https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66631292/23/united-states-v-bankman-fried/

CourtListener is hosted by Free Law Project, a small non-profit that
punches way above its weight. We host some of the largest open legal
databases on the planet, but we need your support to do our work.
Please make a charitable donation today.

In 2022, Free Law Project served nearly 200 million documents and
sent more than 1.3 million alerts to our users. We added millions of
opinions to our database and summarized over a million opinions. We
launched @recap.email and legal webhooks. In a few days, we will add
appellate court support to the RECAP extension.

On the policy side, we helped pass a law to publish judicial
financial disclosures to eliminate conflicts of interest. We opposed
unconstitutional efforts to censor our website. We are working with
others to develop a FOIA-like law for the judiciary.

To learn more about our accomplishments and our goals for 2023,
please read our annual letter. Once you do, we hope you will support
our work with a charitable gift. The more you give, the more we can
do.

Thank you.

x

 Donate Now Annual Report

Toggle navigation CourtListener logo CourtListener Logo

  * About
  * FAQ
  * Donate
  * Sign in / Register

From Free Law Project, a 501(c)(3) non-profit.

  * Opinions 
      + Advanced Search
      + Citation Look Up
      + Citation Visualizations
  * RECAP Archive
  * Oral Arguments
  * Judges
  * Financial Disclosures

  *  Donate

Back to Docket

Your Notes

(edit)

(none)

Share

        
[https://www.courtlis]

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free Law Project, a
federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. We rely on donations for
our financial security.

Please support our work with a donation.

Donate Now

United States v. BANKMAN-FRIED

x

Please Sign In or Register

Sign In Register

x

If you use PACER, please install RECAP

Launched in 2010, the RECAP extension is a free tool for your browser
that helps us collect the content you see on CourtListener. Once
installed, anything you buy on PACER gets automatically added to the
RECAP Archive and anything another RECAP user has bought is
automatically free to you.

Continue to PACER Learn More...

Document #23

District Court, S.D. New York

Docket Number: 1:22-cr-00673

Date Filed: December 23rd, 2022

Buy on PACER Toggle Dropdown

  * Buy on PacerDash


Description

ORDER OF RECUSAL in case as to Samuel Bankman-Fried, Zixiao (Gary)
Wang, Caroline Ellison: It has come to the Courts attention that the
law firm of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, at which my husband is a
partner, advised FTX in 2021, as well as represented parties that may
be adverse to FTX and Defendant Bankman-Fried in other proceedings
(or potential proceedings). My husband has had no involvement in any
of these representations. These matters are confidential and their
substance is unknown to the Court. Nonetheless, to avoid any possible
conflict, or the appearance of one, the Court hereby recuses itself
from this action. See 28 U.S.C. SS 455.SO ORDERED. Judge Ronnie Abrams
is recused. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on December 23, 2022)(arc)
(Entered: 12/23/2022)

This item is not yet in the RECAP collection.  Buy on PACER Install
RECAP

Newsletter

Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and
announcements.

[                    ]
[                    ]
 Subscribe
About
Help & FAQ
Donate
Citation Lookup
Coverage
APIs and Bulk Data
Feeds & Podcasts 
Jurisdictions
Blog & Newsletter
Contact
Data Services
Contribute
Terms & Privacy
Removal
Vulnerability Policies
Donate to support our work

CourtListener is sponsored by the non-profit Free Law Project.