https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3544216.3544232 ACM Digital Library home ACM home * Advanced Search * Browse * About * + Sign in + Register * * Advanced Search * Journals * Magazines * Proceedings * Books * SIGs * Conferences * People * * More * Search ACM Digital Library[ ] SearchSearch Advanced Search 10.1145/3544216.3544232acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstract Publication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections comm * Conference * Proceedings * Upcoming Events * Authors * Affiliations * Award Winners * More HomeConferencesCOMMProceedingsSIGCOMM '22Design and evaluation of IPFS: a storage layer for the decentralized web research-article Free Access Artifacts Available / v1.1 [icon-small] Share on Design and evaluation of IPFS: a storage layer for the decentralized web * Authors: * #Dennis Trautwein University of Gottingen University of Gottingen View Profile , * #Aravindh Raman Telefonica Research Telefonica Research View Profile , * #Gareth Tyson Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (GZ) Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (GZ) View Profile , * #Ignacio Castro Queen Mary University of London Queen Mary University of London View Profile , * #Will Scott Protocol Labs Protocol Labs View Profile , * #Moritz Schubotz FIZ Karlsruhe FIZ Karlsruhe View Profile , * #Bela Gipp University of Gottingen University of Gottingen View Profile , * #Yiannis Psaras Protocol Labs Protocol Labs View Profile Authors Info & Claims SIGCOMM '22: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 ConferenceAugust 2022 Pages 739-752https://doi.org/10.1145/3544216.3544232 Online:22 August 2022Publication History * 0citation * 153 * Downloads Metrics Total Citations0 Total Downloads153 Last 12 Months153 Last 6 weeks153 * * Get Citation Alerts New Citation Alert added! This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to: You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited. To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below. Manage my Alerts New Citation Alert! Please log in to your account * Save to Binder Save to Binder [loader] Create a New Binder Name [ ] + Cancel + Create * Export Citation * Publisher Site * * eReader * PDF SIGCOMM '22: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference Design and evaluation of IPFS: a storage layer for the decentralized web Pages 739-752 PreviousChapterNextChapter ACM Digital Library ABSTRACT Recent years have witnessed growing consolidation of web operations. For example, the majority of web traffic now originates from a few organizations, and even micro-websites often choose to host on large pre-existing cloud infrastructures. In response to this, the "Decentralized Web" attempts to distribute ownership and operation of web services more evenly. This paper describes the design and implementation of the largest and most widely used Decentralized Web platform --- the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) --- an open-source, content-addressable peer-to-peer network that provides distributed data storage and delivery. IPFS has millions of daily content retrievals and already underpins dozens of third-party applications. This paper evaluates the performance of IPFS by introducing a set of measurement methodologies that allow us to uncover the characteristics of peers in the IPFS network. We reveal presence in more than 2700 Autonomous Systems and 152 countries, the majority of which operate outside large central cloud providers like Amazon or Azure. We further evaluate IPFS performance, showing that both publication and retrieval delays are acceptable for a wide range of use cases. Finally, we share our datasets, experiences and lessons learned. Supplemental Material Available for Download pdf p739-trautwein-supp.pdf (81.4 KB) Supplemental material. References 1. 2017. Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network. Technical Report. Protocol Labs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 2. 2020. IPFS for Nextcloud. https://apps.nextcloud.com/apps/ files_external_ipfsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar 3. 2021. DNSLink Standard. https://www.dnslink.io/Google Scholar Google Scholar 4. 2021. Multiformats - Self-describing values for Future-proofing. https://multiformats.io/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 5. 2022. IPFS Ecosystem directory. https://ecosystem.ipfs.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 6. 2022. Udger Data v3 - 20220606-01. Retrieved 02 June 2022 from https://udger.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 7. Omar Abdullah Lajam and Tarek Ahmed Helmy. 2021. Performance Evaluation of IPFS in Private Networks. In 2021 4th International Conference on Data Storage and Data Engineering (Barcelona, Spain) (DSDE '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 77--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 8. C Bommelaer de Leusse and Carl Gahnberg. 