https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/02/report-reveals-the-influence-big-tech-lobbyists-had-on-new-yorks-repair-bill/ Skip to main content * Biz & IT * Tech * Science * Policy * Cars * Gaming & Culture * Store * Forums Subscribe [ ] Close Navigate * Store * Subscribe * Videos * Features * Reviews * RSS Feeds * Mobile Site * About Ars * Staff Directory * Contact Us * Advertise with Ars * Reprints Filter by topic * Biz & IT * Tech * Science * Policy * Cars * Gaming & Culture * Store * Forums Settings Front page layout Grid List Site theme light dark Sign in That'll fix it -- Big Tech lobbyist language made it verbatim into NY's hedged repair bill Report reveals the influence lobbyists had on bill. Kevin Purdy - Feb 16, 2023 4:19 pm UTC Repair shop technician solders on laptop-size circuit board Enlarge Jerry Holt/Star Tribune via Getty Images reader comments 73 with Share this story * Share on Facebook * Share on Twitter * Share on Reddit When New York became the first state to pass a heavily modified right-to-repair bill late last year, it was apparent that lobbyists had succeeded in last-minute changes to the law's specifics. A new report from the online magazine Grist details the ways in which Gov. Kathy Hochul made changes identical to those proposed by a tech trade association. In a report co-published with nonprofit newsroom The Markup, Maddie Stone writes that documents surrounding the drafting and debate over the bill show that many of the changes signed by Hochul were the same as those proposed by TechNet, which represents Apple, Google, Samsung, and other technology companies. The bill would have required that companies that provide parts, tools, manuals, and diagnostic equipment or software to their own repair networks also make them available to independent repair shops and individuals. It saw heavy opposition from trade groups before its passing. New York Assemblymember Patricia Fahy, the bill's sponsor, told Grist that backers had to make "a lot of changes to get it over the finish line in the first day or two of June." The bill passed with broad bipartisan support, but it was pared down to focus only on small electronics. Between that passage and the December signing, lobbyists working for TechNet and firms including Apple, Google, and Microsoft met with the governor, according to state ethics filings. Apple, IBM, and TechNet asked Hochul to veto the bill, while Microsoft sought to cooperate with Fahy on changes. Advertisement Later, TechNet sent a version of the bill that limited the effects to later products and excluded printed circuit boards and business-to-business or government contracts, according to Grist. Crucially, the new version, which had changes attributed to a TechNet vice president, allows for companies to offer "assemblies" of parts if the companies say the parts pose a "safety risk." TechNet's version also suggested independent repair shops should be forced to provide customers with "a written notice of US warranty laws" before they can start work. TechNet's suggestions made their way to the Federal Trade Commission. A staffer at the FTC took aim at the assembly clause, the exclusion of security workarounds for repair, and other elements. Dan Salsburg, chief counsel for the FTC's Office of Technology, Research, and Investigation, wrote that TechNet's suggestions had "a common theme--ensuring that manufacturers retain control over the market for the repair of their products." A TechNet executive told Grist that the original New York bill "presented unacceptable risks to consumer data privacy and safety." TechNet's Chris Gilrein told Grist that even the final law "remains a state-mandated transfer of intellectual property... when consumers have access to more repair options than ever before." New York's Senate has yet to pass the revised law, though it is widely expected to do so. State regulators may be able to clarify aspects of the bill in the final version. And repair and environmental advocates are hoping that New York's first bill, however awkwardly pointed, may trigger similar debates and laws in other states. You can read much more about New York's repair bill and see exactly how lobbyist language made it verbatim into the final wording at Grist. Disclosure: The author previously worked for iFixit, a repair company. He holds no financial stake in the company. reader comments 73 with Share this story * Share on Facebook * Share on Twitter * Share on Reddit Kevin Purdy Kevin is a tech reporter and product specialist at Ars Technica, with more than 15 years' experience writing about technology. Advertisement Channel Ars Technica - Previous story Next story - Related Stories Today on Ars * Store * Subscribe * About Us * RSS Feeds * View Mobile Site * Contact Us * Staff * Advertise with us * Reprints Newsletter Signup Join the Ars Orbital Transmission mailing list to get weekly updates delivered to your inbox. Sign me up - CNMN Collection WIRED Media Group (c) 2023 Conde Nast. All rights reserved. Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (updated 1/1/20) and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement (updated 1/1 /20) and Ars Technica Addendum (effective 8/21/2018). Ars may earn compensation on sales from links on this site. Read our affiliate link policy. Your California Privacy Rights | Do Not Sell My Personal Information The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Conde Nast. Ad Choices