https://phys.org/news/2022-11-netflix-ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock.html Phys.org Topics * Week's top * Latest news * Unread news * Subscribe [ ] Science X Account [ ] [ ] [*] Remember me Sign In Click here to sign in with or Forget Password? Not a member? Sign up Learn more * Nanotechnology * Physics * Earth * Astronomy & Space * Chemistry * Biology * Other Sciences * Medical Xpress Medicine * Tech Xplore Technology * * share this! * 28 * 1 * Share * Email 1. Home 2. Other Sciences 3. Archaeology * * * --------------------------------------------------------------------- November 21, 2022 With Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse, Graham Hancock has declared war on archaeologists by Flint Dibble, The Conversation With Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse, Graham Hancock has declared war on archaeologists The Neolithic archaeological site Gobekli-Tepe in Turkey is one of the locations Hancock visits in "Ancient Apocalypse." Credit: Teomancimit, CC BY-SA Netflix's enormously popular new show, "Ancient Apocalypse," is an all out attack on archaeologists. As an archaeologist committed to public engagement who strongly believes in the relevance of studying ancient people, I feel a full-throated defense is necessary. Author Graham Hancock is back, defending his well-trodden theory about an advanced global ice age civilization, which he connects in "Ancient Apocalypse" to the legend of Atlantis. His argument, as laid out in this show and in several books, is that this advanced civilization was destroyed in a cataclysmic flood. The survivors of this advanced civilization, according to Hancock, introduced agriculture, architecture, astronomy, arts, math and the knowledge of "civilization" to "simple" hunter gatherers. The reason little evidence exists, he says, is because it is under the sea or was destroyed by the cataclysm. "Perhaps," Hancock posits in the first episode, "the extremely defensive, arrogant, and patronizing attitude of mainstream academia is stopping us from considering that possibility." The pseudo fish defense In the opening dialogue of "Ancient Apocalypse," Hancock rejects being identified as an archaeologist or scientist. Instead, he calls himself a journalist who is "investigating human prehistory." A canny choice, as the label "journalist" helps Hancock rebut being characterized as a "pseudo archaeologist" or "pseudo scientist," which, as he puts it himself in episode four, would be like calling a dolphin a "pseudo fish." From my perspective as an archaeologist, the show is surprisingly (or perhaps unsurprisingly) lacking in evidence to support Hancock's theory of an advanced, global ice age civilization. The only site Hancock visits that actually dates to near the end of the ice age is Gobekli Tepe in modern Turkey. Instead, Hancock visits several North American mound sites, pyramids in Mexico, and sites stretching from Malta to Indonesia, which Hancock is convinced all help prove his theory. However, all of these sites have been published on in detail by archaeologists, and a plethora of evidence indicates they date thousands of years after the ice age. [INS::INS] Hancock argues that viewers should "not rely on the so-called experts," implying they should rely on his narrative instead. His attacks against "mainstream archaeologists," the "so-called experts" who "practice censorship" are strident and frequent. After all, as he puts in in episode six, "archaeologists have been wrong before and they could be wrong again." Steph Halmhofer, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Alberta who studies the use of pseudo archaeology and erasure of indigenous heritage by far-right groups, suggests that these attacks on archaeologists function to increase his sense of authority with viewers. As Halmhofer explains: "It's about conspiracism and the positioning of Hancock as the victim of a conspiracy. The repeated disparaging remarks about archaeologists and other academics in every episode of 'Ancient Apocalypse' is needed to remind the audience that the alternative past being proposed is true, regardless of the lack of conclusive evidence for it. And the vagueness of who this supposed advanced civilization was, combined with the credence given to it by being in a Netflix-produced series, is going to make 'Ancient Apocalypse' an easily moldable source for anyone looking to fill in a fantasied mythical past." Dangers of pseudo archaeology In the last decade we have seen how conspiracy theories and distrust in experts impacts the world around us. And research has shown how pseudo archaeology--especially when couched in anti-intellectual rhetoric--can overlap with more dangerous conspiracy thinking. Trailer for Graham Hancock's Netflix series, Ancient Apocalypse. Of course, archaeologists frequently admit when we have been wrong. Any academic teaching "Archaeology 101" or applying to fund a new study points out how new evidence updates our picture of the past. Despite the fact that every scientific field updates its thinking with new evidence, according to Hancock, any rewrites to history mean that archaeologists, his "so-called experts," should not be relied upon. Despite repeated claims made by Hancock, no archaeologists today see stone age hunter-gatherers or early farmers as "simple" or "primitive." We see them as complex people. Priming viewers to distrust archaeologists, also allows Hancock to use circular logic to re-date these sites. The murky origins of Hancock's theories Hancock claims in his book Magicians of the Gods that as the "implications" of his theories "have not yet been taken into account at all by historians and archaeologists, we are obliged to contemplate the possibility that everything we have been taught about the origins of civilisation could be wrong." However, archaeologists have repeatedly addressed his theories in academic publications, on TV and in mainstream media. Most glaring to scholars investigating the history of Hancock's pseudo archaeology is that while claiming to "overthrow the paradigm of history," he doesn't acknowledge that his overarching theory is not new. Scholars and journalists have pointed out that Hancock's ideas recycle the long since discredited conclusions drawn by American congressman Ignatius Donnelly in his book Atlantis: The Antediluvian World, published in 1882. Donnelly also believed in an advanced civilisation--Atlantis--that was wiped out by a flood over 10,000 years ago. He claimed that the survivors taught Indigenous people the secrets of farming and monumental architecture. Like many forms of pseudo archaeology, these claims act to reinforce white supremacist ideas, stripping Indigenous people of their rich heritage and instead