2019. The Global Internet Report: Consolidation in the Internet Economy. Internet Society (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 9. Timm Bottger, Gianni Antichi, Eder L Fernandes, Roberto di Lallo, Marc Bruyere, Steve Uhlig, and Ignacio Castro. 2018. The elusive internet flattening: 10 years of IXP growth. RIPE 78 (2018). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 10. Antonio Carzaniga, Matthew J Rutherford, and Alexander L Wolf. 2004. A routing scheme for content-based networking. In IEEE INFOCOM 2004, Vol. 2. IEEE, 918--928.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar Cross RefCross Ref 11. Ignacio Castro, Rade Stanojevic, and Sergey Gorinsky. 2013. Using Tuangou to reduce IP transit costs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 22, 5 (2013), 1415--1428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar Digital LibraryDigital Library 12. Wei Koong Chai, Ning Wang, Ioannis Psaras, George Pavlou, Chaojiong Wang, Gerardo Garcia de Blas, Francisco Javier Ramon-Salguero, Lei Liang, Spiros Spirou, Andrzej Beben, and Eleftheria Hadjioannou. 2011. Curling: Content-ubiquitous resolution and delivery infrastructure for next-generation services. IEEE Communications Magazine 49, 3 (2011), 112--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 13. Ian Clarke, Oskar Sandberg, Brandon Wiley, and Theodore W Hong. 2001. Freenet: A distributed anonymous information storage and retrieval system. In Designing privacy enhancing technologies. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 14. Kelly Clay. 2013. Amazon.com Goes Down, Loses $66,240 Per Minute. https://web.archive.org/web/20210307232341/https://www.forbes.com /sites/kellyclay/2013/08/19/ amazon-com-goes-down-loses-66240-per-minute/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 15. Bram Cohen. 2003. Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent. In Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer systems, Vol. 6. Berkeley, CA, USA, 68--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 16. Bram Cohen. 2008. The BitTorrent Protocol Specification v2. Retrieved 18 May 2022 from https://www.bittorrent.org/beps/ bep_0052.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar 17. Devin Coldewey. 2020. Cloudflare DNS goes down, taking a large piece of the internet with it. Retrieved 18 May 2022 from https:/ /techcrunch.com/2020/07/17/ cloudflare-dns-goes-down-taking-a-large-piece-of-the-internet-with-it /Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 18. Scott A Crosby and Dan S Wallach. 2007. An analysis of bittorrent's two kademlia-based dhts. Technical Report. Rice Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 19. Christian Dannewitz, Dirk Kutscher, BoRje Ohlman, Stephen Farrell, Bengt Ahlgren, and Holger Karl. 2013. Network of Information (NetInf) - An Information-Centric Networking Architecture. Comput. Commun. 36, 7 (apr 2013), 721--735. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 20. Alfonso de la Rocha, David Dias, and Yiannis Psaras. 2021. Accelerating Content Routing with Bitswap: A Multi-Path File Transfer Protocol in IPFS and Filecoin. (2021).Google Scholar Google Scholar 21. David Dias, Jeromy Johnson, and Juan Benet. 2020. Bitswap - Protocol Specification. Retrieved 01 June 2022 from https:// github.com/ipfs/specs/blob/master/BITSWAP.mdGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar 22. Jarret Falkner, Michael Piatek, John P. John, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and Thomas Anderson. 2007. Profiling a Million User Dht. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement (San Diego, California, USA) (IMC '07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 129--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 23. Roderick Fanou, Gareth Tyson, Pierre Francois, and Arjuna Sathiaseelan. 2016. Pushing the frontier: Exploring the african web ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 435--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 24. Gnutella. 2009. Gnutella Protocol Specification. Retrieved 18 May 2022 from https://web.archive.org/web/20090331221153/http:// wiki.limewire.org/index.php?title=GDFGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar 25. Kalman Graffi, Christian Gross, Dominik Stingl, Daniel Hartung, Aleksandra Kovacevic, and Ralf Steinmetz. 2011. LifeSocial. KOM: A secure and P2P-based solution for online social networks. In CCNC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 26. Barbara Guidi, Marco Conti, Andrea Passarella, and Laura Ricci. 2018. Managing social contents in Decentralized Online Social Networks: A survey. Online Social Networks and Media 7 (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 27. Anaobi Ishaku Hassan, Aravindh Raman, Ignacio Castro, Haris Bin Zia, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nishanth Sastry, and Gareth Tyson. 2021. Exploring content moderation in the decentralised web: The pleroma case. