https://steveblank.com/2023/02/14/startups-that-have-employees-in-offices-grow-3-%c2%bd-times-faster/ * Home * About Steve * Startup Books * Slides/Videos * Fund Raising * Tools! * Secret History [cropped-10] [bg_header_] Steve Blank Entries RSS | Comments RSS [ ] [Search] * Email Subscription Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Email Address [ ] Sign me up! Join 293,227 other subscribers * Entrepreneurship is a Calling See more how to Startup videos here * Categories + 2 Minute Lessons (15) + Air Force (18) + Ardent (9) + Business Model versus Business Plan (64) + California Coastal Commission (9) + China (8) + Commencement Speeches (9) + Conservation (4) + Convergent Technologies (4) + Corporate/Gov't Innovation (119) + Covid-19/Recovery (10) + Customer Development (317) + Customer Development Manifesto (34) + E.piphany (12) + Educators Summit (7) + ESL (8) + Family/Career/Culture (80) + Gordian Knot Center for National Security Innovation (7) + Hacking For Defense (38) + Hacking for Diplomacy (10) + Hacking for Recovery (5) + Harvard Business Review (12) + Innovation Doctrine (2) + Innovation Outposts (4) + Investment Readiness Level (6) + Lean LaunchPad (114) + Life Sciences (NIH) (26) + Market Types (15) + Marketing (27) + MIPS Computers (2) + National Security (29) + Navy (4) + NIH (National Institutes of Health) (17) + NSF (National Science Foundation) (18) + Rocket Science Games (10) + Science and Industrial Policy (26) + Secret History of Silicon Valley (23) + SiriusXM Radio Show (50) + SuperMac (12) + Teaching (177) + Technology (82) + Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition (15) + Technology Innovation and Modern War (20) + Tesla (5) + Uncategorized (8) + Venture Capital (81) + Vertical Markets (5) + Zilog (5) * Get Steve Blank via your RSS Feed + RSS - Posts + RSS - Comments * Recent Posts + Startups that Have Employees In Offices Grow 31/2 Times Faster + Is a Venture Studio Right for You? + Be Where Your Business Is + Technology, Innovation, and Great Power Competition - 2022 Wrap Up + Why The Pentagon Can't Count: It's Time to Reinvent the Audit + The 6th Lean Innovation Educators Summit - Education and Innovation in the Age of Chaos and Disruption + The Three Pillars of World-class Corporate Innovation + A Simple Map for Innovation at Scale + Mapping the Unknown - The Ten Steps to Map Any Industry + National Industrial Policy - Private Capital and The America's Frontier Fund Steps Up * [ ] [Search] * Archives + February 2023 + January 2023 + November 2022 + October 2022 + September 2022 + June 2022 + May 2022 + April 2022 + March 2022 + January 2022 + December 2021 + November 2021 + October 2021 + September 2021 + August 2021 + July 2021 + June 2021 + May 2021 + April 2021 + March 2021 + February 2021 + January 2021 + December 2020 + November 2020 + October 2020 + September 2020 + August 2020 + July 2020 + June 2020 + May 2020 + April 2020 + March 2020 + February 2020 + January 2020 + December 2019 + November 2019 + October 2019 + September 2019 + June 2019 + May 2019 + April 2019 + March 2019 + January 2019 + December 2018 + November 2018 + October 2018 + September 2018 + August 2018 + July 2018 + June 2018 + April 2018 + March 2018 + February 2018 + January 2018 + November 2017 + October 2017 + September 2017 + August 2017 + July 2017 + June 2017 + May 2017 + April 2017 + March 2017 + February 2017 + January 2017 + December 2016 + November 2016 + October 2016 + September 2016 + August 2016 + July 2016 + June 2016 + May 2016 + April 2016 + March 2016 + February 2016 + January 2016 + December 2015 + November 2015 + October 2015 + September 2015 + August 2015 + July 2015 + June 2015 + May 2015 + March 2015 + February 2015 + January 2015 + December 2014 + November 2014 + October 2014 + September 2014 + August 2014 + July 2014 + June 2014 + May 2014 + April 2014 + March 2014 + February 2014 + January 2014 + December 2013 + November 2013 + October 2013 + September 2013 + August 2013 + July 2013 + June 2013 + May 2013 + April 2013 + March 2013 + February 2013 + January 2013 + December 2012 + November 2012 + October 2012 + September 2012 + August 2012 + July 2012 + June 2012 + May 2012 + April 2012 + March 2012 + February 2012 + January 2012 + December 2011 + November 2011 + October 2011 + September 2011 + August 2011 + July 2011 + June 2011 + May 2011 + April 2011 + March 2011 + February 2011 + January 2011 + December 2010 + November 2010 + October 2010 + September 2010 + August 2010 + July 2010 + June 2010 + May 2010 + April 2010 + March 2010 + February 2010 + January 2010 + December 2009 + November 2009 + October 2009 + September 2009 + August 2009 + July 2009 + June 2009 + May 2009 + April 2009 + March 2009 + February 2009 * Other Stuff + About Steve + Startup Tools + Secret History + Books for Startups + Slides/Videos + Raising Money Startups that Have Employees In Offices Grow 31/2 Times Faster Posted on February 14, 2023 by steve blank [EIX-lo][EIX-lo]This article previously appeared in EIX - Entreprenuers and Innovators Exchange. Data shows that pre-seed and seed startups with employees showing up in a physical office have 31/2 times higher revenue growth than those that are solely remote. Let the discussion begin. --------------------------------------------------------------------- During the pandemic, companies engaged in one of the largest unintended experiments in how to organize office work - remotely, in offices, or a hybrid of the two.[Return-to-office][Return-to-office] Post-pandemic, startups are still struggling to manage the best way to manage return-to-office issues - i.e. employee's expectations of continuing to work remotely versus the best path to build and grow a profitable company. Before we can ask which is the best configuration, the first question is what, exactly do we mean by "remote work" versus "office work"? Today work configurations span the spectrum from no office (fully remote, default digital) to some office (flexible hybrid, synchronized hybrid, office first,) to office only. James Kim at Reach Capital, an early-stage tech ed investor, surveyed their portfolio of 37 companies using the following taxonomy of how virtual and physical work could be configured. [Work-Configuration][Work-Configuration]Using this model James found that pre-seed and seed-stage startups that had employees returning to some type of office had 31/2 times the revenue growth of startups that were fully remote. Those are staggeringly large differences, and while other factors may play some role (see "What Does This Mean, below), the impact of the all-hands-on-deck approach can't be ignored. [Avg-Rev-growth-by-stage][Avg-Rev-growth-by-stage] What might account for these differences? Not surprisingly, almost 90% of the responses from pre-seed/seed startups said team culture was influenced by work configuration. However, unexpectedly, self-reported team culture, eNPS (employee Net Promoter Score) and regrettable attrition - departures that hurt the company -- are similar across work configurations. [culture][culture]So while the employees said regardless of the office configuration the team culture didn't appear to change, the performance of very early stage startups (as measured by revenue growth) told a different story. What Does This Mean? The data is suggestive but not conclusive. See a full summary of the survey results here. Let's start with the data set. The survey sample size was 37 companies from the Reach Capital portfolio. That's large enough to see patterns, but not large enough to generalize across all startups. Next, Reach Capital's portfolio of companies are in education and the future of work. The revenue results by workplace configuration may be different in other markets. Reach Capital's investments are made in many regions including Brazil, so the geography is not limited to Silicon Valley. Finally office configuration is only one factor that might influence a startup's growth rate. Still the results are suggestive enough that other VC's might want to run the same surveys across their portfolio of companies and see if the results match. (BTW, Nick Bloom at Stanford and others have done extensive research with thousands of people on remote and hybrid work here, and here. Their research is mostly focused on employees working on independent day-to-day tasks such as travel agents. However, we're interested in the very specific subset of creative knowledge workers in the early stage of startups. Specifically at the stage when startups are searching for product/market fit and a business model not when they are executing day-to-day tasks. If the results appear elsewhere, then one can speculate why. Working from home may offer more distractions by chores, family, network issues. Do those little things add up to meaningful productivity differences? Is it that in early-stage startups the random conversations between employees at unscheduled and unplanned times lead to better insights and ideas? And