https://daily.jstor.org/why-companies-are-so-interested-in-your-myers-briggs-type/ Skip to content [j_dailylogo_header_184x60] where news meets its scholarly match * Newsletters * * * [ ] * About JSTOR Daily * Newsletters * Arts & Culture + Art & Art History + Film & Media + Language & Literature + Performing Arts * Business & Economics + Business + Economics * Politics & History + Politics & Government + U.S. History + World History + Social History + Quirky History * Science & Technology + Health + Natural Science + Plants & Animals + Sustainability & The Environment + Technology * Education & Society + Education + Lifestyle + Religion + Social Sciences * Reading Lists * Syllabi * Columns * Open Community Collections on JSTOR * Contact The Editors * Support JSTOR Daily Education & Society Why Companies Are So Interested in Your Myers-Briggs Type If you've looked for a job recently, you've probably encountered the personality test. You may also have wondered if it was backed by scientific research. High angle view of businessman giving presentation colleagues in board room at office Getty/Jonathan Aprea By: Ben Ambridge September 7, 2022 September 6, 2022 5 minutes Share Tweet Email Print How many piano tuners are there in the entire world? How much should you charge to wash every window in Seattle? How many golf balls can you fit in a school bus? According to urban legend, these are all questions that Google asks at interviews. Or at least, that Google used to ask. Apparently the off-beat questions have fallen out of favor. So, what do they do instead? Well, as well as asking more standard interview questions (e.g., "Tell us about a time you faced and overcame an important challenge"), Google uses personality tests. In fact, according to Psychology Today, around 80 percent of Fortune 500 companies use personality tests in some form. Is the use of personality testing for making hiring decisions backed by scientific research? Well, it's complicated. But is the use of personality testing for making hiring decisions backed by scientific research? Well, it's complicated. There are two basic approaches to personality tests: trait-based and type-based. Mainstream academic psychology has gone almost exclusively down the route of trait-based approaches. By far the dominant approach is known as the "Big 5," as it assumes that personality can essentially be boiled down to five traits, summarized by the acronym OCEAN: Openness to experience; Conscientiousness; Extraversion; Agreeableness; and Neuroticism (these days, more often referred to as "Emotional Stability"). What makes this a trait-based (as opposed to a type-based approach) is that each of these follows a a sliding scale. For example, you might score 82/200 for Conscientiousness, 78/ 100 for Extraversion, 48/100 for Agreeableness, and so on (if you're interested, there are many places online you can take a free version of this personality test yourself). What this approach does not do is categorize people into types (e.g., "He's an extrovert," "She's an introvert"). Do scores on the "Big 5" predict aspects of performance in workplace? Psychologists Leonard D. Goodstein and Richard I. Lanyon answer with a cautious "Yes." Unsurprisingly, conscientiousness shows a correlation with most measures of job performance, regardless of the particular job or of how performance is measured, though the size of the correlation is modest. Researchers measure the relationship between two things (in this case, conscientiousness on a questionnaire and some measure of job performance) on scale from 0 (no relationship whatsoever) to1 (a perfect relationship: i.e., if you know a person's consciousness score, you can predict with perfect accuracy their score on the measure of job performance). On the 0-1 scale, the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance (as measured by this so-called "r value") was 0.22; not trivial, but my no means large. This means only around 5 percent of the variation between different people on their job performance can be explained by their conscientiousness score on the personality questionnaire (calculated by squaring 0.22 to give the "r-squared value"). Similarly modest correlations were observed between extraversion and performance, but only--as you might expect--for employees involved in sales (r=0.15) or managing others (r=0.18). Openness to experience (creativity, enjoying new things) was positively correlated with employees ability at training others (r= 0.25), but not with their job performance per se. So far, so (cautiously) good. But here's the thing: Outside of academic psychology, in the world of big business, employers tend not to use the "Big 5" or other trait-based measures of personality. Instead, they lean toward type-based measures such as the Myers-Briggs. Type-based measures don't give people scores on continuous scales but instead categorize them into distinct "types." In the case of Myers-Briggs, there are 16 different types, defined by the test-taker's preferences on four dimensions: Extraversion (outgoing, life and soul of the party) or Introversion (prefer calmer interactions) Sensing (relying mainly on your eyes and ears, etc.) or Intuition (seeing patterns or connections) Thinking (prioritizing logic in decision making) or Feeling (prioritizing emotions in decision making) Judging (living life in a planned, orderly way) or Perceiving (living life in a flexible, spontaneous way). Your personality-type is simply a combination of your preferences. For example, my type would be "Extraversion Intuition Thinking Judging." How does the Myers-Briggs fare as a measurement of personality? The answer--unlike for the Big 5, which is generally well-supported by a large body of research--is that we just don't know. A 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis set out to investigate "the validity and reliability of the Myers-Briggs," trying to determine if the test measures what it claims to measure (validity), and if it comes up with more-or-less the same answer if people take the test several times (reliability)? Weekly Newsletter Get your fix of JSTOR Daily's best stories in your inbox each Thursday. [ ][Subscribe] Privacy Policy Contact Us You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the provided link on any marketing message. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] D[ ] The researchers came up almost blank: Out of 221 studies of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, only seven studies met their criteria for inclusion: four looking at validity and three at reliability. The four validity studies concluded that individual Myers-Briggs scores do seem to correlate well with one another, and/or other personality measures, although the studies were too different to allow their results to be combined (as is usually done for meta-analysis). The three reliability studies concluded that the correlation between an individual's score on different sittings of the same test is generally good (r=0.7-0.8), although almost all were conducted on college students, who are not necessarily representative of the general population. And that's it--there's simply very little data on how well the Myers-Briggs (and other type-based personality tests) measures personality and even less on how it might predict job performance. We just don't know. It's too early to say that the test is "meaningless ," "totally meaningless," or "a fad." One thing is clear: valid and reliable alternatives that have been shown to correlate with job performance--tests based on the "Big 5" model--are widely available for free. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Support JSTOR Daily! Join our new membership program on Patreon today. Share Tweet Email Print Have a correction or comment about this article? Please contact us. personalitypsychology Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity Journal of Business and Psychology JSTOR logo Resources JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers, and students. JSTOR Daily readers can access the original research behind our articles for free on JSTOR. Applications of Personality Assessment to the Workplace: A Review By: Leonard D. Goodstein and Richard I. Lanyon Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 3 (September 1999), pp. 291-322 Springer Validity and Reliability of the Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator By: Ken Randall, Mary Isaacson and Carrie Ciro Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity, Vol. 10, No. 1 (Spring 2017), pp. 1-27 Join Our Newsletter Get your fix of JSTOR Daily's best stories in your inbox each Thursday. [ ][Subscribe] Privacy Policy Contact Us You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the provided link on any marketing message. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] D[ ] Read this next online personality quizzes Science & Technology What Do Personality Quizzes Really Tell You? Do personality quizzes help solidify one's sense of self? Or is there something limiting in having one's identity summed up so neatly? Trending Posts 1. Why Companies Are So Interested in Your Myers-Briggs Type 2. Urchins of New York and Elsewhere 3. Introducing Our Visual Literacy Column, "Learning to Look" 4. Why Does the Bible Forbid Tattoos? 5. Herbs & Verbs: How to Do Witchcraft for Real More Stories [the_lives_beyond_the_life_sentences_1050x700-600x400] Social Sciences The Lives Beyond the Life Sentences Their lives didn't stop when the judge sentenced them to life in prison. Then what? A 1994 issue of The Angolite profiled the longest-serving Americans. Part of a painting by Paul Sandby of Reading Abbey Gateway Education The Reading Abbey Girls' School This all-girls boarding school in England produced a generation of accomplished female writers in the eighteenth century. Black teachers and children stand facing the camera in a classroom in Mississippi, 1967 The Working-Class Radicalism of Mississippi's Head Start The Child Development Group of Mississippi created jobs and fostered the political inclusion of poor African American and white communities in the South. A dead whale being cleaned by whalers Language & Literature So You Plan to Teach Moby Dick The study of Melville's novel is enhanced by contextualizing it with primary and secondary sources related to the American sperm whaling industry. Recent Posts 1. The Lives Beyond the Life Sentences 2. Why Companies Are So Interested in Your Myers-Briggs Type 3. Who Is Watching the Whale-watchers? 4. Cell Shapes, "Poet Voice," and Learning to Read 5. A Celebration of Working in America Support JSTOR Daily Help us keep publishing stories that provide scholarly context to the news. Become a member About Us JSTOR Daily provides context for current events using scholarship found in JSTOR, a digital library of academic journals, books, and other material. We publish articles grounded in peer-reviewed research and provide free access to that research for all of our readers. * Contact The Editors * Masthead * Newsletters * About Us * Submission Guidelines * RSS * About the American Prison Newspapers Collection * Submissions: American Prison Newspapers Collection * Support JSTOR Daily * JSTOR.org * Terms and Conditions of Use * Privacy Policy * Cookie Policy * Cookie Settings * Accessibility logo JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways. (c) ITHAKA. All Rights Reserved. JSTOR(r), the JSTOR logo, and ITHAKA(r) are registered trademarks of ITHAKA. Sign up for our weekly newsletter Get your fix of JSTOR Daily's best stories in your inbox each Thursday. [ ][Subscribe] Privacy Policy Contact Us You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the provided link on any marketing message. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] D[ ] x