especially when it wields powerful new technologies to peer into our lives like never before. But the Supreme Court has again allowed the executive branch to hide abuses behind unjustifiable claims of secrecy. It is now up to Congress to insist on landmark reforms that will safeguard Americans in the face of the NSA's mass spying programs." "This decision is a blow to the rule of law," said Alex Abdo, litigation director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. "The government has now succeeded in insulating from public judicial review one of the most sweeping surveillance programs ever enacted. If the courts are unwilling to hear Wikimedia's challenge, then Congress must step in to protect Americans' privacy by reining in the NSA's mass surveillance of the internet." The Wikimedia Foundation, which filed the case alongside eight other plaintiffs, sued the NSA in 2015 to protect the rights of Wikipedia readers, editors, and internet users globally. Lawyers representing the Wikimedia Foundation in the litigation include Patrick Toomey, Ashley Gorski, and Sarah Taitz for the American Civil Liberties Union; Alex Abdo and Jameel Jaffer for the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University; and Ben Kleine, Aarti Reddy, and Maximilian Sladek de la Cal from the law firm Cooley LLP. Wikimedia v. NSA is a part of the ACLU's Joan and Irwin Jacobs Supreme Court Docket. . . . For more information about the case: https://knightcolumbia.org/cases/wikimedia-v-nsa https://www.aclu.org/cases/ wikimedia-v-nsa-challenge-upstream-surveillance-under-fisa-amendments-act . . . About the ACLU For more than 100 years, the ACLU has worked in courts, legislatures, and communities to protect the constitutional rights of all people. With a nationwide network of offices and millions of members and supporters, the ACLU takes on the toughest civil liberties fights in pursuit of liberty and justice for all. https://www.aclu.org About the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University The Knight First Amendment Institute defends the freedoms of speech and the press in the digital age through strategic litigation, research, and public education. It promotes a system of free expression that is open and inclusive, that broadens and elevates public discourse, and that fosters creativity, accountability, and effective self-government. www.knightcolumbia.org About the Wikimedia Foundation The Wikimedia Foundation is the nonprofit organization that operates Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia free knowledge projects. Our vision is a world in which every single human can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. We believe that everyone has the potential to contribute something to our shared knowledge, and that everyone should be able to access that knowledge freely. We host Wikipedia and the Wikimedia projects, build software experiences for reading, contributing, and sharing Wikimedia content, support the volunteer communities and partners who make Wikimedia possible, and advocate for policies that enable Wikimedia and free knowledge to thrive. The Wikimedia Foundation is a United States 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization with offices in San Francisco, California, USA. wikimediafoundation.org [translate-] Can you help us translate this article? In order for this article to reach as many people as possible we would like your help. Can you translate this article to get the message out? Start translation Related Subscribe Login with your Wikimedia account Notify of [new follow-up comments ] [ ] [>] [ ] I allow to use my email address and send notification about new comments and replies (you can unsubscribe at any time). Please login with your Wikimedia account to comment 0 Comments Inline Feedbacks View all comments Meta Posted in Global Advocacy, Main page (EN), Policy & AdvocacyTagged Privacy Related [1280px-Wikimania_2019_Group_Photo] Welcome to Diff Welcome to Diff, a community blog by - and for - the Wikimedia movement. Join Diff today to share stories from your community and comment on articles. We want to hear your voice! Learn more Subscribe to Diff via Email Enter your email address to subscribe to Diff and receive notifications of new posts by email. Email Address [ ] Subscribe Wikimedia News Wikimedia Foundation News * Behind the Wikipedia articles educating thousands about the 1838 Jesuit sale of enslaved people 16 February 2023 by Ed Erhart Wikimedia Technology Blog * Perf Matters at Wikipedia in 2016 8 December 2022 by Timo Tijhof Down the Rabbit Hole * 2022 as you saw it on Wikipedia 15 December 2022 by Ed Erhart Photo credits Supreme_Court_Of_The_United_States_(193413861) Jesse Collins CC BY 3.0 Diff This is Diff, a Wikimedia community blog. All participants are responsible for building a place that is welcoming and friendly to everyone. Learn more about Diff. A Wikimedia Foundation Project Links * Join * Subscribe * Guidelines * Editorial guidelines * Privacy Policy * Terms of Use Log in Content licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 ( CC-BY-SA) unless otherwise noted. Powered by WordPress.com VIP, Automattic Privacy Notice. wpDiscuz [ ] Insert Report this comment ( ) This comment is spam ( ) This comment is a violation of the Code of Conduct ( ) Other [ ] [ ] Send You are going to send email to [ ][ ] Send Move Comment [ ] Move