https://phys.org/news/2022-06-fossils-cradle-humankind-million-years.html Phys.org Topics * Week's top * Latest news * Unread news * Subscribe [ ] Science X Account [ ] [ ] [*] Remember me Sign In Click here to sign in with or Forget Password? Not a member? Sign up Learn more * Nanotechnology * Physics * Earth * Astronomy & Space * Chemistry * Biology * Other Sciences * Medical Xpress Medicine * Tech Xplore Technology * * share this! * 3.4K * 94 * Share * Email 1. Home 2. Biology 3. Paleontology & Fossils * * * --------------------------------------------------------------------- June 27, 2022 Fossils in the 'Cradle of Humankind' may be more than a million years older than previously thought by Brittany Steff, Purdue University Famous Sterkfontein Caves deposit 1 million years older than previously thought Four different Australopithecus crania that were found in the Sterkfontein caves, South Africa. The Sterkfontein cave fill containing this and other Australopithecus fossils was dated to 3.4 to 3.6 million years ago, far older than previously thought. The new date overturns the long-held concept that South African Australopithecus is a younger offshoot of East African Australopithecus afarensis. Credit: Jason Heaton and Ronald Clarke, in cooperation with the Ditsong Museum of Natural History. The earth doesn't give up its secrets easily--not even in the "Cradle of Humankind" in South Africa, where a wealth of fossils relating to human evolution have been found. For decades, scientists have studied these fossils of early human ancestors and their long-lost relatives. Now, a dating method developed by a Purdue University geologist just pushed the age of some of these fossils found at the site of Sterkfontein Caves back more than a million years. This would make them older than Dinkinesh, also called Lucy, the world's most famous Australopithecus fossil. The "Cradle of Humankind" is a UNESCO World Heritage Site in South Africa that comprises a variety of fossil-bearing cave deposits, including at Sterkfontein Caves. Sterkfontein was made famous by the discovery of the first adult Australopithecus, an ancient hominin, in 1936. Hominins includes humans and our ancestral relatives, but not the other great apes. Since then, hundreds of Australopithecus fossils have been found there, including the well-known Mrs. Ples, and the nearly complete skeleton known as Little Foot. Paleoanthropologists and other scientists have studied Sterkfontein and other cave sites in the Cradle of Humankind for decades to shed light on human and environmental evolution over the past 4 million years. Darryl Granger, a professor of earth, atmospheric, and planetary sciences in Purdue University's College of Science, is one of those scientists, working as part of an international team. Granger specializes in dating geologic deposits, including those in caves. As a doctoral student, he devised a method for dating buried cave sediments that is now used by researchers all over the world. His previous work at Sterkfontein dated the Little Foot skeleton to about 3.7 million years old, but scientists are still debating the age of other fossils at the site. In a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Granger and a team of scientists including researchers from the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa and the University Toulouse Jean Jaures in France, have discovered that not only Little Foot, but all of the Australopithecus-bearing cave sediments date from about 3.4 to 3.7 million years old, rather than 2-2.5 million years old as scientists previously theorized. That age places these fossils toward the beginning of the Australopithecus era, rather than near the end. Dinkinesh, who hails from Ethiopia, is 3.2 million years old, and her species, Australopithecus africanus, hails back to about 3.9 million years old. Fossils in the 'Cradle of Humankind' may be more than a million years older than previously thought Darryl Granger of Purdue University developed the technology that updated the age of an Australopithecus found in Sterkfontein Cave. New data pushes its age back more than a million years, to 3.67 million years old. Credit: Purdue University photo/Lena Kovalenko Sterkfontein is a deep and complex cave system that preserves a long history of hominin occupation of the area. Understanding the dates of the fossils here can be tricky, as rocks and bones tumbled to the bottom of a deep hole in the ground, and there are few ways to date cave sediments. [INS::INS] In East Africa, where many hominin fossils have been found, the Great Rift Valley volcanoes lay down layers of ash that can be dated. Researchers use those layers to estimate how old a fossil is. In South Africa--especially in a cave--the scientists don't have that luxury. They typically use other animal fossils found around the bones to estimate their age or calcite flowstone deposited in the cave. But bones can shift in the cave, and young flowstone can be deposited in old sediment, making those methods potentially incorrect. A more accurate method is to date the actual rocks in which the fossils were found. The concrete-like matrix that embeds the fossil, called breccia, is the material Granger and his team analyze. "Sterkfontein has more Australopithecus fossils than anywhere else in the world," Granger said. "But it's hard to get a good date on them. People have looked at the animal fossils found near them and compared the ages of cave features like flowstones and gotten a range of different dates. What our data does is resolve these controversies. It shows that these fossils are old--much older than we originally thought." Granger and the team used accelerator mass spectrometry to measure radioactive nuclides in the rocks, as well as geologic mapping and an intimate understanding of how cave sediments accumulate to determine the age of the Australopithecus-bearing sediments at Sterkfontein, Granger and the research group at the Purdue Rare Isotope Measurement Laboratory (PRIME Lab) study so-called cosmogenic nuclides and what they can reveal about the history of fossils, geological features and rock. Cosmogenic nuclides are extremely rare isotopes produced by cosmic rays --high-energy particles that constantly bombard the earth. These incoming cosmic rays have enough energy to cause nuclear reactions inside rocks at the ground surface, creating new, radioactive isotopes within the mineral crystals. An example is aluminum-26: aluminum that is missing a neutron and slowly decays to turn into magnesium over a period of millions of years. Since aluminum-26 is formed when a rock is exposed at the surface, but not after it has been