https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=44747 Language Log * Home * About * Comments policy Greeks in ancient Central Asia: the Ionians October 20, 2019 @ 8:14 pm * Filed by Victor Mair under Historical linguistics, Language and history, Reconstructions << previous post | next post >> In the comments to "A Sino-Mongolian tale in three languages and five scripts" (10/10/19), Michael Watts remarked: I was just reading about the conflict between the Han and Da Yuan. Yuan Wan is supposed to reflect the Greek self-appellation (presumably Iaones or similar), or a Sanskrit rendition thereof. This made me curious what the reconstructed ancient pronunciation of Wan was. To which Chris Button replied: Wan would go back to Old Chinese *?wan and so its identification with Sanskrit "Yavana" or Pali "Yona" for Ionian is well founded. Let us delve into this business of Greeks in Central Asia a bit more deeply. As Chris Button pointed out: Ionians appear in Indic literature and documents as Yavana and Yona. In documents, these names refer to the Indo-Greek Kingdoms; that is, the states formed by the Macedonians, either Alexander the Great or his successors on the Indian subcontinent. The earliest such documentation is the Edicts of Ashoka, dated to 250 BC, within 10 or 20 years. Before then, the Yavanas appear in the Vedas, as early as the 2nd millennium BC. The Vedas are to be distinguished from the much earlier Vedic period. In the Vedas, the Yavanas are a kingdom of Mlechhas, or barbarians, to the far west, out of the line of descent of Indic culture, in the same category as the Sakas, or Skythians (who spoke Iranian), and thus probably were already Greek. The Ionians of the Aegean are the identity customarily assigned to them. Source Since Indic and Iranian are closely linked in their early phases, it is not surprising that we also find the Ionians mentioned in Iranian texts in a form close to that of those in Indic sources: Ionians appear in a number of Old Persian inscriptions of the Achaemenid Empire as Yauna (), a nominative plural masculine, singular Yauna; for example, an inscription of Darius on the south wall of the palace at Persepolis includes in the provinces of the empire "Ionians who are of the mainland and (those) who are by the sea, and countries which are across the sea; ...." At that time the empire probably extended around the Aegean to northern Greece. Source Now we need to learn something about the history, ethnicity, and culture of the "Great Ionians": Dayuan (or Tayuan; Chinese: Da Wan ; pinyin: Dayuan; literally: 'Great Ionians') was a country in Ferghana valley in Central Asia, described in the Chinese historical works of Records of the Grand Historian and the Book of Han. It is mentioned in the accounts of the famous Chinese explorer Zhang Qian in 130 BCE and the numerous embassies that followed him into Central Asia. The country of Dayuan is generally accepted as relating to the Ferghana Valley, controlled by the Greek polis Alexandria Eschate (modern Khujand, Tajikistan). These Chinese accounts describe the Dayuan as urbanized dwellers with Caucasian features, living in walled cities and having "customs identical to those of the Greco-Bactrians", a Hellenistic kingdom that was ruling Bactria at that time in today's northern Afghanistan. The Dayuan are also described as manufacturers and great lovers of wine. The Dayuan were the descendants of the Greek colonists that were settled by Alexander the Great in Ferghana in 329 BCE (see Alexandria Eschate), and had prospered within the Hellenistic realm of the Seleucids and Greco-Bactrians, until they were isolated by the migrations of the Yuezhi around 160 BCE. It appears that the name "Yuan" was simply a transliteration of Sanskrit Yavana or Pali Yona, used throughout antiquity in Asia to designate Greeks ("Ionians"), so that Dayuan would mean "Great Ionians" or "Great Greeks". By 100 BC, the Dayuan were defeated by the Han dynasty in the Han-Dayuan war. The interaction between the Dayuan and the Chinese is historically crucial, since it represents one of the first major contacts between an urbanized Western civilization and the Chinese civilization, opening the way to the formation of the Silk Road that was to link the East and the West in material and cultural exchange from the 1st century BCE to the 15th century. Source Chris Buttons' *?wan seems serviceable as an Old Sinitic reconstruction of Wan . For the sake of comparison, we may also mention the following: Middle Sinitic Zhengzhang /?uan^X/ Shangfang Pan /?wian^X/ Wuyun Shao /?iuan^X/ Rongfen Edwin /?uan^X/ Pulleyblank Li /?iuan^X/ Rong Wang /iwan^X/ Li Bernard /?iwan^X/ Karlgren Expected Mandarin yuan Reflex Old Sinitic (Baxter-Sagart): /*[?]o[r]?