https://blog.apaonline.org/2022/06/29/tiktok-pedagogy-teaching-philosophy-in-60-seconds-or-less/ Sign in Join * About + Contributors + Archive * Topics + Valuing Black Lives + Special Series o Black Issues in Philosophy o Blog Announcements o Climate Matters o COVID-19 o Genealogies of Philosophy o Graduate Student Council (GSC) o Graduate Student Reflection o Into Philosophy o Member Interviews o On Congeniality o Philosophy as a Way of Life o Philosophy in the Contemporary World o Precarity and Philosophy o Recently Published Book Spotlight o Starting Out in Philosophy o Syllabus Showcase o Teaching and Learning Video Series o Undergraduate Philosophy Club o Women in Philosophy + APA + Diversity and Inclusiveness + Issues in Philosophy + Public Philosophy + Research + Service + Teaching + Work/Life Balance * Submissions * Newsletter * Journal Surveys * APA * APA Connect Sign in Welcome!Log into your account [ ]your username [ ]your password [LOG IN] Forgot your password? Create an account Sign up Welcome!Register for an account [ ]your email [ ]your username [REGISTER] A password will be e-mailed to you. Password recovery Recover your password [ ]your email [Send My Pass] Search [ ] LogoBlog of the APAJoin the discussion Blog LogoBlog of the APAJoin the discussion * About + Contributors + Archive * Topics + Valuing Black Lives + Special Series o Black Issues in Philosophy o Blog Announcements o Climate Matters o COVID-19 o Genealogies of Philosophy o Graduate Student Council (GSC) o Graduate Student Reflection o Into Philosophy o Member Interviews o On Congeniality o Philosophy as a Way of Life o Philosophy in the Contemporary World o Precarity and Philosophy o Recently Published Book Spotlight o Starting Out in Philosophy o Syllabus Showcase o Teaching and Learning Video Series o Undergraduate Philosophy Club o Women in Philosophy + APA + Diversity and Inclusiveness + Issues in Philosophy + Public Philosophy + Research + Service + Teaching + Work/Life Balance * Submissions * Newsletter * Journal Surveys * APA * APA Connect Sign in Welcome! Log into your account [ ]your username [ ]your password [Login] Forgot your password? Get help Create an account Create an account Welcome! Register for an account [ ]your email [ ]your username [Register] A password will be e-mailed to you. Password recovery Recover your password [ ]your email [Send My Password] A password will be e-mailed to you. TeachingTikTok Pedagogy: Teaching Philosophy in 60 Seconds or Less Teaching TikTok Pedagogy: Teaching Philosophy in 60 Seconds or Less by Paul Blaschko June 29, 2022 0 [tiktok-5323006_1280] I teach philosophy on TikTok, perhaps to the surprise of some colleagues in the discipline (who haven't met me), and to parts of the internet. The core skeptical question I'm most often asked (or, at least, the question that's at least behind the questions I'm actually asked), is whether it's possible to teach philosophy in 60 seconds or less. I'm familiar with this question. Answering it experimentally is the reason I started making TikTok videos. Within 30 days of beginning the experiment, I'd answered it in the affirmative to my satisfaction. Here, I'd like to reflectively reconstruct why I think this is the case. In what we might loosely refer to as "the literature" on pedagogy in higher education, "active learning" has long been contrasted as a better model of education than the "transmission of knowledge" (ToK) model that many of us have internalized and baked into our pedagogy (reflectively or otherwise). In the ToK model, the teacher has some expertise, some specialized knowledge, that students need (and perhaps want), and her primary aim is to share that knowledge in a deep, rigorous, and comprehensive way. Students come in with more or less "blank slates" that need to be filled with the kind (and form) of knowledge that will allow them to engage in some specialized practice or activity, like, for instance, contributing to literature in the discipline of philosophy via a published research paper. In workshops across university campuses, the professional and amateur pedagogues (like myself) that work with centers of "Teaching," " Teaching and Learning," or "Learning Excellence" will sometimes object to ToK as having been designed, via the industrial revolution, as explicitly for the production of factory workers. It's referred to as the "factory model" of education. Images of rote memorization exercises--sometimes lasting 8 hours at a time and led by a stern, idiot schoolmaster--are invoked to explain why faculty need to permanently archive their PowerPoint slide decks. Faculty who resist risk being pejoratively (albeit indirectly) labeled the "Sage on