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies. 328--335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 28. Sebastian A. Henningsen, Martin Florian, Sebastian Rust, and Bjorn Scheuermann. 2020. Mapping the Interplanetary Filesystem. 2020 IFIP Networking Conference (Networking) (2020), 289--297. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 29. Ralph Holz, Jens Hiller, Johanna Amann, Abbas Razaghpanah, Thomas Jost, Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez, and Oliver Hohlfeld. 2020. Tracking the deployment of TLS 1.3 on the Web: A story of experimentation and centralization. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 50, 3 (2020), 3--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 30. Tomas Isdal, Michael Piatek, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and Thomas Anderson. 2010. Privacy-Preserving P2P Data Sharing with OneSwarm. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 Conference (New Delhi, India) (SIGCOMM '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 31. Van Jacobson, Diana K. Smetters, James D. Thornton, Michael F. Plass, Nicholas H. Briggs, and Rebecca L. Braynard. 2009. Networking Named Content. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (Rome, Italy) (CoNEXT '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 32. M Frans Kaashoek and David R Karger. 2003. Koorde: A simple degree-optimal distributed hash table. In International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems. Springer, 98--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 33. Sebastian Kaune, Konstantin Pussep, Christof Leng, Aleksandra Kovacevic, Gareth Tyson, and Ralf Steinmetz. 2009. Modelling the internet delay space based on geographical locations. In 2009 17th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing. IEEE, 301--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 34. Prashant Khare, Mladen Karan, Stephen McQuistin, Colin Perkins, Gareth Tyson, Matthew Purver, Patrick Healey, and Ignacio Castro. 2022. The Web We Weave: Untangling the Social Graph of the IETF. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 16. 500--511.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 35. David Koll, Dieter Lechler, and Xiaoming Fu. 2017. SocialGate: Managing large-scale social data on home gateways. In IEEE ICNP. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 36. Protocol Labs. 2021. Direct Connection Upgrade through Relay. Retrieved 01 June 2022 from https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/ master/relay/DCUtR.mdGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar 37. Protocol Labs. 2021. Merkle Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). Retrieved 18 May 2022 from https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/ merkle-dag/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 38. Protocol Labs. 2022. AutoNAT. Retrieved 01 June 2022 from https:/ /github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/README.mdGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar 39. Victor Le Pochat, Tom Van Goethem, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Maciej Korczynski, and Wouter Joosen. 2019. Tranco: A Research-Oriented Top Sites Ranking Hardened Against Manipulation. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS 2019). Google Scholar Google ScholarCross RefCross Ref 40. Guoli Li, Vinod Muthusamy, and Hans-Arno Jacobsen. 2008. Adaptive content-based routing in general overlay topologies. In ACM/IFIP/ USENIX International Conference on Distributed Systems Platforms and Open Distributed Processing. Springer, 1--21.Google Scholar Google ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 41. Thomas Mager, Ernst Biersack, and Pietro Michiardi. 2012. A measurement study of the Wuala on-line storage service. In 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 42. Essam Mansour, Andrei Vlad Sambra, Sandro Hawke, Maged Zereba, Sarven Capadisli, Abdurrahman Ghanem, Ashraf Aboulnaga, and Tim Berners-Lee. 2016. A demonstration of the solid platform for social web applications. In WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 43. Eva Mathews. 2021. Amazon cloud outage hits major websites, streaming apps. Retrieved 18 May 2022 from https:// www.reuters.com/article/amazon-com-outages-idCAKBN2IM1U0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 44. Petar Maymounkov and David Mazieres. 2002. Kademlia: A peer-to-peer information system based on the xor metric. In International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems. Springer, 53--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 45. Stephen McQuistin, Mladen Karan, Prashant Khare, Colin Perkins, Gareth Tyson, Matthew Purver, Patrick Healey, Waleed Iqbal, Junaid Qadir, and Ignacio Castro. 2021. Characterising the IETF through the lens of RFC deployment. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference. 137--149.Google Scholar Google ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 46. Fabrizio Parrillo and Christian Tschudin. 2021. Solid over the Interplanetary File System. In 2021 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 47. Charith Perera, Susan YL Wakenshaw, Tim Baarslag, Hamed Haddadi, Arosha K Bandara, Richard Mortier, Andy Crabtree, Irene CL Ng, Derek McAuley, and Jon Crowcroft. 2017. Valorising the IoT databox: creating value for everyone. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies 28, 1 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 48. Michael Piatek, Tomas Isdal, Thomas Anderson, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and Arun Venkataramani. 2007. Do Incentives Build Robustness in BitTorrent?. In 4th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation (NSDI 07). USENIX Association, Cambridge, MA. https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi-07/ do-incentives-build-robustness-bittorrentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar 49. Aravindh Raman, Sagar Joglekar, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nishanth Sastry, and Gareth Tyson. 2019. Challenges in the decentralised web: The mastodon case. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference. 217--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar Digital LibraryDigital Library 50. CAIDA AS Rank. 2022. urlhttp://as-rank.caida.org/.Google Scholar Google Scholar 51. Sylvia Ratnasamy, Paul Francis, Mark Handley, Richard Karp, and Scott Shenker. 2001. A Scalable Content-Addressable Network. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 31, 4 (aug 2001), 161--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 52. Drew Roselli, Jacob R Lorch, and Thomas E Anderson. [n.d.]. A Comparison of File System Workloads. ([n. d.]), 14.Google Scholar Google Scholar 53. Mathieu Rosemain and Raphael Satter. 2021. Millions of websites offline after fire at French cloud services firm. Retrieved 18 May 2022 from https://www.reuters.com/article/ us-france-ovh-fire-idUSKBN2B20NUGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar 54. Antony Rowstron and Peter Druschel. 2001. Pastry: Scalable, decentralized object location, and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems. In IFIP/ACM International Conference on Distributed Systems Platforms and Open Distributed Processing. Springer, 329--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 55. Osama Saleh and Mohamed Hefeeda. 2006. Modeling and Caching of Peer-to-Peer Traffic. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 56. Vasco Santos and Steven Allen. 2021. IPNS - Inter-Planetary Naming System. https://github.com/ipfs/specs/blob/ bab189ee61c316eb3d371c7270abef97641e7ed9/IPNS.mdGoogle Scholar Google Scholar 57. Stefan Saroiu, P Krishna Gummadi, and Steven D Gribble. [n.d.]. A Measurement Study of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Systems. In Multimedia Computing and Networking 2002 (2001-12-10), Vol. 4673. SPIE, 156--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 58. Lorenz Schwittmann, Christopher Boelmann, Matthaus Wander, and Torben Weis. 2013. SoNet-Privacy and Replication in Federated Online Social Networks. In Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 59. Ion Stoica, Robert Morris, David Karger, M Frans Kaashoek, and Hari Balakrishnan. 2001. Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 31, 4 (2001), 149--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 60. Daniel Stutzbach and Reza Rejaie. 2006. Improving lookup performance over a widely-deployed DHT. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross Ref Cross Ref 61. Daniel Stutzbach and Reza Rejaie. 2006. Understanding Churn in Peer-to-Peer Networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (IMC '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 189--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 62. Sanaz Taheri-Boshrooyeh, Alptekin Kupcu, and Oznur Ozkasap. 2015. Security and privacy of distributed online social networks. In Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 63. Dominic Tarr, Erick Lavoie, Aljoscha Meyer, and Christian Tschudin. 2019. Secure Scuttlebutt: An Identity-Centric Protocol for Subjective and Decentralized Applications. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking (Macao, China) (ICN '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 64. Dennis Trautwein. 2021. Nebula - A crawler for networks based on the libp2p DHT implementation. https://github.com/dennis-tra/ nebula-crawlerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar 65. David Vorick and Luke Champine. 2014. Sia: Simple Decentralized Storage. Technical Report. Nebulous Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 66. Liang Wang and J. Kangasharju. 2013. Measuring large-scale distributed systems: case of BitTorrent Mainline DHT. In Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P), 2013 IEEE Thirteenth International Conference on. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 67. Xiaoyun Wang, Yiqun Lisa Yin, and Hongbo Yu. 2005. Finding Collisions in the Full SHA-1. In Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO 2005. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 17--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 68. Web Storage Index. 2022. https://www.storageindex.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 69. Sam Williams, Viktor Diordiiev, Lev Berman, India Raybould, and Ivan Uemlianin. [n.d.]. Arweave: A Protocol for Economically Sustainable Information Permanence. Technical Report. arweave.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 70. Scott Wolchok and J. Alex Halderman. 2010. Crawling BitTorrent DHTs for Fun and Profit. In 4th USENIX Workshop on Offensive Technologies (WOOT 10). USENIX Association, Washington, DC. https://www.usenix.org/conference/woot10/ crawling-bittorrent-dhts-fun-and-profitGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar 71. Lixia Zhang, Alexander Afanasyev, Jeffrey Burke, Van Jacobson, kc claffy, Patrick Crowley, Christos Papadopoulos, Lan Wang, and Beichuan Zhang. 2014. Named Data Networking. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 44, 3 (jul 2014), 66--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 72. Ben Y Zhao, Ling Huang, Jeremy Stribling, Sean C Rhea, Anthony D Joseph, and John D Kubiatowicz. 2004. Tapestry: A resilient global-scale overlay for service deployment. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 22, 1 (2004), 41--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library Index Terms 1. Design and evaluation of IPFS: a storage layer for the decentralized web 1. Computer systems organization 1. Architectures 1. Distributed architectures 1. Peer-to-peer architectures 2. General and reference 1. Cross-computing tools and techniques 1. Design 2. Evaluation 3. Measurement 3. Networks 1. Network architectures 1. Network design principles 1. Naming and addressing 2. Network performance evaluation 1. Network measurement 2. Network performance analysis 3. Network protocols 1. Network protocol design Comments Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus. Login options Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article. Sign in Full Access Get this Publication * Information * Contributors * Published in ACM Conferences cover image SIGCOMM '22: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference August 2022 858 pages ISBN:9781450394208 DOI:10.1145/3544216 + General Chairs: + #Fernando Kuipers Delft University of Technology , + #Ariel Orda Technion Israel Institute of Technology Copyright (c) 2022 Owner/Author Sponsors In-Cooperation Publisher Association for Computing Machinery New York, NY, United States Publication History + Online: 22 August 2022 Permissions Request permissions about this article. Request Permissions Badges + [icon-large]Artifacts Available / v1.1 Author Tags + content addressable storage + content addressing + interplanetary file system + decentralized web + libp2p Qualifiers + research-article Conference Acceptance Rates Overall Acceptance Rate 331 of 2,663 submissions, 12% Funding Sources * [loader] Other Metrics View Article Metrics * Bibliometrics * Citations0 * Article Metrics + 0 Total Citations View Citations + 153 Total Downloads + Downloads (Last 12 months)153 + Downloads (Last 6 weeks)153 Other Metrics View Author Metrics * Cited By This publication has not been cited yet PDF Format View or Download as a PDF file. PDF eReader View online with eReader. eReader Digital Edition View this article in digital edition. View Digital Edition * Figures * Other * * Share this Publication link https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3544216.3544232 Copy Link Share on Social Media Share on * * * * 0References * * * Close Figure Viewer Browse AllReturnChange zoom level[ ] Caption View Table of Contents Export Citations Select Citation format[BibTeX ] * Preview is not available. By clicking download,a new tab will open to start the export process. The process may takea few minutes but once it finishes a file will be downloaded on your browser soplease do not close the new tab. Download + Download citation + Copy citation Categories * Journals * Magazines * Books * Proceedings * SIGs * Conferences * Collections * People About * About ACM Digital Library * ACM Digital Library Board * Subscription Information * Author Guidelines * Using ACM Digital Library * All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library * ACM Computing Classification System * Digital Library Accessibility Join * Join ACM * Join SIGs * Subscribe to Publications * Institutions and Libraries Connect * Contact * Facebook * Twitter * Linkedin * Feedback * Bug Report The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Copyright (c) 2022 ACM, Inc. * Terms of Usage * Privacy Policy * Code of Ethics ACM Digital Library home ACM home About Cookies On This Site We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Learn more Got it!