/ (Zhengzhang): /*qon?/ Source Regardless of how we reconstruct the Middle and Old Sinitic, there can be no doubt that the people of the East Asian Heartland (EAH) were aware of the Ionians and knew of them by name already in B.C. times. They knew that the people of Da Yuan ("Great Ionia") produced fabulous "blood-sweating", "thousand-tricent" horses (also called " Ferghana horses"), grew alfalfa (to feed the horses!), grapes, and many other prized commodities, and so forth. In other words, they were far from ignorant about the peoples, cultures, and languages of Central Asia and beyond westward. Greek and Roman knowledge of the Far East was also extensive. Ptolemy (A.D. ca. 100-ca. 170) listed Dunhuang, the vital Silk Road city in the Gansu Corridor, in his Geography of the Greco-Roman world, referring to it as Throana (Throana), which I believe may derive from an Iranian word druvana meaning something like "fortress for tax collecting" (source), though I would welcome confirmation of this finding. In any event, in our ongoing series of investigations of early East-West linguistic interchange, we need to take seriously the fact that contact between distant peoples did occur and that clines of cultural exchange contributed greatly to their mutual development. Selected readings * "Magi, myrrh, and mummies" (12/24/14) * "China and Rome" (2/24/19) * "Prakritic 'Kroraina' and Old Sinitic reconstructions of 'Loulan, part 2" (5/21/19) * "Galactic glimmers: of milk and Old Sinitic reconstructions" (1/8 /19) * "Tocharian, Turkic, and Old Sinitic 'ten thousand'" (4/23/19) -- with references to many earlier posts October 20, 2019 @ 8:14 pm * Filed by Victor Mair under Historical linguistics, Language and history, Reconstructions Permalink --------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 Comments 1. martin schwartz said, October 21, 2019 @ 12:46 am The Ionians were indeed part of the Achaemenian Persian empire, whence the ethnonym (originally Iawo:n-, where my w = digamma) spread to other Near Eastern peoples for the Greeks in general, just as the Roman knowledge of the Western Greek tribe Graioi/ Graei, adj. Graecus gave rise to the word for Greeks in western languages, while the Greeks themselves referred broadly to their ethnicity as Hellenes, and the territory Hellas. In Central Asia the name *"Ionian" thereby came to designate the (Greco-)Macedonians whom Alexander first put in place. Martin Schwartz 2. Francesco Brighenti said, October 21, 2019 @ 5:51 am The earliest occurrence of the term Yavana in Old Indo-Aryan is in the Astadhyayi of Panini (fourth century BCE), not in the much earlier Vedas as your unsourced and unreliable Wikipedia source claims. 3. Victor Mair said, October 21, 2019 @ 6:21 am From Tsu-Lin Mei: Wu Yi Shan Li 'Alexandria' is the name of a city in Central Asia. Scholars of Old Chinese often cite this term to show that Yi has initial *l and Li has initial *r during the Western Han. Laufer's Sino-Iranica is still worth consulting. I think "the Ionians" is too speculative for my taste. 4. Victor Mair said, October 21, 2019 @ 12:35 pm Yavana Kingdom: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yavana_Kingdom Yona: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yona Vedas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedas Note the section on chronology (orally transmitted [with comparative data available] vs. written): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedas#Chronology 5. Michael Watts said, October 21, 2019 @ 5:06 pm The Ionians were indeed part of the Achaemenian Persian empire, whence the ethnonym (originally Iawo:n-, where my w = digamma) spread to other Near Eastern peoples for the Greeks in general, just as the Roman knowledge of the Western