the Stage," which we're told is essentially embodying the Dickensian Schoolmaster. But the reaction against the ToK model of education in such circles is a bit overstated. (Something even us pedagogues are starting to recognize.) Some students need the kind of specialized knowledge that this model is most adept at providing. Call it "transmission," "installation," or simply "sharing," but many graduate students want to publish papers in a highly professionalized discipline, and courses that exclusively emphasize self-discovery, the "co-production" of knowledge, or intellectual humility will not provide that for them. The problem comes when most college teachers--who received their PhDs in highly competitive, research-focused graduate programs--sometimes don't realize that there's another, better way to approach the undergraduate education that comprises the vast majority of their teaching obligations. The new model asks instructors to articulate clear learning goals, and encourages many of these learning goals to focus on something other than creating area experts, like themselves, or cultivating highly professionalized skills, like research writing for academic publications. But when pedagogues like me refuse to recognize anything legitimate about the ToK model, and professors rightly recognize that this model is what they, themselves, have found to be the most effective part of their learning process, the result is misunderstanding, and sometimes quite a bit of bad faith engagement, all around. So we, as faculty at (elite) undergraduate (research) institutions, need to bring the ToK model just a bit closer to the model preferred by those pedagogues. We need a model of "Teaching Intensive K nowledge-co-production" (TIK) that we can marry to the ToK model. We need TIK-ToK. My 12.6k (and counting) followers on TikTok (the platform) are graduate students, other professors, middle school children, bored undergraduates from other institutions, ex-Mormons (a surprising number of ex-Mormons), and enthusiastic users of SoberTok. I don't presume that they want to develop any of the expertise I can offer them (mostly on epistemic responsibility and its conceptual relationship to doxastic voluntarism), though I sometimes assume they'd like to access it. I'm sometimes a "Sage" on that stage, and simply record a shaky (cinema verite), straight to iPhone camera explainer about a difficult research topic I've encountered. Far more often, though, my learning goals are simpler. By the end of most of my Tiks (or Toks, or whatever the equivalent term to Twitter's Tweets is), I want my viewers to understand something like, "The distinction between instrumental and final goods," or "How Pascal's Wager works," or simply "What the surprise exam paradox is." With some careful consideration, I can design a learning experience that illustrates these. I can engage in (sometimes extensive) discussion about that experience in the comments. I can link to further resources for those who might want to go on to declare a philosophy major. The trick on the TIK-ToK model is just choosing the right learning goals. Not trying to take on too much (I'd never attempt to survey an entire literature in about 10 seconds), or presume to authoritatively explain (and dismiss) an entire sub-field or discipline. (Unless I was doing that as. a. joke.) Might TIK-ToK lead to confusion among my 12.6k "students?" Obviously yes. And in the same way that my 27, 50-minute "active learning" lectures often lead to confusion in the 150 undergraduates who take my semester-long intro to philosophy course at Notre Dame. And in the same way that my 5-year-long PhD studies left me (somehow, still) unable to articulate what the "synthetic a priori" is with any sort of comprehension. Confusion is a crucial part of the learning process, as is curiosity, clarity, failure, discovery, and, ultimately, love. To learn you've got to become excited by knowledge, obsessed with it, sometimes dangerously so, sometimes in ways that might border on compulsion, or even addiction. How else could someone, like me, make it through 7 years of graduate studies--3 of those with children--making, on average, just about $20,000 per year before taxes? Might TIK-ToK on TikTok contribute to the worst cognitive trends in an already vulnerable population (e.g. the shortening of attention spans, the internalization of FOMO, the alarming rise of despair, depression, and anxiety)? Obviously yes. And that's something I think about monthly, worry about daily, and--should I come to a certain kind of affirmative answer with certainty--will be the reason why I immediately and permanently delete my account. You can learn in almost