if so, is the productive brainstorming occurring inside of departments -e.g. engineer to engineer -- or is it the cross-fertilization between departments - e.g. engineering to marketing? Research since the 20^th century has proven that informal face-to-face interaction is important for the coordination of group activities, maintaining company culture, and team building. This informal information gives employees access to new, non-redundant information through connections to different parts of an organization's formal org chart and through connections to different parts of an organization's informal communication network. In addition, research has found that creativity is greatly enhanced in a "small world network - a network structure that is both highly locally clustered and often a hotbed of unscheduled fluid interactions that support innovation. In other words, inside an early-stage startup. For decades Silicon Valley company founders and investors have known this small world network effect as tacit knowledge. It has been a hallmark of the physical design of Silicon Valley office space - from Xerox PARC to Pixar's headquarters, to Google and Apple. So perhaps the converse is true. Does remote work with ad hoc or fixed meetings via Zoom actually stunt the growth of creativity and new insights, just at the time a startup most needs them? Are there new tools such as Discord and others that can duplicate the water cooler effect of physical proximity? Either way, it's the beginning of an interesting discussion. What has been your experience? Lessons Learned + Data from one VC shows pre-seed and seed-stage startups with employees that show up to the office have 31/2 times the revenue growth of those that work remotely + Is the data valid? Is it the same in all markets/industries? + If it's valid, why? + Is there a difference in remote vs. in-office productivity for creative tasks versus execution tasks? Share this: * Print * Email * * Tweet * * * WhatsApp * [pinit_fg_e][pinit_fg_e] * Telegram * Share on Tumblr * Pocket * Like this: Like Loading... Filed under: Covid-19/Recovery, Family/Career/Culture | << Is a Venture Studio Right for You? 10 Responses 1. [db5][db5] Romaric S.T., on February 14, 2023 at 6:31 am said: there seems to be a BIG problem with this article's title. All that your data subjects is that among your portfolio, the revenue among pre seed startups with office is 231% and without is 67%. These data are only usable in basic descriptive statistics to have an idea, and nowhere the generalization this blogpost announces. there may be exogen factors explaining the difference. On top of my head, the market size, the client persona, the amount of incumbents, the composition of the team (number of bizdev people vs sales) ... what you may infer is correlation, but in no way casuation. Beware of the conclusion of this article if i may. Good day, Romaric. Loading... Reply 2. [68a][68a] De Vries, on February 14, 2023 at 7:15 am said: It seems possible that is reflective of how early-stage or pre-product market fit the company is. Is it possible that very early startups that are still figuring out things and how to get to PMF are more likely to be remote, whereas companies that have some feeling of PMF are less likely to be remote at this stage? Loading... Reply 3. [99b][99b] pointsnfigures1, on February 14, 2023 at 7:22 am said: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3841457 This paper confirms your blogpost. Less work got done at home during Covid, and it took quite a bit longer to do it so people weren't as efficient. Loading... Reply 4. [e67][e67] David Dines, on February 14, 2023 at 9:37 am said: Thanks for publishing this, it indeed is an interesting start of a discussion. I like that you say "The data is suggestive but not conclusive." There is a lot more research/data collection needed to determine causation vs correlation (we used to call in multicolinearization in grad school). My initial thought is to find out how many employees, especially in seed/pre-seed companies, are working full time and their time zone difference. I have run across several early stage companies where one or more team members were students or working another gig to make ends meet while waiting for the next investment. These people often have restriictions in their ability to be in the office. I have also observed people working across vast timezones and the nature of collaboration is less realtime. I have a hunch that this additional