Greek tribe Graioi /Graei, adj. Graecus gave rise to the word for Greeks in western languages, while the Greeks themselves referred broadly to their ethnicity as Hellenes, and the territory Hellas. This is true for Achaemenid Persia (c. 500 BC), but it's not a claim we can make for the Vedas referring to Yavana in 2000 BC. To Homer, Hellas was just one of several regions ruled by, if I remember right, Achilles (or rather Peleus). There are different words used to refer to the Greeks collectively, but Hellenes isn't one of them. Homer does mention the Ionians, I assume as an individual tribe like the Hellenes rather than a collective reference. 6. Francesco Brighenti said, October 21, 2019 @ 7:29 pm It doesn't matter, Victor; there is no mention whatsoever of the "Yavanas" in the (four) Vedas, which is what the Wikipedia article quoted in your initial post conversely claims. The names for the Greeks attested in ancient Indian sources, Yavana (Sanskrit) and Yona(-ka) (Pali, Asokan Prakrit), came to Gandhara from across the Hindukush. Starting from the reign of Asoka (mid-third century BCE), who in one of his rock edicts refers to a Seleucid king as Amtiyoko... Yonaraja ("Antiochus... king of Greeks"), the synonymous names Yavana and Yona certainly designated the Greeks. This is far less certain for the earlier period (fourth century BCE), viz. for Panini's mention of the "Yavanas". Since the phonetic shape of Yavana/Yona is clearly similar to that of some foreign "western" names designating all Greeks, such as Old Persian Yauna, Imperial Aramaic Ywn, and Babylonian Yawanu (all attested in Achaemenid documents), the derivation of Yavana/Yona from a native Indo-Aryan root can be excluded. That's why there is a consensus today that the ethnonym Yavana/Yona was borrowed into Old Indo-Aryan from Achaemenid sources. The attestation of the Sanskrit name Yavana in Panini (as its feminine derivative yavanani, Astadhyayi 4.1.49) is certainly earlier than that of the Prakrit name Yona in Asokan edicts. The form yavanani is assumed by most scholars to refer to the script of the "Yavanas" (in contrast with the later Sanskrit form yavani 'a Greek female'), for Katyayana's varttika (critical annotation) #3 on Panini 4.1.49 glosses yavanani as "yavanallipya" ('Yavana script or handwriting'). It is likely that Panini was familiar with a "western" script (Sanskrit lipi, a term occurring in his sutras) that was not that of the Greeks. Indeed, that Panini knew of the Greek script seems a rather unlikely possibility. The Paninean term lipi could have equally indicated a script used by the Persians - possibly Imperial Aramaic, used as the administrative language throughout the Achaemenid empire. Now, as to the form in which the name Yavana was borrowed into Sanskrit in Panini's time, there are various possibilities to be considered: 1) Sanskrit Yavana was a back-formation from an earlier Prakrit form *Yona, itself a loan from Old Persian Yauna 'Greek'. This is the standard explanation offered by the scholars (its original inspirator was probably D.C. Sircar), yet A.K. Narain objected that "there is no warrant for taking Yona as an earlier form. One might conclude from the correspondence of Old Persian Yauna - Middle Indo-Aryan Yona, that there existed an old form *Yona older than Yavana. But this equivalence of sounds applies to inherited words coming independently from an Indo-Iranian source, which Yavana is not, being a loan word. At best one can say that both Yavana and Yona are borrowed from the West, i.e. the Persians and the Semitic peoples" (A.K. Narain, The Indo-Greeks, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1957, p. 169). I guess the two lexical forms, Sanskrit Yavana and Prakrit Yona, may have been borrowed at about the same time after the Indians of Gandhara came into contact with the Greeks settled in the easternmost satrapies of the Achaemenid empire. 2) The immediate source of the two words "may have been [the language of] the Greeks who were already settled in regions to which Panini's knowledge could have very easily extended" (Narain, op. cit., p. 169). This hypothesis is, however, unlikely. Only if all of those Yavanas/Yonas were Ionians from Asia Minor resettled to the far east of the Achaemenid empire - which may not have been the case: cf. the deportation to Bactria of the Barcaeans, of Dorian ancestry, referred to by Herodotus - their autonym would have been Ion (borrowed into Indo-Aryan as Yona). Moreover, if Sanskrit Yavana does not derive from Prakrit Yona (see #1), Greek Ion is phonetically unlikely to have been its direct source, though it could still theoretically have been the direct source for Prakrit Yona. 3) Sanskrit Yavana could have been derived from the Babylonian form Yawanu (attested as ia-a-ma-nu in the Babylonian cuneiform version of the text of Darius I's Behistun Inscription). This is considered by Narain (op. cit., p. 169) among various other possibilities, but I would tend to exclude this source for the borrowing as Babylonian was never spoken in countries bordering on Gandhara. 4) Sanskrit Yavana could have been derived from Aramaic Ywn (closer to the Sanskrit form if vocalized as y[a]w[a]n) since Imperial Aramaic was the language of communication and government in the Achaemenid empire, and there is evidence of it having been used in eastern Iran, not far from Gandhara. In contrast to this, the other ancient Indian term designating the Greeks, Prakrit Yona, could have been derived from the Old Persian form Yauna through a monophthongization of the diphthong au (a common process in Middle Indo-Aryan). Hypothesis #4 is the one I personally favor, although I have some residual doubts as to whether Greek Ion could not have been an alternative source for Prakrit Yona. 7. Victor Mair said, October 22, 2019 @ 1:41 am I will arrange for the revision of the Wikipedia article. May take a few days, as I am at an academic conference in Germany. 8. Francesco Brighenti said, October 22, 2019 @ 5:23 am A few more considerations on the etymology of Greek Io:nes 'Ionians' (sg. Io:n rare) = Iaones (epic poetry; sg. Iao:n rare; note that a shorter form *Iones can also be assumed on the basis of Ionios 'the Ionic Sea'). According to Frisk's and Beekes' Greek etymological dictionaries, comparison with Egyptian and West Asian forms of this ethnonym allows for the reconstruction of an original *Ia:wones (wherein / w/ represents digamma, an archaic Greek letter that had the phonetic value of a voiced labial-velar approximant, and Proto-Greek long /a/ is still preserved). Further analysis in Greek is virtually impossible; the proper meaning is unknown, so that the ethnonym is without a certain etymology. The name i-ja-wo-ne is attested in two Linear B tablets from the Mycenaean layers at Knossos in Crete, yet a section of scholars think it more likely to be the dative singular of a personal name rather than the nominative plural of the ethnic 'Ionian'. Therefore, the matching of the proposed reconstruction *Ia:wones with this attested Mycenaean form, i-ja-wo-ne, may be illusory, and this prevents scholars from tracing the ethnic 'Ionian' back to the Mycenaean era on safe grounds. The tentative Greek (Indo-European) etymologies proposed for Io:nes thus far are hardly convincing. Two among the most discussed hypotheses are the following: 1) 'ia-criers' (the Greek interjection ia, Ionian ie:, was also a type of cry or call) - by which the prehistoric Ionians are turned into 'berserk'-like warriors; 2) 'adorers of Apollon Ie:ios' (the one who is called with the cry 'ie: Paio:n', roughly meaning 'O Healer!'). Yet it is well-known ethnonyms often come from the outside. It is also conceivable that the name *Ia:wones did not initially designate a Greek, but rather an Anatolian or even Cypriot population. Etymological hypotheses to this effect have been, indeed, suggested by some scholars. It is generally assumed that the name *Ia:wones is connected with the Yaw(a)naya (= Iaunaia) people mentioned in Assyrian documents dating from the second half of the eighth century BCE. Another form of this name attested in Neo-Assyrian cuneiform texts is Yawanu (= Iauanu). Both forms are written in cuneiform script with an /m/ substituting for the /w/ (e.g. as ia-am-na-a-a, ia-a-ma-nu, ia-ma-nu), which fact has been attributed since W.F. Albright's times to a "Babylonian fashion" followed by Assyrian scribes. Phonetically, the name is Yawan- (suffixed in two different ways). Two Northwest Semitic forms, Hebrew Ya:wa:n and Aramaic Ywn, were apparently borrowed from Assyrian; besides, there are Demotic Egyptian Wynn and Old Persian Yauna (the latter, too, apparently borrowed from Assyrian). Each of these terms designated the Greeks (not only the Ionians) in the respective languages. Though the name Yaw(a)naya was employed by the Assyrians to designate all Greeks, Ionian or otherwise, it was also used by them for some non-Greek populations settled on the Anatolian seaboard, from the Aegean Sea to Cyprus - an area in which Ionian traders, navigators and soldiers are likely to have formed an important ethnic component since the early centuries of the first millennium BCE. A conservative view is that the name Yaw(a)naya was originally derived from the self-ethnonym of the Ionians who lived in southwestern Asia Minor, and then applied to all maritime populations of the Anatolian seaboard; yet, the two innovative hypotheses I am going to illustrate now hold exactly the reverse, namely, that the early Ionians of Asia Minor accepted as their term of self-designation a geographical name indicating a land that had been named so by non-Greeks. Either hypothesis posits a borrowing of the ethnonym *Ia:wones from an eastern, non-Greek language - Anatolian in the first case, Semitic in the second: 1) Italian Anatolianist O. Carruba suggests that both the reconstructed Greek form *Ia:wones and the Assyrian Yawan- (along with the derived West Asian forms) go back to the Hittite placename Ahhiyawa, which, as it is well-known, designated a kingdom in the Aegean region that many scholars assume to have been a powerful Mycenaean State. According to Carruba, the Luwian form of this name was *Ahhiyawane, which he reconstructs on the basis of a recently discovered eighteenth century BCE Anatolian inscription - the Hieroglyphic Luwian-Phoenician bilingual inscription of Cinekoy - mentioning the land of "hi-ia-wa/i[-ni]" (= Hiyawa[-ni/a]) located in the coastal area of Adana in Cilicia. He considers the place-name Hiyawa(-ni/a) a Luwian equivalent of Hittite Ahhiyawa characterized by aphaeresis (the loss of one or more sounds or letters at the beginning of a word). In sum, the Luwian place-name Hiyawani/Hiyawana, a younger form of the Hittite place-name Ahhiyawa, would have been the basis for the Ionians' endonym *Ia:wones and, at one time, for the Assyrian exonym Yaw(a)naya/Yawanu, designating Greek-speaking groups (Ionians) who sailed, traded, fought, and in certain cases settled permanently along the southern coasts of Asia Minor (and, most likely, also some non-Greek allies of the Ionians). 2) The other hypothesis, formulated by the ANE scholar J.D. Muhly, analyzes *Ia:wones in terms of a formation involving an Indo-European ethnic suffix -wani, best attested in Luwian, attached to 'i:-, the West Semitic word for 'island'. The 'Ionians' would have been, thus, the 'Islanders', and their term of self-designation would have been a hybrid Semitic-Anatolian compound formed with the root 'i:- and the suffix -wani (thus, **'i:-wani > Greek *Ia:wones, Assyrian Yawan- etc.). According to Muhly, these linguistic developments must have taken place in Cilicia and Cyprus. 9. Francesco Brighenti said, October 22, 2019 @ 5:26 am N.B. Please forgive my typo 'Ionic Sea' for 'Ionian Sea'. 10. Victor Mair said, October 22, 2019 @ 6:12 am From Hiroshi Kumamoto: An additional note to Dr. Brighenti's excellent comment on the topic. "there is no mention whatsoever of the "Yavanas" in the (four) Vedas" As Bohtlingk-Roth VI, sp. 85 points out, there is a mention of "yavana" as a tribe name in the Atharvaveda-Parisista (a group of supplements, appendices to the AV), which belongs to an undeterminably late date, but Vedic nonetheless. See the first line of Albrecht Weber's Verzeichnis, Part 1, p. 92: https://archive.org/details/diehandschriften0501preu/page/92 11. Francesco Brighenti said, October 22, 2019 @ 6:43 pm On the post-Vedic character of the language and most of the contents of the Atharvaveda-Parisista, see Michael Witzel at https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/Indo-Eurasian_research/ conversations/topics/14032 B. R. Modak (The Ancillary Literature of the Atharva-Veda: A Study with Special Reference to the Parisistas. New Delhi: Rashtriya Veda Vidya Pratishtan, 1993) comes to the conclusion that the date of the compilation of the Atharvaveda-Parisista lies somewhere between the second century BCE and the fifth century CE (p. 473). Thus, this work, traditionally forming part of the Vedic canon, is actually post-Vedic (as well as post-Panini, and post-Asoka). In any event, although I concede it is formally correct to say there is a mention of the Yavanas in a canonical Vedic work, what is claimed in the Wikipedia article I had contested is that "the Yavanas appear in the Vedas, as early as the 2nd millennium BC," and that this occurrence of the name Yavana would be earlier than its attestation in Asoka's rock edicts in the third century BCE... 12. Chris Button said, October 22, 2019 @ 7:11 pm *?wan seems serviceable as an Old Sinitic reconstruction of Wan (Baxter-Sagart): /*[?]o[r]?/ (Zhengzhang): /*qon?/ Probably worth noting that the *-r coda in Baxter-Sagart's reconstruction would have shifted to *-n by the time we are talking about. They propose **-r becomes *-n or *-j depending on "dialect", although in reality, **-r became *-l (which they unfortunately don't reconstruct in OC) and then vacillated with *-n as would be expected on phonetic grounds. As for *-o- as opposed to *-wa-, that simply reflects not distinguishing underlying phonology from surface reflexes. That is to say, while the nucleus may well have surfaced as something like [o] for many speakers, for others it may have been [Uo] or [Ua], etc. In terms of the reconstructed phonology, the only viable option is /wa/ since we are not reconstructing idiolects or even (contrary to what is sometimes claimed) dialects. 13. Scott P. said, October 22, 2019 @ 10:33 pm In sum, the Luwian place-name Hiyawani/Hiyawana, a younger form of the Hittite place-name Ahhiyawa, would have been the basis for the Ionians' endonym *Ia:wones and, at one time, for the Assyrian exonym Yaw(a)naya/Yawanu, designating Greek-speaking groups (Ionians) who sailed, traded, fought, and in certain cases settled permanently along the southern coasts of Asia Minor (and, most likely, also some non-Greek allies of the Ionians). "Ahhiyawa" is itself thought to come from "Achaioi" (Achaeans), isn't it? 14. Hiroshi Kumamoto said, October 23, 2019 @ 10:59 pm I fully agree with Dr. Brighenti that the Wikipedia article in question is "unsourced and unreliable", and that the earliest mention on record of "Yavana" would probably be Panini. The two cases where we find "yavana" in the AV Parisista are both in omen texts, one concerning the new moon and the other concerning constellations. AVParis 50.2.4 https://archive.org/details/Bolling19093/page/n112 AVParis 56.1.5 https://archive.org/details/Bolling19093/page/n141 The whole text is can also be seen in: http://gretil.sub.uni-goettingen.de/gretil/1_sanskr/1_veda/ 5_vedang/2_paris/avpari_u.htm For the contexts of these passages see Modak pp. 335 and 345, respectively. Incidentally, the URL referred to by Witzel (quoted by Dr. Brighenti above) has a typo; read bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp instead of bun.kyoto-u.ca.jp. It seems to me that the use of the word "Vedic" is tricky. In a general sense "Vedic literature" can cover part of the Vedanga texts with more or less explicit affiliation with a particular Veda (and sakha as in the case of srauta- and grhya-sutras). But when we say post-Vedic, it means that the language and contents are not as old as the Samhitas and Brahmanas. So these late texts are both Vedic and post-Vedic! 15. Francesco Brighenti said, October 24, 2019 @ 11:38 am @Scott P. > "Ahhiyawa" is itself thought to come from "Achaioi" > (Achaeans), isn't it? Here is how Anatolianist Onofrio Carruba and his continuators trace the Greek name of the Aegean Sea and the Greek ethnic names 'Achaean', 'Ionian', and 'Aeolian' to one and the same Anatolian toponym, Ahhiya. Starting point: PIE *akw(-a)- 'water' > Anatolian (*/-iya/ -suffixed adj.) *akw-iya 'pertaining to the water, situated in the water' > 'island' > *ahwiya (with */-k-/ before */w/ > */-h- /) > *ahhiya > Ahhiya (toponym). (Unfortunately, the existence of a PIE root *akw(-a)- for 'water' is generally not accepted, and there are, however, no known Anatolian reflexes of it, pace Carruba...) Developments in the Anatolian > Greek borrowing process according to Carruba & Co.: 1) Hittite Ahhiya (older form) 'the Great Water/island region' (possibly the Anatolian name of the Aegean Sea, lit. 'the [Sea of] Islands') > *Ahhya > *Aihha (/*Aikha?) > Greek *Aiga > (*/-yo /-suffixed adj.) Aiga-ios (pontos) 'Aegean (Sea)'. 2) Hittite Ahhiya-wa (newer form with -wa suffix, often used for ethnic names) 'the countries and/or peoples of the Great Water/ island region' > *Ahhiyaw- > *Ahhyaw- > *Akhaw- (with */-hhy-/ > */-kh-/) > Greek (*/-yo/-suffixed adj.) *Akhaw-ioi (w = digamma [* /w/]) > *Akhaiwoi > Akhaioi 'the Achaeans'. 3) Luwian *Ahhiya-wanni (with -wanni suffix, often used for ethnic names) 'Greeks settled on the southwestern Anatolian coasts' > *(A)iyaunni (with /-hh-/ > O) > Greek *Iawones (w = digamma [*/w/]) > Iaones 'the Ionians'. 4) Hittite (A)hhiyawa > Luwian toponym Hiyawa(-na) (name of a kingdom in Cilicia, perhaps representing another, parallel Anatolian source for Greek *Iawones > Iaones 'the Ionians') > Assyrian etc. Yawan- formations ('the Greeks'). 5) Hittite(-"Lydian") *Ahhiyawa-li 'Greeks settled on the northwestern Anatolian coasts'> *Aiyawali (with /-hh-/ > O) > *Aiyauli > Greek Aiolees 'the Aeolians'. 6) Hittite *Ahhiyaw-assa 'Greeks settled in Caria' = Egyptian / '-q-j-w-s/ (to be read as Aqaiwasa?) 'Eqwes or Ekwesh, name of one of the Sea Peoples'. 16. Victor Mair said, October 25, 2019 @ 11:27 am I asked some specialists in Hittite and other Anatolian languages whether item 6), i.e., Ekwesh / 'Eqwes, in the preceding comment could be a reference to horses Craig Melchert replied: The attempt of Carruba et al. to get all those ethnica from one source, and from IE, was in my view not viable from the start. New evidence that Lydian does *not* delete the "second" laryngeal (which is what geminate -hh- would need to be) makes it even harder to get Aioles etc. The word cited naturally cannot be 'horses' if from one of the "Luvic" languages, since the *k' came out as an affricate/ sibilant: HLuvian azwa-/azu- and Lycian esbe-. Hittite has a u-stem for 'horse' (ANSE.KUR.RA-u-). Kloekhorst in his dictionary assumes this (and the Luvic) are a hoary archaism *ek'u-. I don't believe it, but for your idea it doesn't matter, since the Hittite plural would have been *ekk(u)wes either from *ek'u- or *ek'wo-. I would think that the problem would be that the reference seems to be to the name of a people. RSS feed for comments on this post * Follow us on Twitter * [ ] [Search] Archives [+/-] * + June 2022 + May 2022 + April 2022 + March 2022 + February 2022 + January 2022 + December 2021 + November 2021 + October 2021 + September 2021 + August 2021 + July 2021 + June 2021 + May 2021 + April 2021 + March 2021 + February 2021 + January 2021 + December 2020 + November 2020 + October 2020 + September 2020 + August 2020 + July 2020 + June 2020 + May 2020 + April 2020 + March 2020 + February 2020 + January 2020 + December 2019 + November 2019 + October 2019 + September 2019 + August 2019 + July 2019 + June 2019 + May 2019 + April 2019 + March 2019 + February 2019 + January 2019 + December 2018 + November 2018 + October 2018 + September 2018 + August 2018 + July 2018 + June 2018 + May 2018 + April 2018 + March 2018 + February 2018 + January 2018 + December 2017 + November 2017 + October 2017 + September 2017 + August 2017 + July 2017 + June 2017 + May 2017 + April 2017 + March 2017 + February 2017 + January 2017 + December 2016 + November 2016 + October 2016 + September 2016 + August 2016 + July 2016 + June 2016 + May 2016 + April 2016 + March 2016 + February 2016 + January 2016 + December 2015 + November 2015 + October 2015 + September 2015 + August 2015 + July 2015 + June 2015 + May 2015 + April 2015 + March 2015 + February 2015 + January 2015 + December 2014 + November 2014 + October 2014 + September 2014 + August 2014 + July 2014 + June 2014 + May 2014 + April 2014 + March 2014 + February 2014 + January 2014 + December 2013 + November 2013 + October 2013 + September 2013 + August 2013 + July 2013 + June 2013 + May 2013 + April 2013 + March 2013 + February 2013 + January 2013 + December 2012 + November 2012 + October 2012 + September 