https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02334-2 Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Advertisement Advertisement Nature * View all journals * Search * My Account Login * Explore content * About the journal * Publish with us Subscribe * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed 1. nature 2. news 3. article * NEWS * 25 August 2022 Mouse embryos grown without eggs or sperm: why and what's next? Two research teams grew synthetic embryos using stem cells, long enough to see some organs develop. * Cassandra Willyard 1. Cassandra Willyard View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar * Twitter * Facebook * Email You have full access to this article via your institution. Download PDF Side by side comparison of natural and synthetic embryos showing brain and heart formation Natural and synthetic mouse embryos grown by developmental biologist Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz's research group.Credit: Gianluca Amadei, Charlotte Handford The recipe for mammalian life is simple: take an egg, add sperm and wait. But two new papers demonstrate that there's another way. Under the right conditions, stem cells can divide and self-organize into an embryo on their own. In studies published in Cell^1 and Nature^2 this month, two groups report that they have grown synthetic mouse embryos for longer than ever before. The embryos grew for 8.5 days, long enough for them to develop distinct organs -- a beating heart, a gut tube and even neural folds. [d41586-022] What's next for lab-grown human embryos? The process is far from perfect. Just a tiny fraction of the cells develop these features and those that do don't entirely mimic a natural embryo. But the work still represents a major advance that will help scientists to see organ development in unprecedented detail. "This is very, very exciting," says Jianping Fu, a bioengineer at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. "The next milestone in this field very likely will be a synthetic stem-cell based human embryo," he says. The two research teams achieved the feat using similar techniques. Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz, a developmental and stem-cell biologist with laboratories at the University of Cambridge, UK, and the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, has been working on this problem for a decade. "We started with only embryonic stem cells," she says. "They can mimic early stages of development, but we couldn't take it any further." Then, a few years ago, her team discovered^3 that when they added stem cells that give rise to the placenta and yolk sac, their embryos developed further. Last year, they demonstrated^4 that they could use this technique to culture embryos until day 7. In their latest paper, published in Nature today, Zernicka-Goetz's team describes how they grew embryos for another 1.5 days. Embryos in glass Zernicka-Goetz's team did so with the help of a technique developed by Jacob Hanna, a stem-cell biologist at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel, who has also been working on this problem for years. Last year, Hanna's team reported^5 that they had developed a device that allowed them to culture natural mouse embryos for an unprecedented length of time outside the uterus. This incubator, which kept the embryos going from day 5 to day 11, takes aspects of a previous technology -- in which the embryos reside in glass vials that rotate on a ferris-wheel-like system -- and adds ventilation. The ventilation system controls the mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide going into the vials, and the pressure. After Hanna's paper came out last year, his team shared part of their incubator with other developmental and stem-cell biologists. "The brain of this machine we shared with everyone who asked for it," he says, including Zernicka-Goetz and her colleagues, who tweaked it slightly for their experiments. In a paper published in Cell on 1 August, Hanna's team describes how they used the system to also grow embryos for 8.5 days. Full gestation in mice is about 20 days. That period is long enough for the brain regions to develop, the heart to start beating, and the neural and gut tubes to form. These synthetic embryos look a lot like natural embryos that form when mouse sperm meets egg, but they "were not 100% identical", Hanna says. "You can see some defects and some changes in the organ size." Composite of four images of synthetic mouse embryo models inside beakers taken on days 5 to 8 Synthetic mouse embryos grown inside vials by stem-cell biologist Jacob Hanna's research group.Credit: S. Tarazi et al./Cell (CC BY 4.0 ) Each team grew their embryos by combining three different cell types, and Hanna's team also managed to create all three types from naive embryonic stem cells. "It offers a way to simplify the process," Hanna says. "You can start everything from one population." Zernicka-Goetz's team reported a similar accomplishment in a preprint published^6 on bioRxiv (In their Nature paper, the researchers relied on placenta precursor cells from a cell line to create the embryos.) Brain development Zernicka-Goetz's team also conducted an experiment in which they knocked out a gene called Pax6, which has a key role in brain development. When they eliminated this gene, the mouse heads didn't develop correctly, mimicking what occurs in natural embryos that lack that gene. The result demonstrates "that the system is actually functional", says Zernicka-Goetz. "These two papers, they empower one another," says Martin Pera, a stem-cell biologist at the Jackson Laboratory Center for Precision Genetics in Bar Harbor, Maine. "Two very skilled groups can really produce rather similar results independently." For researchers, these synthetic models have many advantages over natural embryos created from eggs and sperm. Because they grow outside of the uterus, they're much easier to observe. They're also easier to manipulate using genome-editing tools. "We can perturb, we can manipulate, we can knock out every possible mouse or human gene," Fu says. That could make them useful for uncovering the role of different genes in birth defects or developmental disorders. Zernicka-Goetz plans to use this model to understand why pregnancies fail. Hanna hopes to use the technique to develop human synthetic embryos that can be a source of new organs and tissues for people who need them. What about humans? But translating this work into humans won't be easy. Researchers have coaxed human stem cells to become blastocysts and even to mimic some aspects of gastrulation -- when the early embryo organizes into distinct layers composed of different cell types. But reaching the stage of organ formation in human cells, which happens about a month after fertilization, presents a significant technical challenge. Still, Ali Brivanlou, a developmental biologist at Rockefeller University in New York, is optimistic. "The field is not too far away." And the more advanced these embryos become, the greater the ethical concerns. One key question is whether these synthetic structures should be considered embryos, a point of debate in the field. The International Society for Stem Cell Research has long advised against culturing human embryos past day 14 (equivalent to day 6 in a mouse) -- roughly when the 'primitive steak' appears, the structure that marks the beginning of gastrulation. In 2021, the society removed the limit and issued news guidelines saying that such research should have a compelling scientific rationale, and should use the minimum number of embryos necessary to achieve the scientific objective. Still, Pera sees a need for a continued conversation about the ethics of such models. Researchers have been working on human embryo models for years without much opposition. But he worries about a backlash as researchers begin to develop human embryo models that start developing organs. "The reaction to that could jeopardize this whole field of research," he says. "It's important that people know what is being proposed and that it's done with some kind of ethical consensus," adds Pera. "We have to go cautiously." doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-02334-2 References 1. Tarazi, S. et al. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.07.028 (2022). Article Google Scholar 2. Amadei, G. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-05246-3 (2022). Article Google Scholar 3. Sozen, B. et al. Nature Cell Biol. 20, 979-989 (2018). PubMed Article Google Scholar 4. Amadei, G. et al. Dev. Cell 56, 366-382.e9 (2021). PubMed Article Google Scholar 5. Aguilera-Castrejon, A. et al. Nature 593, 119-124 (2021). PubMed Article Google Scholar 6. Kasey, Y. C. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/ 2022.08.01.502371 (2022). Download references Related Articles * [d41586-022] What's next for lab-grown human embryos? Nature Careers Jobs * Staff Scientist Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, WA, United States * Mahan Postdoctoral Fellowship Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, WA, United States * Assistant Professor Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM), WUSTL St. Louis, MO, United States * PRINCIPAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHER, INFECTIOUS DISEASE IMMUNOLOGY Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA, United States You have full access to this article via your institution. Download PDF Related Articles * [d41586-022] What's next for lab-grown human embryos? Advertisement Sign up to Nature Briefing An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday. Email address [ ] [ ] Yes! Sign me up to receive the daily Nature Briefing email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Sign up * Close Nature Briefing Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter -- what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Email address [ ] Sign up [ ] I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Close Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing Explore content * Research articles * News * Opinion * Research Analysis * Careers * Books & Culture * Podcasts * Videos * Current issue * Browse issues * Collections * Subjects * Follow us on Facebook * Follow us on Twitter * Subscribe * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed About the journal * Journal Staff * About the Editors * Journal Information * Our publishing models * Editorial Values Statement * Journal Metrics * Awards * Contact * Editorial policies * History of Nature * Send a news tip Publish with us * For Authors * For Referees * Submit manuscript Search Search articles by subject, keyword or author [ ] Show results from [All journals] Search Advanced search Quick links * Explore articles by subject * Find a job * Guide to authors * Editorial policies Nature (Nature) ISSN 1476-4687 (online) ISSN 0028-0836 (print) nature.com sitemap Nature portfolio * About us * Press releases * Press office * Contact us * * * Discover content * Journals A-Z * Articles by subject * Nano * Protocol Exchange * Nature Index Publishing policies * Nature portfolio policies * Open access Author & Researcher services * Reprints & permissions * Research data * Language editing * Scientific editing * Nature Masterclasses * Nature Research Academies * Research Solutions Libraries & institutions * Librarian service & tools * Librarian portal * Open research * Recommend to library Advertising & partnerships * Advertising * Partnerships & Services * Media kits * Branded content Career development * Nature Careers * Nature Conferences * Nature events Regional websites * Nature Africa * Nature China * Nature India * Nature Italy * Nature Japan * Nature Korea * Nature Middle East Legal & Privacy * Privacy Policy * Use of cookies * Manage cookies/Do not sell my data * Legal notice * Accessibility statement * Terms & Conditions * California Privacy Statement Springer Nature (c) 2022 Springer Nature Limited