any way, and from almost any model. The Greeks allegedly did it on foot, on the move. The Romans did it on the battlefield, sleeveless in the freezing rain. The medievals did it in quiet monasteries or in the public square with a bunch of randos. Our students mostly do it on their iPhones. But whether we're firmly committed to a TIK model, a ToK model, or a TIK-ToK model on TikTok, the joy of teaching--the love of it--embraces these modalities. It inspires a desire to learn from them, on or in them, and certainly with anyone else who is willing to explore the possibility of gaining something of true and lasting intellectual value via their use. author pic Paul Blaschko Paul Blaschko is an assistant teaching professor of philosophy at the University of Notre Dame and Assistant Director at the Notre Dame Institute for Advanced Study. He is the Digital Curriculum Lead for Notre Dame's innovative first philosophy course "God and the Good Life," and -- with Meghan Sullivan -- is currently writing a book based on the course to be published by Penguin Press in January 2022. For the past two and a half years he's helped administer the " Philosophy as a Way of Life" grant from the Andrew W. Mellon foundation, dedicated to helping philosophers design and teach innovative, high impact philosophy courses on issues of meaning, value, and the good life. Tweet * Tags * Paul Blaschko * Sabrina D. MisirHiralall * teaching * Tik Tok Pedagogy Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Linkedin ReddIt Email Print Previous articleTeaching Environmental Ethics Next articleIn Praise of Experimental Workshops RELATED ARTICLES Teaching Teaching Environmental Ethics Teaching John Rawls and Fair Equality of Opportunity Syllabus Showcase Syllabus Showcase: Ethics in the Novel, Felicia Nimue Ackerman Professor Reflection Series Introducing the Professor Reflection Series Undergraduate Philosophy Clubs Undergraduate Philosophy Club: Stetson University Graduate Student Reflection Graduate Student Reflection Series: On Being A Luddite LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Comment: Please enter your comment! [ ] Name:* Please enter your name here [ ] Email:* You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here [ ] Website: [ ] Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. [ ] Notify me of follow-up comments by email. [ ] Notify me of new posts by email. [Post Comment] WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield Currently you have JavaScript disabled. In order to post comments, please make sure JavaScript and Cookies are enabled, and reload the page. Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser. spot_img Topics APABlack Issues in PhilosophyBlog AnnouncementsCaring for Democracy Climate MattersCOVID-19Diversity and InclusivenessGenealogies of PhilosophyGraduate Student Council (GSC)Graduate Student Reflection Into PhilosophyIssues in PhilosophyLaw and PhilosophyMember InterviewsOn CongenialityPhilosophy and TechnologyPhilosophy as a Way of LifePhilosophy in the Contemporary WorldPrecarity and Philosophy Professor Reflection SeriesPublic PhilosophyRecently Published Book SpotlightReports from AbroadResearchServiceStarting Out in Philosophy Syllabus ShowcaseTeachingTeaching and Learning Video Series Undergraduate Philosophy ClubsValuing Black LivesWomen in Philosophy Work/Life Balance [ ] Search Advanced search Posts You May Enjoy [png] Research In Tension: Effective Altruism and Mutual Aid Savannah Pearlman - June 23, 2022 Both Effective Altruism and Mutual Aid are social movements aimed at providing aid and relieving poverty. And yet, there is a tension between a... [png] John Rawls and Fair Equality of Opportunity Teaching June 20, 2022 [png] Recently Published Book Spotlight: Liberating Revolution Recently Published Book Spotlight June 17, 2022 pic of interviewee APA Member Interview: Damian Fisher Member Interviews June 17, 2022 Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Linkedin ReddIt Email Print Blog of the APA ABOUT US The Blog of the American Philosophical Association (APA) shares a variety of perspectives from a broad array of APA members, to highlight the activities being undertaken by the APA, as well as provide a forum where the APA leadership and membership can communicate with one another more effectively. FOLLOW US (c) Newspaper WordPress Theme by TagDiv MORE STORIES Florida State University Undergraduate Philosophy Club: Florida State University Teaching July 14, 2021 decorative Using Discussion Cards to Balance Philosophical Conversations Teaching January 13, 2021 decorative Syllabus Showcase: Critical Thinking, Nathan Eric Dickman Teaching July 22, 2020 Go to mobile version