giving credit to aliens or white people. Hancock even cites Donnelly directly in his 1995 book Fingerprints of the Gods, claiming: "The road system and the sophisticated architecture had been 'ancient in the time of the Incas," but that both 'were the work of white, auburn-haired men.'" While skin color is not brought up in "Ancient Apocalypse", the repetition of the story of a "bearded" Quetzalcoatl (an ancient Mexican deity) parrots both Donnelly's and Hancock's own summary of a white and bearded Quetzalcoatl teaching native people knowledge from this "lost civilization." Hancock's mirroring of Donnelly's race-focused "science" is seen more explicitly in his essay, "Mysterious Strangers: New Findings About the First Americans." Like Donnelly, Hancock finds depictions of "caucasoids" and "negroids" in Indigenous American art and (often mistranslated) mythology, even drawing attention to some of the exact same sculptures as Donnelly. This sort of "race science" is outdated and long since debunked, especially given the strong links between Atlantis and Aryans proposed by several Nazi "archaeologists." These are the reasons why archaeologists will continue to respond to Hancock. It isn't that we "hate him" as he claims, it is simply that we strongly believe he is wrong. His flawed thinking implies that Indigenous people do not deserve credit for their cultural heritage. Netflix labels "Ancient Apocalypse" a docuseries. IMDB calls it a documentary. It's neither. It's an eight-part conspiracy theory that weaponizes dramatic rhetoric against scholars. Provided by The Conversation This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation Citation: With Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse, Graham Hancock has declared war on archaeologists (2022, November 21) retrieved 21 November 2022 from https://phys.org/news/ 2022-11-netflix-ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Explore further UK coronavirus patients to get dexamethasone steroid immediately --------------------------------------------------------------------- 31 shares * Facebook * Twitter * Email Feedback to editors * Featured * Last Comments * Popular New eclipsing binary discovered with TESS 8 hours ago 0 Weak tropical cyclones are intensifying due to global warming, study of surface drifter data finds Nov 18, 2022 0 Simulations suggest GW190521 merger was the result of non-spinning black holes randomly finding each other Nov 18, 2022 0 Why some feces float and others sink Nov 18, 2022 8 Physics study shows that sheep flocks alternate their leader and achieve collective intelligence Nov 17, 2022 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [gif] Researchers develop a new type of light-sensitive nanoparticle to help identify ectopic pregnancy 26 minutes ago [gif] Microlaser chip adds new dimensions to quantum communication 1 hour ago [gif] Reviewing reviews: 'Top reviews' can help sway shoppers, but there are limits 1 hour ago [gif] Going to 'femoral head' of class to explain dinosaur evolution 1 hour ago [gif] A combination of ultrasound and nanobubbles allows cancerous tumors to be destroyed without invasive treatments 1 hour ago [gif] Mapping Lyme disease across western North America 1 hour ago [gif] Researchers identify last remaining steps in the biosynthesis of tropane alkaloids from coca 2 hours ago [gif] Genes and languages aren't always found together, says new study 2 hours ago [gif] Genetic 'hitchhikers' can be directed using CRISPR 2 hours ago [gif] Study analyzes dust transport in the upper levels of the atmosphere over the last two glacial cycles 3 hours ago * Related Stories UK coronavirus patients to get dexamethasone steroid immediately Jun 16, 2020 [gif] Delta variant '40 percent more transmissible': UK health minister Jun 06, 2021 [gif] Social, cultural factors in veterinary field may hinder students, professionals from seeking mental health help Feb 23, 2022 [gif] Harpoon heads, sweeping tails: How predatory mosquito larvae capture prey Oct 04, 2022 [gif] Turkish hilltop where civilization began Jun 10, 2022 UK to open 4,000-bed virus field hospital in London Mar 24, 2020 * Recommended for you [gif] 1,700-year-old spider monkey remains point to earliest evidence of primate captivity, translocation and gift diplomacy 3 hours ago [gif] Words on bronze hand may rewrite past of Basque language Nov 16, 2022 [gif] Footprints claimed as evidence of ice age humans in North America need better dating, new research claims Nov 15, 2022 [gif] Roman roads laid the foundation for modern-day prosperity, study claims Nov 15, 2022 [gif] Oldest evidence of the controlled use of fire to cook food Nov 14, 2022 [gif] Tattoos found on ancient Egyptian women appear to ask for protection during childbirth Nov 11, 2022 Load comments (1) Let us know if there is a problem with our content Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines). Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request [-- please select one -- ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message to the editors [ ] Your email (only if you want to be contacted back) [ ] Send Feedback Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors. Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages. E-mail the story With Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse, Graham Hancock has declared war on archaeologists Your friend's email [ ] Your email [ ] [ ] I would like to subscribe to Science X Newsletter. Learn more Your name [ ] Note Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message [ ] Send Newsletter sign up Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties. [ ] Subscribe More information Privacy policy Medical Xpress Medical Xpress Medical research advances and health news Tech Xplore Tech Xplore The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances Science X Science X The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web Newsletters [ ] Subscribe Science X Daily and the Weekly Email Newsletter are free features that allow you to receive your favorite sci-tech news updates in your email inbox Follow us * * * * * Top * Home * Search * Mobile version * Help * FAQ * About * Contact * Science X Account * Sponsored Account * Archive * News wire * Android app * iOS app * RSS feeds * Push notification (c) Phys.org 2003 - 2022 powered by Science X Network Privacy policy Terms of use Your Privacy This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, collect data for ads personalisation and provide content from third parties. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Ok Cookie options E-mail newsletter [ ] Subscribe Follow us * * * * It appears that you are currently using Ad Blocking software. What are the consequences? x Quantcast