https://www.eff.org/press/releases/international-coalition-rights-groups-call-internet-infrastructure-providers-avoid Skip to main content * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Email updates on news, actions, and events in your area. Join EFF Lists * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks Electronic Frontier Foundation Donate [poweruporg]Double your impact on digital freedom! [poweruporg] Electronic Frontier Foundation * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers + Podcast * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] International Coalition of Rights Groups Call on Internet Infrastructure Providers to Avoid Content Policing Except in Rare Cases, Intervening to Block Sites or Remove Content Can Harm Users PRESS RELEASE Press Release December 1, 2022 International Coalition of Rights Groups Call on Internet Infrastructure Providers to Avoid Content Policing Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link San Francisco--Internet infrastructure services--the heart of a secure and resilient internet where free speech and expression flows--should continue to focus their energy on making the web an essential resource for users and, with rare exceptions, avoid content policing. Such intervention often causes more harm than good, EFF and its partners said today. EFF and an international coalition of 56 human and digital rights organizations from around the world are calling on technology companies to "Protect the Stack." This is a global effort to educate users, lawmakers, regulators, companies, and activists about why companies that constitute basic internet infrastructure--such as internet service providers (ISPs), certificate authorities, domain name registrars, hosting providers, and more--and other critical services, such as payment processors, can harm users, especially less powerful groups, and put human rights at risk when they intervene to take down speech and other content. The same is true for many other critical internet services. EFF today launched the Protect the Stack website at the Internet Governance Forum in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The website introduces readers to "the stack," and explains how content policing practices can and have caused risks to the human rights. It is currently available in English, Spanish, Arabic, French, German, Portuguese, Hebrew, and Hindi. "Internet infrastructure companies help make the web a safe and robust space for free speech and expression," said EFF Legal Director Corynne McSherry. "Content-based interventions at the infrastructure level often cause collateral damage that disproportionately harms less powerful groups. So, except in rare cases, stack services should stay out of content policing." "We have seen a number of cases where content moderation applied at the internet's infrastructural level has threatened the ability of artists to share their work with audiences," said Elizabeth Larison, Director of the Arts and Culture Advocacy Program at the National Coalition Against Censorship. "The inconsistency of those decisions and the opaque application of vague terms of service have made it clear that infrastructure companies have neither the expertise nor the resources to make decisions on content." Infrastructure companies are key to online expression, privacy, and security. Because of the vital role they play in keeping the internet and websites up and running, they are increasingly under pressure to play a greater role in policing online content and participation, especially when harmful and hateful speech targets individuals and groups. But doing so can have far-reaching effects and lead to unintended consequences that harm users. For example, when governments force ISPs to disrupt the internet for an entire country, people can no longer message their loved ones, get news about what's happening around them, or speak out. Another example is domain name system (DNS) abuse, where the suspension and deregistration of domain names is used as a means to stifle dissent. ARTICLE 19 has documented multiple instances of "DNS abuse" in Kenya and Tanzania. Moreover, at the platform level, companies that engage in content moderation consistently reflect and reinforce bias against marginalized communities. Examples abound: Facebook decided, in the midst of the #MeToo movement's rise, that the statement "men are trash" constitutes hateful speech. In addition, efforts to police "extremist" content by social media platforms have caused journalists' and human rights defenders' work documenting terrorism and other atrocities to be blocked or erased. There's no reason to expect that things will be any different at other levels of the stack, and every reason to expect they will be worse. A safe and secure internet helps billions of people around the world communicate, learn, organize, buy and sell, and speak out. Stack companies are the building blocks behind the web, and have helped keep the internet buzzing for businesses, families, and students during the COVID-19 and for Ukrainians and Russians during the war in Ukraine. We need infrastructure providers to stay focused on their core mission: supporting a robust and resilient internet. For more information: https://protectthestack.org/ Contact: Corynne McSherry Related Issues Corporate Speech Controls Security Free Speech Social Networks Content Blocking Big Tech Internet Governance Forum Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Join EFF Lists Discover more. Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Related Updates A multi-colored bullhorn icon surrounded by grey-blue hexagons Deeplinks Blog by Paige Collings | August 25, 2022 How YouTube's Partnership with London's Police Force is Censoring UK Drill Music Originating from the streets of Chicago, drill music is a creative output of inner-city Black youths. It is defined by real life experiences and perspectives, and whilst drill rappers often document gang-related conflict and anti-establishment narratives in their lyrics and music videos, the rap genre is a crucial mouthpiece of... A multi-colored bullhorn icon surrounded by grey-blue hexagons Deeplinks Blog by Paige Collings | July 20, 2022 Self-Proclaimed Free Speech Platforms Are Censoring Nude Content. Here's Why You Should Care If their marketing is to be believed, self-avowed free speech maximalist sites like Parler--"where free speech thrives"--and Frank Speech--"the voice of free speech"--claim they will publish all user content. But the reality is a prohibition of many types of legal content, including legal sexual material. This restriction... A woman holds an ultrasound with keys Deeplinks Blog by Corynne McSherry, Katharine Trendacosta | May 10, 2022 What Companies Can Do Now to Protect Digital Rights In A Post-Roe World The increasing risk that the Supreme Court will overturn federal constitutional abortion protections has refocused attention on the role digital service providers of all kinds play in facilitating access to health information, education, and care--and the data they collect in return.In a post-Roe world, service providers can expect a raft... International issues banner, a colorful graphic of a globe Deeplinks Blog by Karen Gullo | April 28, 2022 EFF Statement on the Declaration for the Future of the Internet The White House announced today that sixty one countries have signed the Declaration for the Future of the Internet. The high-level vision and principles expressed in the Declaration--to have a single, global network that is truly open, fosters competition, respects privacy and inclusion, and protects human rights and fundamental... Caught in the Net Report Deeplinks Blog by Mukund Rathi | April 27, 2022 Amidst Invasion of Ukraine, Platforms Continue to Erase Critical War Crimes Documentation When atrocities happen--in Mariupol, Gaza, Kabul, or Christchurch--users and social media companies face a difficult question: how do we handle online content that shows those atrocities? Can and should we differentiate between pro-violence content containing atrocities and documentation by journalists or human rights activists? In a conflict, should platforms take... laptops in an array, each with a virus icon, except one, which has an free speech (bullhorn) icon Deeplinks Blog by Konstantinos Komaitis | February 15, 2022 What Spotify, Neil Young, and Joe Rogan Tell Us About Content Moderation Content moderation is complex, difficult and, frankly, exhausting. The most recent example involves Spotify and its decision to stick with the controversial podcast host, Joe Rogan, over other creators. There is no question that Spotify has the right to determine whom to host, profit from or reject from its platform;... Online Censorship logo on hot pink background Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley | January 27, 2022 New Tracking Global Online Censorship Site Explains Content Moderation Practices and Impacts Content moderation has become a critical topic across the globe. Unfortunately, it can still be difficult for the average person to understand the processes that go into content moderation, much less how to appeal decisions that those platforms make to censor content or accounts. To help fill this gap, we're... [eff-pr-og] Press Release | January 27, 2022 EFF Launches Tracking Global Online Censorship Project to Shine Light on How Content Moderation Affects Freedom of Expression Around the World San Francisco--The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today launched Tracking Global Online Censorship, a website project that provides comprehensive, in-depth information about how and why social media platforms remove users' posts, how users can appeal these take down decisions, and how the practice affects freedom of expression across the globe.Tracking... A multi-colored bullhorn icon surrounded by grey-blue hexagons Deeplinks Blog by Konstantinos Komaitis, David Greene | January 19, 2022 Fact-Checking, COVID-19 Misinformation, and the British Medical Journal Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, authoritative research and publications have been critical in gaining better knowledge of the virus and how to combat it. However, unlike previous pandemics, this one has been further exacerbated by a massive wave of misinformation and disinformation spreading across traditional and online social media.The increasing volume... [eff-pr-og] Press Release | December 8, 2021 EFF, Partners Launch New Edition of Santa Clara Principles, Adding Standards Aimed at Governments and Expanding Appeal Guidelines San Francisco--The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and a coalition of civil society organizations and academics today released the second edition of the Santa Clara Principles on Transparency and Accountability In Content Moderation, adding standards directed at government and state actors to beef up due process and expanding guidelines for... Back to top EFF Home Follow EFF: * twitter * facebook * instagram * youtube * flicker * rss Contact * General * Legal * Security * Membership * Press About * Calendar * Volunteer * Victories * History * Internships * Jobs * Staff * Diversity & Inclusion Issues * Free Speech * Privacy * Creativity & Innovation * Transparency * International * Security Updates * Blog * Press Releases * Events * Legal Cases * Whitepapers * EFFector Newsletter Press * Press Contact Donate * Join or Renew Membership Online * One-Time Donation Online * Shop * Other Ways to Give * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks JavaScript license information *