data would create some interesting insights. Keep us posted. Loading... Reply 5. [002][002] Giovanni, on February 14, 2023 at 9:45 am said: "The survey sample size was 37 companies from the Reach Capital portfolio. That's large enough to see patterns, but not large enough to generalize across all startups." This statement seems paradoxical, as how can one discern patterns in something that cannot be universally applied? While acknowledging the necessity for founder-only or pre-seeded companies to make swift decisions, it is contended that agility is derived from a company's cultural disposition, rather than its physical presence. A culture of agility transcends the physical realm, meaning that regardless of whether employees share a room, campus or virtual platform, the company will possess a nimble quality, resulting in favorable growing conditions. Loading... Reply 6. [][] Anonymous, on February 14, 2023 at 10:36 am said: Could not agree more Loading... Reply 7. [][] Anonymous, on February 14, 2023 at 11:47 am said: I would guess that the higher performance and the option of physical presence are result of a highly execution-oriented founder, and not a direct correlation between both. Loading... Reply 8. [4d5][4d5] Jeremy Green, on February 14, 2023 at 1:23 pm said: For the past seven years, I've been teaching startup founders how to establish and maintain a high performance organizational culture. As Steve discusses here, those informal face-to-face interactions, in the hallway before and after meetings, get togethers after work, "watercooler" and over the cubicle conversations, etc. play a key role in developing and maintaining the culture. Stories get told, values and norms discussed, and heroes are celebrated. Can those informal interactions take place remotely? Of course, but it 's one of the norms that needs to be established in that culture. Another key element in creating and maintaining a high performance culture is leader social modeling, being able to observe leaders demonstrating and reinforcing the values and norms of the culture. Can this be demonstrated remotely? One way might be for organizational leaders to explain the whys of their decisions and plans in terms of organizational values and norms. Others would be to tell stories that illustrate those values and norms and publicly recognize these in others. But again, this would have to be an intentional norm within that culture. After several years teaching entrepreneurship in a classroom environment, when I first started teaching remotely during the pandemic, I was concerned that the social bonds and peer mentoring that informally developed in the classroom environment would be difficult to re-create remotely. Much to my surprise, the opposite occurred. The virtual classroom became more like a group of people gathered around a campfire. The typical inhibitions about speaking out in class (either to me or each other) seemed to disappear in the virtual classroom, and as it did I gave them more time to interact with each other. As that level of interaction, which never occurred, I had the additional opportunity to coach them in mentoring. The virtual classroom is certainly a different environment that an early- or seed-stage startup, but it does suggest that the differential financial performance between in office and work from home might lie with the organizations leaders and their cultural leadership flexibility and not with the work from home employees. Loading... Reply 9. [e36][e36] Steve Glaveski, on February 14, 2023 at 2:00 pm said: Which VC sponsored this study? As you well know Steve, success in startups is the sum of SO MANY moving parts - parts we can control, and parts we can't such as luck. How on earth can you isolate this one variable as being so heavily influential on revenue growth? I call bullsh*t. Loading... Reply 10. [][] Anonymous, on February 14, 2023 at 2:11 pm said: Is a study really needed to arrive at this obvious fact? The praise for remote work comes only from a personal gain aspect. People do not want to see the obvious. Loading... Reply Leave a Reply Cancel reply * contact: info@kandsranch.com [twitter-lo][twitter-lo] @sgblank [linkedin1][linkedin1] [new-som-bl][new-som-bl] [hbr-reprin][hbr-reprin] [four-steps][four-steps] [sbpodcastb][sbpodcastb]Get the Podcasts for Free * My Tweets Powered by WordPress.com. WP Designer. Loading Comments... Write a Comment... [ ] Email [ ] Name [ ] Website [ ] [Post Comment] %d bloggers like this: