https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-62000742 BBC Homepage * Skip to content * Accessibility Help * Your account * Home * News * Sport * Reel * Worklife * Travel * Future * More menu More menu Search BBC * Home * News * Sport * Reel * Worklife * Travel * Future * Culture * Music * TV * Weather * Sounds Close menu BBC News Menu * Home * War in Ukraine * Coronavirus * Climate * Video * World * US & Canada * UK * Business * Tech * Science More * Stories * Entertainment & Arts * Health * In Pictures * Reality Check * World News TV * Newsbeat * Long Reads * Science Supreme Court limits Biden's power to cut emissions By Esme Stallard BBC News * Published 1 hour ago Share close Share page Copy link About sharing Smokestack in LouisianImage source, Getty Images The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has lost some of its power to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The landmark ruling by the US Supreme Court represents a major setback to President Joe Biden's climate plans. He called it a "devastating decision" but said it would not undermine his effort to tackle the climate crisis. The case against the EPA was brought by West Virginia on behalf of 18 other mostly Republican-led states and some of the nation's largest coal companies. They argued that the agency did not have the authority to limit emissions across whole states. These 19 states were worried their power sectors would be forced to move away from using coal, at a severe economic cost. In a 6-3 ruling, the court sided with the conservative states and fossil-fuel companies, agreeing that the EPA did not have the authority to impose such sweeping measures. * A really simple guide to climate change * Biden: 'Decisive decade' to tackle climate change Attorney General Eric Schmitt for Missouri - one of the 19 states - called it a "big victory... that pushes back on the Biden EPA's job-killing regulations". The court hasn't completely prevented the EPA from making these regulations in the future - but says that Congress would have to clearly say it authorises this power. And Congress has previously rejected the EPA's proposed carbon limiting programmes. Environmental groups will be deeply concerned by the outcome as historically the 19 states that brought the case have made little progress on reducing their emissions - which is necessary to limit climate change. The states made up 44% of the US emissions in 2018, and since 2000 have only achieved a 7% reduction in their emissions on average. "Today's Supreme Court ruling undermines EPA's authority to protect people from climate pollution at a time when all evidence shows we must take action with great urgency," said Vickie Patton, general counsel for Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). President Biden looking thoughtful with hands claspedImage source, EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock It means President Biden is now relying on a change of policy from these states or a change from Congress - otherwise the US is unlikely to achieve its climate targets. This is a significant loss for the president who entered office on a pledge to ramp up US efforts on the environment and climate. On his first day in office he re-entered the country into the Paris Agreement, the first legally-binding universal agreement on climate change targets. And he committed the country to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 52% by 2030 against 2005 levels. "While this decision risks damaging our nation's ability to keep our air clean and combat climate change, I will not relent in using my lawful authorities to protect public health and tackle the climate crisis," he said. The outcome of this case will be noted by governments around the world, as it will affect global efforts to tackle climate change. The US accounts for nearly 14% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions. A United Nations spokesman called it "a setback in our fight against climate change" but added that no single nation could derail the global effort. In the US, this ruling could also affect the EPA's broader existing and future regulatory responsibilities - including consumer protections, workplace safety and public health. The ruling gives "enormous power" to the courts to target other regulations they don't like, Hajin Kim, assistant professor of law at University of Chicago, tells the BBC. This is because judges can say Congress did not explicitly authorise the agency to do that particular thing, she adds. line The impact on regulatory powers will be significant Analysis box by Anthony Zurcher, North America reporter For decades, the Supreme Court has held that judges should generally defer to government agencies when interpreting federal law. On Thursday, the conservative majority continued a recent trend of chipping away at that practice. Instead, the court's justices embraced what's called the "major questions doctrine" - which asserts that a federal agency's discretion is limited on big issues that involve broad regulatory actions. If Congress had intended the Environmental Protection Agency to be able to issue sweeping regulations of an entire sector of the US economy, they said, it would have explicitly written that power into the Clean Air Act. In January, a similar majority of the court cited the major questions doctrine to strike down an attempt by the Biden administration to use a federal workplace law to mandate vaccinations for employees in large companies. It's now clear this court will turn a sceptical eye to agency attempts to cite vague or broad laws to enact any sort of major regulatory changes. That's a significant development, given how difficult it has been for Congress to pass substantive new legislation in recent years. The time when presidents could find unilateral "work-arounds" in existing law may be coming to an end. More on this story * A really simple guide to climate change + 13 October 2021 Picture of the Earth * Biden: 'Decisive decade' to tackle climate change + 22 April 2021 Joe Biden * Carbon 'surge' expected in post-Covid energy boom + 20 April 2021 Coal China Top Stories * Supreme Court limits Biden's power to cut emissions + Published 1 hour ago * Why Russia couldn't hold on to Snake Island + Published 10 hours ago * Europe heatwave breaks multiple June records + Published 7 hours ago Features * 'I was sentenced to 30 years for suffering a miscarriage' Karen * Why Russia couldn't hold on to Snake Island Satellite view shows smoke rising over Snake Island, Ukraine amid Russia"s attack on the country, May 8, 2022 * Yair Lapid: The ex-TV host who is Israel's new PM Yair Lapid speaks at the Israeli parliament (20 June 2022) * * Putin hits back at G7 leaders' topless photo jibes Vladimir Putin topless on a horse * 'Trans people exist and we are in Ghana' Video'Trans people exist and we are in Ghana' Angel Maxine, Ghana's first openly transgender musician, talks about the journey to becoming herself. * Juror's nightmares after child murder trial Logan Mwangi, also known as Logan Williamson * Hong Kong handover: Am I Chinese or a Hongkonger? VideoHong Kong handover: Am I Chinese or a Hongkonger? Two Hongkongers born in 1997, the year the city returned to China, tell us how they view identity. * 'I pinch myself at my luck being in Stranger Things' Jamie Campbell Bower * Why asteroids are the next prize in the space race. VideoWhy asteroids are the next prize in the space race Asteroid belt Elsewhere on the BBC * The case for turning off your Zoom camera Workers may have a strong argument against appearing on screen Woman at desk * America's first interracial love song How a taboo-busting duet became a hit and broke new ground Billy Vera and Judy Clay * A breakfast staple created by accident More than a century ago, a glut of oranges kick-started a craze Splashing orange juice on table Most Read 1. 1Why Russia couldn't hold on to Snake Island 2. 2Supreme Court limits Biden's power to cut emissions 3. 3Tory whip resigns saying he 'embarrassed himself' 4. 4Putin hits back at G7 leaders' topless photo jibes 5. 5Russia leaves Snake Island and Putin's topless insult 6. 6Claire Foy faced 'significant risk' from stalker 7. 7Controversial Florida abortion ban blocked by court 8. 8Ketanji Brown Jackson sworn in to US Supreme Court 9. 9Cameron Diaz to come out of acting retirement 10. 10Europe heatwave breaks multiple June records BBC News Services * On your mobile * On smart speakers * Get news alerts * Contact BBC News * Home * News * Sport * Reel * Worklife * Travel * Future * Culture * Music * TV * Weather * Sounds * Terms of Use * About the BBC * Privacy Policy * Cookies * Accessibility Help * Parental Guidance * Contact the BBC * Get Personalised Newsletters * Why you can trust the BBC * Advertise with us * AdChoices / Do Not Sell My Info (c) 2022 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.