2012 + August 2012 + July 2012 + June 2012 + May 2012 + April 2012 + March 2012 + February 2012 + January 2012 + December 2011 + November 2011 + October 2011 + September 2011 + August 2011 + July 2011 + June 2011 + May 2011 + April 2011 + March 2011 + February 2011 + January 2011 + December 2010 + November 2010 + October 2010 + September 2010 + August 2010 + July 2010 + June 2010 + May 2010 + April 2010 + March 2010 + February 2010 + January 2010 + December 2009 + November 2009 + October 2009 + September 2009 + August 2009 + July 2009 + June 2009 + May 2009 + April 2009 + March 2009 + February 2009 + January 2009 + December 2008 + November 2008 + October 2008 + September 2008 + August 2008 + July 2008 + June 2008 + May 2008 + April 2008 * [Posts before 4/8/2008 are here] [Search old posts here] Blogroll [+/-] * + ...And read all over + A Linguist Goes to Law School + A Roguish Chrestomathy + A Walk in the WoRds + A Way With Words + Abecedaria + Alex's phonetic thoughts + All Things Linguistic + Anggarrgoon + Archival Sounds (British Library) + Arrant Pedantry + Ask the League of Nerds + Babel's Dawn (Edmund Blair Bolles) + Bad Language + BadLinguistics (Pauline Foster) + Between the Lines with Edwin Battistella + Blogamundo + Bradshaw of the Future + Bremer sprachblog + Building Rapport + Bulbulovo + Career Linguist + Child's Play + Citizen sociolinguistics + clinicallinguistics + Coby Lubliner's Blog + Cognition And Language Lab + Colorless Green Ideas + Conjugate Visits + DCblog (David Crystal) + Degelka af soomaaliga + Descriptively Adequate + dialect blog + Dictionary Evangelist + Dictionary Society of North America + Double-Tongued Dictionary + Ed Absurdum + Eggcorn Database + Endangered Languages and Cultures + English, Jack + Epea Pteroenta + Eternally Stressed Semanticist + Everything You Know About English Is Wrong + Evolving English + Far Outliers + Found in Translation + Freemorpheme + Fritinancy + Fully (sic) + Good Reason + Gordon P. Hemsley + Greater Blogazonia + Hanzi Smatter Yi Zhi Ban Jie + Harmless Drudgery + HeadsUp: The Blog + Idibon + Isabella Massardo Copy & Translation + Jabal al-Lughat + John Wells's Phonetic Blog + Johnson + JoshMillard.com + Keywords + Langguj Gel + Language Evolution + Language Geek + Language Hat + Language Is The People's + Language Jones + Language Trainers Blog + Language: A Feminist Guide + Lathophobic Aphasia + LAWnLinguistics + LGSA Fledgelings + Lingformant + Lingua Franca + Linguaphiles + Linguism + Linguistics Anonymous + Linguistrix + Literal-Minded + Living Languages + Logomacy + Logophilius + Making Noise and Hearing Things + Matjjin-nehen + Mental Floss (language section) + Metrolingua + Michael Erard + Motivated Grammar + Mr. Verb + Naked Translations + Natural Language Processing Blog + No-sword + Noncompositional + NPR code switch + Office Natural Language Team Blog + Omniglot - The Blog + Oxford Etymologist + Ozarque's Journal + Paleoglot + Paperpools + Peter Harvey, Linguist + phonoloblog + Pinyin News + Podictionary + Polyglot Conspiracy + Polyglot Vegetarian + Polysyllabic (Karl Hagen) + Popular Linguistics + Proper Words in Proper Places + Replicated Typo + Ryan's linguistics blog + Sauvage Noble + Schnaufblog + Sentence First + Separated by a Common Language + Sesquiotica (James Harbeck) + SLA Blog + Strong Language + Staefcraeft & Vyakarana + Superlinguo + Talk Wordy to Me + Talking Brains + Technologies du Langage + Tenser, said the Tensor + That Munanga Linguist + ThatWhichMatter + The Babbel Blog + The Diacritics + The Engine Room + The Greenbelt + The Ideophone + The Language Guy + The Lexicographer's Rules + The Ling Space + The Lingua FIle + The Lousy Linguist + The mashed radish + The Ramblings of a Proto-linguist + The Stone and the Shell + The Virtual Linguist + The Visual Linguist + The Web of Language + The Zero Morpheme + Throw Grammar From the Train + Transblawg + Transient Languages & Cultures + Translate This! + Val Systems + Vocalized/Vocalised (Lauren Hall-Lew) + Web-Translations + Wishydig + Word Jazz + Word Journal + Word Porn + Word Routes + Wordlustitude + Wordnik blog + Words Are Delicious + Words from Sweden + Words to the Wise + You Don't Say * Meta + Log in + RSS 2.0 + Atom + WordPress Powered By WordPress