deeply buried in a cave, PRIME lab researchers can date cave sediments (and the fossils within them) by measuring levels of aluminum-26 in tandem with another cosmogenic nuclide, beryllium-10. In addition to the new dates at Sterkfontein based on cosmogenic nuclides, the research team made careful maps of the cave deposits and showed how animal fossils of different ages would have been mixed together during excavations in the 1930s and 1940s, leading to decades of confusion with the previous ages. "What I hope is that this convinces people that this dating method gives reliable results," Granger said. "Using this method, we can more accurately place ancient humans and their relatives in the correct time periods, in Africa, and elsewhere across the world." The age of the fossils matters because it influences scientists' understanding of the living landscape of the time. How and where humans evolved, how they fit into the ecosystem, and who their closest relatives are and were, are pressing and complex questions. Putting the fossils at Sterkfontein into their proper context is one step towards solving the entire puzzle. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Explore further How we calculated the age of caves in the Cradle of Humankind--and why it matters --------------------------------------------------------------------- More information: Cosmogenic nuclide dating of at Sterkfontein, South Africa, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2022). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2123516119. Journal information: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Provided by Purdue University Citation: Fossils in the 'Cradle of Humankind' may be more than a million years older than previously thought (2022, June 27) retrieved 29 June 2022 from https://phys.org/news/ 2022-06-fossils-cradle-humankind-million-years.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. 3477 shares * Facebook * Twitter * Email Feedback to editors * Featured * Last Comments * Popular Microporous polymer membranes for light-gated ion transport 9 hours ago 0 Astronomers detect a new cataclysmic variable system 10 hours ago 0 Using AI to identify chick distress calls in large poultry farms 10 hours ago 0 The environmental cost of cheating to overcome cooperation in simple multicellular organisms 10 hours ago 0 Study identifies a tidal disruption event that coincides with the production of a high-energy neutrino Jun 28, 2022 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [gif] Webb telescope: NASA to reveal deepest image ever taken of universe 1 hour ago [gif] Team reassesses greenhouse gas emissions from African lakes 1 hour ago [gif] Laser writing may enable 'electronic nose' for multi-gas sensor 2 hours ago [gif] Cooking up a conductive alternative to copper with aluminum 2 hours ago [gif] How the world's rivers are changing 3 hours ago [gif] Research team captures an elusive shadow: State-by-state gun ownership 3 hours ago [gif] Monitoring COVID-19: Could medicine found in wastewater provide an early warning? 3 hours ago --------------------------------------------------------------------- Relevant PhysicsForums posts Airplane Fare Mystery 1 hour ago Formula for Doppler effect in moving medium? 2 hours ago Constraints on Lorentz velocity transformation 2 hours ago Interpretations of the Aharonov-Bohm effect 2 hours ago SOFIA IR Observatory in the Southern Sky. 2 hours ago Which units is this conversion factor for (molar volume)? 0.023901488 2 hours ago More from Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Related Stories [gif] How we calculated the age of caves in the Cradle of Humankind--and why it matters Nov 22, 2018 [gif] South Africa's Sterkfontein Caves produce two new hominin fossils Feb 11, 2016 [gif] New instrument dates old skeleton--'Little Foot' 3.67 million years old Apr 01, 2015 [gif] Evolution: South Africa's hominin record is a fair-weather friend Nov 21, 2018 [gif] After 20 years, researcher presents the most complete Australopithecus fossil ever found Dec 06, 2017 [gif] Is forearm curvature in the 'Little Foot' Australopithecus natural or pathological? Dec 29, 2020 * Recommended for you [gif] Shrimps and worms among first animals to recover after largest mass extinction 5 hours ago [gif] Researchers describe new kangaroo fossil from Papua New Guinea 23 hours ago [gif] How did vertebrates first evolve jaws? Jun 28, 2022 [gif] New insight into the hunting patterns of ancient cephalopods Jun 23, 2022 [gif] What did Megalodon eat? Anything it wanted, including other predators Jun 22, 2022 [gif] More than 100 fossils discovered in Brazilian paleontological site that was lost for 70 years Jun 22, 2022 Load comments (0) Let us know if there is a problem with our content Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines). Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request [-- please select one -- ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message to the editors [ ] Your email (only if you want to be contacted back) [ ] Send Feedback Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors. Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages. E-mail the story Fossils in the 'Cradle of Humankind' may be more than a million years older than previously thought Your friend's email [ ] Your email [ ] [ ] I would like to subscribe to Science X Newsletter. Learn more Your name [ ] Note Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Your message [ ] Send Newsletter sign up Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties. [ ] Subscribe More information Privacy policy Medical Xpress Medical Xpress Medical research advances and health news Tech Xplore Tech Xplore The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances Science X Science X The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web Newsletters [ ] Subscribe Science X Daily and the Weekly Email Newsletter are free features that allow you to receive your favorite sci-tech news updates in your email inbox Follow us * * * * * Top * Home * Search * Mobile version * Help * FAQ * About * Contact * Science X Account * Sponsored Account * Archive * News wire * Android app * iOS app * RSS feeds * Push notification (c) Phys.org 2003 - 2022 powered by Science X Network Privacy policy Terms of use Your Privacy This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, collect data for ads personalisation and provide content from third parties. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Ok Cookie options E-mail newsletter [ ] Subscribe Follow us * * * * It appears that you are currently using Ad Blocking software. What are the consequences? x Quantcast